Clinical prognostic factors in surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of the literature

The Role of Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage NSCLC

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The involvement of lymph nodes by the tumor has a strong impact on survival of patients. For this reason, lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in the staging and prognosis of NSCLC, to define the most appropriate therapeutic strategies concerning the stage of the disease. To date, the benefit, in terms of survival, of the different extents of lymphadenectomy remains controversial in the scientific community. It is recognized that metastatic involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer is one of the most significant prognostic factors, in terms of survival, and it is therefore mandatory to identify patients with lymph node metastases who may benefit from adjuvant therapies, to prevent distant disease and local recurrences. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the role of lymphadenectomy in early-stage NSCLC in terms of efficacy and accuracy, comparing systematic, sampling, and lobe-specific lymph node dissection and analyzing the existing critical issue, through a search of the most relevant articles published in the last decades.

Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Review

Simple Summary

The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement (pN2) is controversial. The aim of our review was to study the literature relating to PORT for completely resected NSCLC patients with pN2 involvement. The Lung ART and PORT-C trials indicate better locoregional control with PORT, but this has not yet translated into survival benefits. Given the conflicting results, guidelines do not recommend the use of PORT routinely. Future research should focus on identifying subgroups of patients who might benefit from PORT.

Abstract

Background: For patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement (pN2), the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care. The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is controversial. Methods: We describe the current literature focusing on the role of PORT in completely resected NSCLC patients with pN2 involvement and reflect on its role in current guidelines. Results: Based on the results of the recent Lung ART and PORT-C trials, the authors conclude that PORT cannot be generally recommended for all resected pN2 NSCLC patients. A substantial decrease in the locoregional relapse rate without translating into a survival benefit suggests that some patients with risk factors might benefit from PORT. This must be balanced against the risk of cardiopulmonary toxicity with potentially associated mortality. Lung ART has already changed the decision making for the use of PORT in daily practice for many European lung cancer experts, with lower rates of recommendations for PORT overall. Conclusions: PORT is still used, albeit decreasingly, for completely resected NSCLC with pN2 involvement. High-level evidence for its routine use is lacking. Further analyses are required to identify patients who would potentially benefit from PORT.

Significantly favourable outcome for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer stage IIIA/IIIB and single-station persistent N2 (skip or additionally N1) disease after multimodality treatment

OBJECTIVES

Persistent lymph nodes infiltration after neoadjuvant treatment remains a controversial topic in the treatment of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study is to identify subgroups with persistent N2 disease, who could experience survival benefit from the addition of surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective mono-institutional study was conducted to analyse all patients with a final histopathology of NSCLC and persistent mediastinal disease after induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and surgery from January 1998 to June 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients (93 men, 52 women) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median age was 60 years (range 38-78). A total of 82 (56.5%) patients received a lobectomy, 48 (33.1%) a pneumonectomy, 11 (7.6%) a bilobectomy and 4 (2.6%) an anatomical segmentectomy; 128 (88.3%) were completely resected (R0). Operative mortality was 2.6% (4 patients), and morbidity was 35.2% (51 patients). Overall survival at 5 years was 47.3% (n = 19) for single N2 (skip), 30.2% (n = 16) for single N2 and N1 lymph nodes and under 5% (n = 1) for multiple mediastinal stations disease. Overall survival at 5 years after lobectomy/bilobectomy was not statistically different than after pneumonectomy (33.5% vs 20.5%, P = 0.082). Disease-free survival at 5 years was 30.6% (n = 6) for ypN2a1, 23.4% (n = 7) for ypN2a2 and under 5% (n = 1) for ypN2b status.

CONCLUSIONS

Lobectomy or bilobectomy has to be taken into account as a potentially curative option with promising long-term results for patients after induction treatment and persistent single-station N2 involvement (skip or additionally N1 status).

TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER

14-6138-BO.

Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for non-small cell lung cancer: still an open question

Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) with or without chemotherapy has been used in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for decades. Numerous trials have investigated the potential survival benefit of this strategy, but despite greater knowledge of the disease, considerable technological developments in imaging and radiotherapy, and significant progress in surgery, many questions remain unsolved. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on this problem and discuss issues which still require elucidation.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy is superior to postoperative chemotherapy alone in squamous cell lung cancer patients with limited N2 lymph node metastasis

Background

The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) following surgery in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with N2 lymph node metastasis (N2-NSCLC).

Methods

The clinical data of patients with N2-NSCLC treated with POCRT or postoperative chemotherapy (pCT) alone were retrospectively collected and reviewed. The overall survival (OS) rates were analyzed utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was used to determine factors significantly associated with survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics and OS was compared after matching.

Results

Between 2004 and 2014, a total of 175 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 60 of whom were treated with POCRT, while 115 were administered pCT. The 1, 3 and 5-year OS rates in the POCRT and pCT groups were 98.3 vs. 86.1%, 71.7 vs. 53.0% and 45.7 vs. 39.0%, respectively (P = 0.019). Compared with pCT, POCRT improved OS in patients with squamous cell subtype (P = 0.010), no lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.006), pN2a (P = 0.006) or total number of metastatic lymph nodes ≤7 (P = 0.016). After PSM, these survival differences between POCRT and pCT remained significant in patients with squamous cell lung cancer (P = 0.010).

Conclusions

POCRT following complete resection may be beneficial for patients with squamous cell lung cancer, particularly those with limited nodal involvement.

Nomograms for predicting progression and efficacy of post-operation radiotherapy in IIIA-pN2 non-small cell lung cancer patients

In this retrospective study, we developed nomograms for predicting the efficacy of post-operation radiotherapy (PORT) in IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In total, 334 patients received post-operational chemotherapy and were included in the analysis. Of those, 115 also received either concurrent or sequential post-operational radiotherapy (PORT). Nomograms were developed using Cox proportional hazard regression models to identify clinicopathological characteristics that predicted progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and subgroup analyses of the effects of PORT were performed using nomogram risk scores. PFS and OS predicted using the nomogram agreed well with actual PFS and OS, and patients with high PFS/OS nomogram scores had poorer prognoses. In subgroup analyses, PORT increased survival more in patients with low PFS nomogram risk scores or high OS nomogram risk scores. Thus, our novel nomogram risk score model predicted PFS, OS, and the efficacy of PORT in IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients.

The influence of the metastasis pattern of mediastinal lymph nodes on the postoperative radiotherapy's efficacy for the IIIA-pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of 220 patients

Objective

The use of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) remains controversial for Stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, a possible reason is that IIIA-pN2 NSCLC diseases are a heterogeneous group with different clinicopathologic features. The aim of this research was to prove whether the mediastinal lymph nodes’ (LNs) skipping status could indicate the necessity of the PORT for the pN2 NSCLC patients.

Methods

The skip metastasis was defined as pN0N2 (no N1 LN involved), and nonskip metastasis was pN1N2 (one or more N1 LNs involved). Patients were divided into two groups: LNs nonskip and LNs skip, and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) and postoperative chemotherapy. Then, the LN nonskip and LN skip groups were further divided into subgroups: POCRT and point of care testing (POCT) for subgroup analysis.

Results

There were 220 cases included in the analysis, and 43 of them received PORT. On univariate analysis, the median 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was, respectively, 16 months (27.7%) for the LN skip group and 11 months (15.3%) for the LN nonskip group (P=0.001). The median 3-year overall survival (OS) was, respectively, 35 months (47.0%) for the LN skip group and 27 months (38.7%) for the LN nonskip group (P=0.025). The median 3-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was, respectively, 25 months (41.0%) for the LN skip group and19 months (29.9%) for the LN nonskip group (P=0.014). The median 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was, respectively, 22 months (32.5%) for the LN skip group and 15 months (20.4%) for the LN nonskip group (P=0.013). The median 3-year PFS was, respectively, 17 months (25.6%) for the POCRT group and 12 months (18.6%) for the POCT group (P=0.037). Although the POCRT group showed better OS, LRFS, and DMFS than the POCT group, the results showed no statistical significance. In subgroup analysis, there was no statistical significance in the Kaplan–Meier analysis between subgroups, but it showed that POCRT resulted in better PFS, OS, and DMFS in both LN skip and LN nonskip subgroups; this advantage was more obvious in the LN skip subgroup.

Conclusion

The LN skip status is closely related to the survival of the IIIA-N2 NSCLC disease, and the LN skip patients may get more benefit in PFS and LRFS than the LN nonskip patients from PORT.

Optimum treatment for mediastinal lymph node positive (N2) resectable non-small cell lung cancer: what is the role for surgery?

INTRODUCTION

A third of patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) present with Stage III disease with mediastinal (N2) nodal involvement representing an extremely heterogeneous population with a generally poor prognosis. Areas covered: This article describes the complexity of Stage III-N2 patients reviewing the outcomes of key clinical trials while highlighting the trial designs and subtleties that have created controversy in management. Both bimodality approaches combining chemotherapy with either surgery or radiation and trimodality approaches combining chemotherapy with both local therapies are reviewed. Finally, prognostic factors and future directions are explored for the management of this population. Expert commentary: Upfront surgery is not recommended for patients with Stage III-N2 NSCLC. Neoadjuvant approaches with both chemotherapy and chemoradiation are acceptable in a multidisciplinary setting if appropriate surgery is performed by a dedicated thoracic surgeon. Non-operative candidates should receive definitive concurrent chemoradiation. Innovative approaches are necessary to improve outcomes in this population.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) induction and adjuvant therapy for N2 non-small-cell lung cancer

The integration of chemotherapy, radiation therapy (RT), and surgery in the management of patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung carcinoma is challenging. The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria Lung Cancer Panel was charged to update management recommendations for this clinical scenario. The Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. There is limited level I evidence to guide patient selection for induction, postoperative RT (PORT), or definitive RT. Literature interpretation is complicated by inconsistent diagnostic procedures for N2 disease, disease heterogeneity, and pooled analysis with other stages. PORT is an appropriate therapy following adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with incidental pN2 disease. In patients with clinical N2 disease who are potential candidates for a lobectomy, both definitive and induction concurrent chemotherapy/RT are appropriate treatments. In N2 patients who require a pneumonectomy, definitive concurrent chemotherapy/RT is most appropriate although induction concurrent chemotherapy/RT may be considered in expert hands. Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery +/- PORT may also be an option in N2 patients. For preoperative RT and PORT, 3-dimensional conformal techniques and intensity-modulated RT are most appropriate.

Selection of proper candidates with resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer for postoperative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

To establish a prediction model in selecting fit patients with resected pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT), and evaluate the model in clinical practice.

METHODS

Between January 2003 and December 2005, 221 patients with resected pIIIA-N2 NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed. The effect of PORT on overall survival (OS) of patients with different clinicopathological factors was evaluated and the results were used to establish a prediction model to select patients fit for PORT.

RESULTS

Compared with the control, PORT significantly improved the OS of patients with a smoking index ≤400 (P = 0.033), cN2 (P = 0.003), pT3 (P = 0.014), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (P = 0.013), or ≥4 positive nodes (P = 0.025). Patients were divided from zero to all five factors into low, middle, and high PORT index (PORT-I) groups (scored 0-1, 2, and 3-5, respectively). PORT did not improve OS (3-year, P = 0.531), disease free survival (DFS) (P = 0.358), or loco-regional recurrence free survival (LRFS) (P = 0.412) in the low PORT-I group. PORT significantly improved OS (P = 0.033), and tended to improve DFS (P = 0.064), but not LRFS (P = 0.287) in the middle PORT-I group. PORT could significantly improve OS (P = 0.000), DFS (P = 0.000), and LRFS (P = 0.006) in the high PORT-I group.

CONCLUSION

The prediction model is valuable in selecting patients with resected pIIIA-N2 NSCLC fit for PORT. PORT is strongly recommended for patients with three or more of the five factors of smoking index ≤400, cN2, pT3, SCC, and ≥4 positive nodes.

Prognostic Significance of the Number of Metastatic pN2 Lymph Nodes in Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Curative Resection

Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) shows prognostic heterogeneity. We investigated the prognostic relevance of the number of metastatic pN2 nodes in patients with IIIA-N2 NSCLC. The criteria for the number of pN2 used in this study were significantly associated with the survival outcomes after surgery and may improve the accuracy of prognostic prediction in this subgroup of patients.

INTRODUCTION

There have been controversies regarding the prognostic relevance of the number of positive N2 nodes in pathologic stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We examine prognosis of patients with pathologic stage IIIA-N2 with classifying the number of positive N2 nodes into subgroups.

METHODS

From January 1997 to December 2004, 250 patients were diagnosed with pathologic stage IIIA-N2 disease. All patients underwent mediastinal lymph node dissection. After excluding 44 patients with preoperative chemotherapy, incomplete resection, and postsurgical mortality, 206 patients were included in the analysis. Patients were classified according to the number of positive N2 lymph nodes (N2a: 1 [n = 83], N2b: 2-4 [n = 82], N2c: ≥ 5 [n = 41]), and its correlation with survival outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 96.3 months, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 27.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.6-33.7), and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 37.7% (95% CI, 31.5-44.7) in all patients. The number of metastatic N2 lymph nodes was associated with DFS (P < .001) and OS (P = .01). In the N2a, N2b, and N2c groups, 5-year DFS rates were 38%, 24%, and 5%, respectively, and 5-year OS rates were 47%, 35%, and 24%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the number of metastatic N2 lymph nodes was an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Stratification of patients according to the number of metastatic N2 lymph nodes may improve the accuracy of prognostic prediction among patients with curatively resected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.

Reappraisal of the role of postoperative radiation therapy in patients with pIIIa-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity score matching analysis

Background

Reappraisal of the role of postoperative radiotherapy in pN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients according to N1 lymph node involvement.

Methods

A total of 218 pIIIa-N2 NSCLC patients who underwent complete surgical resection with systematic nodal dissections were enrolled. Propensity scores were used for matching N1 involvement. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

After matching, pN2b patients without N1 involvement (pN0N2b) exhibited better prognoses than those with N1 involvement (pN1N2b) (5-year OS: 37.5% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.008; 5-year DFS: 31.8% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.004). Similar results were not detected in pN2a disease (5-year OS: 37.8% vs. 31.0%, P = 0.517; 5-year DFS: 27.1% vs. 20.2%, P = 0.788). The five-year OS of patients who received no adjuvant therapy (22 pN2a cases, 7 pN0N2b, 5 pN1N2b), adjuvant chemotherapy alone (74 pN2a cases, 11 pN0N2b, 17 pN1N2b) or chemoradiotherapy (25 pN2a cases, 7 pN0N2b, 6 pN1N2b) were compared (pN2a: 31.3%, 37.0%, and 32.0%, P = 0.808; pN0N2b: 0.0%, 18.2%, and 71.4%, P = 0.108; pN1N2b: 0.0%, 0.0%, and 33.3%, P < 0.0001). The five-year DFS was also analyzed (pN2a: 31.6%, 24.0%, and 18.3%, P = 0.410; pN0N2b: 0.0%, 11.1%, and 57.1%, P = 0.192; pN1N2b: 0.0%, 0.0%, and 16.7%, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the novel classification based on N1 involvement and pN2a/pN2b staging was an independent prognostic factor of OS and DFS.

Conclusion

N1 involvement significantly impacted the prognosis of pN2b NSCLC patients. The benefit of adjuvant therapy in pN2a and pN0N2b patients requires confirmation by further study.

The impact of positive nodal chain ratio on individualized multimodality therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

This study aimed to analyze the prognostic significance of the positive nodal chain ratio (NCR) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 208 pIIIa-N2 NSCLC patients who underwent complete surgical resections with a systematic nodal dissection were enrolled. The median values of NCR and the positive lymph node ratio (LNR) were used to grouping patients. The differences of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the different groups were compared. The median values of NCR and LNR were 0.31 and 0.45, respectively. The patients were separated into group A (NCR ≤0.45 and LNR ≤0.31; 91 cases), group B (NCR ≤0.45 and LNR >0.31 or NCR >0.45 and LNR ≤0.31; 51 cases), and group C (NCR >0.45 and LNR >0.31; 66 cases) according to their combined LCR and LNR values. Groups A, B, and C exhibited significantly different prognoses (5-year OS: 43.7, 25.2, and 12.3 %, respectively, p < 0.0001; 5-year DFS: 30.4, 23.3, and 8.6 %, respectively, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analyses revealed that this novel grouping method based on the combination of NCR and LNR was an independent prognostic factor for 5-year OS and 5-year DFS in pIIIa-N2 NSCLC. In group C, patients who received no postoperative treatment, adjuvant chemotherapy alone, or chemoradiotherapy exhibited different 5-year OS rates (0.0, 11.6, and 37.5 %, respectively, p = 0.003) and 5-year DFS rates (0.0, 7.5, and 25.0 %, respectively, p = 0.009). Therefore, postoperative chemoradiotherapy may significantly improve the prognosis of patients displaying NCR >0.45 and LNR >0.31. NCR combined with LNR may be more effective to guide individualized multimodality therapy including postoperative chemoradiotherapy for pIIIa-N2 NSCLC.

The efficacy of restaging endobronchial ultrasound in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after preoperative therapy

BACKGROUND

Patient selection for surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer depends on accurate restaging of mediastinal (N2) lymph nodes. Our objective is to assess the accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) for restaging N2 lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent staging with repeat computed tomography and positron emission tomography and had restaging EBUS for sampling of N2 lymph nodes. Endobronchial ultrasound was performed for suspicious nodes in stations 2R, 2L, 4R, 4L, and 7. Selected patients who were N2-negative underwent thoracotomy with complete thoracic lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

There were 32 patients with N2 disease who underwent preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, and subsequently had restaging EBUS. There were 3 patients who had recalcitrant N2 nodal disease detected by EBUS. There were 5 patients with pulmonary function or comorbidities that were prohibitive for surgery. Of the remaining 24 patients with negative EBUS, 3 underwent mediastinoscopy and 2 had recalcitrant N2 disease. The remaining 22 patients underwent thoracotomy. Recalcitrant N2 disease was noted in 1 patient at thoracotomy in the EBUS-assessable nodal stations. Thus EBUS was falsely negative in 3 patients. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of restaging EBUS were 50% and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Restaging EBUS is relatively accurate at predicting the absence of metastatic disease in N2 mediastinal lymph node in patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Surgical outcomes after initial surgery for clinical single-station N2 non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Single-station N2 (Stage IIIA) non-small-cell lung cancer has been reported to have a relatively favorable prognosis after surgery. However, most previous studies examined surgical outcomes in N2 disease by pathologic nodal status but not by clinical nodal status. The objective of this study was to clarify the surgical outcomes in clinical single-station N2 non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 125 consecutive patients with clinical single-station N2 non-small-cell lung cancer were treated in our institution between 1992 and 2008. Among them, 97 (78%) patients underwent thoracotomy, and were included in this retrospective study. We defined clinical single-station N2 node as a node measuring 1-2 cm in a single mediastinal station observed on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The median follow-up period was 5.9 years (range, 1.8-12.6).

RESULTS

Eighty-eight (91%) patients underwent lung resection. Of them, 17 (19%) had true (pathologic) single-station N2 disease. Twenty-eight (32%) had pathologic multistation N2 and 43 (49%) had pN0-1 disease with favorable prognoses. The overall survival of the clinical single-station N2/pathologic N2 patients after initial surgery was unsatisfactory with a 5-year overall survival of 23.6%, but their prognoses were heterogeneous. True single-station pathologic N2 status (hazard ratio = 0.35, P = 0.008) and negative subcarinal node status (hazard ratio = 0.34, P = 0.022) were independent favorable prognostic factors after initial resection for clinical single-station N2/ pathologic N2 patients. The patients with both factors revealed a relatively favorable 5-year overall survival of 43.8%.

CONCLUSION

Clinical single-station N2 status does not always correspond with pathologic true N2 status. From a prognostic point of view, initial surgery for clinical single-station N2 patients is indicated if their true single-station N2 status and negative subcarinal involvement are preoperatively confirmed.

Treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) describes a heterogeneous population with disease presentation ranging from apparently resectable tumors with occult microscopic nodal metastases to unresectable, bulky nodal disease. This review updates the published clinical trials since the last American College of Chest Physicians guidelines to make treatment recommendations for this controversial subset of patients.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted through MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database for Systematic Review up to December 2011, focusing primarily on randomized trials, selected meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and reviews.

RESULTS

For individuals with stage IIIA or IIIB disease, good performance scores, and minimal weight loss, treatment with combined chemoradiotherapy results in better survival than radiotherapy alone. Consolidation chemotherapy or targeted therapy following definitive chemoradiation for stage IIIA is not supported. Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery is neither clearly better nor clearly worse than definitive chemoradiation. Most of the arguments made regarding patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection provide evidence for better prognosis but not for a beneficial impact of this treatment strategy; however, weak comparative data suggest a possible role if only lobectomy is needed in a center with a low perioperative mortality rate. The evidence supports routine platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy following complete resection of stage IIIA lung cancer encountered unexpectedly at surgery. Postoperative radiotherapy improves local control without improving survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodality therapy is preferable in most subsets of patients with stage III lung cancer. Variability in the patients included in randomized trials limits the ability to combine results across studies and thus limits the strength of recommendations in many scenarios. Future trials are needed to investigate the roles of individualized chemotherapy, surgery in particular cohorts or settings, prophylactic cranial radiation, and adaptive radiation.

[Resected non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma stage pIIIA-N2. Which patients will benefit most from adjuvant therapy?]

BACKGROUND

Controversy persists as regards the indications and results of surgery in the treatment of patients with stage pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study was to analyze the overall survival of a multicentre series of these patients and the role of adjuvant treatment, looking for factors that may define subgroups of patients with an increased benefit from this treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 287 patients, with stage pIIIA-N2 NSCLC subjected to complete resection, taken from a multi-institutional database of 2.994 prospectively collected consecutive patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer. Adjuvant treatment was administered in 238 cases (82.9%). Analyses were made of the age, gender, histological type, administration of induction and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy treatments.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival was 24%, with a median survival of 22 months. Survival was 26.5% among patients receiving with adjuvant treatment, versus 10.7% for those without it (P=.069). Age modified the effect of adjuvant treatment on survival (interaction P=.049). In patients under 70 years of age with squamous cell carcinoma, adjuvant treatment reduced the mortality rate by 37% (hazard ratio: 0,63; 95% CI; 0,42-0,95; P=.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Completely resected patients with stage pIIIA-N2 NSCLC receiving adjuvant treatment reached higher survival rates than those who did not. Maximum benefit was achieved by the subgroup of patients under 70 years of age with squamous cell carcinoma.

Patterns of failure after postoperative radiotherapy for incompletely resected (R1) non-small cell lung cancer: implications for radiation target volume design

OBJECTIVE

Overall survival (OS) and pattern of failure in R1-resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with 3D-planned postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) was retrospectively evaluated. The outcomes and patterns of failure in patients with (+) and without (-) extracapsular nodal extension (ECE) were compared and analyzed with respect to the radiation target volume design.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty R1-resected (37 ECE+ and 43 ECE-) patients received PORT (60Gy, 2Gy daily) between 2002 and 2011. Patients with N2 disease received limited elective nodal irradiation (ENI); for pN0-1 disease the use of ENI was optional. Among ECE- (extranodal-R1) patients there were 35 pN0-1 and eight pN2 cases; in pN0-1 patients, patterns of failure and outcomes were analyzed with respect to the use of ENI. Loco-regional failure (LRF) was defined as in-field relapse; isolated nodal failure (INF) was defined as out-of-field regional nodal recurrence occurring without LRF, irrespective of distant metastases.

RESULTS

The actuarial 3-year OS rate was 36.3% (median: 30 months). Three-year OS rates in the ECE- and ECE+ group were 40.4% and 31.4%, with median OS of 31 and 24 months, respectively (p=0.43). In multivariate analysis, the presence of ECE was correlated with OS (HR=3.02; 95% CI: 1.00-9.16; p=0.05). Three-year cumulative incidence of LRF (CILRF) was 14.5% and 15.5% in the ECE- and ECE+ groups, respectively (p=0.98). Three-year cumulative incidence of INF (CIINF) was 14.1% in the ECE- group and 11.1% in the ECE+ group (p=0.76). For pN0-1 patients treated with and without ENI (13 and 22 patients) 3-year CILRF rates were 7.7% and 20.8%, respectively (p=0.20); 3-year CIINF rates were 9.1% and 16.3%, respectively (p=0.65).

CONCLUSION

PORT resulted in a relatively good survival of R1-resected NSCLC patients. Relatively high incidence of INF was found in both ECE+ and ECE- patients. For ECE+ patients, treated with limited ENI, distant failure remains a major concern, so the design of ENI fields seems of lesser importance. Omission of ENI in pN0-1 (extranodal-R1) patients resulted in an unacceptably high incidence of INF. We postulate the use of some form of ENI in this setting.

Size of Stage IIIA Primary Lung Cancers and Survival: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database Analysis

Size of early-stage lung cancer is important in the prognosis of patients. We examined the large population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database to determine if tumor size was an independent risk factor of survival in patients undergoing lobectomy for N2 positive Stage IIIA nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study identified 1971 patients diagnosed with N2 positive Stage IIIA NSCLC, from 1998 to 2007, and who underwent lobectomy. Five tumor groups based on the seventh edition TNM lung cancer staging system (pathologic T1a 2 cm or less; T1b greater than 2 cm and 3 cm or less; T2a greater than 3 cm and 5 cm or less; T2b greater than 5 cm and 7 cm or less; T3 greater than 7 cm) were analyzed. Survival was reduced in patients with T3, T2a, and T2b tumors compared with patients with T1a and T1b ( P < 0.001). Survival estimates correlated with tumor size with poorer survival in T3 followed by T2b, T2a, and then T1b and T1a. Cohorts with T1a (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; P = 0.01) and T1b (HR, 0.54; P = 0.01) were both found to have decreased hazard of death. Negative predictors of survival, in addition to increasing tumor size, included age and male gender, whereas positive predictors included tumor Grade I and upper lobe location. Increasing size of tumor is an independent negative risk factor for survival in patients undergoing lobectomy for N2 positive Stage IIIA NSCLC.

Survival impact of node zone classification in resected pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer

We assessed the prognostic value of the 'Zone-classification' which has been proposed by the Japanese Association for Lung Cancer (JALC) for mediastinal nodal metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among 357 NSCLC patients who underwent curative surgery, 46 patients with pathological (p) N2 disease were divided into two groups as follows: 32 patients in whom the nearer zone was involved were classified as the pN2a-1 group, and 14 patients in whom the further mediastinal node station was involved were classified as the pN2a-2 group. The proportions of patients with non-adenocarcinoma histology, with multiple station metastases with the involvement of four or more nodes, and who underwent pneumonectomy, were higher in the pN2a-2 group. The 'Zone-classification' proved to be a significant prognostic factor in a univariate analysis (the 5-year overall survival rate, 7.1% for pN2a-2 versus 21.9% for pN2a-1; P < 0.01). A multivariate analysis confirmed that pN2a-2 sub-classification (hazard ratio 2.77; P = 0.03) and undergoing pneumonectomy (hazard ratio 4.86; P < 0.01) were independent and significant factors in predicting a poor prognosis. In pN2 NSCLC patients, the involved mediastinal zone according to the primary tumour site was important in prediction of survival.

[Indications for surgery in non-small cell lung cancer with lymph node invasion]

Surgery is indicated for N1 non-small cell lung cancer and performed, with good results in some patients, when N2 disease is not diagnosed preoperatively "minimal N2". Following the publication of the "EORTC 08941" and "Intergroup 0139" trials, it remains debatable for patients with proven N2 disease. Good prognostic factors before treatment or post-induction favour surgery, which seems superior to radiochemotherapy if the operative risk is low (lobectomies, and some pneumonectomies). N3 status is a contraindication to surgery, except in some rare cases with a strong response to induction treatment.

Re-appraisal of N2 disease by lymphatic drainage pattern for non-small-cell lung cancers: by terms of nodal stations, zones, chains, and a composite

PURPOSE

N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease with an extremely wide range of 5-year survival rates. A composite method of sub-classification for N2 is likely to provide a more accurate method to more finely differentiate prognosis of N2 disease.

METHODS

A total of 720 pN2 (T1-4N2M0) NSCLC cases were enrolled in our retrospective analysis of the proposed composite method. Survival rates were respectively calculated according to the N2 stratification methods: singly by "nodal stations", "nodal zones", or "nodal chains", or by combination of all three. Statistical analysis was carried out by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 10,199 lymph nodes (8059 mediastinal; 2140 hilar and intra-lobar) were removed. By nodal station, there were 173 cases of single-station involvement and 547 multi-stations. By nodal zone, there were 413 single-zone involvement and 307 with multiple zones. By nodal chain, there were 311 cases with single-chain and 409 multi-chain involvements. The overall 5-year survival was 20% and median survival time was 27.52 months. The 5-year survival was significantly better for cases of single-zone involvement, as compared to multi-zones (29% vs. 6%, p<0.0001). The 5-year survival rates of single- and multi-chains involvement were 36% and 8%, respectively (p<0.0001). When taking all of the above grouping methods into consideration, the N2 disease state could be further sub-classified into two subgroups with respective survival rates of 36% and 7% (p<0.0001). Subgroup I was composed of individuals with single-chain involvement and having either one or two station metastasis; individuals with any other metastasis combinations formed Subgroup II. Multivariate analysis revealed that the composite sub-classification method, number of positive lymph nodes, ratio of nodal metastasis, and pT information were the most important risk factors of 5-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

By combining the three N2 stratification methods based on "stations", "zones", and "chains" into one composite method, prognosis prediction was more accurate for N2 NSCLC disease. Single nodal chain involvement, which may be either one or two nodal stations metastasis, is associated with best outcome for pN2 patients.

Which is the better prognostic factor for resected non-small cell lung cancer: the number of metastatic lymph nodes or the currently used nodal stage classification?

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes (nN) in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in comparison with the currently used pathologic nodal (pN) category in the staging system.

METHODS

A total of 1659 patients who underwent potentially curative resection for NSCLC from 2000 to 2006 were included in this study. The association between the nN and survival was explored, and the results were compared with those using the location-based pN stage classification.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into four categories according to the number of metastatic nodes: nN0, absence of metastatic nodes; nN1, metastasis in one to two nodes; nN2, metastasis in three to six nodes; and nN3, metastasis in seven or more nodes. The 5-year overall survival for nN0, nN1, nN2, and nN3 was 89.2%, 65.1%, 42.1%, and 22.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). The nN category could be used to subdivide pN1 and pN2 patients into two (nN1 and nN2) and three (nN1, nN2, and nN3) prognostically distinct subgroups, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed the nN category was an independent prognostic factor for resected NSCLC. The difference in overall survival between pN1 and pN2 was not significant (55.4% versus 47.8%, p = 0.245). Patients in each nN category could not be subdivided into different prognostic subgroups according to the pN classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The nN category in this study was shown to be a better prognostic determinant than the location-based pN stage classification.

Postoperative radiotherapy for resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study of 221 cases from a single institution

BACKGROUND

For patients with resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is not well defined. In this single-institutional study, we re-evaluated the effect of PORT on overall survival (OS) as well as tumor control in this subgroup of patients.

METHODS

In 2003-2005, 221 consecutive patients with resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC at our institution were retrospectively analyzed in an institutional review board-approved study. The effect of PORT on OS, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. The impact of PORT on locoregional control and distant metastasis was also analyzed. Results. Compared with the control, patients treated with PORT had a significantly longer OS time (χ2, 3.966; p = .046) and DFS interval (χ2, 6.891; p = .009), as well as a trend toward a longer CSS duration (χ2, 3.486; p = .062). Patients treated with PORT also had a significantly higher locoregional recurrence-free survival rate (χ2, 5.048; p = .025) as well as distant metastasis-free survival rate (χ2, 11.248; p = .001). Multivariate analyses showed that PORT was significantly associated with a longer OS duration (p = .000).

CONCLUSIONS

PORT can significantly improve the survival of patients with resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. A prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial is ongoing.

Is there a subset of patients with preoperatively diagnosed N2 non-small cell lung cancer who might benefit from surgical resection?

OBJECTIVE

The role of surgery in the treatment of preoperatively diagnosed N2 non-small cell lung cancer remains controversial. This study sought significant prognostic factors to select candidates for surgery and assess prognosis.

METHODS

The study population included 277 patients who underwent primary resection (192) or induction chemotherapy followed by surgery (85) for preoperatively diagnosed, potentially resectable N2 non-small cell lung cancer. N2 descriptors were prospectively recorded. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate survival, and statistical significance of differences between curves was assessed by log-rank test. Cox regression was used for multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Preoperative significant prognostic factors were number of mediastinal node levels involved (P < .001), symptom severity (P = .013), clinical T (P = .041), and induction chemotherapy (P = .001). Three groups with different prognoses were based on individual prognostic score. The group that did best had a median survival of 29.6 months. Postoperative predictors of survival were pathologic T (P = .003), tumor residue (P = .034), and number of mediastinal nodes involved (P < .001). Of 3 groups with different prognoses, the most favorable had a median survival as long as 42 months.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a practical tool that uses significant prognostic factors to predict which patients with preoperatively diagnosed N2 non-small cell lung cancer have better prognoses. Because patients with the favorable prognostic factors showed good long-term survival and excellent local disease control, surgery should still play an important role in the multimodality treatment of these patients.

Survival of patients with unsuspected N2 (stage IIIA) nonsmall-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine the survival of patients who have completely resected, nonsmall-cell, stage IIIA, lung cancer from unsuspected (nonimaged) N2 disease who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using a prospective database. All patients underwent positron emission tomography scan and computed tomography scan with contrast, R0 resection with complete thoracic lymphadenectomy, and had unsuspected, pathologic N2 NSCLC.

RESULTS

Between June 1998 and December 2007, there were 148 patients (89 men). The most common pulmonary resection was right upper lobectomy in 67 patients (48%), and the most common lymph node station for unsuspected N2 diseased was 4R. One hundred and thirty-seven patients (93%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and 13% received postoperative radiation as well. The overall 2- and 5-year survivals were 58% and 35%, respectively. The 5-year survival for the 98 patients with single lymph node disease compared with patients with multiple nodal involvement was 40% versus 25%, respectively (p = 0.028). The number of lymph nodes involved (p = 0.032) was an independent predictors of survival on multivariate analysis. Median follow-up was 54 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year survival of patients with unsuspected N2 disease who undergo complete resection, followed by adjuvant therapy, is 35%. Patients with single station N2 disease fare better. The role for mediastinoscopy, endoscopic esophageal ultrasound with fine-needle aspirate, or endobronchial ultrasound in patients who are negative by positron emission tomography and computed tomography is unknown, since the benefit of neoadjuvant therapy in these patients is also unproven. A randomized study is needed.

The prognostic significance of multiple station N2 in patients with surgically resected stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Mediastinal (N2) lymph node involvement is heterogeneous with huge variation in the extent and grouped together under stage IIIA. However, they showed a different survival even in the same stage. We tried to determine the prognostic implication of the multiple station N2 lymph node metastasis in stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The survival of stage IIIA N2 was analyzed according to the number of N2 station and their survival was compared with that of stage IIIB. In stage IIIA N2 NSCLC, multivariate analysis indicated that multiple station N2 was one of the independent prognostic factors for poor survival. The 5-yr survival of multiple station N2 IIIA (20.4%) was lower than that of single station N2 IIIA (33.8%) significantly (p=0.016). but when it was compared with that of stage IIIB (15.5%), there was no difference. Therefore, we suggest that multiple station N2 should be considered similar to stage IIIB disease with regard to predicting survival and accordingly should receive a new position in the TNM staging system.

Accessing the Aortopulmonary Window (#5) and the Paraaortic (#6) Lymph Nodes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of the different techniques of lymph node biopsies in patients with suspected metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the subaortic (station #5) and paraaortic (station #6) lymph nodes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted of a prospective database of patients between January 2003 and June 2006 with suspected N2 disease only in the #5 or #6 lymph nodes, or both. All patients had integrated 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and nodal biopsy or thoracotomy, or both, with complete thoracic lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

There were 112 patients with clinically suspected N2 disease in lymph node stations #5 or #6, or both. The primary tumor was in the left upper lobe in 98 (88%) and in the left lower lobe in 14 (13%), and 58 had pathologic N2 disease in #5 or #6 lymph node stations only. Mediastinoscopy, used in all patients found, unsuspected N3 disease in 4 patients (3.6%) and N2 (#4L) disease in 12 (11%). Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), implemented in 62 patients (56%), correctly identified 41 patients (66%). Left single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) was used in 39 patients and was correct in 100%. Of the 58 patients, 53 (91%) completed neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by resection, and their 5-year survival was 64%.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA is less accurate for the #5 and #6 lymph node stations than left VATS. We prefer left VATS over the Chamberlain procedure for patients with suspected nodal metastases isolated only to #5 or #6 stations, and if positive, we prefer neoadjuvant therapy. The advantage of neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection compared with resection followed by adjuvant therapy remains controversial; and hence, the role for biopsy of these nodes is also controversial.

The role of surgery in the treatment of stage III non—small-cell lung cancer

Stage III, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer represents an incredibly heterogeneous group of patients. The majority of patients are treated with curative intent, but optimal therapy is controversial and the role of surgery is not well defined. Consensus has shown that the majority of patients with IIIB disease are not amenable to resection. The exceptions are selected patients with tumor stage 4 (T4) by virtue of a satellite nodule or those with isolated invasion of the spine, superior sulcus, carina, or vena cava. Surgery is more widely used for stage IIIA disease. Patients with nodal stage 2 (N2) disease represent the largest population of patients in stage III. Increasing evidence supports the use of surgery as part of a multimodality approach for N2 disease. The impact of surgery is partially determined by the bulk of the mediastinal node involvement. Patients with micrometastatic disease and single-station nodal involvement have the greatest chance for cure, and surgery appears to play a significant role in their treatment. Patients with bulky multistation disease are frequently not amenable to complete resection and may be best approached with definitive chemotherapy and radiation. In addition, the ability to sterilize mediastinal lymph nodes with induction therapy correlates strongly with survival following resection, but the ideal induction regime that balances the safety and efficacy has yet to be determined.