Hyperbaric oxygen for carbon monoxide poisoning: does it really work?

Outcome and prognostic factors of patients treated in the intensive care unit for carbon monoxide poisoning

BACKGROUND

Carbon monoxide (CO), a colorless and odorless gas, is one of the common causes of poisoning-related deaths worldwide. CO poisoning can result in hypoxic brain damage and death, but intensive care can improve the likely outcome for critically ill patients. However, there is a paucity of clinical data regarding the prognostic factors and association between organ dysfunction and clinical outcome of patients treated for CO poisoning in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients admitted to a university affiliated hospital ICU between July 2001 and December 2010 following CO poisoning. Outcomes were survival to ICU discharge and to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and eighty-seven patients were admitted to the university hospital following CO poisoning, of which 140 (17.8%) were admitted to the hospital ICU. The overall mortality rate of the patients admitted to the ICU was 14.3% (20/140). Univariate analysis indicated that non-surviving patients with CO poisoning were more likely to have initial blood carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) level > 30%, shock, acute respiratory failure, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score ≥ 25, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of 3, acute renal failure, dysfunction or failure of more than 3 organs, low blood pH, low HCO3- level, high potassium level, and high glucose level. They were also more likely to have not received hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) intervention. Multivariate logistical regression analysis indicated that the mortality rate of patients treated in the ICU for CO poisoning was higher if their initial APACHE II score was ≥25, GCS was 3, and more than 3 organs were dysfunctional. Moreover, HBO intervention in ICU significantly decreased patients' risk of mortality due to CO poisoning.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we observed that APACHE II score >25, GCS 3, and dysfunction of more than 3 organ systems on admission to emergency department was associated with a significant mortality risk in patients treated in the ICU for CO poisoning. Moreover, HBO therapy could reduce the risk of mortality in patients with CO poisoning in ICU.

Toxicity Associated with Carbon Monoxide

Carbon monoxide is an insidious poison that accounts for thousands of deaths each year in North America. Clinical effects maybe diverse and include headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting,syn-cope, seizures, coma, dysrhythmias, and cardiac ischemia. Children, pregnant women, and patients who have underlying cardiovascular disease are particularly at risk for adverse out-comes. Treatment consists of oxygen therapy, supportive care, and, in selected cases, hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

Carbon monoxide poisoning

CO is an ubiquitous poison with many sources of exposure. CO poisoning produces diverse signs and symptoms that are often subtle and may be easily misdiagnosed. Failure to diagnose CO poisoning may result insignificant morbidity and mortality and permit continued exposure to a dangerous environment. Treatment of CO poisoning begins with inhalation of supplemental oxygen and aggressive supportive care. HBOT accelerates dissociation of CO from hemoglobin and may also prevent DNS. Absolute indications forHBOT for CO poisoning remain controversial, although most authors would agree that HBOT is indicated in patients who are comatose or neurologically abnormal, have a history of LOC with their exposure, or have cardiac dysfunction. Pregnancy with an elevated CO-Hgb level(>15%-20%) is also widely, considered an indication for treatment.HBOT may be considered in patients who have persistent symptoms despite NBO, metabolic acidosis, abnormalities on neuropsychometric testing, or significantly elevated levels. The ideal regimen of oxygen therapy has yet to be determined, and significant controversy exists regarding HBOTtreatment protocols. Often the local medical toxicologist, poison control center, or hyperbaric unit may assist the treating physician with decisions regarding therapy.

Carbon monoxide poisoning

CO is an insidious poison with many sources of exposure. CO poisoning produces diverse signs and symptoms, which often are subtle and can be misdiagnosed easily. Failure to diagnose CO poisoning may result insignificant morbidity and mortality and allow continued exposure to a dangerous environment. In the ED, a high index of suspicion must be maintained for occult CO exposure. Headache, particularly when associated with certain environments, and flulike illness in the wintertime with symptomatic cohabitants should raise the index of suspicion in the ED significantly for occult CO poisoning. Emergency treatment of CO poisoning begins with inhalation of supplemental oxygen and aggressive supportive care. HBOT accelerates dissociation of CO from hemoglobin and may prevent DNS. Absolute indications for HBOT for CO poisoning remain controversial, although most would agree that HBOT is indicated in patients who are comatose, are neurologically abnormal, have a history of loss of consciousness with their exposure, or have cardiac dysfunction. Pregnancy with an elevated CO-Hgb level (>15-20%) also is widely considered an indication for treatment. HBOT may be considered in patients who have persistent symptoms despite NBO, metabolic acidosis, abnormalities on neuropsychometric testing, or significantly elevated levels. The ideal regimen of oxygen therapy has yet to be determined, and significant controversy exists regarding HBOT protocols. The emergency physician may be confronted with the difficult decision regarding disposition and even transfer to a hyperbaric facility. Often the local medical toxicologist, poison control center, or hyperbaric unit can assist the emergency physician with the decision-making process.

Carbon monoxide poisoning

Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is common and frequently unrecognized since the signs and symptoms are relatively nonspecific. CO poisoning causes tissue hypoxia. Additionally, various animal studies have demonstrated that CO interferes with myoglobin, P450, and other enzyme function; causes lipid peroxidation through neutrophil activation; produces oxidative stress manifested by peroxynitrate deposition in endothelium; binds to cytochrome aa3, disrupting intracellular oxygen utilization; can cause neuroexcitotoxicity; and contributes to hippocampal cellular death through apoptosis. Emergency treatment for CO poisoning is 100% oxygen. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO2) is accepted in CO poisoning, although data from randomized clinical trials regarding the efficacy of HBO2 in CO poisoning is conflicting. CO poisoning, even when treated with supplemental oxygen can leave the patient with permanent neurocognitive or affective problems. Unfortunately, there appears to be no marker or constellation of signs or symptoms at presentation that predicts long-term outcome following CO poisoning. Given the neurocognitive sequelae following CO poisoning, increased awareness and prevention of CO poisoning is imperative.

Hyperbaric or normobaric oxygen for acute carbon monoxide poisoning: a randomised controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess neurological sequelae in patients with all grades of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning after treatment with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and normobaric oxygen (NBO).

DESIGN

Randomised controlled double-blind trial, including an extended series of neuropsychological tests and sham treatments in a multiplace hyperbaric chamber for patients treated with NBO.

SETTING

The multiplace hyperbaric chamber at the Alfred Hospital, a university-attached quarternary referral centre in Melbourne providing the only hyperbaric service in the State of Victoria.

PATIENTS

All patients referred with CO poisoning between 1 September 1993 and 30 December 1995, irrespective of severity of poisoning. Pregnant women, children, burns victims and those refusing consent were excluded.

INTERVENTION

Daily 100-minute treatments with 100% oxygen in a hyperbaric chamber--60 minutes at 2.8 atmospheres absolute for the HBO group and at 1.0 atmosphere absolute for the NBO group--for three days (or for six days for patients who were clinically abnormal or had poor neuropsychological outcome after three treatments). Both groups received continuous high flow oxygen between treatments.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Neuropsychological performance at completion of treatment, and at one month where possible.

RESULTS

More patients in the HBO group required additional treatments (28% v. 15%, P = 0.01 for all patients; 35% v. 13%, P = 0.001 for severely poisoned patients). HBO patients had a worse outcome in the learning test at completion of treatment (P = 0.01 for all patients; P = 0.005 for severely poisoned patients) and a greater number of abnormal test results at completion of treatment (P = 0.02 for all patients; P = 0.008 for severely poisoned patients). A greater percentage of severely poisoned patients in the HBO group had a poor outcome at completion of treatment (P = 0.03). Delayed neurological sequelae were restricted to HBO patients (P = 0.03). No outcome measure was worse in the NBO group.

CONCLUSION

In this trial, in which both groups received high doses of oxygen, HBO therapy did not benefit, and may have worsened, the outcome. We cannot recommend its use in CO poisoning.

Carbon monoxide poisoning: a review for clinicians

Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning continues to be a significant health problem both in the United States and in many other countries. CO poisoning is associated with a high incidence of severe morbidity and mortality. Epidemics of CO poisoning commonly occur during winter months and sources include: smoke from fires, fumes from heating systems burning fuels, and exhaust fumes from motor vehicles. The history of exposure and carboxyhemoglobin levels should alert the physician to this diagnosis. In the absence of exposure history, CO poisoning should be considered when two or more patients are simultaneously sick. The clinical presentation is non-specific and may range from nausea and headache to profound central nervous system dysfunction. The mainstay of therapy for CO poisoning is supplemental oxygen, ventilatory support, and monitoring for cardiac dysrhythmias. This article reviews up-to-date information of this potentially devastating exposure.

Poisoning and epidemiology: 'toxicoepidemiology'

1. There is little hypothesis-testing clinical research performed in toxicology. Randomized clinical trials are rare and most observational studies are performed on highly selected patients and are subject to marked bias. Thus, for many poisonings, our approach has been based almost entirely on deduction from known pharmacological/toxicological effects, generalizations from drugs within the same therapeutic class, animal data and case reports. This is also far from satisfactory, as many toxicological mechanisms are poorly understood and not related to the therapeutic class. 2. Although we need much better data to address the clinical and public health aspects of poisoning, there are many practical and ethical reasons why randomized clinical trials are difficult in this field. However, the scope for observational research, in particular population-based clinical epidemiology, is almost unlimited. The collection of data on human poisoning is facilitated because most non-fatal overdoses are admitted to hospital and by legal requirements to report to the coroner deaths that are due to poisoning. In the present article I argue that 'toxicoepidemiology', meaning the application of epidemiological methods to the problem of acute poisoning, is the best means we have of addressing deficiencies in our knowledge of poisoning. 3. Examples are given of a variety of observational research strategies, ranging from audit to meta-analysis, that may be applied to clinical toxicology. From coronial and clinical data obtained from reasonably well-defined populations, it has been possible to identify a number of previously unrecognized differences in the severity and spectrum of toxicity between and within drug classes. Also, the demographic risk factors for poisoning and the reproducibility, validity and optimal use of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions can be assessed. 4. The major limitations to the range of associations and interventions that may be studied are the need to achieve adequate power to study uncommon outcomes or poisonings and the ability to replicate findings at other centres using similar methodology. The expansion of data collection to other centres has the potential largely to overcome these obstacles.

Environmental emergencies

This article reviews the pearls and pitfalls of high-altitude sickness, decompression sickness, and barotrauma; new findings relevant to the near-drowning patient; continued controversies on hyperbaric oxygen for carbon monoxide poisoning; pitfalls in hypothermia management; and updates on the management of venomous snakebites.