Laboratory tests and imaging studies in patients with cutaneous malignant melanomas: a survey of experienced physicians

Is surveillance imaging effective for detecting surgically treatable recurrences in patients with melanoma? A comparative analysis of stage-specific surveillance strategies

OBJECTIVE

To guide resource utilization, we aimed to determine the impact of routine surveillance imaging for the detection of melanoma recurrences amenable to surgical resection with curative intent.

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for melanoma surveillance are largely consensus based.

METHODS

Using single-institution, patient-level data (n = 1600), transition probabilities were calculated for a Markov model simulating the natural history of patients with stage I-III melanoma. As a base estimate, imaging was assumed to detect regional and distant recurrences of which 80% and 20% could be surgically treated with curative intent, respectively. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for all point estimates. For each disease stage, we calculated the number of surgically treatable regional or distant recurrence detected during 5 years per 10,000 patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans at 6- or 12-month intervals. The associated positive and negative predictive values and life expectancy were also calculated and compared with clinical examination alone.

RESULTS

At 5-year follow-up, CT or PET/CT at 6-month intervals detected surgically treatable regional or distant recurrence in 6.4% of patients with stage I, 18.5% of stage II, and 33.1% of stage III disease; 12-month intervals decreased the rates to 3.0%, 7.9%, and 13.0%, respectively. The high false-positive rates of CT (20%) and PET/CT (9%) resulted in overall low positive predictive values. However, both CT and PET/CT effectively predicted absence of disease. Life-expectancy gains were minimal (≤ 2 months) for all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of routine surveillance imaging for detecting treatable melanoma recurrences is limited. Even in patients with stage III disease, only minimal gains in life expectancy were achieved.

Melanoma metastases in the abdomen and pelvis: Frequency and patterns of spread

AIM: To investigate the frequency, typical and atypical locations and patterns of melanoma metastases identifiable by computed tomography (CT) in the abdomen and pelvis.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of index CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis in patients with melanoma and recorded all findings suggestive of metastatic disease.

RESULTS: Metastases were present on 36% (181/508) of the index examinations and most commonly involved the liver (47%) and pelvic lymph nodes (27%). Lower extremity primaries had the highest rate of metastasis (52%). Ocular and head and neck melanomas have a predilection to metastasize to the liver (hepatic involvement in 70% and 63%, respectively, of patients with metastatic disease) and metastases from lower extremity primaries most commonly involve pelvic lymph nodes (54% of patients with metastatic disease). Metastases to atypical locations were present in 14% of patients and most commonly occurred in the subcutaneous tissue and spleen. Primary tumors of the lower extremity, back and head and neck were most commonly associated with atypical metastases. Pelvic metastases are more common with lower extremity primaries (accounting for 70% of cases with pelvic metastases) but 5% of patients with supraumbilical primaries also had pelvic metastases.

CONCLUSION: The distribution of metastatic melanoma in the abdomen and pelvis that we have defined should help guide the interpretation of CT exams in these patients.

Costs of the detection of metastases and follow-up examinations in cutaneous melanoma

At present, no universally accepted recommendations exist for cutaneous melanoma follow-up. Various surveillance strategies, some associated with significant cost, others of uncertain value, are routinely used. This study aimed to evaluate of the costs incurred for varied surveillance strategies practiced in Europe and the USA. One thousand nine hundred and sixty-nine cutaneous melanoma patients with stage I-III disease attending the Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen for follow-up between 1996 and 1998 participated in the study. Routine surveillance consisted of cutaneous examination, lymph node and abdomen sonography, chest radiograph (CR) and blood tests. The costs incurred were based upon the 2004 German official scale for medical reimbursement and the 2004 Medicare fee reimbursement schedule (USA). The total charges were based on the number of recurrences detected per stage. Recurrences were detected in 1.5% of patients with stage I, 18.0% in stage II, and 68.6% in stage III. Physical examination was the most effective method, detecting 50.0% of recurrences. Lymph node sonography was effective in stage II-III, detecting 13.2% of recurrences; CR and abdominal sonography, detecting 4.5 and 3.4% of recurrences, were deemed beneficial in stage III. Blood tests detected 1.4% of recurrences and were deemed to be ineffective. Computed tomography scans were valuable in clarifying ambiguous findings and helping to detect 22.5% of recurrences (1.9% in stage I, 1.9% in stage II, and 18.6% in stage III). A risk-adapted surveillance strategy for stage I-II including thorough history, physical examination and lymph node sonography but omitting CR, blood work and abdomen sonography, seems appropriate and cost effective.

The Conundrum of Follow-Up: Should it be Abandoned?

This article critically evaluates the practice of follow-up for patients who have undergone treatment for a primary melanoma without evidence of metastases. One conclusion from this analysis is that the benefits of routine imaging and blood testing are insufficient to warrant a place in routine follow-up. Few patients who have metastases are identified in this fashion and even fewer survive because they underwent these tests. Far more often, false-positive results occur, which invariably cause unnecessary concern, lead to additional unnecessary testing, and may even result in needless surgery. Based on the evidence available, the relevance of follow-up per se must even be challenged. No convincing evidence exists that regional control, survival, and quality of life improve through surveillance. Other reasons for surveillance may be present, but these are less imperative. The present findings challenge current practice.

Cutaneous melanoma: baseline and ongoing laboratory evaluation

Numerous laboratory tests and imaging methods are available that can be used in patients who are diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma. The downside risks related to testing are cost and patient anxiety. Therefore, it must be critically considered which examinations are useful and feasible. After a diagnosis of primary cutaneous melanoma, many physicians in Germany perform lymph node ultrasound to detect occult regional metastasis. Whole-body imaging techniques, except the physical examination, are unlikely to detect distant occult metastasis. In tumors that have an intermediate or high risk of recurrence (> 1 mm tumor thickness), baseline whole-body imaging may serve as a reference for ongoing evaluation. During follow-up care, physical examination alone is appropriate when there is a low risk for recurrence (up to 1-mm tumor thickness). In patients whose tumors are > 1 mm thickness, regular lymph node ultrasound examinations and determination of serum tumor marker S-100beta protein are commonly used by physicians in Germany. Whole-body imaging techniques are useful in patients who have locoregional and/or distant metastasis. For consideration of surgical resections in stage IV disease, more advanced examinations techniques such as positron emission tomography-computed tomography or whole body magnetic resonance imaging may be used. Early detection of limited disease using these methods may be helpful for patients who have locoregional metastases and for 10-20% of patients who have distant metastases and whose limited disease may be amenable to surgical resection.

Follow-up in patients with localised primary cutaneous melanoma

Follow-up services for patients with localised cutaneous melanoma are widely discussed but there is no international consensus. Our aim was to discuss frequency and duration of follow-up, type of health professional involved, optimum intensity of routine investigation, and patients' satisfaction with follow-up. Searches of the published work were directed at publications between January, 1985, and February, 2004 on recurrences, subsequent primary melanoma, routine tests, and patients' satisfaction. In a selection of 72 articles, 2142 (6.6%) recurrences were reported, 62% of which were detected by the patients themselves. 2.6% of patients developed a subsequent primary melanoma. Most investigators do not support high-intensity routine follow-up investigations. Of the various follow-up investigations requested by physicians, only medical history and physical examination seem to be cost effective. Lymph-node sonography seems to be a promising method for detection, although survival benefit remains to be proven. Patients were found to be anxious about follow-up visits, although other research showed that provision of information to patients was much appreciated. Published work on the follow-up of patients with cutaneous melanoma has mainly been retrospective and descriptive. Recommendations can be given with only a low grade of evidence. For meaningful guidelines to be developed, prospective, high-quality methodological research is needed.

Evaluation of staging chest radiographs and serum lactate dehydrogenase for localized melanoma

BACKGROUND

Radiographic and laboratory evaluations are often routinely used in the initial work-up for melanoma.

PURPOSE

To examine the yield of a chest radiograph and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), in the work-up for newly diagnosed localized melanoma.

METHODS

Patients with a new diagnosis of localized invasive melanoma were entered into a prospective database. The status of the chest radiograph, LDH, and sentinel lymph node (SLN) was assessed.

RESULTS

Two-hundred-twenty-four patients were entered into the study and 210 had chest radiograph data for analysis. The true positive chest radiograph rate, defined as the percent of chest radiographs interpreted as "positive or equivocal possibly melanoma related" with subsequent confirmed melanoma metastases, was 0%. The false positive chest radiograph rate, defined as the percent of chest radiographs interpreted as "positive or equivocal possibly melanoma related" with melanoma metastases excluded based on previous or subsequent studies or other known medical conditions, was 7%. Ninety-six patients (melanoma> or =1 mm) had LDH results for analysis. Elevations in LDH were found in 15% and did not lead to detection of occult disease in any patients. Seventy-seven patients underwent SLN biopsy. A positive SLN did not correlate with abnormal chest radiograph or LDH.

CONCLUSION

Low yield, high rate of false-positive tests and lack of significant impact of early detection of metastases on survival argue that chest radiographs and serum lactate dehydrogenase should probably not be accepted into routine clinical practice in patients with clinically localized melanoma in the absence of data supporting their use.

Prognostic signs in melanoma: state of the art

Prognoses for melanoma patients are currently based on statistically confirmed parameters, above all the Breslow thickness and number of lymph node and/or distant metastases. However, metastases can develop even with "thin" melanomas (< 0.7 mm), while survival has been recorded in patients with tumours classified as "thick" (> 4 mm). This review of the literature examines the most recent advances in prognostic markers for melanoma (serological, immunohistochemical, histological, genetic and surgical). These markers offer interesting possibilities in terms of diagnostic certainty, identification of early growth phases and estimation of the tumour's potential for progression and metastasis. It is reasonable to assume that their combined use can provide useful information for formulating prognoses that are not only statistically valid but also individualized.

Geographic variation in posttreatment surveillance intensity for patients with cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

We investigated whether geographic determinants could account for variation in posttreatment melanoma surveillance intensity among plastic surgeons.

METHODS

A custom-designed questionnaire was mailed to U.S. and non-U.S. members of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ASPRS). Subjects were asked how they use 14 specific follow-up modalities during years 1 to 5 and 10 following primary treatment for patients with cutaneous melanoma. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare practice patterns by TNM stage, year postsurgery, U.S. census region, metropolitan statistical area (MSA), and managed care organization (MCO) penetration rate.

RESULTS

Of the 1,142 respondents, 395 were evaluable. Those who did not perform melanoma surgery or follow-up were excluded. Correlation analysis showed that mean follow-up intensity for the modalities surveyed was highly correlated across TNM stages and years postsurgery. Within MSAs, only chest radiograph utilization varied significantly. The pattern of testing varied significantly by geographic region for seven modalities (office visit, computed tomography scan of the brain and chest/abdomen, alpha-fetoprotein level, 5S-cysteinyl dopa level, abdominal ultrasonogram, bone scan); in each of these, utilization by non-U.S. surgeons exceeded utilization in any U.S. census region. The pattern of testing varied significantly by MCO penetration rate for chest radiograph (greater utilization in the lowest MCO penetration rate areas) and 5S-cysteinyl dopa level (greater utilization in the highest MCO penetration rate areas).

CONCLUSIONS

The intensity of posttreatment surveillance recommended by ASPRS members caring for patients with cutaneous melanoma varies markedly. This analysis provides the first evidence that geographic factors significantly affect the surveillance strategies of clinicians following patients with cutaneous melanoma. Variation by census region was most prominent, although the size of detected differences was small.

Prospective evaluation of a follow-up schedule in cutaneous melanoma patients: recommendations for an effective follow-up strategy

PURPOSE

To prospectively examine and evaluate the results of follow-up procedures in a large cohort of cutaneous melanoma patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study in 2,008 consecutive patients with stage I to IV cutaneous melanoma from 1996 to 1998 on the yield of stage-appropriate follow-up examinations according to the German guidelines. Documentation of patient and follow-up data comprised patient demography, primary tumor specifics, and any clinical and technical examinations performed. The detection of metastasis was classified as early or late, and the means of their detection and the resulting overall survival probabilities were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 3,800 clinical examinations and 12,398 imaging techniques were documented. Sixty-two second primary melanomas in 46 patients and 233 disease recurrences in 112 patients were detected during this time. In stage I to III disease, physical examination was responsible for the discovery of 50% of all recurrences. In the primary tumor stages, 21% of all recurrences were discovered by lymph node sonography, with the majority being classified as early detection. Forty-eight percent of the recurrences were classified as early detection, and these patients had a significant benefit of overall survival probability.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that an elaborated follow-up schedule in cutaneous melanoma is suitable for the early detection of second primary melanomas and early recurrences. The intensity of clinical and technical examinations can be reduced during follow-up of patients in the primary tumor stages and may be intensified in locoregional disease. Recommendations for an effective follow-up strategy are outlined.

A rational approach to the follow-up of melanoma patients

There are no generally accepted guidelines for the follow-up of cutaneous melanoma (CM), and there is an ongoing debate about the value of follow-up examinations. Some authors doubt whether early detection has any beneficial effect on patient survival and suggest that it may only prolong the patient's period of suffering from the knowledge of having metastasis. A systematic review of the literature on early detection and resection of CM metastasis shows the following picture: (1) In in-transit metastasis and in regional node metastasis, the tumour volume of the metastatic nodules at the time of diagnosis is prognostically significant. Either the number of nodes involved in regional metastasis or the diameter of the largest node showed prognostic impact in different studies. Therefore, early detection seems to affect the cure rate in this stage of disease. (2) In distant metastasis, surgical resection of all recognisable metastases prolongs survival. This is true as long as only one organ system is involved and particularly if complete resection of all metastases can be achieved. Therefore, early detection contributes to prolongation of survival. We performed a follow-up study in 2008 prospectively documented consecutive patients with stage I-III cutaneous melanoma who presented for follow-up examination at the Department of Dermatology of the University of Tübingen from August 1996 to August 1998. Stage-appropriate follow-up examinations were carried out according to the German Society of Dermatology guidelines. A total of 3,800 clinical examinations and 12,398 imaging techniques were documented: 62 second primary melanomas were detected in 46 patients and 233 disease recurrences in 112 patients during this time. Physical examination was responsible for the discovery of 50% of all recurrences, with the patient initially detecting the metastasis on self-examination in 17% of these cases. Technical examinations were responsible for the detection of the remaining 50%. In the primary tumour stages, 21% of all recurrences were discovered by lymph node sonography, the majority being classified as early detection. Among the recurrences, 48% were classified as early detection, and these patients had a significantly more favourable probability of recurrence-free survival than those with recurrences classified as late detection. The results of our study suggest that a follow-up schedule elaborated for cutaneous melanoma is suitable for the early detection of second primary melanomas and of early recurrences in approximately 5% of patients during a 2-year follow-up period.

Primary staging and follow-up in melanoma patients--monocenter evaluation of methods, costs and patient survival

In a German cohort of 661 melanoma patients the performance, costs and survival benefits of staging methods (history and physical examination; chest X-ray; ultrasonography of the abdomen; high resolution sonography of the peripheral lymph nodes) were assessed at initial staging and during follow-up of stage I/II+III disease. At initial staging, 74% (23 out of 31) of synchronous metastases were first detected by physical examination followed by sonography of the lymph nodes revealing 16% (5 out of 31). Other imaging methods were less efficient (Chest X-ray: one out of 31; sonography of abdomen: two out of 31). Nearly 24% of all 127 first recurrences and 18% of 73 second recurrences developed in patients not participating in the follow-up programme. In follow-up patients detection of first or second recurrence were attributed to history and physical examination on a routine visit in 47 and 52% recurrences, respectively, and to routine imaging procedures in 21 and 17% of cases, respectively. Lymph node sonography was the most successful technical staging procedure indicating 13% of first relapses, but comprised 24% of total costs of follow-up in stage I/II. Routine imaging comprised nearly 50% of total costs for follow-up in stage I/II and in stage III. The mode of detecting a relapse ('patient vs. doctor-diagnosed' or 'symptomatic vs asymptomatic') did not significantly influence patients overall survival. Taken together, imaging procedures for routine follow-up in stage I/II and stage III melanoma patients were inefficient and not cost-efficient.

Predictive value of serum S100B for monitoring patients with metastatic melanoma during chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy

In the immunohistology of malignant melanoma the use of polyclonal antibodies against protein S100 is well established. Recently, it was shown that S100B, a subunit of the S100 protein family, is detectable in the serum of melanoma patients and correlates with the stage of the disease in patients with metastatic melanoma. In the present study, the first evaluation of a large number of treatment observations (n = 77) in 64 different patients during chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy for advanced metastatic melanoma (stage IV) is presented. All patients received treatment according to standardized protocols comprising 8 weeks of treatment followed by routine staging procedures to evaluate therapeutic outcome. In 13 patients with tumour enlargement after first-line therapy, a second-line treatment was subsequently given. S100B immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) tests were performed before, during and after treatment at scheduled time points. In the interim analysis at 4 weeks 29 of 37 (78%) patients with tumour progression during treatment showed a raised S100B level. In the final analysis at 8 weeks, 31 of these 37 patients (84%) demonstrated rising S100B values (P < 0.001). Patients who responded to treatment (stable or regressing metastatic disease) showed constant or declining S100B levels in 38 of 40 patients (95%) at the interim analysis, at 8 weeks this was further increased to 39 of 40 patients (98%; P < 0.001). Thus, the use of S100B for monitoring treatment is adequate in the majority of cases. Our observations are of great interest for therapeutic trials of adjuvant and palliative therapies as the rise of S100B levels might indicate that re-staging and/or changes in therapy strategies should be chosen.

[Managing cutaneous melanoma]

Cutaneous melanoma represents the main cause of death among skin cancers. Early diagnosis gives, for the time being, the only possibility for high rate of curative treatment. Diagnosis is based on pathological findings, and at primary tumor stage. Breslow thickness of the lesion is the best prognostic index. At local stage of the disease, treatment is precisely codified by international recommendations and consensus conferences. Follow-up after surgical treatment is also well codified. Treatment of lymph node invasion or metastatic disease is, on the other hand, less codified. Despite recent advances, especially in immunotherapy, treatment of advanced stages of melanoma remains difficult.

Laboratory tests and imaging studies in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma

Laboratory tests and imaging studies are often ordered for asymptomatic patients with malignant melanomas (MMs) in an effort to detect subclinical metastatic disease. However, their sensitivity and specificity for detecting cryptic metastases are not well established. A review of the literature on laboratory tests and imaging studies for MM metastases was undertaken to address the usefulness of such investigations in asymptomatic patients with MM in AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer system of classification) stages I, II, and III. A review of the pertinent literature since 1966 was conducted through MEDLINE, Medica, and Cancerlit. Laboratory tests and imaging studies revealed occult MM metastases in only a small number of the thousands of reported patients with putative AJCC stage I, II, and III MM. However, for those diagnosed with limited metastases, surgical removal with or without immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy can lead to long-term remissions in some patients. For patients with asymptomatic AJCC stage I or II disease, chest roentgenograms (CXR) and blood lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels may be obtained at low cost and prove to be of benefit if metastases are identified. For patients with AJCC stage III disease, computed tomographic (CT) scans of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis (especially when the primary cutaneous site of the melanoma is below the waist) may be considered for detecting metastatic MM. Other tests, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain, may be ordered based on symptoms or physical findings. In the future, technologically improved techniques and newer methods may prove cost-effective for detecting treatable asymptomatic MM metastases. Furthermore, improvement in treatments will also influence the indications for the search for occult MM metastases. At this time there is a need for an international consensus conference on laboratory tests and imaging studies for occult melanoma metastases.

Classification and staging of melanoma

Although a standardized and uniformly accepted cancer staging system is an essential and fundamental requirement to enable meaningful comparisons across patient populations, the sometimes capricious biologic behavior of melanoma makes developing such a staging system particularly difficult. Since the earliest well-documented attempts at classifying patients with cutaneous melanoma were described more than 50 years ago, the identification of increasingly powerful prognostic factors has led to sequential modifications of the cutaneous melanoma staging system. The current AJCC staging system is based on relatively well-established prognostic factors; however, several recent reports have identified additional prognostic factors not included in the current system, and other studies support the re-evaluation of some of the currently employed staging criteria. Some of the more controversial areas include the relevance of level of invasion versus tumor thickness, optimal cutoffs for tumor thickness, importance of ulceration, the grouping of satellites with in-transit metastases, the inclusion of microsatellites and local recurrences as a separate staging criterion, the replacement of size of nodal mass with number of positive nodes, the importance of nodal metastases in more than one nodal basin, and the prognostic significance of distant metastases. Therefore, future modifications of the staging system are anticipated to better incorporate these observations. Stage-specific staging recommendations for the patient with melanoma provide the clinician with a framework to most efficiently assess extent of disease in an era of cost-conscious clinical practice. In the asymptomatic patient with primary melanoma (stage I or II), we recommend a chest roentgenogram and evaluation of alkaline phosphatase and LDH levels; extensive radiologic evaluations are not indicated, because the rate of detection in this population is extremely low. Additional staging information should also be obtained by the technique of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy. For patients with local-regional disease (stage III, satellites, and local recurrence), a selective approach to imaging studies is warranted. For this patient population, we recommend complete blood count, liver function tests including alkaline phosphatase and LDH, a chest roentgenogram, and a CT scan of the abdomen. Although the yield of these tests, particularly CT of the abdomen, in detecting distant metastases in asymptomatic patients is low, they may identify false-positive abnormalities and provide an important baseline for future studies in this high-risk population. For patients with disease below the waist or in the head and neck region, we recommend CT of the pelvis and CT of the neck, respectively. Additional studies should be done only if clinically indicated. Finally, patients with known systemic disease (stage IV) should be more comprehensively evaluated, because the likelihood of detecting asymptomatic metastases is higher. Accordingly, in addition to the work-up outlined previously for stage III patients, we also perform a CT scan of the chest and MR imaging of the brain; other studies (e.g., bone scan, gastrointestinal series) are performed on the basis of symptoms.

An estimate of the annual direct cost of treating cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Although the survival benefits of early stage melanoma have been clearly documented, the potential economic impact of early versus late stage disease has not been assessed.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to estimate the annual direct cost of diagnosing and treating melanoma, based on the number of projected cases of melanoma entering each stage in 1997.

METHODS

A model was constructed with assumptions derived from the literature and clinical experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital Melanoma Center and the Boston University Medical Center. Cost estimates were based on 1997 Boston area Medicare reimbursements.

RESULTS

The annual direct cost of treating newly diagnosed melanoma in 1997 was estimated to be $563 million. Stage I and II disease each comprised about 5% of the total cost; stage III and stage IV disease consumed 34% and 55% of the total cost, respectively. About 90% of the total annual direct cost of treating melanoma in 1997 was attributable to less than 20% of patients (those patients with advanced disease, that is, stage III and stage IV).

CONCLUSION

In addition to the potential survival advantages, aggressive primary prevention through sun protection and intensive screening to enhance earlier detection should reduce the economic burden of melanoma care.