Aspectos quirúrgicos en los terceros y cuartos retrasplantes renales

Pediatric kidney retransplantation focused on surgical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Despite survival rates after pediatric kidney transplantation (KT) are on the rise it is still likely that most pediatric recipients will require more than one retransplant in their lifetime. The earlier the age at the first KT the higher is the risk of repeat pediatric kidney transplantation (RPKT).

OBJECTIVE

The current study aims to analyze the outcomes of repeat pediatric kidney transplantation (RPKT) among pediatric kidney transplant recipients focusing on surgical complications and compare the outcomes of second and subsequent grafts with those of the first kidney graft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of RPKT (<18 years) undertaken between January 2000-2020. We analyzed primary etiology of renal disease, time to graft loss (GL), etiology of initial graft failure, history of acute rejection, previous delayed graft function, HLA-mismatches at the initial transplant, surgical complications and outcomes. Additionally, we compared the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent RPKT (group 1) with those who received a first kidney graft (group 2).

RESULTS

Out of 229 kT, 59 patients underwent RPKT (26 females/33 males). At the time of RPKT median age was 11.37 years (SD:5.7). The most frequent primary renal disease was congenital nephrotic syndrome in 11 (18.6%). Fifty-four (91.5%) were on renal replacement therapy at the time of transplant. Fourty-one patients received their second KT (69.5%), 14 (23.7%) the third, 3 (5.1%) the fourth and 1 (1.7%) the fifth. Transplant graft nephrectomy (GN) was performed in 26 patients (44.1%) prior to retransplantation. Fifty-four (91.5%) received a cadaveric graft and 5 (8.5%) a living-related graft. An extraperitoneal approach was achieved in 53 patients (89.8%), whereas in the remaining 6 (10.2%) the graft was placed intraperitoneally. We observed 10 surgical complications (16.9%): 9 major which required reintervention and 1 minor (perirenal hematoma). No vascular complications were observed and none of the surgical complications were involved in graft loss. Graft survival at 1,3 and 5 years was 91%, 84% and 73% respectively. The most frequent cause of GL was chronic graft nephropathy in 15 (25.4%). After a mean follow-up of 9.40 years (SD: 4.7) only 2 patients died (3.4%), both with functioning grafts.

DISCUSSION

Pediatric recipients of second and subsequent kidney grafts constitute a remarkable high-risk population but are becoming more frequent at reference pediatric transplant centers.

CONCLUSIONS

RPKT is technically challenging but can yield good results. In our series overall the incidence of surgical complications and particularly vascular complications was low.

A Single-Center Experience With Third and Fourth Kidney Transplants and Second Kidney Transplant After Pancreas-Kidney Transplant: Surgical Aspects and Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Overall, 25% to 33% of patients on kidney transplant wait lists present with prior graft loss. In addition, the number of patients who require a retransplant seems to be increasing. Here, we describe our experience with patients who had a second kidney transplant after a previous pancreas-kidney transplant or a third or fourth kidney transplant. We focused specifically on the technical aspects and outcomes related to this patient group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was performed. The cohortincluded 15 patients > 18 years old who had received a second kidney graft after pancreas-kidney transplant or a second or greater kidney graft between 2013 and 2019.

RESULTS

Median age of recipients was 45 years (range, 20-58 y). In 10 patients, the transperitoneal approach was selected. In 5 patients, the retroperitoneal heterotopic kidney retransplant technique was used. Early surgical complications (≤ 30 days posttransplant) were reported in 4 patients. Three patients had late ureteral stenosis (> 90 days posttransplant). All grafts were functioning at time of patient discharge. Mean creatinine level was 2.69 mg/dL (range, 1.23-6.26 mg/dL). The 1-year and 2-year graft survivalrates were 85% and 75%, respectively. No grafts were lost because of surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Retransplant of a second graft after pancreas-kidney transplant or retransplant of a third or fourth renal graft is challenging but feasible, with evidence of reasonably positive outcomes after retransplant.

[Renal retransplantation: risk factors and results]

OBJECTIVE

to review our experience in renal retransplantations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

we carried out a retrospective study on 71 patients with retransplantation performed between 1980 and 2005. We studied: the characteristics of the recipient and graft, surgery data, causes of loss of the graft, number of rejects and transplantectomies and, survival of the graft.

RESULTS

the most frequent cause of graft loss was chronic rejection. The causes of first graft loss were not associated with a greater loss of the second graft (p>0.05). The percentage of anti-HLA antibodies increased in the second transplant in comparison to the first (17.23±27.91% vs. 1.21±7.43%) (p=0.001), however, it was not correlated with a significant increase in loss of the second graft (p=0.320). There were no significant differences between the complications of the first and second transplants (p>0.05) and they were not associated with graft loss (p>0.05). The patients with a transplantectomy in the first transplant presented a risk 8.5 times higher of undergoing a second one (p=0.0001; OR: 8.54; CI: 95% 0.941 - 77.501). The most frequent cause of transplantectomies in the second transplant was acute rejection. Acute rejection as a cause for transplantectomy in the first transplant proved to be an independent risk factor of transplantectomy of the second transplant (p=0.009). The mean survival of the second graft was 5.08±4.81 years, higher than the first transplant (p=0.133). The survival of the graft at 1.5 and 10 years was 83%, 75% and 52%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

the survival of the second transplant was not lower than the first, neither was there an increase in the number of complications.

Impact of Surgical Procedures and Complications on Outcomes of Third and Subsequent Kidney Transplants

BACKGROUND

Surgical procedures and complications have rarely been described in patients receiving a third or subsequent renal transplant.

METHODS

Data from 61 consecutive third (n=56), fourth (n=4), and fifth (n=1) renal transplants performed during 1974 to 2005 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Actuarial graft survival was 91%, 74%, and 57% at one, five, and 10 years, respectively. Technical failure accounted for the loss of three grafts (5%). A transperitoneal approach was necessary in 41% of patients. Technical difficulties occurred in half of the procedures, mainly due to atheroma or vascular calcifications. Overall, there were 45 surgical complications in 30 patients, of urological (n=11), vascular (n=6), infectious (n=9), hemorrhagic (n=12), digestive (n=3), or wound origin (n=4). The rate of surgical revision was 16%. Univariate analysis showed that among surgical complications, only vascular complications were associated with a poor graft outcome (P=0.02). Urological complications did not influence long-term graft outcome. Multivariate analysis of all surgical procedures and complications that might have influenced graft survival showed that only vascular complications were associated with a poorer graft outcome (relative risk=6.13, P=0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high rate of surgical complications and revisions, third and subsequent kidney transplantations may be performed safely by experienced surgeons without surgical complications influencing long-term graft outcome.