Mortality and morbidity with intraoperative radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

Practice-oriented solutions integrating intraoperative electron irradiation and personalized proton therapy for recurrent or unresectable cancers: Proof of concept and potential for dual FLASH effect

Background

Oligo-recurrent disease has a consolidated evidence of long-term surviving patients due to the use of intense local cancer therapy. The latter combines real-time surgical exploration/resection with high-energy electron beam single dose of irradiation. This results in a very precise radiation dose deposit, which is an essential element of contemporary multidisciplinary individualized oncology.

Methods

Patient candidates to proton therapy were evaluated in Multidisciplinary Tumor Board to consider improved treatment options based on the institutional resources and expertise. Proton therapy was delivered by a synchrotron-based pencil beam scanning technology with energy levels from 70.2 to 228.7 MeV, whereas intraoperative electrons were generated in a miniaturized linear accelerator with dose rates ranging from 22 to 36 Gy/min (at Dmax) and energies from 6 to 12 MeV.

Results

In a period of 24 months, 327 patients were treated with proton therapy: 218 were adults, 97 had recurrent cancer, and 54 required re-irradiation. The specific radiation modalities selected in five cases included an integral strategy to optimize the local disease management by the combination of surgery, intraoperative electron boost, and external pencil beam proton therapy as components of the radiotherapy management. Recurrent cancer was present in four cases (cervix, sarcoma, melanoma, and rectum), and one patient had a primary unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In re-irradiated patients (cervix and rectum), a tentative radical total dose was achieved by integrating beams of electrons (ranging from 10- to 20-Gy single dose) and protons (30 to 54-Gy Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE), in 10-25 fractions).

Conclusions

Individual case solution strategies combining intraoperative electron radiation therapy and proton therapy for patients with oligo-recurrent or unresectable localized cancer are feasible. The potential of this combination can be clinically explored with electron and proton FLASH beams.

Dihydroisotanshinone I as a Treatment Option for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are the most common cancers of the head and neck, and their prevalence is rapidly increasing. HNSCCs present a clinical challenge because of their high recurrence rate, therapeutic resistance to radiation and chemotherapy drugs, and adverse effects. Hence, traditional Chinese herbal treatment may be advantageous to therapeutic strategies for HNSCCs. Danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza), a well-known Chinese herb, has been extensively applied in treatments for various diseases, including cancer, because of its high degree of safety and low rate of adverse effects despite its unclear mechanism. Thus, we aimed to explore the possible anticancer effects and mechanisms of dihydroisotanshinone I (DT), a compound in danshen (extract from danshen), on HNSCCs. Three HNSCCs cell lines were used for in vitro studies, and a Detroit 562 xenograft mouse model was chosen for in vivo studies. Our in vitro results showed that DT could initiate apoptosis, resulting in cell death, and the p38 signaling partially regulated DT-initiated cell apoptosis in the Detroit 562 model. In the xenograft mouse model, DT reduced tumor size with no obvious adverse effect of hepatotoxicity. The present study suggests that DT is a promising novel candidate for anti-HNSCCs therapy.

A prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical trial of intraoperative radiotherapy using a low-energy X-ray source for local advanced Laryngocarcinoma (ILAL): a study protocol

BACKGROUND

Laryngocarcinoma (LC), in most cases a squamous cell carcinoma, accounts for 1 ~ 5% of the incidence of all tumors. At present, laryngocarcinoma is mainly managed with the integration of surgery and radio- and chemo-therapies. The current development trend of treatment is to improve the local control rate of tumor and the quality of life of patients. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is a radiotherapy that delivers single high dose irradiation at a close range to the tumor bed during the surgical operation process. It has particular radiobiological advantages in protecting normal surrounding tissues by directly applying the irradiation dose to the high-risk tumor bed area. Two forms of IORT, i.e., high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT, including electron and photono IORT), had been studied before the treatment of head and neck tumors (including laryngocarcinoma). However, no relevant assessment had been carried out on 50KV low-energy X-ray. We are convinced by certain arguments that the application of low-energy X-ray for intraoperative local radiotherapy of laryngocarcinoma can not only achieve the therapeutic effect of IORT but also reduce the incidence of high-energy irradiation related toxic and side effects. The purpose of this study is to observe the safety and short-term efficacy of IORT when used in conjunction with standard of care for the treatment of local advanced laryngocarcinoma (LAL).

METHODS/DESIGN

In consideration of the applications of precise targeted IORT in oncosurgery and in line with the application range and reference clinical medical guidances approved by SFDA (ZEISS radiosurgical operation system has been used for the treatment of solid tumors since 31 December, 2013 with an approval from SFDA), we have preliminarily planned the tumors suitable for IORT, determined the members of MDT in our hospital, improved the MDT diagnosis and treatment processes for the tumors, established the standards, indications and contraindications for the application of IORT, determined the indicators to be observed after the treatment of tumors with surgical operations plus IORT, and carried out follow-up visits and statistical analysis. This is a single-arm, prospective Phase II clinical trial of the treatment of LAL patients with IORT + EBRT. The study subjects are followed up for statistics and information of their acute/chronic toxic reactions and local control rate, DFS, and OS etc. The safety and short-term efficacy of the application of IORT as SIB for the treatment of LAL. The sample size of the study is 125 subjects.

DISCUSSION

The safety and efficacy of IORT for the treatment of head and neck cancers have been proven in studies by multiple institutions (1-3). The purpose of this study is to investigate the maximum safe dose and short-term efficacy of IORT for providing a theoretical basis for clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov , NCT04278638. Registered 18 February 2020 - prospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04278638.

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Promising Treatment Modality in Head and Neck Cancer

Every year, almost 62,000 are diagnosed with a head and neck cancer (HNC) and 13,000 will succumb to their disease. In the primary setting, intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) can be used as a boost in select patients in order to optimize local control. Addition of external beam radiation to limited volumes results in improved disease control over surgery and IORT alone. In the recurrent setting, IORT can improve outcomes from salvage surgery especially in patients previously treated with external beam radiation. The use of IORT remains limited to select institutions with various modalities being currently employed including orthovoltage, electrons, and high-dose rate brachytherapy. Practically, execution of IORT requires a coordinated effort and careful planning by a multidisciplinary team involving the head and neck surgeon, radiation oncologist, and physicist. The current review summarizes common uses, outcomes, toxicities, and technical aspects of IORT in HNC patients.

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in head and neck cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Multimodality therapy constitutes the standard treatment of advanced and recurrent head and neck cancer. Since locoregional recurrence comprises a major obstacle in attaining cure, the role of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as an add-on in improving survival and local control of the disease has been investigated. IORT allows delivery of a single tumoricidal dose of radiation to areas of potential residual microscopic disease while minimizing doses to normal tissues. Advantages of IORT include the conformal delivery of a large dose of radiation in an exposed and precisely defined tumor bed, minimizing the risk of a geographic miss creating the potential for subsequent dose reduction of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). This strategy allows for shortening overall treatment time and dose escalation. The aim of this review is to summarize recent published work on the use of IORT as an adjuvant modality to treat common head and neck cancer in the primary or recurrent setting.

METHODS

We searched the Medline, Scopus, Ovid, Cochrane, Embase, and ISI Web of Science databases for articles published from 1980 up to March 2016.

RESULTS

Based on relevant publications it appears that including IORT in the multimodal treatment may contribute to improved local control. However, the benefit in overall survival is not so clear.

CONCLUSION

IORT seems to be a safe, promising adjunct in the management of head and neck cancer and yet further well organized clinical trials are required to determine its role more precisely.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for parotid cancer: a single-institution experience

PURPOSE

Our practice policy has been to provide intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) at resection to patients with head-and-neck malignancies considered to be at high risk of recurrence. The purpose of the present study was to review our experience with the use of IORT for primary or recurrent cancer of the parotid gland.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1982 and 2007, 96 patients were treated with gross total resection and IORT for primary or recurrent cancer of the parotid gland. The median age was 62.9 years (range, 14.3-88.1). Of the 96 patients, 33 had previously undergone external beam radiotherapy as a component of definitive therapy. Also, 34 patients had positive margins after surgery, and 40 had perineural invasion. IORT was administered as a single fraction of 15 or 20 Gy with 4-6-MeV electrons. The median follow-up period was 5.6 years.

RESULTS

Only 1 patient experienced local recurrence, 19 developed regional recurrence, and 12 distant recurrence. The recurrence-free survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years was 82.0%, 68.5%, and 65.2%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rate after surgery and IORT was 88.4%, 66.1%, and 56.2%, respectively. No perioperative fatalities occurred. Complications developed in 26 patients and included vascular complications in 7, trismus in 6, fistulas in 4, radiation osteonecrosis in 4, flap necrosis in 2, wound dehiscence in 2, and neuropathy in 1. Of these 26 patients, 12 had recurrent disease, and 8 had undergone external beam radiotherapy before IORT.

CONCLUSIONS

IORT results in effective local disease control at acceptable levels of toxicity and should be considered for patients with primary or recurrent cancer of the parotid gland.

Intraoperative radiation therapy as an "early boost" in locally advanced head and neck cancer: preliminary results of a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

The acute toxicity of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) delivered as an "early boost" after tumor resection in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer was evaluated.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent surgery with radical intent, and 17 had microvascular flap reconstruction. The IORT was delivered in the operating room. Twenty patients received adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).

RESULTS

Five patients experienced various degrees of complications in the postoperative period, all of which were treated conservatively. One patient had a partial flap necrosis after EBRT that was treated with flap removal. Six deaths were recorded during the mean follow-up period of 8 months; none of the deaths were related to radiation treatment.

CONCLUSION

This feasibility study shows that the use of IORT as an early boost is feasible with no increase in acute toxicity directly attributable to radiation.

Recurrent salivary gland carcinomas treated by surgery with or without intraoperative radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for patients with locally recurrent carcinomas of the salivary glands is unclear.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients underwent salvage surgery for locally recurrent salivary gland carcinomas. Eighty-one (82%) had previously received radiation. Thirty-seven patients (37%) received intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) to a median dose of 15 Gy (range, 12-18 Gy) at the time of salvage.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year estimates of local control after salvage surgery were 88%, 75%, and 69%, respectively. A Cox proportional hazard model identified positive margins (0.01) and the omission of IORT (p = .001) as independent predictors of local failure. The 5-year overall survival was 34%. Distant metastasis was the most common site of subsequent failure, occurring in 42% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IORT significantly improves disease control for patients with locally recurrent carcinomas of the salivary glands. The high rate of distant metastasis emphasizes the need for effective systemic therapies.

Feasibility of flap reconstruction in conjunction with intraoperative radiation therapy for advanced and recurrent head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Radiation is a known risk factor for poor wound healing. Patients undergoing intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) typically receive higher cumulative doses to their wound beds than patients treated with conventional radiation therapy. We review our experience with IORT in patients undergoing resection of head and neck cancer and flap reconstruction. Logistics of delivery and outcomes are discussed.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients at Beth Israel Medical Center who underwent IORT for head and neck cancer between 2000 and 2007. Twenty-one patients receiving 22 treatments involving flap reconstruction were identified. The results of these reconstructions were evaluated for complications and functional outcome.

RESULTS

All patients had complex surgical wounds of the face, upper aerodigestive tract, or neck who received IORT in conjunction with pedicled or free flap closure. Twenty-five flaps in 21 patients were performed in the setting of IORT. All patients received between 10 and 15 Gy of IORT administered directly to the wound bed. There were no perioperative mortalities. Wound breakdown occurred in three cases, all of which were treated successfully by operative revision. Functionally, most patients did well and performed similarly to historic controls for their type of reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction using flaps in the context of IORT can be achieved with expectation of good wound healing in the majority of cases despite heavy cumulative doses of radiation to recipient wound beds.

Intraoperative radiation therapy for recurrent head-and-neck cancer: the UCSF experience

PURPOSE

To review a single-institutional experience with the use of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for recurrent head-and-neck cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1991 and 2004, 137 patients were treated with gross total resection and IORT for recurrence or persistence of locoregional cancer of the head and neck. One hundred and thirteen patients (83%) had previously received external beam radiation as a component of definitive therapy. Ninety-four patients (69%) had squamous cell histology. Final surgical margins were microscopically positive in 56 patients (41%). IORT was delivered using either a modified linear accelerator or a mobile electron unit and was administered as a single fraction to a median dose of 15 Gy (range, 10-18 Gy). Median follow-up among surviving patients was 41 months (range, 3-122 months).

RESULTS

The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year estimates of in-field control after salvage surgery and IORT were 70%, 64%, and 61%, respectively. Positive margins at the time of IORT predicted for in-field failure (p = 0.001). The 3-year rates of locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were 51%, 46%, and 36%, respectively. There were no perioperative fatalities. Complications included wound infection (4 patients), orocutaneous fistula (2 patients), flap necrosis (1 patient), trismus (1 patient), and neuropathy (1 patient).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative RT results in effective disease control with acceptable toxicity and should be considered for selected patients with recurrent or persistent cancers of the head and neck.

Intraoperative single fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy for head and neck cancers

PURPOSE

To report on the use of single fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy in delivering localized intraoperative radiation therapy to sites in the head and neck region inaccessible to intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

After maximal surgical resection, 7.5-20 Gy intraoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IOHDR) was delivered to 65 patients using custom-made surface applicators.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year local control rates for the entire group were 77%, 69%, and 59%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 83%, 63%, and 42%, respectively, with a median overall survival of 50 months. There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

IOHDR can be used to treat selected locally advanced head and neck tumors arising at sites inaccessible to IOERT or at institutions not using IOERT. A prospective multi-institutional study with a larger number of patients treated with IOHDR is needed to firmly establish the efficacy of IOHDR in this population group.

Radiotherapy-induced salivary dysfunction

Dry mouth (xerostomia) is one of the most common complaints following radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancers. Notably, RT causes irreparable damage to salivary glands that increases the risk for severe and long-term oral and pharyngeal disorders. Several strategies in the treatment of head and neck cancers have been developed to prevent RT-induced salivary dysfunction while providing definitive oncologic therapy. These include salivary-sparing RT; cytoprotectants (such as amifostine); combination therapy of high-dose-rate intraoperative RT, external beam RT, plus a cytoprotectant; salivary gland surgical transfer; and gene therapy. Future research that incorporates biologic, pharmacologic, and technologic advancements that optimize therapeutic ratios and minimizes adverse oral sequelae is warranted.

Intraoperative radiation therapy in the multimodality approach to upper aerodigestive tract cancer

The cure rate of operable lung cancer and locally advanced head and neck cancer remains suboptimal, with a limited rate of local control despite improvements in the surgical removal of primary tumors and in methods for mediastinal lymph node dissection, in particular. The efficacy of adjuvant therapy, such as EBRT, has improved, and the immediate efficacy of new chemotherapeutic drugs is increasingly significant, although local recurrences remain frequent. Locoregional failure is not uncommon in upper aerodigestive tract cancers. Factors limiting radiocurability for locally advanced (stage III) lung cancer include mediastinal intolerance of irradiation (high risk of mediastinal fibrosis, which increases exponentially when levels of much more than 50 Gy are administered to the whole mediastinum) and the very high radiosensitivity of the healthy lung, which can develop fibrosis with relatively small or moderate doses starting at 18 to 20 Gy, and even more frequently when larger volumes are irradiated. Head and neck neoplasms are less difficult sites in which to administer doses of up to 70 Gy of external beam radiotherapy initially, but, like locoregionally recurrent lung cancers, they are not easily reirradiated with tumoricidal doses of EBRT. For these reasons, IORT seems to be a good option for increasing local control, because areas of [figure: see text] residual microscopic disease may be irradiated using IOERT approaches without affecting critical organs to the same extent. In addition, careful patient selection is paramount. Combined modality treatment regimens incorporating IORT may benefit patients with locally advanced disease. The ability of IORT to sterilize microscopic residual disease can enhance the "completeness" of resection and thus, theoretically, improve local control. Although distant disease dissemination remains by far the overriding issue, as newer effective agents emerge, local failure will continue to be a problem. Preliminary studies have demonstrated that IORT can be administered to patients who have locally advanced NSCLC and head and neck cancer, in the context of aggressive combined modality therapy, and is generally well tolerated. Long-term efficacy and benefit can only be determined in the setting of carefully designed clinical trials. (See the article by Thomas and Merrick elsewhere in this issue for further discussion of this topic.) Several relatively small, single-institution pilot studies exploring the utility and benefit of IORT for locally advanced upper aerodigestive tract cancers have been conducted. Clear conclusions have been difficult to determine because of the mixing of disease stages, varying degrees and completeness of surgical resection, varying radiation doses, different schemas, and other factors. Yet, given the major morbidity and mortality associated with locally recurrent lung cancer, methods of improving local control need to be pursued and refined. Encouraging preliminary data suggest that IOERT can be safely administered and may benefit local control. Based on several centers' expertise in the combined modality treatment of locally advanced lung cancer and familiarity with IORT, the UCSF Thoracic Oncology Program has proposed a multicenter phase 2 study incorporating IORT in a combined multimodality treatment schema for patients who have completely resected locally advanced stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC (nonpleural effusion, non-N3) (Fig. 1). It is hoped that this study will commence in the upcoming year.

Rationale for integrating high-dose rate intraoperative radiation (HDR-IORT) and postoperative external beam radiation with subcutaneous amifostine for the management of stage III/IV head and neck cancer

Locoregional recurrence remains a major obstacle to achieving cure of locally advanced head and neck cancers despite maximal resection and postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Locoregional failure occurs in 30% to 40% of high-risk resected head and neck cancer patients after standard postoperative EBRT. In an effort to overcome this problem, a number of strategies have been designed to enhance the effectiveness of radiation including concurrent postoperative chemoradiation, accelerated radiation schedules, incorporation of targeted biologic therapies, and improved radiation delivery techniques such as intensity modulated radiation and high-dose rate (HDR) intraoperative radiation therapy. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) represents an important approach to improve outcome in head and neck cancer patients treated with definitive surgery. High-dose rate IORT is defined as the delivery of a single, large dose of radiation at the time of surgery when the tumor bed is exposed. In conjunction with EBRT, HDR-IORT offers several advantages including: (1) conformal delivery of a large dose of radiation while the tumor bed is precisely defined, minimizing the risk of a geographic miss; (2) potential for subsequent dose reduction of EBRT; (3) shortening overall treatment time; and (4) dose-escalation. Because mucositis represents the dose-limiting acute toxicity and xerostomia ranks as the most common long-term quality-of-life complaint, a reduction of the EBRT dose may provide an important benefit in reducing toxicity, especially when combined with the radioprotectant amifostine (Ethyol, WR-2721; MedImmune, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD). The purpose of this article is to review the rationale for integrating HDR-IORT with a reduced dose of postoperative EBRT combined with amifostine to improve locoregional control and quality of life outcomes in advanced-stage resected head and neck cancer patients.

Intraoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy for paranasal sinus tumors

PURPOSE

Advanced and recurrent tumors of the paranasal sinuses can be difficult to irradiate to high doses with standard external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), conventional brachytherapy, or intraoperative electron beams. We, therefore, explored the role of intraoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IOHDR) as a boost to EBRT in primary tumors or as sole adjuvant treatment in recurrent disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1992 and 1998, 34 patients with locally advanced tumors arising in the paranasal sinuses were treated with IOHDR after maximal surgical excision. Twenty-seven patients with new primaries underwent gross resection and 10-12.5 Gy IOHDR followed by 45-50 Gy EBRT. Seven previously irradiated (45-63 Gy) patients with recurrent disease were treated with 15-20 Gy of IOHDR alone after gross excision. Local control and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 6 years (range 34-120 months), the 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rate was 80%, 62%, and 44%, respectively. The overall local control rate at 1 and 5 years was 75% and 65%, respectively, and distant failure was documented in 44% of patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that the presence of gross disease after surgical resection was the strongest prognosticator, with a 5-year survival and local control rate of 17% and 50%, respectively, compared with 60% and 68%, respectively, for microscopic disease. The local control rates of patients with new primaries were similar to those of patients treated for recurrent disease (63% vs. 71%), probably because gross residual disease occurred only in the group of patients with new primaries. The addition of EBRT to IOHDR increased the 5-year disease-free survival rate from 27% to 44% but had no effect on local control (64% vs. 65%).

CONCLUSION

IOHDR can be safely used to deliver a high radiation dose to locally advanced and recurrent tumors in the paranasal sinuses. In an attempt to improve outcome, we are now adding limited-dose EBRT (20-30 Gy) after 17.5 Gy of IOHDR in previously irradiated patients and increasing the EBRT dose for both microscopic (50-54 Gy) and gross residual disease (60-65 Gy) after 15 Gy of IOHDR in previously unirradiated patients. Chemosensitization should also be considered in previously irradiated patients and in those with gross residual disease. Interstitial boosting techniques, which can deliver higher doses at depth, should also be considered in patients with gross residual disease.

Multimodal intensification therapy for previously untreated advanced resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or hypopharynx

BACKGROUND

An intensified treatment regimen for previously untreated Stage III and IV resectable oral cavity, oropharyngeal, or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma was analyzed to assess disease control, patient compliance, and toxicity.

METHODS

Forty three patients with previously untreated, advanced, resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or hypopharynx were enrolled in a prospective Phase II institutional clinical trial at a tertiary care comprehensive cancer center. This regimen was a continuum of multimodal treatment in a contracted time interval. It included preoperative slightly accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin, followed immediately with surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy, and completed with early postoperative weekly paclitaxel (beginning on Day 6 after surgery), two additional cisplatin cycles, and concurrent once daily radiotherapy beginning on Day 28 after surgery.

RESULTS

The current trial was designed to reduce the toxicity of the systemic therapy while maintaining or improving locoregional/distant disease control and patient compliance. There were 43 patients enrolled, and the range of time at risk was 2.6 to 24.7 months (median, 14.6 months). Of the 43 registered patients, 43 were evaluable. The locoregional (100%) and systemic (93%) disease control rates were excellent, with low rates of patient noncompliance (21%) and reduced levels of toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

An intensive treatment regimen that improves disease control and treatment compliance is clearly feasible for this patient population. Future plans include modifications to continue to reduce toxicity and expansion to a multi-center Phase II trial to determine if the single institutional results can be duplicated.

High-dose-rate intraoperative irradiation: current status and future directions

Intraoperative irradiation (IORT) refers to the delivery of a single high dose of radiation therapy at the time of surgery when the tumor bed can be precisely defined and adjacent normal tissue maximally protected. It can be effectively delivered using either electrons (IOERT) or photons produced from a high-dose-rate gamma emitting radioisotope (HDR-IORT) and has been explored primarily for locally advanced or recurrent tumors at high risk for local failure despite extensive resection and full dose external beam radiation. With coordinated multidisciplinary interaction, IORT can be integrated in a combined-modality setting without undue additional toxicity. The purpose of this review will be to summarize the growing HDR-IORT experience in the treatment of various cancers, to compare its efficacy and toxicity vis a vis the IOERT data, and to discuss future trials as well as new areas of potential application.

Pilot study of intraoperative high dose rate brachytherapy for head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To develop a new technique, intraoperative high dose rate brachytherapy (IOHDR), to deliver localized radiation therapy intraoperatively to head and neck tumors at sites inaccessible to intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOEBRT) in the skull base region.

METHODS

After maximal surgical resection, afterloading catheters spaced 1 cm apart embedded in custom surface applicators made of foam or silicone were placed on resected tumor beds. IOHDR was delivered in a shielded operating room using preplanned dosimetry with a nominal 10 Ci iridium-192 source in an HDR micro-Selectron afterloader. Twenty-nine patients (20 males, 9 females) ranging in age from 9 to 80 years (median = 61) were irradiated intraoperatively for advanced head and neck tumors at sites inaccessible to IOEBRT. Six patients who had previously received external beam radiation (EBRT) ranging from 50 to 75 Gy, were given 15 Gy of IOHDR only. Twenty-three patients who had no prior radiation received 7.5 to 12.5 Gy IOHDR, and 45 to 50 Gy EBRT was planned post-operatively; however, six of these patients did not complete the planned EBRT. Doses to normal tissues were reduced whenever possible by shielding with lead or by displacement with gauze or retractors. Treatment time ranged from 3.8 to 23 min (median = 6.5 min). Five patients received concurrent cis-platinum based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients treated to 30 sites had local tumor control of 67% and crade survival of 72%, with the follow-up ranging from 3 to 33 months (median = 21 months). In the group of 17 previously unirradiated patients who had completed full treatment (IOHDR and EBRT) to 18 sites, the local tumor control was 89%, and all of these patients survived. Tumor control in the six previously unirradiated patients who did not complete EBRT was 50% with a crude survival of 50%. In the group of six previously irradiated patients treated by IOHDR only, the local tumor control was 17% with a crude survival of 17%. No intraoperative complications were noted. The delayed morbidity included cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak with bone exposure (1), chronic subdural hematoma (1), septicemia (1), otitis media (1), and severe xerostomia (1). We cannot comment on long-term morbidity due to the relatively short follow-up period of 21 months.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to deliver IOHDR, with acceptable toxicity, to skull base tumors at sites inaccessible to IOEBRT. The use of IOHDR as a pre-radiotherapy boost produced excellent local control and survival in the selected group of patients who had no previous radiation therapy. The use of exclusive IOHDR in the previously irradiated group resulted in poor outcome, possibly due to the limitations on re-irradiation doses and/or volumes determined by normal tissue tolerance or because these patients have inherently radioresistant tumors. Higher IOHDR doses, additional EBRT, and/or chemotherapy should be considered for this group. The use of IOHDR as a pre-EBRT boost to maximize local control has a promising future in the treatment of carefully selected patients with advanced skull base tumor.