Opioid peptide receptor studies. 9. Identification of a novel non-mu- non-delta-like opioid peptide binding site in rat brain

DARK Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: Etonitazene and Related Benzimidazoles

Etonitazene and related 2-benzylbenzimidazoles are potent analgetics invented in the research laboratories of the Swiss pharmaceutical giant CIBA in the late 1950s. Though the unprecedented structure distinguishes this class of compounds from poppy-derived and other synthetic analgetics, a range of studies indicate that these drugs are selective μ opioid receptor agonists possessing morphine-like pharmacotoxicological properties in animals as well as humans. Several unscheduled members of this synthetically readily accessible class of opioids that are not controlled under the international and national drug control systems have recently emerged on the illicit drug market. Among them, isotonitazene has been implicated in at least 200 fatalities in Europe and North America. None of the 2-benzylbenzimidazole derivatives have been developed into medicines, but etonitazene and some of its derivatives have been used as receptor probes and in addiction behavior studies in animals. The unique structure has inspired research on such benzimidazoles and related benzimidazolones of which "brorphine" made its debut as one of the newest psychoactive substance to emerge on the illicit opioid drug market in mid-2019. This in-depth review provides a historical introduction, an overview on the chemistry, pharmacological profiles, adverse effects, addiction liability, regulatory status, and the impact on chemical neuroscience of the 2-benzylbenzimidazoles. Structurally related benzimidazoles with opioid and/or analgesic properties are also discussed briefly.

Docking studies suggest ligand-specific delta-opioid receptor conformations

An automated docking procedure was used to study binding of a series of delta-selective ligands to three models of the delta-opioid receptor. These models are thought to represent the three ligand-specific receptor conformations. Docking results are in agreement with point mutation studies and suggest that different ligands--agonists and antagonists--may bind to the same binding site under different receptor conformations. Docking to different receptor models (conformations) also suggests that by changing to a receptor-specific conformation, the receptor may open or close different binding sites to other ligands.

Ten years of antisense inhibition of brain G-protein-coupled receptor function

Antisense oligonucleotides (AOs) are widely used as tools for inhibiting gene expression in the mammalian central nervous system. Successful gene suppression has been reported for different targets such as neurotransmitter receptors, neuropeptides, ion channels, trophic factors, cytokines, transporters, and others. This illustrates their potential for studying the expression and function of a wide range of proteins. AOs may even find therapeutic applications and provide an attractive strategy for intervention in diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). However, a lack of effectiveness and/or specificity could be a major drawback for research or clinical applications. Here we provide a critical overview of the literature from the past decade on AOs for the study of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The following aspects will be considered: mechanisms by which AOs exert their effects, types of animal model system used, detection of antisense action, effects of AO design and delivery characteristics, non-antisense effects and toxicological properties, controls used in antisense studies to assess specificity, and our results (failures and successes). Although the start codon of the mRNA is the most popular region (46%) to target by AOs, targeting the coding region of GPCRs is almost as common (41%). Moreover, AOs directed to the coding region of the GPCR mRNA induce the highest reductions in receptor levels. To resist degradation by nucleases, the modified phosphorothioate AO (S-AO) is the most widely used and effective oligonucleotide. However, the end-capped phosphorothioate AOs (ECS-AOs) are increasingly used due to possible toxic and non-specific effects of the S-AO. Other parameters affecting the activity of a GPCR-targeting AO are the length (mostly an 18-, 20- or 21-mer) and the GC-content (mostly varying from 30 to 80%). Interestingly, one-third of the AOs successfully targeting GPCRs possess a GC/AT ratio of 61-70%. AO-induced reductions in GPCR expression levels and function range typically from 21 to 40% and 41 to 50%, respectively. In contrast to many antisense reviews, we therefore conclude that the functional activity of a GPCR after AO treatment correlates mostly with the density of the target receptors (maximum factor 2). However, AOs are no simple tools for experimental use in vivo. Despite successful results in GPCR research, no general guidelines exist for designing a GPCR-targeting AO or, in general, for setting up a GPCR antisense experiment. It seems that the correct choice of a GPCR targeting AO can only be ascertained empirically. This disadvantage of antisense approaches results mostly from incomplete knowledge about the internalisation and mechanism of action of AOs. Together with non-specific effects of AOs and the difficulties of assessing target specificity, this makes the use of AOs a complex approach from which conclusions must be drawn with caution. Further antisense research has to be carried out to ensure the adequate use of AOs for studying GPCR function and to develop antisense as a valuable therapeutic modality.

Opioid peptide receptor studies. 12. Buprenorphine is a potent and selective mu/kappa antagonist in the [35S]-GTP-gamma-S functional binding assay

We utilized the [(35)S]-GTP-gamma-S functional binding assay to determine the selectivity of opioid receptor agonists in guinea pig caudate membranes. The study focused on two opioid agonists used for treating opioid-dependent patients: methadone and buprenorphine. Selective antagonists were used to generate agonist-selective conditions: TIPP + nor-BNI to measure mu receptors, CTAP + nor-BNI to measure gamma receptors and TIPP + CTAP to measure kappa receptors. The assay was first validated with opioid agonists of known subtype specificity (DAMGO for mu, SNC80 for delta, and U69, 593 for kappa receptors). Methadone-stimulated [(35)S]-GTP-gamma-S binding was mu-specific and less potent and efficacious than etorphine (K(d) = 1,537 nM vs. K(d) = 7.8 nM). Buprenorphine failed to stimulate [(35)S]-GTP-gamma-S binding but inhibited agonist-stimulated [(35)S]-GTP-gamma-S binding. The antagonist-K(i) values (nM) of buprenorphine at mu, delta, and kappa receptors were 0.088 nM, 1.15 nM, and 0.072 nM, respectively. The antagonist-K(i) values (nM) of naloxone at mu, delta, and kappa receptors were 1.39 nM, 25.0 nM, and 11.4 nM, respectively. Autoradiographic studies showed that buprenorphine failed to stimulate [(35)S]-GTP-gamma-S binding in caudate-level rat brain sections but blocked DAMGO-stimulated [(35)S]-GTP-gamma-S binding. In cells expressing the cloned rat mu receptor, buprenorphine was a partial agonist and potent mu antagonist. Administration of buprenorphine to rats produced a long-lasting (>24 h) decrease in mu and kappa2 receptor binding and attenuated mu-stimulated [(35)S]-GTP-gamma-S binding. Viewed collectively, these data indicate that, in this assay system, buprenorphine is a potent mu and gamma receptor antagonist. The clinical implications remain to be elucidated. Synapse 34:83-94, 1999. Published 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.