A global perspective on the past, present, and future of nosocomial infection prevention and control

The Effect of Infection Control Nurses on the Occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Healthcare-Acquired Infection and Multidrug-Resistant Strains in Critically-Ill Children

Background

Healthcare-acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) infections in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), which have a high incidence, increase treatment costs and mortality, and seriously threaten the safety of critically ill children. It is essential to seek convenient and effective methods to control and prevent healthcare-acquired infections (HAIs). This research was conducted to study the effect of infection control nurses on the occurrence of P. aeruginosa HAIs and multi-drug resistance (MDR) strains in PICU.

Methods

The clinical data was divided into two groups, with the age ranging from 1 month to 14 years. One group of the critically ill patients(N = 3,722) was admitted to PICU from 2007 to 2010, without the management of infection control nurses. The other group of the critically ill patients (N = 3,943) was admitted to PICU from 2011 to 2013, with the management of infection control nurses. Compare the mortality, morbidity and the incidence of acquired P. aeruginosa infections to evaluate the effect of infection control nurses.

Results

After implementation of the post of infection control nurses, the patient's overall mortality fell from 4.81% to 3.73%. Among the patients with endotracheal intubation more than 48 hours, the incidence of endotracheal intubation-related pneumonia decreased from 44.6% to 34.32%. The mortality of patients with endotracheal intubation decreased from 16.96% to 10.17%, and the morbidity of HAIs with P. aeruginosa decreased from 1.89% to 1.07%. The mutual different rate (MDR) dropped from 67.95% to 44.23%. There were remarkable differences in these rates between the two groups (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Implementing the post of infection control nurses is associated with effectively reducing the HAI rate, especially the incidence and morbidity of P. aeruginosa HAIs, reducing PICU mortality, improving P. aeruginosa drug resistance.

Infection prevention and control strategies in the era of limited resources and quality improvement: a perspective paper

This paper aims to describe, using an evidence-based approach, the importance of and the resources necessary for implementing effective infection prevention and control (IPC) programmes. The intrinsic and explicit values of such strategies are presented from a clinical, health-economic and patient safety perspective. Policy makers and hospital managers are committed to providing comprehensive, accessible, and affordable healthcare of high quality. Changes in the healthcare system over time accompanied with variations in demographics and case-mix have considerably affected the availability, quality and ultimately the safety of healthcare. The main goal of an IPC programme is to prevent and control healthcare-associated infections (HAI). Many patient-, healthcare provider-, and organizational factors are associated with an increased risk for acquiring HAIs and may impact both the quality and outcome of patient care. Evidence has been published in support of having an effective IPC programme. It has been estimated that about one-third of HAIs could be prevented if key elements of the evidence-based recommendations for IPC are adequately introduced and followed. However, several healthcare agencies from over the world have reported deficits in the essential resources and components of current IPC programmes. To meet its main goal, staffing, training, and infrastructure requirements are needed. Nevertheless, and given the economic crisis, policy makers and hospital managers may be tempted to not increase or even to reduce the budget as it consumes resources and does not generate sufficient visible revenue. IPC is a critical issue in patient safety, as HAIs are by far the most common complication affecting admitted patients. The significant clinical and health-economic burden HAIs place on the healthcare system speak to the importance of getting introduced effective IPC programmes.

Device-associated hospital-acquired infection rates in Turkish intensive care units. Findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC)

We conducted a prospective study of targeted surveillance of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in 13 intensive care units (ICUs) from 12 Turkish hospitals, all members of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). The definitions of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNISS) were applied. During the three-year study, 3288 patients for accumulated duration of 37 631 days acquired 1277 device-associated infections (DAI), an overall rate of 38.3% or 33.9 DAIs per 1000 ICU-days. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (47.4% of all DAI, 26.5 cases per 1000 ventilator-days) gave the highest risk, followed by central venous catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infections (30.4% of all DAI, 17.6 cases per 1000 catheter-days) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (22.1% of all DAI, 8.3 cases per 1000 catheter-days). Overall 89.2% of all Staphylococcus aureus infections were caused by methicillin-resistant strains, 48.2% of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone, 52.0% to ceftazidime, and 33.2% to piperacilin-tazobactam; 51.1% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolones, 50.7% to ceftazidime, 38.7% to imipenem, and 30.0% to piperacilin-tazobactam; 1.9% of Enterococcus sp. isolates were resistant to vancomycin. This is the first multi-centre study showing DAI in Turkish ICUs. DAI rates in the ICUs of Turkey are higher than reports from industrialized countries.

The organization of hospital infection control in Turkey

This article describes the current organization of infection control in Turkey in regard to regulations, functions and responsibilities of infection control committees and the national NosoLINE project. Also, incidence and prevalence of hospital infections and antimicrobial resistance in Turkey are reported.

Prospective surveillance applying the national nosocomial infection surveillance methods in a Brazilian pediatric public hospital

BACKGROUND

A hospital-wide, traditional prospective surveillance for nosocomial infections was commenced in 1992 in Centro Geral de Pediatria in Minas Gerais, Brazil, to describe the epidemiology of nosocomial infection in this pediatric hospital and to implement cross-infection prevention and control policies.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort nosocomial infection surveillance of all patients receiving acute care according to the hospital-wide and intensive care unit components of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System from January 1993 to December 1997 (14,892 discharges; 131,764 patient-days). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta) 1988-definitions and the Brazilian Ministry of Health-Legislation 930 (1992) were used.

RESULTS

The average overall nosocomial infection rate per 1000 patient-days was 8.9 in units 2 and 3 and 16.4 in the pediatric intensive care unit. Over time, the overall hospital infection rate decreased from 16.6 nosocomial infections per 1000 patient-days in 1993 to 7.0 in 1997 (P <.05). We believe this can be attributed to interventions and data reporting during the period. The five most frequent sites of infections were eye-ear-nose-throat (38%), skin (22%), pneumonia (12%), soft tissue (5%) and laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (4%). In the pediatric intensive care unit, the most frequent nosocomial infection sites were pneumonia related to mechanical ventilators (22%), with rates ranging from 0 to 42 per 1000 ventilator-days; and sepsis related to central lines (11%), with rates ranging from 0 to 32 per 1000 central line-days.

CONCLUSIONS

Describing the epidemiology of nosocomial infections in this hospital enabled us to establish infection occurrence, distribution, and expected incidence, as well as to recognize trends and keep track of possible outbreaks. The knowledge acquired through this surveillance allowed us to target more specific and continuous quality improvement projects, to upgrade health care quality in pediatric public hospitals in Brazil, and to implement preventive strategies. Methods from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System can be successfully applied in pediatric public hospitals in Brazil.

Variation in administrators' and clinicians' attitudes toward critical elements of an infection control program and the role of the infection control practitioner in New South Wales, Australia

BACKGROUND

Debate remains over the core activities of infection control (IC) programs. Differences in stakeholder opinions must be considered if consensus panel guidelines and recommendations are to be broadly applied. This article describes a survey of administrators and clinicians employed in hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Respondents self-reported their levels of agreement with affirmative statements regarding the role of the infection control practitioner (ICP) and the essential requirements and infrastructure of IC programs.

METHOD

The study population included administrators and clinicians in each public, private, and freestanding day hospital in New South Wales. Respondents reported the intensity of their agreement with 16 affirmative statements relating to IC program infrastructure and resources and the ICP's role and responsibilities.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 62.1% (587/945). Clinicians (349/587) and administrators (238/587) accounted for 59.5% and 40.5% of the response rate, respectively. Overall, administrators and clinicians reported greatest levels of agreement for those elements not requiring additional resources.

CONCLUSION

The extent of divergence between administrators and clinicians is not so great that it can not be resolved. Our findings demonstrate the degree of administrator support that clinicians can expect for each element. We advocate better communication between clinicians and administrators in conjunction with objective strategic planning. Our findings provide a guide for ICPs to either establish or negotiate the core components of their IC program.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): is there a need to change clinical practice?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a virulent organism that causes significant mortality and morbidity especially to patients in critical care areas (CCAs). MRSA can (and does in some cases) also contribute to an increased length of hospital stay and higher health care costs. The literature proposes that routine screening of patients in CCAs is an effective strategy to control MRSA. Furthermore, placing patients in contact isolation until screening results are confirmed can prevent the spread of MRSA. The policies for management of MRSA patients and the incidence of MRSA infection vary widely. The preliminary findings from this review suggest that a uniform policy regarding routine screening and infection control management for all CCA patients should be recommended. A uniform policy has the potential to reduce rates of infection, cross-contamination and associated health costs attributed to MRSA management. However, further research is required before changes to infection control policy can be recommended. The outcomes from this review will be used to increase staff awareness of current infection control practices for MRSA patients in critical care areas and encourage further research.

Comparison of effectiveness and required time of two surveillance methods in intensive care patients

The intensive care unit (ICU) standardized protocol of the NNIS (National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance) system is a surveillance method of hospital acquired infections (HAI), which provides device-associated infection rates. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and the required time for data collection and analysis of a selective surveillance method (SSM) derived from the NNIS ICU surveillance protocol, and to compare its data with that of a reference surveillance method (RSM). The sensitivity, specificity and the positive predictive value (PPV) of the RSM were 87.5, 100 and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and the PPV of the SSM were 59.4 97.6 and 79.2%, respectively. Considering device-related infections only (ventilator-related pneumonia, catheter-related urinary tract infections, central line-related sepsis), the sensitivities of the RSM and the SSM were 80.9 and 90.5%, respectively. The SSM required only one third of the time of the RSM (1.1 h and 3.4 h per 10 beds per week with the SSM and the RSM, respectively). We conclude that the SSM has a very high sensitivity for detecting device associated infections, but is not sensitive enough for surveying all types of HAI.