Susceptibility Testing for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria: Should it be Performed?

Flow cytometric testing of susceptibilities of Mycobacterium avium to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin and rifabutin in 24 hours

OBJECTIVE

To develop a biologically safe flow cytometric susceptibility test that depends on detection and enumeration of actively growing Mycobacterium avium organisms in drug-free and antimycobacterial agent-containing medium.

METHODS

Prior to analysis by flow cytometry, all M. avium susceptibility test samples were inactivated by exposure to paraformaldehyde. The susceptibilities of 20 clinical isolates of M. avium to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, and rifabutin were tested by the flow cytometric and BACTEC methods.

RESULTS

Agreement was 97% between the results of the two methods. The results of flow cytometric susceptibility tests were available 24 h after inoculation of drug-containing medium, while the BACTEC method required 4-8 days to complete.

CONCLUSIONS

The flow cytometric assay is safe, simple and reproducible.

Evaluation of a new method for rapid drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates by using the mycobacteria growth indicator tube

The reliability of the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT [BBL]) for rapid drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) isolates was evaluated. MICs of amikacin, clarithromycin, clofazimine, ethambutol, and rifabutin were determined by the MGIT system for 16 MAC strains. The results were compared with those obtained by the BACTEC broth macrodilution method. The turnaround times were 6 to 8 days (median, 7 days) for the MGIT and 5 to 7 days (median, 6 days) for the BACTEC system. Agreements with BACTEC system-determined MICs, within +/-1 log2 dilution, were 100, 100, 88, 63, and 44% for amikacin, clofazimine, rifabutin, clarithromycin, and ethambutol, respectively. Within +/-2 log2 dilutions, agreement with BACTEC system-determined MICs increased to 100% for all the tested drugs. In addition, if MGIT-determined MICs were evaluated according to the thresholds adopted for the interpretation of BACTEC system-determined ones, ethambutol was the only drug for which susceptible strains were frequently misclassified as resistant. It is concluded that the MGIT system is a promising, nonradiometric alternative to the BACTEC method for rapid susceptibility testing of MAC isolates; however, additional studies are required to confirm our results and to determine the optimal criteria for the interpretation of ethambutol MICs.