[Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: inicial experience with 50 cases]

Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: current status

The classic retroperitoneal open surgical access to the kidney has been duplicated while performing laparoscopy but is less common than transperitoneal laparoscopy. We reviewed minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy as a part of the international consultation on urological diseases and European Association of Urology international consultation on minimally invasive surgery in urology. A Pubmed/Medline search was performed to identify studies assessing the feasibility, safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and robotic retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy. The articles were reviewed to assess outcomes after simple, radical and donor nephrectomy and comparative trials between retroperitoneoscopic versus the open and transperitoneal route were evaluated. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy is feasible for most cases of benign non-functioning kidneys. Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy is also feasible for most tumours and may be better suited for posteriorly located tumours. Both retroperitoneoscopic and transperitoneal nephrectomy have similar outcomes but the operative time may be shorter for the former. The data are insufficient for robotic retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy probably because of limited space and lack of benefit of a robot in ablative surgeries.

Level of evidence: 3a

Efficacy of early use of snake retractor in retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A snake retractor is generally used to create a better surgical field and space, but when to start using it is still controversial. In this study, we used a snake retractor starting in an early stage of the procedure to safely perform surgery and compared the results with a control group in which the procedure depended on operator discretion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve patients were enrolled in this study and compared with a control group (n = 12) in which no special technique was used. We used four ports in both right- and left sided cases and used a snake retractor when removing the flank pad to create a better surgical space and field. We compared two groups in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

Three surgeons were enrolled. In the intervention group (early use of snake retractor), operative time was 107 to 300 minutes (median 162 min), and intraoperative blood loss was 0 to 462 g (69.5 g). In the control group, operative time was 185 to 485 minutes (258 min) and intraoperative blood loss was 0 to 302 g (40 g). Operative time was significantly shorter in the intervention group than the control group (P = 0.0034). There was no significant correlation with intraoperative blood loss volume and BMI in these two groups. We did not have any patients with metastasis or recurrence of cancer in either group in post-operative follow-up. Only the control group included a case with a slight duodenum injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Early use of the snake retractor in retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy may produce a significantly safer operative procedure.