An alpha-actinin-profilin chimaera with two alternatively operating actin-binding sites

Functional characterization of green fluorescent protein-profilin fusion proteins

To clarify the role of profilins in cells, fusion proteins constructed with green fluorescent protein (GFP) should be extremely helpful. As profilins are considerably smaller than the GFP fusion partner (14-17 kDa compared with 27 kDa, respectively), we characterized the fusion proteins in vitro, to ascertain their biological function. We fused mouse profilin I and II to either the C-terminus or N-terminus of GFP. These fusion proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli and affinity-purified on polyproline-Sepharose. Interaction with vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, a proline-rich ligand of profilin, was investigated by ELISA, as was binding to PtdIns(4,5)P2. The affinity for actin was quantitatively determined in polymerization assays. Our results show that fusion of GFP to the C-terminus of profilin I abolishes polyproline binding. In contrast, the other fusion proteins bound to polyproline-Sepharose and VASP. Binding to PtdIns(4,5)P2 was not significantly altered. Furthermore, fusion of either isoform with GFP did not decrease the affinity for actin. In localization studies with mammalian cells, all fusion proteins showed the localization expected for profilin in areas of high actin dynamics, such as leading lamellae and ruffles induced by epidermal growth factor. However, with regard to our in vitro data, we suspect that only a minor fraction of profilin I carrying the GFP at the C-terminus can target these sites. Therefore, other constructs should be preferred for further in vivo studies.

Effects of single amino acid substitutions in the actin-binding site on the biological activity of bovine profilin I

For a detailed analysis of the profilin-actin interaction, we designed several point mutations in bovine profilin I by computer modeling. The recombinant proteins were analyzed in vitro for their actin-binding properties. Mutant proteins with a putatively higher affinity for actin were produced by attempting to introduce an additional bond to actin. However, these mutants displayed a lower affinity for actin than wild-type profilin, suggesting that additional putative bonds created this way cannot increase profilin's affinity for actin. In contrast, mutants designed to have a reduced affinity for actin by eliminating profilin-actin bonds displayed the desired properties in viscosity assays, while their binding sites for poly(L)proline were still intact. The profilin mutant F59A, with an affinity for actin reduced by one order of magnitude as compared to wild-type profilin, was analyzed further in cells. When microinjected into fibroblasts, F59A colocalized with the endogenous profilin and actin in ruffling areas, suggesting that profilins are targeted to and tethered at these sites by ligands other than actin. Profilin null cells of Dictyostelium were transfected with bovine wild-type profilin I and F59A. Bovine profilin I, although expressed to only approximately 10% of the endogenous profilin level determined for wild-type Dictyostelium, caused a substantial rescue of the defects observed in profilin null amoebae, as seen by measuring the growth of colony surface areas and the percentage of polynucleated cells. The mutant protein was much less effective. These results emphasize the highly conserved biological function of profilins with low sequence homology, and correlate specifically their actin-binding capacity with cell motility and proliferation.