Audit in the management of T3 fixed-cord laryngeal cancer

Total laryngectomy vs. non-surgical organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer: a metanalysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the oncological results and the functional outcomes of patients undergoing Total Laryngectomy (TL) with the non-surgical treatment (organ preservation protocol) in the treatment of advanced laryngeal carcinomas through systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A literature survey strategy was employed in order to perform a systematic review of the available evidence. Success rate and functional outomes after oncological treatment of patients with advanced laryngeal carcinomas was evaluated through systematic review and metanalysis, comparing TL and organ preservation protocol.

RESULTS

The surgical treatment was associated with better survival outcomes. When stratifying by T stage, while patients with T4 staging have less risk of mortality with TL, there is no difference between the different treatments for patients with T3 tumors. Surgery is related to a lower chance of recurrence, late dysphagia and feeding tube dependence.

CONCLUSION

Patients with T4 tumors should undergo TL as their treatment of choice. For patients with T3 tumors, there is no differences on the risk of mortality according to the therapeutic option, however, there is a greater chance of recurrence and dysphagia when surgery is not performed.

Survival Outcomes in T3 Laryngeal Cancers: Primary Total Laryngectomy vs. Concurrent Chemoradiation or Radiation Therapy-A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of cT3 laryngeal cancers remains controversial, with studies recommending surgical or non-surgical approaches. Despite the many papers that have been published on the subject, there is a lack of studies showing which treatment has better results in terms of survival.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the difference in survival outcomes following total laryngectomy (TL), concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) or radiation therapy (RT) alone in T3 laryngeal cancers.

METHODS

Search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases from 1995 to 2023 employing specific keywords and Boolean operators to retrieve relevant articles. Statistical analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the Q-test and I2 statistic. Funnel plot asymmetry was assessed using rank correlation and regression tests.

RESULTS

The qualitative data synthesis comprised 10,940 patients from 16 included studies. TL was performed in 2149 (19.4%), CRT in 6723 (61.5%), RT in 295 (2.7%), while non-surgical treatment was not specified in 1773 (16.2%) patients. The pooled 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were TL = 73%, CRT = 74.7%, RT = 57.9%, 3-year OS rates were TL = 64.3%, CRT = 62.9%, RT = 52.4%, and 5-year OS rates were TL = 54.2%, CRT = 52.7%, RT = 40.8%. There was a significant heterogeneity in the included studies. There was no statistically significant difference in 2-year OS (logOR= -0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI): -1.99 to 0.23), p = 0.12), 3-year OS (logOR = -0.6 (95% CI: -1.34 to 0.15), p = 0.11), and 5-year OS (logOR = -0.54 (95% CI: -1.29 to 0.21), p = 0.16) between TL and CRT. Instead, there was significant difference in 2-year OS (logOR= -1.2383 (95% CI: -2.1679 to -0.3087), p = 0.009), 3-year OS (-1.1262 (95% CI: -1.6166 to -0.6358), p < 0.001), and 5-year OS (-0.99 (95% CI: -1.44 to -0.53)), p < 0.001) between TL and RT alone.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

TL followed with adjuvant (chemo)radiation on indication and CRT with salvage surgery in reserve appear to have similar OS outcomes. Both resulted in better OS outcomes compared to RT alone in the treatment of T3 laryngeal cancers. If patients are unfit for chemotherapy, making CRT impossible, surgery may become the choice of treatment.

[Larynx preservation: recommendations for decision-making in T3 laryngeal cancer patients]

BACKGROUND

By today's standard, the optimal treatment of every individual tumor patient is discussed and determined in an interdisciplinary tumor board. According to the new S3 guidelines, larger volume T3 laryngeal cancers which are no longer safely resectable with larynx-sparing surgery are ideal candidates for a larynx preservation approach using primary chemoradiation (pCRT). So far, no clear criteria have been defined under what circumstances primary radiotherapy alone (pRT) might be acceptable in case chemotherapy (CT) is prohibited or in what cases, even in T3, upfront total laryngectomy with risk-adapted adjuvant treatment (TL±a[C]RT) should be recommended.

METHOD

The literature was searched for parameters chosen as criteria for an inclusion in the surgical rather than the conservative arm in non-randomized LP studies or which proved to be significant prognostic markers after conservative treatment. Development of a counselling tool for therapeutic decision making.

RESULTS

Significant prognostic markers were tumor volume (< 3.5 ccm/< 6 ccm vs. 6-12 ccm vs. > 12 ccm), presence and kind of vocal cord fixation (none vs. Succo I/II vs. Succo III/IV), extent of cartilage infiltration (none vs. minimal vs. multiple/gross), nodal status (N0‑1 vs. N2-3), and laryngeal dysfunction (pretreatment necessity of feeding tube or tracheostomy).

CONCLUSION

For T3 laryngeal cancers, pRT could be acceptable when the tumor volume is < 3.5 ccm for glottic and < 6 ccm for supraglottic tumors and there are no further risk factors. pCRT can be regarded as the standard for LP for tumors between 6 ccm and 12 ccm, vocal cord fixation Succo pattern I/II, only minimal cartilage infiltration and a high nodal burden. For tumor > 12 ccm, vocal cord fixation Succo pattern III/IV, gross or multiple cartilage infiltration or clinically relevant laryngeal dysfunction, upfront TL±a[C]RT should be considered.

Chemoradiotherapy but Not Radiotherapy Alone for Larynx Preservation in T3. Considerations from a German Observational Cohort Study

Simple Summary

For advanced laryngeal carcinoma, primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (pCRT or pRT) is used as an alternative to total laryngectomy (TL) to preserve a functional larynx. For advanced laryngeal cancer (T4), poorer survival has been reported after nonsurgical treatment. Is there a need to fear worse survival in moderately advanced tumors (T3)? The outcomes after pRT, pCRT, or surgery were evaluated in 121 patients with T3 laryngeal cancers. pCRT and TL with risk-adopted adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (TL ± a(C)RT) yielded results without a significant survival difference. However, after pRT alone, survival was significantly poorer than after TL ± a(C)RT. Thus, according to our data and supported by the literature, pCRT instead of pRT alone is recommended for T3 laryngeal cancers. According to the literature, this recommendation also applies to bulky tumors (6–12 mm), vocal cord fixation, at least minimal cartilage infiltration, and advanced N stage. TL ± a(C)RT instead of larynx preservation should be considered if any of these factors is present and chemotherapy is prohibited; in cases with a tumor volume > 12 mm, severe forms of vocal cord fixation or cartilage infiltration; or when the patient needs a feeding tube or a tracheotomy before the onset of therapy.

Abstract

For advanced laryngeal cancers, after randomized prospective larynx preservation studies, nonsurgical therapy has been applied on a large scale as an alternative to laryngectomy. For T4 laryngeal cancer, poorer survival has been reported after nonsurgical treatment. Is there a need to fear worse survival also in T3 tumors? The outcomes of 121 T3 cancers treated with pCRT, pRT alone, or surgery were evaluated in an observational cohort study in Germany. In a multivariate Cox regression of the T3 subgroup, no survival difference was noted between pCRT and total laryngectomy with risk-adopted adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (TL ± a(C)RT) (HR 1.20; 95%-CI: 0.57–2.53; p = 0.63). However, survival was significantly worse after pRT alone than after TL ± a(C)RT (HR 4.40; 95%-CI: 1.72–11.28, p = 0.002). A literature search shows that in cases of unfavorable prognostic markers (bulky tumors of 6–12 ccm, vocal cord fixation, minimal cartilage infiltration, or N2–3), pCRT instead of pRT is indicated. In cases of pretreatment dysphagia or aspiration requiring a feeding tube or tracheostomy, gross or multiple cartilage infiltration, or tumor volume > 12 ccm, outcomes after pCRT were significantly worse than those after TL. In these cases, and in cases where pCRT is indicated but the patient is not suitable for the addition of chemotherapy, upfront total laryngectomy with stage-appropriate aRT is recommended even in T3 laryngeal cancers.

Efficacy comparison between primary total laryngectomy and nonsurgical organ-preservation strategies in treatment of advanced stage laryngeal cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to provide a pooled analysis of controlled trials comparing long-term survival after primary laryngectomy and primary organ preservation methods in patients with T3-4 laryngeal cancer.

METHODS

We performed random-effects meta-analyses on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and locoregional control (LRC).

RESULTS

Fifteen studies met the selection criteria including 6288 patients (2696 patients who underwent primary laryngectomy and 3592 patients who underwent primary nonsurgical organ preservation therapy). There was a significant difference between the groups with respect to OS (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.89, P = .003). However, a subgroup analysis found OS was not significantly worse for patients with T3 laryngeal cancer who received primary organ preservation compared with patients who underwent primary laryngectomy (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.45-2.03, P = .91). There was no significant difference for DFS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39-1.04, P = .07) in two groups. Patients with laryngeal cancer who underwent primary laryngectomy had a better DSS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.88, P = .02) and LRC (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.390.80, P = .001) than patients who underwent primary nonsurgical organ preservation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our results support total laryngectomy for patients with T4 laryngeal cancer and show that primary organ preservation for laryngeal cancer has no advantage and also did not decrease the rate of OS in patients with T3 laryngeal cancer when compared with primary total laryngectomy.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes for T3 Glottic Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Objectives

This study compared the survival outcomes, local control rate, and laryngeal preservation rate of various treatment strategies in the treatment of T3 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottis using proportional meta-analyses.

Methods

Twenty-five retrospective case-series studies were included in these analyses. Treatment strategies were classified as total laryngectomy (TL), open partial laryngectomy (PL), transoral laser microsurgery (TLM), chemo-radiation therapy (CRT), and radiation therapy (RT) alone.

Results

The overall survival rate and disease-specific survival rate among laryngeal preservation treatments did not differ from the overall survival rate of TL. However, the local control rate was lower with RT than TL and PL, and laryngeal preservation rates of TLM and CRT were higher than RT alone.

Conclusion

Consideration of preservation of laryngeal function is necessary when treating T3 glottic squamous cell carcinoma. PL, TLM, and, CRT are considered more appropriate initial laryngeal preservation strategies if available.

Efficacy Comparison Between Total Laryngectomy and Nonsurgical Organ-Preservation Modalities in Treatment of Advanced Stage Laryngeal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

It remains unclear whether the efficacy of nonsurgical organ-preservation modalities (NOP) in the treatment of advanced-stage laryngeal cancer was noninferiority compared with that of total laryngectomy (TL). The objective of this study was to compare the curative effects between TL and NOP in the treatment of advanced-stage laryngeal cancer through a meta-analysis.Clinical studies were retrieved from the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge infrastructure. A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the differences in the curative efficacy of advanced-stage laryngeal cancer between TL and the nonsurgical method. Two reviewers screened all titles and abstracts, and independently assessed all articles. All identified studies were retrospective.Sixteen retrospective studies involving 8308 patients (4478 in the TL group and 3701 in the nonsurgical group) were included in this meta-analysis. The analysis results displayed the advantage of TL for 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS)(OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.85-4.23 and OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.14) as well as in 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS)(OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.61-1.98), but no significant difference in 2-year DSS was detected between the 2 groups (OR = 2.09,95% CI0.69-6.40). Additionally, there were no significant differences between TL and NOP for 5-year local control (LC) either (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 0.87-3.53). When we carried out subgroup analyses, the advantage of TL was especially obvious in T4 subgroups, but not in T3 subgroups.This is the first study to compare the curative effects on advanced-stage laryngeal cancer using meta-analytic methodology. Although there was a trend in favor of TL for OS and DSS, there is no clear difference in oncologic outcome between TL and NOP. Therefore, other factors such as tumor T-stage and size, lymph node metastasis, and physical condition are also important indicators for treatment choice.

Primary surgical treatment of T3 glottic carcinoma: long-term results and decision-making aspects

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of primary surgical treatment in the management of T3 glottic carcinomas.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of the records for all patients treated with primary surgery for T3 glottic carcinomas at a tertiary referral center between 1980 and 2005 was carried out. Data for the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed, as well as local control rates in relation to vocal cord immobility, N classification, choice of surgical modality, and adjuvant therapy. Patients who underwent partial laryngectomy were also evaluated in relation to organ preservation and the rate of permanent tracheotomies.

RESULTS

The 5-year DSS in the 120 patients was 78.3%. Positive neck disease was shown to be a significant negative prognostic factor. Organ preservation was achieved in 90.1% of the patients who underwent partial laryngectomy and in 50% of the overall patient group. The occult metastasis rate was 14%.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary surgical treatment is an effective modality against T3 glottic carcinomas. Partial laryngectomy is a reliable method in carefully selected cases. Low complication rates can be expected.

[Radical surgery of the malignant laryngeal tumors]

Modern therapeutical protocols for treatment of T3 and T4 malignomas of the larynx are not adjusted, because there are attempts to treat these diseases with non-operative methods (such as chemo- and radiotherapy) in order to preserve the organ. The aim of the study was to establish today's results of the surgical treatement of patients with T3 and T4 laryngeal malignoma. We studied the group of patients with laryngeal carcinoma, who had undergone total laryngectomy, during the period of eight years (1990-1997). The patients' data was submitted from medical documentation, it was filled in specially designed questionnaries and was statistically reviewed. During this eight-year-period, 1054 total laryngectomies were done. The five-years survival rate, established in the group of patients who had undergone total laryngectomiy is 308/794 (39%). In the patient group where total laryngectomy was salvage surgery after radiotherapy, the five-years survival rate is 47/172 (27%). In the patient group where total laryngectomy was salvage surgery after conservative or reconstructive surgery, the five-years survival rate is 28/84 (33%). Despite diagnostical and therapeutical achievements, prognosis for T3 and T4 malygnoma of the larynx was not significantly approved in the last few decades.

Management of T3N0M0 glottic carcinoma: therapeutic outcomes

BACKGROUND

The best therapeutic approach for the treatment of T3N0M0 (stage III) glottic carcinoma is controversial.

METHOD

A retrospective study of Tumor Research Project data were performed using patients with T3N0M0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma treated with curative intent by seven different treatment modalities from January 1950 to December 1996 at Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish Hospital.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients with T3N0M0 glottic carcinoma were treated using seven modalities: total laryngectomy (TL, n = 30), TL with neck dissection (TL/ND, n = 40), conservation surgery alone (CS, n = 22), radiation therapy alone (RT, n = 29), TL combined with RT (TL/RT, n = 31), TL and ND combined with RT (TL/ND/RT, n = 36), and CS combined with RT (CS/RT, n = 12). The overall 5-year observed survival rate (OS) was 54% and the 5-year disease-specific survival rate (DSS) was 67%. The 5-year DSS for the individual treatment modalities included TL, 65.4%; TL/ND, 76.5%; CS, 71.4%; RT, 56.5%, TL/RT, 51.9%; TL/ND/RT, 71.4%; and CS/RT, 80%. There was no significant difference in DSS for any individual treatment modality (P =.375). The overall local and regional control rate was 74% (148 of 200). The overall recurrence rate was 37.5% with recurrence at the primary site and in the neck of 19.5% and 11%, respectively. Recurrence was not related to treatment modality. The 5-year DSS after treatment of recurrent cancer (salvage rate) was 35.8%. The incidence of distant metastasis was 11% and for second primary cancers it was 19.5%. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between necks initially treated (72%, 5-y DSS) versus necks observed and later treated if necessary (70%, 5-y DSS) (P =.797).

CONCLUSIONS

The seven treatment modalities had statistically similar recurrence, complication, and survival rates. Patients with clear surgical margins have a significant survival advantage compared with patients with close and involved margins. Because postoperative radiation therapy in patients with positive margins did not improve survival, formal re-resection of the site of the positive margin should be considered. In patients whose N0 neck was not treated electively, close follow-up observation with meticulous examinations combined with appropriate treatment for subsequent neck disease resulted in a similar survival rate compared with those patients whose N0 necks were treated initially. Six-year minimum follow-up is recommended for early identification of primary and neck recurrence and for discovering expected second primary cancers. Patients treated with RT and CS had statistically similar rates of survival, maintenance of voice, and acquired permanent tracheal stoma. CS is a valid alternative to RT in treating highly selected patients with T3N0 glottic carcinoma.

Radioterapia como tratamento exclusivo no câncer avançado da laringe

Caracteristicamente os estágios avançados (III e IV) do câncer da laringe são tratados inicialmente por cirurgia, seguida de radioterapia complementar. Esta tem sido a combinação terapêutica que tem obtido os melhores resultados, com relação à maior sobrevida e ao maior tempo livre de doença, nestes pacientes. Porém, como freqüentemente a cirurgia a ser adotada nestes casos representa uma mutilação, perda da voz laríngea, nem sempre esta opção de tratamento é aceita pelos pacientes. Por outro lado, pacientes portadores de doença em estágio avançado podem encontrar-se com suas condições clínicas bastante comprometidas, o que impossibilita a realização de uma cirurgia de grande porte. A associação de quimioterapia e radioterapia tem tido pouca utilidade neste tipo de pacientes, pois geralmente apresentam estado clínico geral comprometido e não suportam a alta toxicidade dos esquemas terapêuticos empregados. Nestes casos a indicação de radioterapia exclusiva, como forma de tentar controlar a doença, tem sido a única arma terapêutica que nos resta, e cujos resultados sempre foram uma incógnita no nosso meio. Foram estudados 62 pacientes portadores de carcinoma epidermóide avançado (estágios III e IV) da laringe, tratados por radioterapia exclusiva, no Hospital do Câncer (INCa), durante os anos de 1992 e 1993. Foi realizado tratamento radioterápico com intenção curativa, sendo empregada a dose clássica de 50cGy em cinco semanas. Estes pacientes foram retrospectivamente analisados quanto à sobrevida, ao estágio da doença, à presença de linfonodos cervicais metastáticos, à idade e à necessidade de traqueostomia prévia. Além da constatação da total ineficácia da radioterapia no controle da doença laríngea estágio IV, detectou-se que a sobrevida de três anos igual a 54% para os pacientes do estágio III e a preservação da função da laringe em 2/3 dos pacientes, poderão representar, dependendo de estudos mais abrangentes, uma alternativa terapêutica para pacientes selecionados.