Health care cost containment: an overview of policy options

Budgetary targets as cost-containment measure in the Swiss healthcare system? Lessons from abroad

Growing healthcare expenditure is a major concern for policy makers and calls for effective cost containment measures. For the decentralized Swiss healthcare system, ranking second among OECD countries in healthcare spending, a group of experts has proposed budgetary targets as key measure. In order to substantiate this proposal, we review the literature and analyse experiences with budgetary targets in comparable social health insurance systems, such as Germany and the Netherlands. Budgetary targets raise the cost responsibility and prompt providers to give greater weight to cost-benefit considerations. Our analysis suggests that the involvement of all principal healthcare players and clear decision-making and negotiating structures are key to successful implementation. Risks of rationing, lower quality incentives or conservation of structures have to be countered with taking into account age-related morbidity and medical progress when setting the budgetary targets. Accompanying measures such as incentive-compatible remuneration schemes and quality monitoring are of paramount importance.

Exploring the determinants of endocrinologist visits by patients with diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is today a major public health concern in terms of its financial and social burden. Previous studies have revealed that specialist care for patients with diabetes leads to more positive outcomes than care by general practitioners (GPs) alone. The aim of this study was to estimate the determinants of endocrinologist consultation by patients with diabetes.

METHODS

We used a two-part model to explore both the decision to consult and the frequency of consultations. We used claim data collected for 65,633 affiliates of a French social security provider. Patients were aged over 18 and treated for diabetes (types I and II). We controlled for patients' socioeconomic characteristics, type of diabetes treatment, medical care, and health status. We also controlled for variables, such as the cost of a visit, the distance to the nearest endocrinologist's office, the density of medical practitioners and the prevalence of diabetes in the area.

RESULTS

The results show that the parameters associated with the decision to consult an endocrinologist were considerably different from factors associated with the frequency of consultations. A marked positive effect of income on the decision to consult was found, whereas travel time to the office had a negative impact on both the decision to consult and the frequency of consultations. Increasing treatment complexity is associated with a higher probability of consulting an endocrinologist. We found evidence of a significant substitution effect between GPs and endocrinologists. Finally, consultation price is a barrier to seeing an endocrinologist.

CONCLUSION

Given that financial barriers were identified in the relatively wealthy population analysed here, it is likely that this may be even more of an obstacle in the general population.

Cultural Sensitivity and Day Care Workers

Reaching workers in small worksites presents economic and access barriers for occupational health nurses. Some barriers can be overcome through strategies based on cultural sensitivity. Day care centers employ young, low income, mostly minority women in settings with few workers onsite at any one center. These settings were used to develop a culturally sensitive approach tested through onsite cardiovascular screening, informal interviews, and discussion of behavior change for better health. The study examined both the impact of the Healthier People Health Risk Appraisal (HPHRA) as a culturally appropriate recruitment strategy to involve a group of child day care workers in a cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening and risk reduction program and the effect of that program on observable CVD measures. Faculty and students from an institution of higher education forged a trust relationship with day care providers at nine day care centers in a large metropolitan area. Cardiovascular health was the impetus for the project because minority populations in the southeastern United States have high heart attack and stroke mortality and morbidity rates. Participation rates in the project increased from 26% of the day care workers in the first year of the project to 73% when long term relationships were built on culturally appropriate strategies. The project's culturally sensitive educational intervention focused on individual risks and lifestyle. Statistical analysis of outcomes of the intervention and personal interviews demonstrated the improvement of cardiovascular status in the day care workers. This psychosocial approach can provide the foundation for culturally sensitive care in larger occupational and community settings.