La resucitación cardiopulmonar en el hospital: recomendaciones 2005

[Interprofessional team training with in situ simulation to improve the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation]

INTRODUCTION

In situ simulation facilitates training in clinical settings under similar emotional pressure that occurs in real life situations. The objective of the present study was to assess the feasibility, implementation, facilitators self-confidence and teaching challenges of a training program of cardiopulmonary resuscitation through an in situ simulation plan.

METHOD

A training program was designed for the facilitators. The number of professionals trained and in situ simulations performed were recorded, as well as the logistical challenges. An ad hoc survey was designed to assess facilitators self-confidence and educational challenge which were classified using the debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare©.

RESULTS

During a period of 3 years, 95 trained facilitators implemented 378 in situ simulations that allowed to train 1281 nursing professionals working at inpatient units. Integration of in situ simulations with daily activities and availability of facilitators were the main logistical challenges. Stablishing and maintaining a stimulating learning environment and structuring the debriefing in an organized way were the main educational challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

In situ simulation helps to train the coordination of nursing teams taking care of patients in cardiorespiratory arrest and to identify the risks that may affect patient safety. Identifying the educational challenges during the implementation of in situ simulation facilitates the design of specific educational and monitoring strategies.

The sounds of cardiac arrest: innovating to obtain an accurate record during in-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

To obtain an accurate audit during in-hospital cardiac arrest, following recommendations of the Utstein style and measuring time intervals between the different interventions, is difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the use of an audio recording system during in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation allows the register of more items during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective observational study between January 2008 and December 2009. The population that were included, were hospitalized patients and non-hospitalized patients assisted by a cardiac arrest team, except for critical areas. An audio recording system with a timer was turned on when cardiac arrest team was alerted. Recordings were reviewed to fill in the items recommended by the Utstein style. Time intervals were calculated. Mean number of completed items per patient were compared between recorded and non-recorded cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

119 CA team alerts took place. 64 (53.7%) cases were real CA and 37 (57.8%) of them were properly recorded. A mean number of items per patient in recorded cardiac arrest cases were 18.18 (±3.2) vs. 15.96 (±4.1) in non-recorded cardiac arrest cases (p<0.05). In the recorded cases, mean times were: alert - arrival: 1.23 (±0.95)min; arrival - cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation: 0.63 (±0.38)min; arrival - first defibrillation: 2.06 (±1.33)min; arrival - intubation: 8.42 (±4.64)min; arrival - first adrenaline: 3.30 (±1.98)min.

CONCLUSIONS

The audio recording system permits the register of a larger number of items per patient during in-hospital cardiac arrest and allows measurement of time intervals between the different interventions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

[Ethics of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions]

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) must be attempted if indicated, not done if it is not indicated or if the patient does not accept or has previously rejected it and withdrawn it if it is ineffective. If CPR is considered futile, a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order (DNR) will be recorded. This should be made known to all physicians and nurses involved in patient care. It may be appropriate to limit life-sustaining-treatments for patients with severe anoxic encephalopathy, if the possibility of clinical evolution to brain death is ruled out. After CPR it is necessary to inform and support families and then review the process in order to make future improvements. After limitation of vital support, certain type of non-heart-beating-organ donation can be proposed. In order to acquire CPR skills, it is necessary to practice with simulators and, sometimes, with recently deceased, always with the consent of the family. Research on CPR is essential and must be conducted according to ethical rules and legal frameworks.