Therapeutic drug monitoring and the inhibitory quotient of antiretroviral drugs: can they be applied to the current situation?

HIV-infected adolescents: relationship between atazanavir plasma levels and bilirubin concentrations

The use of atazanavir (ATV) in adolescents infected with human immunodeficiency virus was analyzed in this study. ATV morning plasma concentrations were determined during regular visits to the outpatient department. Results showed that bilirubin levels were higher among patients with higher ATV plasma concentrations (p = .018). Monitoring plasma levels of ATV could avoid toxicity in these patients.

Comparison of levels of antiretroviral drugs with efficacy in children with HIV infection

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of low and high antiretroviral (ARV) plasma levels and to analyze correlation between ARV concentrations and the appearance of therapeutic failure and toxicity.

METHODS

The authors present here a study evaluating antiretroviral plasma concentrations in HIV infected children on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors based therapy. The authors carried out a multicentre, cross-sectional study, including HIV-infected children from five large Hospitals in Madrid, Spain. Clinical, haematological, biochemical and immuno-virological parameters were assessed. Antiretroviral plasma trough levels were performed using a validated high performance liquid chromatography method.

RESULTS

Between April 2006 and April 2008, 129 children were enrolled in the present study, with median treatment duration of 39.2 months. 25.5% of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors levels were low and 17.6%, high. 27.9% percent of the protease inhibitors levels were low and 12.5%, high. A correlation was found among adequate or high levels of antiretrovirals and normal CD4 percentage and low viral load. Lopinavir/ritonavir plasma levels were correlated with an increase in lipodystrophy. Patients with Tanner stage 1 presented the lowest ARV plasma levels. Full adherence was reported for all the participants by a questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

Many HIV-infected children show ARV plasma levels out of the therapeutic range which demands a child-adjusted approach. However, larger studies are urgently needed in pediatric populations to define optimal reference values.

Predictive values of the human immunodeficiency virus phenotype and genotype and of amprenavir and lopinavir inhibitory quotients in heavily pretreated patients on a ritonavir-boosted dual-protease-inhibitor regimen

The inhibitory quotient (IQ) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (PIs), which is the ratio of drug concentration to viral susceptibility, is considered to be predictive of the virological response. We used several approaches to calculate the IQs of amprenavir and lopinavir in a subset of heavily pretreated patients participating in the French National Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS) 104 trial and then compared their potentials for predicting changes in the plasma HIV RNA level. Thirty-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive either amprenavir (600 mg twice a day [BID]) or lopinavir (400 mg BID) plus ritonavir (100 or 200 mg BID) for 2 weeks before combining the two PIs. The 90% inhibitory concentration (IC(90)) was measured using a recombinant assay without or with additional human serum (IC(90+serum)). Total and unbound PI concentrations in plasma were measured. Univariate linear regression was used to estimate the relation between the change in viral load and the IC(90) or IQ values. The amprenavir phenotypic IQ values were very similar when measured with the standard and protein binding-adjusted IC(90)s. No relationship was found between the viral load decline and the lopinavir IQ. During combination therapy, the amprenavir and lopinavir genotypic IQ values were predictive of the viral response at week 6 (P = 0.03). The number of protease mutations (< 5 or > or = 5) was related to the virological response throughout the study. These findings suggest that the combined genotypic IQ and the number of protease mutations are the best predictors of virological response. High amprenavir and lopinavir concentrations in these patients might explain why plasma concentrations and the phenotypic IQ have poor predictive value.