Linear IgA bullous dermatosis in a patient with chronic renal failure: response to intravenous immunoglobulin therapy

Pemphigoid diseases in patients with end-stage kidney diseases: pathogenesis and treatment

Background

Pemphigoid diseases constitute a group of autoimmune blistering disorders characterized by subepithelial blistering. The association between pemphigoid diseases and both end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and its treatment is notable. However, there is limited evidence about the management of pemphigoid diseases in patients with ESKD. This systematic review compiled case reports and relevant studies, summarized the underlying mechanisms of pemphigoid diseases in patients with ESKD, and summarized the efficacy of various therapies.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was performed for articles published between 1982 to June 2, 2024.

Results

Fifty-three case reports and eight relevant studies were included. Triggers for pemphigoids in patients with ESKD included materials used to treat ESKD, immune dysregulation of patients with ESKD, and rejection of renal allograft. Treatment for these patients included removing triggers, as well as administering of corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tetracyclines, rituximab, methotrexate, dapsone, azathioprine, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobin (IVIG), plasmapheresis, and Janus kinase inhibitors.

Conclusion

Removing triggers is the most effective strategy. Despite their suboptimal efficacy, corticosteroids remain the most commonly used agents in this patient population. MMF, tetracyclines, and rituximab are less used but with benefits. There are significant adverse effects associated with methotrexate treatment. Other treatment may also be beneficial and require further investigation. These findings may enable clinicians to optimize the therapeutic approach for these patients.

Management Options for Linear Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Bullous Dermatosis: A Literature Review

Linear immunoglobulin A (IgA) bullous dermatosis (LABD) is an autoimmune condition with various triggers. Because of the lack of randomized controlled trials on LABD treatment, management options are mostly anecdotal. This paper provides a comprehensive review of treatment options from a literature review of reported treatments to arm clinicians with a guideline for the management of LABD in both pediatric and adult patients as well as those recalcitrant to first-line therapy (dapsone and steroids). We additionally illustrate an algorithm to use for the management of LABD to aid clinicians when faced with unique patient circumstances.

Bullous Dermatosis in an End-Stage Renal Disease Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease including ESRD patients may present with a wide spectrum of cutaneous abnormalities, ranging from xerosis to hyperpigmentation to severe deforming necrotizing lesions. Skin problems are not uncommon in this population of patients, with a clinical presentation that can be quite bizarre, mandating a long list of differential diagnostic possibilities, and subsequent rise of a puzzling diagnostic challenge. We describe an ESRD patient who presented with blistering, nonhealing ulcerative lesions with a diagnostic skin biopsy revealing a mixed pattern of linear IgA bullous dermatosis and dermatitis herpetiformis. A clinical remission could be achieved with pulse intravenous steroids followed by oral maintenance in combination with dapsone, with no evidence of recurrence.

Intravenous Immunoglobulins: Mode of Action and Indications in Autoimmune and Inflammatory Dermatoses

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), a mixture of variable amounts of proteins (albumin, IgG, IgM, IgA, and IgE antibodies), as well as salt, sugar, solvents, and detergents, are successfully used to treat a variety of dermatological disorders. For decades, IVIGs have been administered for treatment of infectious diseases and immune deficiencies, since they contain natural antibodies that represent a first-line defense against pathogens. Today their indication has expanded, including the off-label therapy for a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. In dermatology, IVIGs are administered for treatment of different disorders at different therapeutic regimens, mostly with higher doses then those administered for treatment of infectious diseases. The aim of this prospective review is to highlight the indications, effectiveness, side effects, and perspectives of the systemic treatment with IVIGs for patients with severe, life-threatening, and resistant to conventional therapies autoimmune or inflammatory dermatoses.

Treatment of chronic bullous disease of childhood

Chronic bullous disease of childhood (CBDC) is generally a self-limited disease of prepubescent children that resolves within months to years. However, as discussed in the previous issue of Dermatologic Clinics, the disease is associated with significant morbidity and usually requires systemic therapy. Treatment is aimed at controlling blistering while avoiding adverse reactions. There are several anecdotal reports of treatment options, but controlled or comparative studies are lacking. This article discusses the management options of CBDC in more detail.

Treatment of subepidermal immunobullous diseases

The subepidermal immunobullous diseases are a group of autoimmune blistering disorders of the skin and mucous membranes that share the common features of autoantibody deposition and blister formation at the dermal-epidermal junction or basement membrane. This group includes bullous pemphigoid, linear IgA disease, dermatitis herpetiformis, and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, among others. Although these disorders share some common features, each disease is unique in its clinical presentation, histopathology, and immunofluorescence patterns, which allows for accurate diagnosis and disease-specific treatment strategy. Treatment of these disorders is complex and requires expert knowledge of disease pathogenesis. We review common treatment approaches for each of these disorders.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of autoimmune bullous dermatoses: an update

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is being increasingly utilized as an off-label therapy for a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory conditions across various specialties. Numerous reports have shown that it is an effective treatment for autoimmune skin blistering disorders. Unlike most therapies for blistering disorders, IVIg is not immunosuppressive and has a favorable side effect profile. This has allowed its use to expand dramatically over the last decade. However, due to the rarity and severity of autoimmune skin blistering diseases, well-designed prospective trials are generally lacking. This work highlights major research developments and the best evidence to date regarding the treatment of autoimmune pemphigus, bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, pemphigoid gestationis, and linear IgA dermatosis with IVIg, providing an update on its efficacy, proposed mechanisms of action, side effect profile, and indications for use.

Cutaneous manifestations of chronic kidney disease

Among the most common systemic diseases associated with cutaneous manifestations is kidney failure. Most of these occur in the setting of chronic kidney disease. In the following review, we will target 6 of these conditions in details. The entities are as follows: pruritus acquired perforating dermatoses, nail disorders, bullous disorders, calciphylaxis, and nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy.

The use of i.v. IG therapy in dermatology

The intravenous administration of exogenous pooled human immunoglobulin (i.v. IG) was originally licensed as antibody replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiencies and there are currently six FDA-approved uses for this agent. Despite a current lack of FDA approval, off-label treatment of a multitude of dermatologic disorders with i.v. IG has shown exciting potential for this unique treatment modality. The diseases successfully treated with i.v. IG include autoimmune bullous diseases, connective tissue diseases, vasculitides, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and infectious disorders (such as streptococcal toxic shock syndrome). Currently the biggest drawback in the consideration of i.v. IG therapy in dermatologic disorders is the lack of randomized controlled trials. Nevertheless, there is a significant body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of i.v. IG in patients with dermatologic disorders that are resistant to treatment with standard agents. In summary, i.v. IG constitutes a valuable and potentially life-saving agent in managing patients with a variety of dermatologic disorders under the appropriate circumstances.

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulins for the treatment of autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases: evaluation of its use in 19 cases

BACKGROUND

The mainstay of therapy of autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases has been prolonged high-dose systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. Recently, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been employed in selected cases, with excellent results in most of them.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the outcome of the use of IVIg in patients with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases refractory to conventional therapy or with contraindications for it.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical response to monthly cycles of IVIg in 19 patients affected with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases: 10 patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV), 2 with pemphigus foliaceus (PF), 4 with mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), 2 with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and one with linear IgA bullous dermatosis.

RESULTS

Four (21%) of 19 cases presented a complete response (2 PV, 1 MMP and 1 epidermolysis bullosa acquisita). Five (26%) patients did not respond to the treatment (3 PV, 1 PF, 1 MMP). Ten patients (53%) had a partial response.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective noncontrolled study with a heterogeneous group of patients.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of IVIg was inferior to that previously reported. This difference could be attributed to the preparations employed, the different severity of the disease, or individual responses in each patient dependent on Fc receptor gamma polymorphisms.

Off-label uses of biologics in dermatology: Interferon and intravenous immunoglobulin (Part 1 of 2)

The introduction of a number of biologic therapies into the market has revolutionized the practice of dermatology. These therapies include interferons, intravenous immunoglobulin, infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, efalizumab, alefacept, and rituximab. Most dermatologists are familiar with the Food and Drug Administration-approved indications of these medications. However, numerous off-label uses have evolved. As part 1 of a 2-part series, this article will review the literature regarding the off-label uses of the interferons and intravenous immunoglobulin in dermatology.

Off-Label Uses of Biologic Agents in Dermatology: A 2006 Update

The introduction of a number of biologic therapies into the market has revolutionized the practice of dermatology. These therapies include adalimumab, alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab, IVIg, omalizumab, and rituximab. Most dermatologists are familiar with the indications of these medications that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration; however, numerous off-label uses have evolved. To update the reader on more recent uses of the biologics for off-label dermatologic use, this article will emphasize more recent published data from 2005 through the date of submission in May 2006.

Use of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in autoimmune blistering diseases

Autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases (AMBD) are an interesting group of rare diseases that affect the mucous membranes and the skin and are frequently or potentially fatal. The clinical presentation is significantly variable, as is the course and prognosis. The immunopathology is well characterized and the target antigens to which the autoantibodies are directed have been studied by various investigators. A significant majority of the patients respond to conventional therapy, which consists of high-dose long-term systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. This treatment program has significantly improved the prognosis in many patients. In such patients, significant side effects of the drugs may appear and produce a very poor quality of life. In patients with progressive diseases, especially those with mucous membrane pemphigoid, the significant sequela; such as blindness, aphonia, and stenosis of the anal and vaginal canals can occur. In several patients treated with conventional immunosuppressive therapy, death occurs as a consequence of prolonged immune suppression leading to opportunistic infections. In this manuscript, the published data on the use of immunoglobulins intravenous (IGIV) in patients with AMBD is presented. The most important features of IGIV in patients with AMBD are: 1) the ability to clinically control the disease; 2) the ability to induce and maintain a long-term clinical remission; 3) a lower incidence of side effects; and 4) a higher quality of life. The important characteristic of the IGIV therapy in the AMBD is two-fold. First, the therapy, when given according to a published protocol, produces a lasting and long-term clinical remission, rather than a temporary arrest of the disease. Second, the therapy, as described in the protocol, has a very definitive endpoint. Consequently, once the patients are treated and go into long-term remission, the therapy is no longer required. The significant positive results obtained with IGIV are to a large extent also due to the associated aggressive topical therapy that was used and the frequent use of sublesional injections with triamcinolone. The rapid and early detection of cutaneous and mucosal infections and their treatment with systemic antibiotics is also a very important feature of IGIV therapy. When patients are under long-term conventional therapy, the infections are often not detected because they lack the ability to mount signs of inflammation. It is also becoming increasingly clear for patients to have a successful outcome, in treatment with IGIV therapy, it is critical that the physician spends a significant amount of time with each patient, monitor the therapy closely, and be familiar with the overall health of the patient. It is also best if the therapies are instituted by a physician who has significant interest and experience in blistering diseases and IGIV therapy.

Autoimmune bullous diseases: ocular manifestations and management

The ocular manifestations of autoimmune bullous diseases are common and potentially sight-threatening. Major ophthalmic involvement is most commonly seen in mucous membrane pemphigoid (cicatricial pemphigoid), epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, linear IgA bullous disease, pemphigus vulgaris and paraneoplastic pemphigus. The main pathological process is related to autoimmune-induced conjunctival inflammation with consequent lid and corneal pathology, which may eventually result in permanent visual loss. Ocular involvement can be asymptomatic. Early detection is aided by careful attention to symptoms and signs of early ophthalmic disease. Ocular disease can be difficult to treat and management usually involves systemic therapy with immunomodulators to control inflammation and prevent progression to irreversible blindness, as well as surgical intervention in advanced disease. Recent advances in treatment, including methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, monoclonal antibodies and topical tacrolimus therapies, have led to promising results.

Treatment of autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy

Autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases (AMBDs) are a group of rare diseases that affect the skin and mucous membranes and are potentially fatal. They have variable clinical presentation, course and prognosis. Their immunopathology is well-characterised and target antigens have been studied. Many patients respond to conventional therapy, which consists of high-dose long-term systemic corticosteroids with an immunosuppressive agent, but side effects develop that can produce a poor quality of life. Many patients develop significant sequelae, such as blindness, loss of voice, vaginal and anal stenosis. In most patients cause of death is opportunistic infections secondary to immune suppression. To date, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been reported to have benefited 156 patients with AMBDs. Its most important features include the ability to reduce or eliminate conventional therapy, the enabling of clinical control, the ability to induce and maintain long-term clinical remission, the capacity for usage based on a defined protocol with a described end point and a resulting increase in quality of life. IVIg produces the best clinical outcome when combined with aggressive topical therapy, sublesional injections of triamcinolone and rapid detection, and early treatment of cutaneous and mucosal infection. Successful therapy requires a physician to spend significant time with each patient. This manuscript provides the opinion of the author on the current use of IVIg to treat AMBDs.

Effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for skin disease other than toxic epidermal necrolysis: a retrospective review of Mayo Clinic experience

OBJECTIVE

To examine retrospectively the use and effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment of various skin diseases, primarily immunobullous disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified patients who had received IVIg therapy for skin disease between 1996 and 2003 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, Scottsdale, Ariz, and Jacksonville, Fla, and retrospectively reviewed their medical records.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were treated with IVIg for various skin diseases: immunobullous disease in 11 adults (pemphigus vulgaris [7 patients], bullous pemphigold [3], and cicatricial pemphigoid [1]); dermatomyositis (2); mixed connective tissue disease (1); chronic urticaria (1); scleromyxedema (1); leukocytoclastic vasculitis (1); and linear IgA bullous disease (1). Responses of patients by type of disease were as follows: pemphigus vulgaris, 1 partial response (PR) and 6 no response (NR); bullous pemphigoid, 1 complete response (CR) and 2 NR; cicatricial pemphigoid, 1 NR; dermatomyositis, 1 CR and 1 PR; mixed connective tissue disease, 1 CR; chronic urticaria, 1 CR; scleromyxedema, 1 CR; leukocytoclastic vasculitis, 1 PR; and linear IgA bullous disease, 1 CR. Six patients (33%) experienced CR, 3 (17%) had PR, and 9 (50%) had NR to IVIg therapy. All 9 nonresponders were adult patients with immunobullous disease.

CONCLUSION

Although this was a retrospective study of a small cohort of a mixture of patients, the findings emphasize that our experience with IVIg treatment for skin disease, particularly immunobullous disease, is less favorable than that reported previously. Further studies are needed to verify the efficacy of IVIg for skin disease.

Unusual clinical manifestation of linear IgA dermatosis: A report of two cases

Linear IgA dermatosis is a rare autoimmune bullous skin disease with subepidermal blister formation and linear IgA deposits along the basement membrane zone. We describe two female patients showing erythematous annular plaques with scaling at the margin, strictly localized to the palms in one patient, and also found on the soles and buttocks in the second patient. Histology showed numerous neutrophils in the dermis with an admixture of eosinophils, some subepidermal clefting, and occasional papillary microabscesses. Direct immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy revealed in vivo IgA deposition along the basement membrane zone. One patient cleared after treatment with dapsone. The second patient did not respond to dapsone alone and various immunosuppressive treatment regimens. Considerable improvement was achieved with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy combined with corticosteroid and dapsone.

Blistering disorders: diagnosis and treatment

Blistering diseases are a heterogeneous group of disorders that can affect either skin and mucous membrane, or both, varying in presentation, clinical course, pathohistology, immunopathology and treatment. Not infrequently the diagnosis is delayed. This can result in severe, and sometimes fatal consequences. Although these diseases are rare, it is very important to make an accurate diagnosis based on a combination of clinical profile and laboratory observations. A brief review is presented of the following bullous diseases: pemphigus, paraneoplastic pemphigus, bullous pemphigoid, cicatricial pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, dermatitis herpetiformis, linear IgA bullous disease, porphyria cutanea tarda, and subcorneal pustular dermatitis. Their clinical, pathohistologic and immunopathologic features and recommendations for therapy are discussed.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin for immune-mediated skin disease: current view

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIgs) exert a variety of immunomodulating activities and are, therefore, increasingly being used for the treatment of immune-mediated as well as autoimmune diseases. There is also accumulating evidence that high-dose IVIg (hdIVIg) is highly efficacious in the treatment of skin diseases, despite the lack of evidence from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. A major advantage of hdIVIg in comparison with other commonly used immunomodulating therapeutic strategies is the excellent safety profile. Accordingly, IVIgs have been used successfully for the treatment of bullous autoimmune diseases such as pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid, dermatomyositis, scleroderma, cutaneous lupus erythematosus, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and erythema exudativum multiforme. In most cases, hdIVIg is effective only in combination with other immunomodulating strategies and allows for the reduction of adjuvants. Adverse effects of hdIVIg are generally mild and self-limiting. These include headache, myalgia, flush, fever, nausea or vomiting, chills, lower backache, changes in blood pressure, and tachycardia. To avoid infusion-related rigors, headaches, and other adverse events, pre-treatment with analgesics, NSAIDs, antihistamines, or low-dose intravenous corticosteroids may be beneficial. Controlled, double-blind, long-term clinical trials and a better understanding of the complex immunomodulating mechanism of IVIg are required to ultimately optimize dose, frequency, duration, and mode of IVIg administration.

Use of IGIV in the treatment of immune-mediated dermatologic disorders

Immunoglobulin (Ultravenous, IGIV) is now used in a variety of immune-mediated diseases. Its presumed mechanism of action involves both anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activities. A number of dermatologic conditions are believed to be immune mediated and in these disorders, IGIV has shown benefit in reducing symptoms and the need for cortecosteroids or cytotaxic drugs. In many of these diseases, the initial benefits seen in open-labeled trials must be confirmed in controlled clinical trials.

Linear IgA disease: successful treatment with erythromycin

Conventional first-line treatments for linear IgA disease (and the related chronic immunobullous disease of childhood) include topical steroids and dapsone, both of which may be associated with potentially serious side-effects. Alternative anti-inflammatory therapies such as tetracycline and macrolide antibiotics, have been used to treat other immunobullous disorders and we now report an adult case of linear IgA disease and a paediatric case of mixed immunobullous disease of childhood that both responded to the macrolide antibiotic erythromycin. The mode of action is speculative and anti-inflammatory mechanisms are unclear. Nevertheless, from a clinical perspective, erythromycin may have a role in the treatment of linear IgA disease and could be considered ahead of many other, perhaps potentially more toxic, therapies.

Cicatricial pemphigoid with circulating IgA and IgG autoantibodies to the central portion of the BP180 ectodomain: beneficial effect of adjuvant therapy with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin

Cicatricial pemphigoid (CP) is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease characterized by deposits of IgG, IgA, or C3 at the cutaneous basement membrane zone. CP may present with considerable variation regarding age, morphology of lesions, and mucosal involvement, which may heal with or without scarring. We describe a patient with CP who presented with circulating IgA and IgG autoantibodies to the epidermal side of salt-split human skin. By immunoblot analysis, the patient's IgA reacted with the soluble ectodomain of BP180 (LAD-1). This reactivity was mainly directed to the central portion of the BP180 ectodomain, a site that, to date, has not been described as the target of IgA autoantibodies. Different immunosuppressive treatment regimens including steroids and mycophenolate mofetil did not control this patient's disease, and severe scarring of the conjunctivae occurred with impairment of vision. Addition of adjuvant intravenous immunoglobulin (1 g/kg body weight on 2 consecutive days) every 4 weeks led to a dramatic improvement of conjunctivitis and gingivitis. Clinical improvement correlated with the serum's IgA immunoblot reactivity against LAD-1. Further studies on a larger number of patients with CP should try to correlate the specificity of autoantibodies in CP with the response to certain therapeutic regimens.

Diagnostic features of pemphigus vulgaris in patients with pemphigus foliaceus: detection of both autoantibodies, long-term follow-up and treatment responses

There are several studies that describe the simultaneous presence and conversion of pemphigus foliaceus into pemphigus vulgaris and vice versa. We describe eight patients with clinical, histological and immunopathological features of pemphigus foliaceus, at the time of the initial diagnosis. After a mean period of 2.5 years, additional serological features of pemphigus vulgaris were observed. During a long-term follow-up, systemic therapies, their durations and treatment outcomes were recorded. These patients did not respond to conventional systemic therapy and developed multiple side-effects from these drugs. Hence, they were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIg). Prior to the initiation of IVIg therapy, different assays were performed to detect the presence of autoantibodies, including indirect immunofluorescence (IIF), immunoblot assay using bovine gingival lysate, and ELISA. Twenty-five healthy normal individuals, 12 patients with pemphigus vulgaris, and eight patients with pemphigus foliaceus served as controls for comparison of serological studies. At the time of initial diagnosis, the sera of all eight study patients also demonstrated binding on an immunoblot assay to a 160-kDa protein (desmoglein 1) only. This is typically observed in pemphigus foliaceus. Prior to staring IVIg therapy, binding was observed to both the 160 kDa and 130 kDa (desmoglein 3) proteins on an immunoblot assay which was characteristic of pemphigus vulgaris. The antidesmogleins, 1 and 3 autoantibodies, were predominantly of the IgG4 subclass in all eight patients studied. IVIg therapy induced remission in four patients and control in four of the eight patients. The total follow-up period ranged from 2.6 to 9.5 years (mean 5.3 years). It is difficult to determine the exact time at which these patients with pemphigus foliaceus developed pemphigus vulgaris. It is possible that the disease was nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapy owing to the simultaneous presence of two autoantibodies.

Pemphigus vulgaris: the role of IL-1 and IL-1 receptor antagonist in pathogenesis and effects of intravenous immunoglobulin on their production

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is increasingly being used for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. In the present report, the role of IVIG on in vivo and in vitro production of IL-1 and IL-1 receptor antagonist (Ra) was studied in patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV). Serum samples from 20 untreated patients with active PV prior to initiation of systemic therapy, 20 patients receiving IVIG treatment, 20 patients in clinical remission after conventional therapy, and 20 normal human controls were studied to determine the serum levels of IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-1Ra. The in vitro production of these cytokines was measured in the culture supernatant of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 10 PV patients immediately before and after IVIG therapy and from age and sex-matched 10 healthy donors simultaneously. Elevated levels of IL-1alpha and IL-1beta were detected (i) in the serum of untreated PV patients with active disease prior to systemic therapy and (ii) before IVIG infusions in patients receiving IVIG therapy. These increased levels are statistically significant when compared to the levels in healthy controls (P < 0.01). A marked reduction of IL-1alpha and IL-1beta was detected (i) in the serum of patients in prolonged clinical remission and (ii) immediately after IVIG infusion in those patients on IVIG therapy. Increased level of IL-1Ra was detected in PV patients in prolonged clinical remission and after IVIG infusion in those receiving IVIG therapy. These differences were statistically significant when compared to the levels in normal controls and to the levels in the sera of patients with active disease (P < 0.01) or just before the beginning of IVIG infusion (P < 0.01). Similar differences in the levels of IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-1Ra were found in the culture supernatant of PBMC isolated from the PV patients pre and post IVIG therapy. These observations suggests that, compared to normal controls, patients with active PV have reversed levels of IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-1Ra. IVIG therapy may down-regulate production of IL-1alpha and IL-1beta and enhance production of IL-1Ra, in vivo and in vitro. This might be one of the important mechanisms by which IVIG produces its early therapeutic effects in pemphigus vulgaris.

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulins: An approach to treat severe immune-mediated and autoimmune diseases of the skin

Adjuvant high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIgs) are being used increasingly in a range of immune-mediated and autoimmune diseases. Although numerous immunomodulatory mechanisms have been suggested, the exact mechanisms of action are poorly understood. The efficacy of IVIg in certain diseases has been proven in clinical trials, insofar as IVIg is approved as the therapy of choice for Kawasaki syndrome or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. IVIg treatment has been shown to be safe, without the many drug-related adverse effects, including systemic immunosuppression, that are related to corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents. Current dermatologic uses of IVIg are increasing, which calls for adequately controlled clinical trials. This review focuses on experiences with IVIg therapy for skin diseases and discusses current opinion concerning its potential immunomodulating mechanisms.

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis induced by atorvastatin

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) is an autoimmune blistering skin disease characterized by circulating IgA antibodies binding the basement membrane zone. In most cases the origin is not clear, but in a minority of cases LABD is drug induced. We describe a patient in whom linear IgA disease developed shortly after beginning therapy with atorvastatin. In Western blotting analysis we detected IgA and IgG class antibodies targeting a 97-kd protein. To our knowledge this is the first reported case of atorvastatin-induced LABD.

A review of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (hdIVIg) in the treatment of the autoimmune blistering disorders

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (hdIVIg) is being used increasingly for dermatological indications. Its mode of action is via a number of proposed mechanisms and it is not associated with the many side-effects of steroids and other immunosuppressive agents. The evidence for using hdIVIg in the treatment of autoimmune bullous disorders is based on uncontrolled trials and case reports. However, there are now 62 reported patients and this review aims to make a critical assessment of the current data. This has been obtained from a Medline search of the English literature from 1966 to 2000 for pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus, bullous pemphigoid, pemphigoid gestationis, cicatricial pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and linear IgA disease. Taken together hdIVIg was effective in 81% of the patients with blistering disease. Patients appear to be more likely to respond when hdIVIg is used as adjunctive therapy (91% response rate) than as monotherapy (56% response rate). hdIVIg may offer a safe potential therapeutic avenue for resistant cases of the autoimmune bullous disorders but should be further assessed using double-blind placebo-controlled trials.