Treatment of Candida nail infection with terbinafine

Race reporting and representation in onychomycosis clinical trials: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Onychomycosis is the most common nail disease seen in clinical practice. Inclusion of diverse groups in onychomycosis clinical trials subjects is necessary to generalise efficacy data.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to systematically review race and ethnicity reporting and representation, as well as, treatment outcomes in onychomycosis clinical trials.

METHODS

A PubMed search for onychomycosis clinical trials was performed in August 2020. Primary clinical trial data were included and post hoc analyses were excluded. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Statistical significance was set at p < .05. Photos in articles were categorised by Fitzpatrick skin type.

RESULTS

Only 32/182 (17.5%) trials reported on race and/or ethnicity and only one trial compared treatment efficacy in different subgroups. Darker skin colours were infrequently depicted in articles. Topical treatment, location with ≥1 US-based site, industry funding type and publication date after 2000 were significantly associated with reporting of racial/ethnic data (p < .05 for all comparisons).

LIMITATIONS

Demographics on excluded subjects and methods of recruitment were not available. Assigning Fitzpatrick skin type is inherently subjective.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights a need for consistent reporting of races and ethnicities of onychomycosis clinical trial participants with subgroup analyses of treatment efficacies.

In vitro synergism of a water insoluble fraction of Uncaria tomentosa combined with fluconazole and terbinafine against resistant non-Candida albicans isolates

CONTEXT

Uncaria tomentosa D.C. (Rubiaceae) has several biological activities, including activity against resistant Candida strains. The synergistic interaction with terbinafine or fluconazole can be an important alternative to overcome this resistance.

OBJECTIVES

The potential synergy between a water insoluble fraction (WIF) from Uncaria tomentosa bark and the antifungals terbinafine (TRB) and fluconazole (FLZ) against non-Candida albicans resistant strains was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TRB and FLZ, alone and combined with WIF, were tested by the checkerboard procedure using the micro-dilution technique against seven isolates of Candida glabrata and C. krusei. The molecular interactions occurring outside the cell wall were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis.

RESULTS

The checkerboard inhibitory assay demonstrated synergy for WIF:TRB and WIF:FLZ combinations, respectively. The best synergistic cell damage was demonstrated unequivocally for the associations of WIF and TRB (1.95:4.0 μg/mL) and WIF and FLZ (1.95:8.0 μg/mL). The comparison of the FT-IR spectra of the antifungal alone, and in combination with WIF, allows recognizing clear differences in 3000, 1600, 1400, and 700-800 cm^-1 bands. Additionally, modifications on TRB and FLZ thermograms were clearly noticed after their combination with WIF.

CONCLUSIONS

DSC and infrared analysis demonstrated intermolecular interactions between WIF and either TRB or FLZ. Hence, quite likely the synergistic effect is related to interaction events occurring outside the cell wall between antifungal and cat's claw proanthocyanidins. A direct action on the cell wall is suggested, without connection with the ABC efflux pump mechanism.

An update on treatment of onychomycosis

Onychomycosis (OM) is a fungal infection of the nail plate or nail bed which is highly prevalent in the general population and also responsible for significant morbidity. The condition needs to be treated in view of the physical and emotional handicap it produces. The peculiarities of the nail apparatus in health and disease lead to difficulties in being able to successfully treat this condition. Hence, the very same antifungals which produce high cure rates in skin infections are rendered less efficacious in nail disease. Low cure rates and high relapse rates even with highly efficacious antifungals have lead to an increasing interest in exploring newer treatment options which can ensure drug penetration, drug persistence, mycological cure and effective prevention of relapse. The current review aims to summarize our current status of knowledge about the treatment options for OM. It also summarizes the newer areas of research especially with respect to devices related therapies; physical measures to enhance penetration through nail; and development and evaluation of synergistic combinations.

Recent updates in oral terbinafine: its use in onychomycosis and tinea capitis in the US

Onychomycosis and tinea capitis are prevalent fungal diseases that are difficult to cure and usually require systemic treatment. Onychomycosis has high recurrence rates and can significantly affect a patient's quality of life. Oral terbinafine has been approved for onychomycosis for 20 years in Europe and 15 years in the United States. Over these past 20 years, numerous studies show that oral terbinafine is a safe and efficacious treatment for onychomycosis. More recently, oral terbinafine also has been approved for tinea capitis. Once difficult to treat, terbinafine has revolutionised treatment of these fungal diseases. It has minimal side effects and its limited drug interactions make it an excellent treatment option for patients with co-morbidities. This review discusses oral terbinafine and new insights into the treatment of onychomycosis and tinea capitis. Recent publications have enhanced our knowledge of the mechanisms of oral terbinafine and its efficacy in treating onychomycosis. Oral terbinafine vs. other antifungal therapeutic options are reviewed. Overall, terbinafine remains a superior treatment for dermatophyte infections because of its safety, fungicidal profile, once daily dosing, and its ability to penetrate the stratum corneum.

The safety of oral antifungal treatments for superficial dermatophytosis and onychomycosis: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We estimated the absolute risks of treatment termination and incidence of adverse liver outcomes among all commonly used oral antifungal treatments for superficial dermatophytosis and onychomycosis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, case series, and cohort studies published before December 31, 2005. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment, and extracted data. Treatment arms with the same regimen in terms of drug, type (continuous or intermittent), and dosage were combined to estimate the risk of an outcome of interest.

RESULTS

We identified 122 studies with approximately 20,000 enrolled patients for planned comparison. The pooled risks (95% confidence intervals) of treatment discontinuation resulting from adverse reactions for continuous therapy were 3.44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.28%-4.61%) for terbinafine 250 mg/day; 1.96% (95% CI, 0.35%-3.57%) for itraconazole 100 mg/day; 4.21% (95% CI, 2.33%-6.09%) for itraconazole 200 mg/day; and 1.51% (95% CI, 0%-4.01%) for fluconazole 50 mg/day. For intermittent therapy, the pooled risks were as follows: pulse terbinafine: 2.09% (95% CI, 0%-4.42%); pulse itraconazole: 2.58% (95% CI, 1.15%-4.01%); intermittent fluconazole 150 mg/week: 1.98% (95% CI, 0.05%-3.92%); and intermittent fluconazole 300 to 450 mg/week: 5.76% (95% CI, 2.42%-9.10%). The risk of liver injury requiring termination of treatment ranged from 0.11% (continuous itraconazole 100 mg/day) to 1.22% (continuous fluconazole 50 mg/day). The risk of having asymptomatic elevation of serum transaminase but not requiring treatment discontinuation was less than 2.0% for all treatment regimens evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Oral antifungal therapy against superficial dermatophytosis and onychomycosis, including intermittent and continuous terbinafine, itraconazole, and fluconazole, was associated with a low incidence of adverse events in an immunocompetent population.

Identification and in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of 200 clinical isolates of Candida spp. responsible for fingernail infections

A total of 200 samples of Candida spp. that are responsible for fingernail infections were isolated in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil from April 2004 to May 2005. The samples were identified by routine microbiological techniques and had the following distribution: Candida parapsilosis (40.5%), C. albicans (31.5%), C. tropicalis (26%), and C. guilliermondii (2%). We performed in vitro susceptibility tests with ciclopiroxolamine, terbinafine, ketoconazole, itraconazole, and fluconazole using the CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) and EUCAST (European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing) methodologies. The percentages of agreement between the two methodologies varied from 48 to 100% (the percentage increased to more than 60% for the majority of the samples). Percentages of agreement between the methodologies lower than 60% were seen with ketoconazole (57%) and itraconazole (48%) for samples of C. albicans and with fluconazole (54%) for samples of C. tropicalis. In general, we observed higher agreement between the values of the MICs obtained with both methodologies for ciclopiroxolamine and terbinafine for all tested species. With azoles, lower percentages of agreement between the methodologies were observed for samples C. albicans and C. tropicalis.

Systemic antifungal agents: an update of established and new therapies

Terbinafine is the drug of choice for dermatophyte onychomycosis. Adjunct therapies, such as topical agents or surgical approaches, may improve outcomes in patients who have risk factors for incomplete response or recurrence. Despite many studies of newer antifungal agents for tinea capitis, griseofulvin (20 mg/kg/d) remains the gold standard. Terbinafine (> or = 6 mg/kg/d) and fluconazole (8 mg/kg once weekly) have yet to demonstrate comparable efficacy in large-scale RCTs. The current role of second-generation triazoles and echinocandins is for treatment of invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis in patients who are critically ill and immunocompromised. Strengths of the newer triazoles include increased activity against resistant and emerging pathogens, convenience of oral formulations, and in vivo activity against subcutaneous mycoses, in particular eumycotic mycetoma. Their metabolism via cytochrome P450 isoenzymes increases the risk for significant drug interactions, and their established mechanism of action may lead to development of resistant pathogens. The echinocandins inhibit fungal cell wall synthesis, a novel therapeutic target; thus, they are effective against azole-resistant species. Their metabolism is independent of hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes, minimizing drug interactions. They are available only as i.v. formulations.

Toenail onychomycosis: current and future treatment options

Onychomycosis is a common disease affecting as much as 8% of the general population. Treatment of onychomycosis is challenging, complicated by low cure rates and relatively high relapse rates. This paper reviews the efficacy of current oral, topical, and surgical treatment options. Currently, the treatment of choice for toenail onychomycosis is oral terbinafine because of its high efficacy, low relapse rates, and cost-effectiveness. Oral itraconazole or fluconazole could be considered for infections caused by Candida. Topical therapies may be a useful adjunct to these systemic therapies, but are less effective when used alone. More research is needed to determine the best measures for preventing reinfection.

Current use of anti-infectives in dermatology

Dermatologic diseases encompass a broad category of pathologic situations. Infection remains a significant aspect of the pathology faced in patient encounters, and it is natural to expect that anti-infectives play a major element in the armamentarium utilized by dermatologists. Aside from the treatment of the classic bacterial and fungal infections, there are now new uses for antiviral agents to help suppress recurrent disease, such as herpes simplex. There is also the novel approach of using anti-infectives, or agents that have been thought to have antimicrobial activity, to treat inflammatory diseases. This review describes anti-infectives, beginning with common antibiotics used to treat bacterial infections. The discussion will then cover the current use of antivirals. Finally, the description of antifungals will be separated, starting with the oral agents and ending with the topical antimycotics. The use of anti-infectives in tropical dermatology has been purposefully left out, and perhaps should be the subject of a separate review. Cutaneous bacterial infections consist chiefly of those microorganisms that colonize the skin, such as species of staphylococcus and streptococcus. Propionibacterium acnes and certain other anaerobes can be involved in folliculitis, pyodermas and in chronic conditions such as hidradenitis suppurativa.

Onychomycosis in Taiwan

The pathogens of onychomycosis have implications in choosing therapy. We aimed to survey the pathogens of onychomycosis in Taiwan and further analyse the distribution of pathogens in various conditions. We also compared the distribution of pathogens in Taiwan with those in various countries. This study included 182 cases of onychomycosis who attended our clinic between January and December 2001. Histopathologic examination and fungus culture of the nail specimens were performed to confirm the diagnosis and identify the pathogens. The pathogens were dermatophytes in 101 patients (55.5%), Candida in 66 (36.3%), and non-dermatophyte moulds in 16 (8.2%). Candida was more frequently seen in patients older than 60 years (40.9%), females with fingernail onychomycosis (66.7%) or combined fingernail and toenail onychomycosis (58.3%), and presence of paronychia (57.9%). Dermatophytes are the predominant pathogens in temperate Western countries; meanwhile, Candida and non-dermatophyte moulds are prevailing in Mediterranean and tropical countries including Taiwan. Clinicians should appreciate that the pathogens of onychomycosis may vary in different patient groups and geographical locations, and choose optimal antifungal agents accordingly.

Terbinafine in the treatment of onychomycosis: a review of its efficacy in high-risk populations and in patients with nondermatophyte infections

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of onychomycosis is higher in certain high-risk populations, such as the immunocompromised, diabetics and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients. These patients can also develop onychomycosis due to nondermatophyte fungi. Although the efficacy of terbinafine is well demonstrated in the treatment of conventional dermatophyte nail infection, there are few data on the efficacy of terbinafine in high-risk patient groups or in nondermatophyte fungi, which can be difficult to treat.

OBJECTIVES

To review previously published data regarding the safety and efficacy of terbinafine in special patient populations, such as those with diabetes mellitus or HIV infection, those receiving immunosuppressive therapy, and patients with onychomycosis due to nondermatophyte fungi.

METHODS

A Medline literature search up to October 2002 was performed in order to identify relevant studies. Pertinent abstracts presented at international meetings were also included. Cure rates (per-protocol and intention-to-treat) were extracted or calculated. All available safety data were also collated.

RESULTS

Terbinafine was highly effective and well tolerated in patients with diabetes mellitus. Mycological cure rates of 62-78% were achieved in three studies, which is comparable with the efficacy in nondiabetic populations. Mycological cure rates of 64-91% were achieved in subsets of diabetic patients with Candida-positive nail cultures. The efficacy of terbinafine in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy was also similar to that reported in immunocompetent patients. Levels of ciclosporin in the blood clearly decreased, with little clinical consequence; however, consideration should be given to the monitoring of ciclosporin levels in patients concomitantly receiving immunosuppressive therapy and terbinafine. Two small studies reported that terbinafine was also effective in treating onychomycosis in HIV-positive patients. Terbinafine was also effective and well tolerated in the treatment of nondermatophyte onychomycosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that terbinafine is a safe and effective treatment for onychomycosis in high-risk populations. However, the majority of these studies only included small numbers of patients and larger clinical trials are needed, especially in patients with HIV infection.

Superficial fungal infections: an update on pityriasis versicolor, seborrheic dermatitis, tinea capitis, and onychomycosis

The recent advances in pityriasis versicolor, seborrheic dermatitis, tinea capitis and onychomycosis are reviewed. Some highlighted points include the new classification of Malassezia species, and the association of Malassezia species with seborrheic dermatitis. The use of terbinafine, fluconazole, and itraconazole for the treatment of tinea capitis is discussed. The management of onychomycosis, highlighting the high efficacy rates obtained with terbinafine when used to treat dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis, is discussed. The use of combination therapies in some circumstances to maximize cure rates is reviewed.

How to improve cure rates for the management of onychomycosis

To improve the treatment of onychomycosis clinicians need to identify correctly the causative organism, choose a therapy that is effective against the pathogen, and take into consideration the pharmacokinetics (eg, bioavailability, drug interactions) of the oral agent. In addition, variations of the standard regimens may need to be considered (ie, booster or supplemental therapy). To reduce the recurrence of onychomycosis, once mycologic cure has been achieved, clinicians should educate their patients about proper foot care. Familiarity with the symptoms and signs of tinea pedis and onychomycosis may enable patients to seek appropriate care when the disease is at an early stage.

Terbinafine: a review of its use in onychomycosis in adults

Terbinafine, an orally and topically active antimycotic agent, inhibits the biosynthesis of the principal sterol in fungi, ergosterol, at the level of squalene epoxidase. Squalene epoxidase inhibition results in ergosterol-depleted fungal cell membranes (fungistatic effect) and the toxic accumulation of intracellular squalene (fungicidal effect). Terbinafine has demonstrated excellent fungicidal activity against the dermatophytes and variable activity against yeasts and non-dermatophyte molds in vitro. Following oral administration, terbinafine is rapidly absorbed and widely distributed to body tissues including the poorly perfused nail matrix. Nail terbinafine concentrations are detected within 1 week after starting therapy and persist for at least 30 weeks after the completion of treatment. Randomized, double-blind trials showed oral terbinafine 250 mg/day for 12 or 16 weeks was more efficacious than itraconazole, fluconazole and griseofulvin in dermatophyte onychomycosis of the toenails. In particular, at 72 weeks' follow-up, the multicenter, multinational, L.I.ON. (Lamisil vs Itraconazole in ONychomycosis) study found that mycologic cure rates (76 vs 38% of patients after 12 weeks' treatment; 81 vs 49% of recipients after 16 weeks' therapy) and complete cure rates were approximately twice as high after terbinafine treatment than after itraconazole (3 or 4 cycles of 400 mg/day for 1 week repeated every 4 weeks) in patients with toenail mycosis. Furthermore, the L.I.ON. Icelandic Extension study demonstrated that terbinafine was more clinically effective than intermittent itraconazole to a statistically significant extent at 5-year follow-up. Terbinafine produced a superior complete cure rate (35 vs 14%), mycologic cure rate (46 vs 13%) and clinical cure rate (42 vs 18%) to that of itraconazole. The mycologic and clinical relapse rates were 23% and 21% in the terbinafine group, respectively, compared with 53% and 48% in the itraconazole group. In comparative clinical trials, oral terbinafine had a better tolerability profile than griseofulvin and a comparable profile to that of itraconazole or fluconazole. Post marketing surveillance confirmed terbinafine's good tolerability profile. Adverse events were experienced by 10.5% of terbinafine recipients, with gastrointestinal complaints being the most common. Unlike the azoles, terbinafine has a low potential for drug-drug interactions. Most pharmacoeconomic evaluations have shown that the greater clinical effectiveness of oral terbinafine in dermatophyte onychomycosis translates into a cost-effectiveness ratio superior to that of itraconazole, fluconazole and griseofulvin.

CONCLUSION

Oral terbinafine has demonstrated greater effectiveness than itraconazole, fluconazole and griseofulvin in randomized trials involving patients with onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes. The drug is generally well tolerated and has a low potential for drug interactions. Therefore, terbinafine is the treatment of choice for dermatophyte onychomycosis.

Non-dermatophyte onychomycosis

Non-dermatophyte organisms are becoming increasingly prevalent in onychomycosis. This apparent emergence might be an artifact of improved diagnostic techniques and increased awareness that these fungi are potential etiologic agents. It is important to bear in mind that all isolated organisms should be evaluated as potential pathogens when diagnosing fungal infections, especially given the increasing use of immunosuppressive drugs and the increasing numbers of chronically immunocompromised individuals. While many patients with non-dermatophyte mold onychomycosis will respond to oral or topical antifungal therapy, poor or incomplete response might still be expected in some patients.

Itraconazole versus terbinafine in the management of onychomycosis: an overview

Ever since the introduction of itraconazole and terbinafine in the management of onychomycosis, there has been a revival of interest in the latter. In order to comprehend the intricate emerging scenario, an endeavor has been made to form a distinct outline in the shape of an overview on several of their facets. The review, therefore, envisages forming and facilitating instant decision-making.

Onychomycosis: strategies to improve efficacy and reduce recurrence

Fungal infections may be difficult to treat for several reasons. It is important to obtain the correct diagnosis, and select the appropriate antifungal agent and route. General considerations that may be associated with recurrent infections are, a genetic predisposition and suboptimal bioavailability of drug, resulting in insufficient concentration at the target site. The aetiologic organism, the severity of disease, other coexisting diseases, concomitant drug intake, and the presence of fungal infection at other sites are some factors that determine the choice of antifungal therapy and its route of administration, oral vs. topical lacquer. Local factors such as the thickness of the nail, presence of lateral onychomycosis, longitudinal spike, dermatophytoma and severe onycholysis are some factors that may determine the choice of secondary measures such as mechanical or topical treatment. Booster or supplemental therapy may be of benefit when the response to initial treatment is poorer than expected and unlikely to result in complete response. Steps should be taken to reduce the possibility of recurrence once cure has been achieved.

Pharmacokinetics of antifungal agents in onychomycoses

Onychomycosis is caused by infection by fungi, mainly dermatophytes and nondermatophyte yeasts or moulds; it affects the fingernails and, more frequently, the toenails. Dermatophytes are responsible for about 90 to 95% of fungal infections. Trichophyton rubrum is the most common dermatophyte; Candida albicans is the major nondermatophyte yeast. Although topical therapy of onchomycosis does not lead to systemic adverse effects or interactions with concomitantly taken drugs, it does not provide high cure rates and requires complete compliance from the patient. At present there are 3 oral antifungal medications that are generally used for the short term treatment of onychomycosis: itraconazole, terbinafine and fluconazole. The persistence of these active drugs in nails allows weekly administration, reduced treatment or a pulse regimen. Good clinical and mycological efficacies are obtained with itraconazole 100 to 200 mg daily, terbinafine 250mg daily for 3 months, or fluconazole 150 mg weekly for at least 6 months. Itraconazole is a synthetic triazole with a broad spectrum of action. It is well absorbed when administered orally and can be detected in nails 1 to 2 weeks after the start of therapy. The nail : plasma ratio stabilises at around 1 by week 18 of treatment. Itraconazole is still detectable in nails 27 weeks after stopping administration. Nail concentrations are higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for most dermatophytes and Candida species from the first month of treatment. The elimination half-life of itraconazole from nails is long, ranging from 32 to 147 days. Terbinafine is a synthetic allylamine that is effective against dermatophytes. Terbinafine is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, and the time to reach effective concentrations in nail is 1 to 2 weeks. The half-life is from 24 to 156 days, explaining the observed persistence of terbinafine in nails for longer than 252 days. Fluconazole is a bis-triazole broad spectrum antifungal with high oral bioavailability. The uptake of fluconazole by nail increases with the length of treatment, and nail : plasma ratios are generally 1.5 to 2 at steady state. Fluconazole concentrations exceed the MIC for Candida species soon after the start of treatment. Fluconazole concentrations fall slowly after the drug is stopped, with a half-life of 50 to 87 days, and fluconazole is still detectable in nails 5 months after the end of treatment. All these drugs are potent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and may increase the plasma concentrations of concomitantly used drugs. Itraconazole inhibits CYP3A4. Fluconazole inhibits CYP3A4, but to a lesser degree than itraconazole, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Terbinafine inhibits CYP2D6.

Systemic antifungal therapy

Systemic antifungal therapy for superficial mycoses has advanced greatly since the introduction of griseofulvin in 1958. The discovery of the azole antifungal compounds, ketoconazole, itraconazole, and fluconazole, allowed for a broader spectrum of treatment and a shorter treatment duration. Terbinafine, through a unique mechanism of action, has a fungicidal power not seen previously in the other antifungals. It is important to use our knowledge of the pharmacology in combination with clinical experience and cost of therapy in order to select the proper drug. The search to identify new oral antifungal agents should continue, since none of the five currently used drugs fulfill the criteria of the "ideal" antifungal.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of ciclopirox nail lacquer solution 8% and the new oral antifungal agents used to treat dermatophyte toe onychomycosis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Recently a novel topical nail lacquer, ciclopirox solution 8%, has been approved for the treatment of onychomycosis.

OBJECTIVE

This was undertaken to determine the most cost-effective treatment for the treatment of dermatophyte onychomycosis of the toes in the United States in 2000.

METHODS

The nature of the problem was defined. The drug comparators were ciclopirox nail lacquer, terbinafine, itraconazole (pulse), itraconazole (continuous), fluconazole, and griseofulvin. A decision analytic model that reflected the manner in which pedal tinea unguium is managed was produced. Studies that have evaluated the efficacy of the nail lacquer and the oral antifungal agents for this indication were identified. Appropriate studies were used in a meta-analysis to determine the mycologic and clinical response rates when the drug comparators are used for the treatment for toe dermatophyte onychomycosis. For each drug comparator a cost of regimen analysis was carried out. This is the sum of the drug acquisition cost, the cost of medical management, and the cost of managing adverse effects. Next, the expected cost of management was calculated, disease free days were determined, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

For each comparator the meta-analytic average mycologic cure (MC) rate and clinical response (CR) rates were: ciclopirox nail lacquer (MC: 52.6 +/- 4.2%, CR: 52.4 +/- 9.0%), griseofulvin (MC: 41.1 +/- 20.4%, CR: 33.7 +/- 14.1%), itraconazole (continuous) (MC: 66.3 +/- 4.2%, CR: 70.3 +/- 4.2%), itraconazole (pulse) (MC: 70.8 +/- 5.7%, CR: 73.6 +/- 4.6%), terbinafine (MC: 77.2 +/- 4.0%, CR: 75.3 +/- 2.9%), and fluconazole (MC: 65.6 +/- 7.1%, CR: 66.5 +/- 11.7%). The cost of regimen for the drug comparators was: ciclopirox nail lacquer $325.2, griseofulvin $1413.1, itraconazole (continuous) $1410.2, itraconazole (pulse) $811.7, terbinafine $890.1, and fluconazole $966.8. The cost/mycologic cure rate and expected cost/expected symptom free day were, ciclopirox nail lacquer ($618.2, 1.69), griseofulvin $3438.2, 5.3), itraconazole (continuous) ($2126.9, 3.52), itraconazole (pulse) ($1146.4, 2.01), terbinafine ($1153.0, 2.14), and fluconazole ($1473.7, 2.10). The relative cost-effectiveness was ciclopirox nail lacquer 1.00, itraconazole (pulse) 1.19, fluconazole 1.24, terbinafine 1.27, itraconazole (continuous) 2.08, and griseofulvin 3.13. Sensitivity analysis indicated that ciclopirox nail lacquer was a cost effective alternative compared with the oral regimens of terbinafine, itraconazole (continuous), and griseofulvin when clinical response rate was used as the primary efficacy parameter.

CONCLUSION

Ciclopirox nail lacquer solution 8% is a recent addition to the armamentarium of therapies available to the physician and patient for the treatment of onychomycosis. The nail lacquer is a cost effective agent compared with the oral antifungal therapies, terbinafine, itraconazole, fluconazole, and griseofulvin.

Current Management of Onychomycosis and Dermatomycoses

Three newer oral antifungal agents, itraconazole, terbinafine and fluconazole, have revolutionized treatment of superficial mycoses. The tissue pharmacokinetics of itraconazole and terbinafine allow much shorter courses of therapy- with higher efficacy-in the treatment of onychomycosis, compared to other oral agents. Itraconazole pulse dosing and terbinafine daily dosing have shown comparable efficacy against dermatophyte onychomycosis; similar itraconazole regimens have been effective against nondermatophyte infections. Refractory clinical patterns of nail disease appear to be more responsive to oral antifungal therapy when combined with adjunctive therapy, such as debridement. These agents are effective against cutaneous dermatophytosis, with shorter treatment regimens. Tinea versicolor may be treated with a single-dose, intermittent, or daily regimen of an oral azole agent, depending on the drug selected. These newer oral antifungal agents have been proven effective against tinea capitis; effective regimens are shorter than those for griseofulvin. The safety profile of these newer agents has been very favorable.

The frequency of Candida parapsilosis in onychomycosis. An epidemiological survey in Israel

Candida albicans is regarded as the major pathogen in yeast-induced onychomycosis. Based on our impression of an increasing prevalence of Candida parapsilosis in this disease, we examined the data of two mycology laboratories in the same geographic location, from 1994 to 1996 in one (centre A) and for 1995 (6 months) in the other (centre B). A total of 954 and 230 toenails and 621 and 190 fingernails, respectively, underwent KOH microscopy and culture studies in each centre. Positive findings were noted in 45 and 65% of the toenails and 44 and 72% of the fingernails, respectively. In the toenails, Candida spp. were found in 22 and 15%, respectively, and in the fingernails, in 77 and 63%, respectively. The most frequent Candida species was C. parapsilosis (39.5% in toenails, 36.7% in fingernails), followed by C. albicans (19.5% in toenails, and 34.4% in fingernails). These results demonstrate a higher frequency of isolation of C. parapsilosis compared with C. albicans in onychomycosis. This might have important therapeutic implications.

Onychomycosis in the elderly

Onychomycosis is found more frequently in the elderly, and in more males than females. Onychomycosis of the toes is usually caused by dermatophytes, most commonly Trichophyton rubrum and T. mentagrophytes. The most common clinical presentations are distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis (which usually affects the great/first toe) and white superficial onychomycosis (which generally involves the third/fourth toes). Only about 50% of all abnormal-appearing nails are due to onychomycosis. In the remainder, trauma to the nail, psoriasis and conditions such as lichen planus should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Therefore, the clinical impression of onychomycosis should be confirmed by mycological examination, whenever possible. The management of onychomycosis may include no therapy, palliative treatment with mechanical or chemical debridement, topical antifungal therapy, oral antifungal agents or a combination of treatment modalities. In the US, the only new oral agents approved for treatment of onychomycosis are terbinafine and itraconazole. Fluconazole is approved for onychomycosis in some other countries. Ciclopirox nail lacquer has recently been approved in the US for the treatment of onychomycosis. In some other countries topical agents such as amorolfine are also used. Griseofulvin and ketoconazole are no longer preferred for the treatment of onychomycosis. The new oral antifungal agents are effective and well tolerated in the elderly. Patient selection should be based on the history (including systems review and medication record), examination and baseline monitoring, if indicated. Laboratory monitoring during therapy for onychomycosis varies among physicians. A combination of removal of the diseased nail plate or local measures and oral antifungal therapy may be optimal in certain instances, e.g. when lateral onychomycosis or dermatophytoma are present. For dermatophyte toe onychomycosis the recommended duration of therapy with terbinafine is 250 mg/day for 12 weeks. For itraconazole (pulse) the regimen is 200 mg twice daily for 1 week on, 3 weeks off, repeated for 3 consecutive pulses and with fluconazole the regimen is 150 to 300 mg once weekly given for a usual range of 6 to 12 months or until the nail plate has grown out. In some instances, if extra therapy is required, one suggestion is that 4 weeks of terbinafine or an extra pulse of itraconazole are given between months 6 and 9 from the start of therapy. Once cure has been achieved, it is important to counsel patients on the strategies of reducing recurrence of disease.

A risk-benefit assessment of the newer oral antifungal agents used to treat onychomycosis

The newer antifungal agents itraconazole, terbinafine and fluconazole have become available to treat onychomycosis over the last 10 years. During this time period these agents have superseded griseofulvin as the agent of choice for onychomycosis. Unlike griseofulvin, the new agents have a broad spectrum of action that includes dermatophytes, Candida species and nondermatophyte moulds. Each of the 3 oral antifungal agents, terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole, is effective against dermatophytes with relatively fewer data being available for the treatment of Candida species and nondermatophyte moulds. Itraconazole is effective against Candida onychomycosis. Terbinafine may be more effective against C. parapsilosis compared with C. albicans; furthermore with Candida species a higher dose of terbinafine or a longer duration of therapy may be required compared with the regimen for dermatophytes. The least amount of experience in treating onychomycosis is with fluconazole. Griseofulvin is not effective against Candida species or the nondermatophyte moulds. The main use of griseo-fulvin currently is to treat tinea capitis. Ketoconazole may be used by some to treat tinea versicolor with the dosage regimens being short and requiring the use of only a few doses. The preferred regimens for the 3 oral antimycotic agents are as follows: itraconazole - pulse therapy with the drug being administered for 1 week with 3 weeks off treatment between successive pulses; terbinafine - continuous once daily therapy; and fluconazole - once weekly treatment. The regimen for the treatment of dermatophyte onychomycosis is: itraconazole - 200mg twice daily for I week per month x 3 pulses; terbinafine - 250 mg/day for 12 weeks; or, fluconazole - 150 mg/wk until the abnormal-appearing nail plate has grown out, typically over a period of 9 to 18 months. For the 3 oral antifungal agents the more common adverse reactions pertain to the following systems, gastrointestinal (for example, nausea, gastrointestinal distress, diarrhoea, abdominal pain), cutaneous eruption, and CNS (for example, headache and malaise). Each of the new antifungal agents is more cost-effective than griseofulvin for the treatment of onychomycosis and is associated with high compliance, in part because of the shorter duration of therapy. The newer antifungal agents are generally well tolerated with drug interactions that are usually predictable.

Onychomycosis: a compendium of facts and a clinical experience

Fifty percent of all nail disturbances result from onychomycosis, with toenails being affected approximately four times as often as those of the fingernails. The overall incidence in the population is not known, but it is reported at about 2%-13% and is presently on the rise. This lengthy paper reviews all facets of onychomycosis. The present-day classification of onychomycosis is presented. Predisposing factors, causative organisms, as well as the differential diagnosis are included. A thorough comparison of the five presently available oral antifungal agents (griseofulvin, ketoconazole, itraconazole, terbinafine, and fluconazole) in an easy-to-read table is presented. A second table presents many studies performed by many researchers in various countries on these same drugs. The author has included her own personal clinical experience using both fluconazole and terbinafine in 22 and 51 patients with pedal onychomycosis, respectively. This is not meant to be a "controlled study," but rather the experience of one podiatrist in an office setting. The newer oral antifungal agents (itraconazole, terbinafine, and fluconazole) are highly recommended even for the most severe cases of onychomycosis.

In vitro activities of terbinafine against cutaneous isolates of Candida albicans and other pathogenic yeasts

Terbinafine is active in vitro against a wide range of pathogenic fungi, including dermatophytes, molds, dimorphic fungi, and some yeasts, but earlier studies indicated that the drug had little activity against Candida albicans. In contrast, clinical studies have shown topical and oral terbinafine to be active in cutaneous candidiasis and Candida nail infections. In order to define the anti-Candida activity of terbinafine, we tested the drug against 350 fresh clinical isolates and additional strains by using a broth dilution assay standardized according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) M27-A assay. Terbinafine was found to have an MIC of 1 microg/ml for reference C. albicans strains. For 259 clinical isolates, the MIC at which 50% of the isolates are inhibited (MIC50) of terbinafine was 1 microg/ml (fluconazole, 0.5 microg/ml), and the MIC90 was 4 microg/ml (fluconazole, 1 microg/ml). Terbinafine was highly active against Candida parapsilosis (MIC90, 0.125 microg/ml) and showed potentially interesting activity against isolates of Candida dubliniensis, Candida guilliermondii, Candida humicola, and Candida lusitaniae. It was not active against the Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, and Candida tropicalis isolates in this assay. Cryptococcus laurentii and Cryptococcus neoformans were highly susceptible to terbinafine, with MICs of 0.06 to 0.25 microg/ml. The NCCLS macrodilution assay provides reproducible in vitro data for terbinafine against Candida and other yeasts. The MICs for C. albicans and C. parapsilosis are compatible with the known clinical efficacy of terbinafine in cutaneous infections, while the clinical relevance of its activities against the other species has yet to be determined.

Terbinafine: an update

Oral terbinafine was first introduced in the United Kingdom in February 1991 and was approved for the treatment of onychomycosis in the United States in May 1996. It is estimated that 4 million patients worldwide have been treated with oral terbinafine as of December 1996. The efficacy of terbinafine in the treatment of onychomycosis and other dermatomycoses is reviewed. The adverse-effects profile of oral terbinafine is evaluated.