[F-18-FDG positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of ovarian recurrence. Comparison with CT scan and CA 125]

Evaluation of follow-up strategies for women with epithelial ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a previous Cochrane Review, last updated in 2014. Ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cancer and seventh most common cause of death due to cancer in women worldwide. Traditionally, most women who have been treated for cancer undergo long-term follow-up in secondary care. However, it has been suggested that the use of routine review may not be effective in improving survival, or health-related quality of life (HRQOL), or relieving anxiety. In addition, traditional follow-up may not be cost-effective.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the potential effects of different strategies of follow-up in women with epithelial ovarian cancer, following completion of primary treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, CENTRAL 2022, Issue 11, MEDLINE, and Embase from August 2013 to November 2022. We also searched review articles and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated follow-up strategies for women with epithelial ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed standard Cochrane methodology. Two review authors independently selected potentially relevant trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. They compared results, and resolved disagreements by discussion. We assessed the certainty of evidence, using the GRADE approach, for the outcomes of interest: overall survival (OS), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), psychological effects, and cost analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

For this update, we included one new RCT, including 112 women with ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, who had completed primary treatment by surgery, with or without chemotherapy. This study reported the effect of individualised, i.e. individually tailored, nurse-led follow-up versus conventional medical follow-up on HRQOL, psychological outcomes, and cost-analysis. Individualised follow-up improved HRQOL in one of the two scales, with a decrease in mean difference (MD) in the QLQ-C30 discomfort scale following 12 months of individualised treatment compared to 12 months of conventional treatment (MD -5.76 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) -10.92 to -0.60; 1 study, 112 participants; low-certainty evidence; minimal important difference 4 to 10 points). There may be little or no difference in the other HRQOL scale (QLQ-Ov28, MD -0.97 points, 95% CI -2.57 to 0.63; 1 study, 112 participants: low-certainty evidence); psychological outcome, measured with the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS; MD 0.10 point, 95% CI -0.81 to 1.02; 1 study, 112 participants: low-certainty evidence), or cost analysis (MD -GBP 695.00, 95% CI -1467.23 to 77.23; 1 study, 112 participants: moderate-certainty evidence). Our previous review included one RCT, with 529 women in a confirmed remission, with normal CA125 concentration and no radiological evidence of disease, after surgery and first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. This study evaluated immediate treatment of ovarian cancer relapse following a rise of serum CA125 levels versus delaying treatment until symptoms developed for OS, and HRQOL. There was little or no difference in OS between the immediate and delayed arms after a median follow-up of 56.9 months (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.20; 1 study, 529 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Time from randomisation to first deterioration in global health score or death was shorter in the immediate treatment group than in the delayed treatment group (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.88).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence from one trial suggests that routine surveillance with CA125 in asymptomatic women and treatment at CA125-defined relapse does not seem to offer survival advantage when compared to treatment at symptomatic relapse. However, this study pre-dates the use of PARPi maintenance treatment and the increased use of secondary cytoreductive surgery, so the results may be limited in their applicability to current practice. Limited evidence from one trial suggests that individualised nurse-led follow-up may improve HRQOL in women with ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment. Large RCTs are needed to compare different types of follow-up, looking at survival, HRQOL, psychological effects, and cost as outcomes.

Evaluation of follow-up strategies for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer and seventh commonest cause of death in women worldwide. Traditionally, many people who have been treated for cancer undergo long-term follow-up in secondary care. However, it has been suggested that the use of routine review may not be effective in improving survival, quality of life (QoL), or relieving anxiety, or both. In addition, traditional follow-up may not be cost-effective.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the potential benefits of different strategies of follow-up in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update we searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 7, 2013, MEDLINE and EMBASE from November 2010 to July 2013. We also searched reference lists of review articles and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated follow-up strategies for women with epithelial ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

The authors did not identify any new studies that were eligible for inclusion in this update of the review. The search for the original review identified only one RCT that met the inclusion criteria, which included 529 women. This study reported data on immediate treatment of ovarian cancer relapse following rise of serum CA125 levels versus delaying treatment until symptoms developed. All the women participating had previous confirmation of remission, with normal CA125 concentration and no radiological evidence of disease, after surgery and first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.Overall survival between the immediate and delayed arms showed no difference after a median follow-up of 56.9 months (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.20; P value 0.85). Time from randomisation to first deterioration in global health score or death was shorter in the immediate treatment group than in the delayed treatment group (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.88; P value < 0.01). The trial was at low risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence from a single trial suggests that routine surveillance with CA125 in asymptomatic patients and treatment at CA125 relapse does not seem to offer survival advantage when compared to treatment at symptomatic relapse. RCTs are needed to compare different types of follow-up, looking at survival, QoL, cost and psychological effects as outcomes.

Clinical utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of suspected recurrent ovarian cancer in the setting of normal CA-125 levels

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to estimate the accuracy of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) as compared with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in detecting cancer in patients who have normal cancer antigen (CA)-125 (<35 U/dL) but are suspected of having a recurrent disease based on clinical symptoms.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who had undergone primary cytoreductive surgery and subsequently underwent CECT and FDG-PET/CT for suspected recurrence. [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and CECT interpretation to evaluate a recurrent disease was carried out independently by 2 experienced radiologists who were blinded to the final diagnosis for the suspected recurrence. Long-term follow-up imaging (12 months) and biopsy reports were used to assess the true status of the suspected recurrence seen on FDG-PET/CT or CECT. Sensitivity and specificity of all modalities were estimated. McNemar test was used to compare pairs of modalities. All tests were 2-sided, and P < or = 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in our analysis. Fifty-eight percent (18/31) and 54% (17/31) of the patients with normal CA-125 levels had evidence of a recurrent disease on FDG-PET/CT and CECT, respectively. Thirty-one percent (6/19) of the patients with no indication of cancer on CECT had evidence of disease on FDG-PET/CT images, which was supported by pathological proof.

CONCLUSION

[18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography is capable of detecting ovarian cancer recurrence in symptomatic patients with normal CA-125 levels and, in this setting, has slightly better sensitivity than CECT and can be considered as the frontline modality for all such patients.

Surveillance of patients after initial treatment of ovarian cancer

The surveillance of ovarian cancer patients after initial treatment is a challenging question in clinical practice. Serum CA 125 assay, physical examination, and imaging examinations have been employed with different time schedules for the follow-up of asymptomatic patients. Rising serum CA 125 levels may precede the clinical detection of relapse in 56-94% of cases with a median lead time of 3-5 months. An ongoing randomised phase III European trial is comparing the benefits of early administration of chemotherapy based on serum CA 125 assay alone versus delaying treatment until clinical or radiological detection of recurrent disease. Physical examination, with or without ultrasound, is very useful for the surveillance of these patients, since approximately 25-50% of relapses involve the pelvis. Additional radiological imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are usually performed in asymptomatic patients with rising CA 125 levels as well as in patients with suspicious symptoms or signs. Integrated positron emission tomography (PET) and CT scanners (PET/CT) can identify recurrent disease in tissues that appear normal at CT imaging as well as metastatic lesions intimately associated with the bowel wall that are difficult to detect with CT or MRI, so that in most series PET/CT has a higher diagnostic reliability than that of conventional imaging techniques. Moreover, PET/CT can disclose unusual supra-diaphragmatic spreading of the disease and may be very helpful for treatment planning, especially for the selection of patients suitable for secondary surgical cytoreduction. A prospective, randomised trial of therapeutic interventions based on stratification by PET/CT disease status could elucidate the real impact of this diagnostic procedure in the management of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Discrepancy between magnetic resonance and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in a case of borderline ovarian tumor

Borderline ovarian tumors have a far more favorable clinical course compared to malignant ovarian tumors. To date, the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the differentiation of an ovarian mass remains controversial. Discrepancy between FDG-PET and magnetic resonance (MR) images is rare but may cause a serious dilemma in decision-making. We report a case of a borderline ovarian tumor showing discrepancy between MR and FDG-PET findings. FDG-PET findings may help with the differentiation of ovarian masses when clinical findings are not coincidental.

Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET in the follow-up of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study was designed to retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic yield of FDG PET for the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Eighty FDG PET scans were performed on 55 patients owing to suspicion of relapse, and 45 FDG PET scans were performed on 31 patients who were clinically disease free. PET results were compared with the results of conventional radiological imaging (CIM) and serum CA 125 levels, and related to pathological findings in 54 cases or clinical follow-up in 71 cases.

RESULTS

CIM correctly identified 49 cases with recurrence [sensitivity (SE) 53.3%] ,and there were 27 true negatives [specificity (SP) 81.8%] However, 43 cases were false negative and six were false positive. The positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (ACC) of CIM were 89%, 38.6% and 60.8%, respectively. FDG PET correctly detected recurrent disease in 80/92 cases (SE 86.9%, p<0.05) and ruled out relapse in 26/33 cases (SP=78.8%). The PPV, NPV and ACC of PET were 91.9%, 68.4% and 84.8%, respectively. Standardised uptake values did not provide additional diagnostic accuracy compared with visual analysis. The CA 125 results showed an SE of 57.6%, an SP of 93.9% and an ACC of 67.2%. In 23 patients with positive serum CA 125 levels, but negative CIM, FDG PET was positive and relapse was confirmed. Furthermore, FDG PET was positive and relapse was confirmed in 11 patients with negative serum CA 125 levels and CIM.

CONCLUSION

FDG PET may detect recurrent ovarian cancer earlier than CIM, with higher sensitivity and even higher diagnostic accuracy.

Surveillance procedures for patients treated for epithelial ovarian cancer: a review of the literature

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer in the Western countries. Approximately 20%–30% of patients with early-stage disease and 50%–75% of those with advanced disease who obtain a complete response following first-line chemotherapy will ultimately develop recurrent disease, which more frequently involves the pelvis and abdomen. Few formal guidelines exist regarding the surveillance of these patients, and there is no agreement in the literature about the type and timing of examinations to perform. Moreover, the objective of follow-up is unclear as recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer continues to be a therapeutic dilemma and quite all the relapsed patients will eventually die of their disease. The follow-up of asymptomatic patients generally include complete clinical history, serum cancer antigen (CA)125 assay, physical examination, and often ultrasound examination, whereas additional radiologic imaging techniques are usually performed when symptoms or signs appear.18Fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (18FDG)–positron emission tomography (PET) has a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 85% approximately for the detection of recurrent disease, and this examination appears to be particularly useful for the diagnosis of recurrence when CA125 levels are rising and conventional imaging is inconclusive or negative. Recently, technologic advances have led to novel combined18FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) devices, which perform contemporaneous acquisition of both18FDG-PET and CT images. The role of18FDG-PET/CT for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer is very promising, and this technique may be especially useful for the selection of patients with late recurrent disease who may benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery.

Imaging of pelvic malignancies with in-line FDG PET-CT: case examples and common pitfalls of FDG PET

The role of 2-[fluorine 18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of pelvic malignancies has been rapidly growing in recent years. FDG PET has proved to be valuable in the evaluation of a variety of pelvic malignancies, including colorectal cancer, uterine cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, a number of pitfalls are commonly encountered at FDG PET, including normal physiologic activity in bowel, ovaries, endometrium, and blood vessels and focal retained activity in ureters, bladder diverticula, pelvic kidneys, and urinary diversions. The use of an in-line FDG PET-CT system, with special attention given to proper patient preparation and scanning protocol, often provides valuable information to help localize and define disease and avoid potential diagnostic pitfalls.

Meta-análisis de la eficacia diagnóstica de la PET-FDG en pacientes con sospecha de recurrencia por cáncer de ovario

AIM

The aim of this paper was to perform a meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the accuracy of FDG-PET in recurrence detection in patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The search strategy consisted in identifying papers published between November 1972 and October 2003 indexed in MEDLINE and CANCERLITE. Inclusion criteria were publications that evaluated recurrence with FDG-PET in patients with ovarian carcinoma. Exclusion criteria were duplicated papers or those outdated by subsequent ones. The statistical analysis included 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp) and natural logarithm of the odds ratio (Ln OR).

RESULTS

Seventeen publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The S and Sp were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.46-0.85), respectively. The Ln OR presented global homogeneity and significant values in > 75% of the studies.

CONCLUSION

According to our meta-analysis, FDG-PET has high S and intermediate Sp, with few false negative results. These preliminary findings suggest that FDG-PET may be an effective means of identifying patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Impacto de la tomografía por emisión de positrones mediante 18-Fluoro-2-Desoxi-D-Glucosa (PET-FDG) en el manejo terapéutico de pacientes con recurrencia secundaria a cáncer de ovario

AIM

Recurrent ovarian cancer is a major problem and an accurate diagnosis can often change patients' management. This study aimed to assess the impact on management of FDG-PET in recurrent ovarian cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-three patients in whom FDG-PET scan was performed due to suspected recurrent ovarian cancer were included. FDG-PET results were confirmed by histopathology and clinical follow-up of at least 12 months. To assess impact on management the treatment plan based on conventional imaging methods was compared with the treatment plan based on inclusion of PET findings, classifying FDG-PET impact on management as high, medium, low or no impact. Management changes, when present, were classified as intermodality or intramodality.

RESULTS

FDG-PET had a high impact on therapeutic management in 28 patients (65.1 %), medium impact in 2 patients (4.6 %), low impact in 9 patients (20.9 %), and no impact in 4 patients (9.3 %). FDG-PET induced an intermodality change in management in 27 patients (62,8 %); intramodality changes were induced in 3 patients (7 %). Finally, it produced no treatment changes in 13 patients (30.2 %).

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET supplied additional information when compared to conventional diagnostic procedures and allowed adequate management changes in most patients.

[The value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in diagnosis of neoplastic diseases]

Positron emission tomography (PET) has the ability to detect cancer based on molecular and biochemical processes within the tumor tissues. The most widely used radiotracer in oncology at this time is the glucose analogue 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG). Like glucose, 18F-FDG is transported into cells by a glucose transporter protein and rapidly converted into 18F-FDG-6-phosphate. PET imaging with 18F-FDG is able to diagnose, stage, and restage many cancers with accuracies ranging from 80% to 90%. Responses to therapy can be identified earlier and with greater accuracy than is possible with anatomic imaging modalities. The prognostic information available through 18F-FDG PET is superior to that of conventional imaging for many cancers. The aim of this review article is to show the most promising clinical indications for the use of PET in oncology.

The reproductive tract

Diagnostic imaging has played a major role in the evaluation of patients with the cancers of the reproductive tract. The imaging modalities have included ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, hysterosalpingography, and scintigraphy with radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies. Positron emission tomography (PET) with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose also has been shown to be useful in the imaging evaluation of these patients. Clinical applications have included initial staging and posttherapy restaging of disease, detecting metastatic disease, differentiating posttherapy anatomic alterations from recurrent or residual disease, and predicting and evaluating treatment response. In this article, we review the diagnostic utility of dedicated PET and combined PET-computed tomography systems in the imaging assessment of reproductive tract malignancies (excluding prostate cancer) in both sexes with an emphasis on fluorodeoxyglucose applications.