Tambur AR. Monitoring indirect presentation of alloantigens by utilizing the autologous processing machinery of dendritic cells in-vitro.
J Immunol Methods 2003;
283:215-23. [PMID:
14659913 DOI:
10.1016/j.jim.2003.09.011]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Judicious individualization of immunosuppression protocols requires the ability to monitor the recipients' specific immune response towards the allograft. While several indirect presentation studies have been reported, currently there are no consistently reliable means to assess the state of transplant acceptance. A potential explanation might be the lack of established kinetics for in-vitro indirect presentation assays.
METHODS
Dendritic cell (DCs) were used as self-specific "processing machinery" for the generation of allogeneic peptide repertoire tailored by the individual's capacity to process antigens via the indirect pathway. The kinetics of antigen processing and presentation of newly acquired antigens was then assessed to define the following: (1) Optimal time to introduce apoptotic-allogeneic cells to DCs; (2) optimal time for processing before induction of DC maturation; and (3) optimal time for stimulation of autologous T cells by the pulsed DCs.
RESULTS
Altering kinetic parameters associated with time allotted for antigen processing; antigen presentation and DCs maturation, showed substantial variations in the level of T cell activation, as was documented by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR)-like proliferation assays. Further experiments using allogeneic cellular extracts showed similar variations in T cell stimulation by monitoring T cell precursor frequencies and interferon (IFN)-gamma secretion ELISPOT assays. Using the appropriate kinetic parameters, we have also shown difference in T-cell-subsets (CD4, CD8) precursor frequencies and cytokine secretion in response to different antigenic sources.
CONCLUSIONS
The ability to construct an in-vitro, recipient-tailored, donor-specific, indirect presentation assay is dependent on essential kinetic parameters associated with antigen processing and presentation, as described in this report. Moreover, the use of this approach may circumvent the need for identifying specific immunogenic peptides for cancer-related or other vaccine-development studies.
Collapse