Pharmacokinetics of doxepin in subjects with pruritic atopic dermatitis

Overcoming drug delivery barriers and challenges in topical therapy of atopic dermatitis: A nanotechnological perspective

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory disorder centered around loss of epidermal barrier function, and T helper 2 (Th2) immune responses. The current understanding of disease heterogeneity and complexity, limits the rational use of existing topical, systemic therapeutic agents, but paves way for development of advanced therapeutic agents. Additionally, advanced nanocarriers that deliver therapeutics to target cells, seem to offer a promising strategy, to overcome intrinsic limitations and challenges of conventional, and traditional drug delivery systems. Ever-evolving understanding of molecular target sites and complex pathophysiology, adverse effects of current therapeutic options, inefficient disease recapitulation by existing animal models are some of the challenges that we face. Also, despite limited success in market translatibility, nanocarriers have demonstrated excellent preclinical results and have been extensively studied for AD. Detailed research on behavior of nanocarriers in different patients and tailored therapy to account for phenotypic variability of the disease are the new research avenues that we look forward to.

Antidepressants as antipruritic agents: A review

Pruritus is a concomitant symptom of various underlying disorders viz. dermatological, systemic and psychiatric disorders that provoke the person to scratch the skin. Many natural as well as, antipruritic therapies are usually practiced in the treatment of pruritus including general preventive measures, topical therapies such as cooling agents, antihistamines, anesthetics, capsaicin, corticosteroids, immunomodulators and; systemic therapies including administration of antihistamines, opioid antagonists/agonists, antiepileptic drugs/neuroleptics (e.g., gabapentin and pregabalin), antidepressants (e.g., doxepin, amitriptyline, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, escitalopram and mirtazapine) (Patel and Yosipovitch, 2010; Reich et al., 2011; Martín and Padilla, 2015; Eskeland et al., 2016). Topical therapies are the mainstay of treatment of delicate and localized pruritus while other systemic drug therapies are used to treat stern and generalized pruritus. The reported antipruritic activity of some antidepressant drugs has intrigued this review to focus on the types of pruritus, pruritus mechanism, the antipruritic mechanism of antidepressants and to comprehend the role of antidepressants in the management of pruritus.

Development of a mucoadhesive delivery system for control release of doxepin with application in vaginal pain relief associated with gynecological surgery

The main purpose of this study was to develop a semisolid mucoadhesive formulation for the non-invasive vaginal administration of doxepin (DOX) for relief of pain derived from the scarring process after surgery. An orafix^® platform loading DOX was tested for adequate stability, rheology and vaginal mucoadhesion capacity. The formulation exhibited appropriate pH and was microbiologically stable. The rheological studies confirmed its pseudoplastic and thixotropic nature with prevalence of the elastic behavior component over the viscous one. Appropriate syringeability and spreadability results were also confirmed. Different experiments showed adequate mucoadhesion capacity even in the presence of simulated vaginal fluid. Finally, DOX release, permeation and retention in vaginal mucosa studies were also accomplished with promising results. DOX release kinetics followed the modified Higuchi model and the permeation studies did not render such high values as to suggest potential systemic absorption which could lead to undesirable systemic side effects. Therefore, we can hypostatize that the proposed formulation may assist to fill in the therapeutic gap regarding pure pain relief at local level in vagina.

Scoping systematic review of treatments for eczema

Background

Eczema is a very common chronic inflammatory skin condition.

Objectives

To update the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) systematic review of treatments for atopic eczema, published in 2000, and to inform health-care professionals, commissioners and patients about key treatment developments and research gaps.

Data sources

Electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched from the end of 2000 to 31 August 2013. Retrieved articles were used to identify further randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Review methods

Studies were filtered according to inclusion criteria and agreed by consensus in cases of uncertainty. Abstracts were excluded and non-English-language papers were screened by international colleagues and data were extracted. Only RCTs of treatments for eczema were included, as other forms of evidence are associated with higher risks of bias. Inclusion criteria for studies included availability of data relevant to the therapeutic management of eczema; mention of randomisation; comparison of two or more treatments; and prospective data collection. Participants of all ages were included. Eczema diagnosis was determined by a clinician or according to published diagnostic criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool. We used a standardised approach to summarising the data and the assessment of risk of bias and we made a clear distinction between what the studies found and our own interpretation of study findings.

Results

Of 7198 references screened, 287 new trials were identified spanning 92 treatments. Trial reporting was generally poor (randomisation method: 2% high, 36% low, 62% unclear risk of bias; allocation concealment: 3% high, 15% low, 82% unclear risk of bias; blinding of the intervention: 15% high, 28% low, 57% unclear risk of bias). Only 22 (8%) trials were considered to be at low risk of bias for all three criteria. There was reasonable evidence of benefit for the topical medications tacrolimus, pimecrolimus and various corticosteroids (with tacrolimus superior to pimecrolimus and corticosteroids) for both treatment and flare prevention; oral ciclosporin; oral azathioprine; narrow band ultraviolet B (UVB) light; Atopiclair™ and education. There was reasonable evidence to suggest no clinically useful benefit for twice-daily compared with once-daily topical corticosteroids; corticosteroids containing antibiotics for non-infected eczema; probiotics; evening primrose and borage oil; ion-exchange water softeners; protease inhibitor SRD441 (Serentis Ltd); furfuryl palmitate in emollient; cipamfylline cream; andMycobacterium vaccaevaccine. Additional research evidence is needed for emollients, bath additives, antibacterials, specialist clothing and complementary and alternative therapies. There was no RCT evidence for topical corticosteroid dilution, impregnated bandages, soap avoidance, bathing frequency or allergy testing.

Limitations

The large scope of the review coupled with the heterogeneity of outcomes precluded formal meta-analyses. Our conclusions are still limited by a profusion of small, poorly reported studies.

Conclusions

Although the evidence base of RCTs has increased considerably since the last NIHR HTA systematic review, the field is still severely hampered by poor design and reporting problems including failure to register trials and declare primary outcomes, small sample size, short follow-up duration and poor reporting of risk of bias. Key areas for further research identified by the review include the optimum use of emollients, bathing frequency, wash products, allergy testing and antiseptic treatments. Perhaps the greatest benefit identified is the use of twice weekly anti-inflammatory treatment to maintain disease remission. More studies need to be conducted in a primary care setting where most people with eczema are seen in the UK. Future studies need to use the same core set of outcomes that capture patient symptoms, clinical signs, quality of life and the chronic nature of the disease.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.

Chemical genetic screening identifies tricyclic compounds that decrease cellular melanin content

A screen of a library of 2,000 drugs and natural products in murine melanocytes identified 10 tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) as compounds that potently decreased intracellular melanin content. The rank order of potency of these compounds for decreasing melanin content was different than their relative potencies as antidepressants. These compounds had no effect on either the level or the enzymatic activity of cellular tyrosinase (Tyr). Increased presence of both Tyr and melanin in the culture media was observed in treated melanocytes. Immunofluorescence localization revealed that these compounds decreased intracellular melanin content by disrupting the intracellular trafficking of Tyr gene family proteins. In treated melanocytes, Tyr, Tyr-related protein 1, and dopachrome tautomerase accumulated in enlarged granules distributed throughout the cytoplasm. Colocalization of Tyr with lysosome-associated membrane protein 1 was observed within many of these granules. Partial colocalization of Tyr with the Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 1 gene product observed in control melanocytes was abolished by TCA treatment. Our results show that these compounds decreased intracellular melanin content by altering the trafficking of Tyr gene family proteins and inducing abnormal secretion of Tyr. Results from our screening have implications for the design of products for skin lightening and treatment of hyperpigmentation.

A systematic review of the safety of topical therapies for atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

The safety of topical therapies for atopic dermatitis (AD), a common and morbid disease, has recently been the focus of increased scrutiny, adding confusion as how best to manage these patients.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of these systematic reviews was to determine the safety of topical therapies for AD.

METHODS

Databases searched included: OVID Medline, Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. In addition to the articles identified by this search, investigators were also referred to a list of links (most recently updated 25 September 2005) to recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) studies, reports and meetings regarding the topical calcineurin inhibitors for further potential references. Only fully published papers available in English and data obtained from FDA sites were included. Furthermore, the criteria for inclusion and exclusion for each systematic review were further evaluated at a meeting of all of the content and evidence-based medicine experts participating in this process and alteration of the inclusion criteria was done at that time when it was felt necessary to avoid inclusion of lower-quality data in the review. Qualitative review of the abstracted data was performed and reviewed at a meeting of all of the content and evidence-based medicine experts.

RESULTS

While systemic exposure to these topical agents does occur, physiological changes appear to be uncommon and systemic complications rare and have only been found with use of topical corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the data that are available the overall safety of AD therapies appears to be good with the only documented systemic side-effects of therapy those occasionally seen with use of topical corticosteroids.

Steroids versus other immune modulators in the management of allergic dermatoses

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The classic role of topical and systemic corticosteroids for allergic dermatoses is discussed, with special attention to the impact on the current clinical treatment paradigm by newer systemic and topical therapies. These products are reviewed and recommendations presented on how to effectively assimilate them into clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current knowledge about the etiopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis has resulted in drug development focused on agents with less toxicity than current topical and systemic corticosteroids. Some agents with ceramide/cholesterol/acid combinations demonstrate efficacy in restoring the dysfunctional skin barrier of atopic patients. Concerns resulting from the recent Federal Drug Administration announcement regarding a theoretical risk of cancer associated with topical calcineurin inhibitors are also addressed. Novel therapeutic entities are presented.

SUMMARY

Patients seeking relief from atopic dermatitis have historically had few really effective and safe therapeutic options. Topical calcineurin inhibitors represent an exciting new therapy for atopic dermatitis without the side-effect profile associated with topical corticosteroids. Nonsteroidal formulations incorporating glycyrrhetinic acid/telmesteine/Vitis vinifera extract and palmitoylethanolamide as 'active' ingredients recently entered the market, stressing antipruritic, antiinflammatory, and skin barrier repair. This confabulates against previously designed topical therapy paradigms. These new products may be used as monotherapy or alternatives to steroid agents.

Measuring atopic dermatitis severity in randomized controlled clinical trials: what exactly are we measuring?

Well-designed clinical trials are a fundamental aspect of evidence-based medicine. Such trials are dependent on the use of valid, reliable, and relevant outcome measures. Wide variation in outcome methodology can have important detrimental effects on the correct interpretation and comparison of results. The objective of this study was to describe the variation in outcome methodology in randomized controlled trials of therapeutic interventions for atopic dermatitis published between January 1994 and December 2001. Of the 93 eligible randomized controlled trials identified using a systematic electronic database search strategy, 85 (91%) incorporated an objective measurement of clinical signs. Only 23 (27%) of these trials used a published severity scale, however. The remainder used either modified versions of published scales (14%) or unnamed scales with no data on validity or reliability (59%), although unpublished scales were used significantly less frequently over the last 2 y compared to previously (21%vs 74%, p<0.01). There was lack of consensus on which clinical features best reflect disease severity, with 31 different descriptions of clinical signs being used across all scoring systems. Fifty-six different "objective" clinical scales were identified. Patient symptoms were recorded in 80 trials (86%) and disease extent in 62 trials (67%). Quality of life was measured in only three trials (3%). This wide variation in outcome methodology is hindering evidence-based practice, and the widespread use of unvalidated outcome measures is a potential source of bias and inaccuracy. More emphasis should be placed on measuring things that are important to patients such as symptoms and quality of life.

Pharmacology of antidepressants

Presently in the United States, 21 compounds have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as antidepressants. Two additional drugs marketed outside the United States as antidepressants have been approved for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nearly one half of all these compounds became available within the past 12 years, whereas the first antidepressant was available more than 40 years ago. After the clinical aspects of depression are introduced in this article, the pharmacology of the newer generation drugs is reviewed in relationship to the older compounds. The information in this review will help clinicians treat acute depression with pharmacological agents.

Optimal management of atopic dermatitis

Optimal treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis requires the knowledge of its pathogenetic factors and the often time-consuming attention to the course of the disease in each individual patient. In the therapeutic attempt, altered skin barrier function, possible provocation factors and psychological matters have to be taken into account. Basic therapy should comprise optimal skin care and the strict avoidance of triggering factors if possible. During periods of acute exacerbation, topical glucocorticosteroids in combination with classic antihistamines with sedative effects are still the drugs of first choice and will result in the rapid relief of symptoms in most patients. UVA1 phototherapy has proven to be a glucocorticoid-equivalent alternative therapy for exacerbated atopic dermatitis. If superinfection with Staphylococcus aureus is evident, topical antiseptics are useful in treating localized lesions, while a general superinfected eczema should be treated with systemic staphylococcal-effective antibacterials. Cyclosporin or extracorporeal photochemotherapy are reserved for patients with very severe atopic dermatitis that is unresponsive to conventional treatment protocols. Promising future therapeutic approaches consist of an improvement in the antipruritic treatment options, the topical application of immunomodifying treatment modalities or phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and possibly Chinese herbal therapies and psychological intervention strategies.