The impact of surgical adjuvant thoracic radiation for different stages of non-small cell lung cancer: the experience from a single institution

Effect of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With pIIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Complete Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy: The Phase 3 PORT-C Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has not been well defined in resected pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Objective

To evaluate the effect of PORT using modern techniques on survival and safety in patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The PORT-C randomized clinical trial was conducted in 394 patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC treated with complete resection and 4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2009 and December 2017. Data were analyzed between March 2019 and December 2020.

Interventions

Patients were randomized equally into the PORT arm (n = 202) or the observation arm (n = 192). The total dose of PORT was 50 Gy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival, and toxic effects.

Results

In total, 394 patients were enrolled and 364 were eligible, with a median (range) age of 55 (25-70) years. There were 202 (55.5%) male and 162 (44.5%) female patients. The median follow-up was 46.0 (95% CI, 41.9-51.4) months, and 230 DFS events were reported. There were 184 patients in the PORT arm and 180 patients in the observation arm. The 3-year DFS rates were 40.5% with PORT vs 32.7% with observation (median, 22.1 vs 18.6 months), and the difference in DFS was not statistically significant without adjustment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.09; P = .20), though it was significant with preplanned yet exploratory analysis (stratified analysis by the number of detected lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes, HR, 0.75; log-rank P = .04). The 3-year OS rates were 78.3% vs 82.8% (HR, 1.02; P = .93), and LRFS was 66.5% vs 59.7% (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97; P = .03), respectively. For 310 per-protocol patients (140 with PORT and 170 with observation), PORT significantly improved DFS (42.8% vs 30.6%; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-1.00; P = .05) but not OS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.53-1.30; P = .41). The 3-year local recurrence only rates were 9.5% and 18.3% in the 2 arms, respectively (Fine-Gray HR, 0.55; Gray test P = .04). No radiotherapy-related grade 4 or 5 adverse event was observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial of patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy, PORT did not improve DFS. Further studies exploring patients who might best benefit from PORT are needed.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00880971.

Multi-disciplinary approach for the management of non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the Middle East and Africa: Expert panel recommendations

The Middle East and Africa (MEA) region, a large geographical area, lies at the confluence of Asian, Caucasian and African races and comprises of a population with several distinct ethnicities. The course of management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) differs as per patients' performance status as well as stage of disease, requiring personalized therapy decisions. Although management of NSCLC has received a significant impetus in the form of molecularly targeted therapies and immune therapies in last few years, surgery remains gold standard for patients with early-stage disease. In case of unresectable disease, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the primary management modalities. With newer therapies being approved for treatment of early stage disease, use of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) for comprehensive management of NSCLC is of prime importance. A group of experts with interest in thoracic oncology, deliberated and arrived at a consensus statement for the community oncologists treating patients with NSCLC in the MEA region. The deliberation was based on the review of the published evidence including literature and global and local guidelines, subject expertise of the participating panellists and experience in real-life management of patients with NSCLC. We present the proposed regional adaptations of international guidelines and recommends the MDT approach for management of NSCLC in MEA.

Outcome and prognostic factors of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) after incomplete resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

PURPOSE

Current guidelines recommend postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for incompletely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is still a paucity of evidence for this approach. Hence, we analyzed survival in 78 patients following radiotherapy for incompletely resected NSCLC (R1) and investigated prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All 78 patients with incompletely resected NSCLC (R1) received PORT between December 2001 and September 2014. The median total dose for PORT was 60 Gy (range 44-68 Gy). The majority of patients had locally advanced tumor stages (stage IIA (2.6%), stage IIB (19.2%), stage IIIA (57.7%) and stage IIIB (20.5%)). 21 patients (25%) received postoperative chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Median follow-up after radiotherapy was 17.7 months. Three-year overall (OS), progression-free (PFS), local (LPFS) and distant progression-free survival (DPFS) rates were 34.1, 29.1, 44.9 and 51.9%, respectively. OS was significantly prolonged at lower nodal status (pN0/1) and following dose-escalated PORT with total radiation doses >54 Gy (p=0.012, p=0.013). Furthermore, radiation doses >54 Gy significantly improved PFS, LPFS and DPFS (p=0.005; p=0.050, p=0.022). Interestingly, survival was neither significantly influenced by R1 localization nor by extent (localized vs. diffuse). Multivariate analyses revealed lower nodal status and radiation doses >54.0 Gy as the only independent prognostic factors for OS (p=0.021, p=0.036).

CONCLUSION

For incompletely resected NSCLC, PORT is used for improving local tumor control. Local progression is still the major pattern of failure. Radiation doses >54 Gy seem to support improved local control and were associated with better OS in this retrospective study.

Postoperative radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer and thymic malignancies

For many thoracic malignancies, surgery, when feasible, is the preferred upfront modality for local control. However, adjuvant radiation plays an important role in minimizing the risk of locoregional recurrence. Tumors in the thoracic category include certain subgroups of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as thymic malignancies. The indications, radiation doses, and treatment fields vary amongst subtypes of thoracic tumors, as does the level of data supporting the use of radiation. For example, in the setting of NSCLC, postoperative radiation is typically reserved for close/positive margins or N2/N3 disease, although such diseases as superior sulcus tumors present unique cases in which the role of neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant treatment is still being elucidated. In contrast, for thymic malignancies, postoperative radiation therapy is often used for initially resected Masaoka stage III or higher disease, with its use for stage II disease remaining controversial. This review provides an overview of postoperative radiation therapy for thoracic tumors, with a separate focus on superior sulcus tumors and thymoma, including a discussion of acceptable radiation approaches and an assessment of the current controversies involved in its use.

Post-operative adjuvant thoracic radiotherapy for patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer with nodal involvement: outcome and prognostic factors

The purpose of this study was to analyse the outcome and prognostic factors of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with nodal disease treated by complete tumour resection followed by radiotherapy alone. Between October 1990 and October 1999, 49 NSCLC patients with N1 or N2 stage were treated with complete resection of tumour followed by post-operative radiotherapy in our department. The radiation was delivered with 10 MV X-rays given 5 days per week at 1.8-2 Gy per fraction. Total doses ranged from 40 Gy to 64.8 Gy, with a median dose of 55.8 Gy. All patients had at least 30 months of follow-up. The 5 year overall survival rate (OS), local control rate (LC) and distant metastasis-free rate (DMF) were 34%, 52% and 29%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, stage and margin were found to influence OS. The total number of involved lymph nodes and positive margins were significant factors for LC. Only N stage was found to correlate with DMF. In conclusion, patients with multiple involved lymph nodes, advanced stage or positive surgical margins had a poor outcome even with post-operative radiotherapy. Based on these prognostic factors, new therapeutic regimens and modalities for NSCLC need to be further investigated.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy of non-small cell lung cancer

Though surgery offers the best chance of cure for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many patients who undergo complete tumor resection will die of recurrent disease. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been employed both individually and in combination in an effort to prevent local recurrence and extrathoracic metastatic disease. However, the administration of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy remains controversial. Phase II and III trials with traditional radiotherapy schedules and cytotoxic drugs have produced conflicting results. Novel approaches utilizing long-term administration of less toxic drugs and targeted biologic therapies are promising.

Adjuvant therapy of resected non-small-cell lung cancer

The administration of adjuvant therapy after complete resection of non-small-cell lung cancer is controversial. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy have been used individually and concomitantly in efforts to prevent local recurrence and improve survival. However, recent phase II and III trials and a meta-analysis have produced conflicting results. Postoperative adjuvant therapy remains a subject of active investigation.