1
|
Azevedo* LS, Pierrotti LC, Abdala E, Costa SF, Strabelli TMV, Campos SV, Ramos JF, Latif AZA, Litvinov N, Maluf NZ, Filho HHC, Pannuti CS, Lopes MH, dos Santos VA, da Cruz Gouveia Linardi C, Yasuda MAS, de Sousa Marques HH. Cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2015; 70:515-23. [PMID: 26222822 PMCID: PMC4496754 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2015(07)09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 175] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2015] [Revised: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 03/31/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus infection is a frequent complication after transplantation. This infection occurs due to transmission from the transplanted organ, due to reactivation of latent infection, or after a primary infection in seronegative patients and can be defined as follows: latent infection, active infection, viral syndrome or invasive disease. This condition occurs mainly between 30 and 90 days after transplantation. In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in particular, infection usually occurs within the first 30 days after transplantation and in the presence of graft-versus-host disease. The major risk factors are when the recipient is cytomegalovirus seronegative and the donor is seropositive as well as when lymphocyte-depleting antibodies are used. There are two methods for the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection: the pp65 antigenemia assay and polymerase chain reaction. Serology has no value for the diagnosis of active disease, whereas histology of the affected tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage analysis are useful in the diagnosis of invasive disease. Cytomegalovirus disease can be prevented by prophylaxis (the administration of antiviral drugs to all or to a subgroup of patients who are at higher risk of viral replication) or by preemptive therapy (the early diagnosis of viral replication before development of the disease and prescription of antiviral treatment to prevent the appearance of clinical disease). The drug used is intravenous or oral ganciclovir; oral valganciclovir; or, less frequently, valacyclovir. Prophylaxis should continue for 90 to 180 days. Treatment is always indicated in cytomegalovirus disease, and the gold-standard drug is intravenous ganciclovir. Treatment should be given for 2 to 3 weeks and should be continued for an additional 7 days after the first negative result for viremia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiz Sergio Azevedo*
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Lígia Camera Pierrotti
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Edson Abdala
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Silvia Figueiredo Costa
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Tânia Mara Varejão Strabelli
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Silvia Vidal Campos
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Jéssica Fernandes Ramos
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Acram Zahredine Abdul Latif
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Nadia Litvinov
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Natalya Zaidan Maluf
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Helio Hehl Caiaffa Filho
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Claudio Sergio Pannuti
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Marta Heloisa Lopes
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Vera Aparecida dos Santos
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Camila da Cruz Gouveia Linardi
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Maria Aparecida Shikanai Yasuda
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Heloisa Helena de Sousa Marques
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Committee for Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chumpitazi BFF, Flori P, Kern JB, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Hincky-Vitrat V, Brion JP, Thiebaut-Bertrand A, Minet C, Maubon D, Pelloux H. Characteristics and clinical relevance of the quantitative touch-down major surface glycoprotein polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia. Med Mycol 2011; 49:704-13. [PMID: 21417683 DOI: 10.3109/13693786.2011.566894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) characteristics can increase the accuracy of the laboratory diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). Between July 2008 and September 2009, 66 non-sequential prospective bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples, obtained from five HIV-infected and 49 non HIV-infected patients were investigated, using a quantitative-touch-down-PCR to determine the number of copies of major surface glycoprotein (MSG) genes of Pneumocystis jirovecii (q-TD-MSG-PCR). PCP was confirmed by microscopic observation of Pneumocystis, radio-clinical and therapeutic data in 18/54 patients. For PCP, the cut-off was 54.3 MSG copies per ml of BAL fluid. The PCR was positive in these same 18 cases and it was the only positive assay in two cases and the earliest diagnosis test in one case of PCP relapse. The likelihood positive ratio, sensitivity and specificity of the q-TD-MSG-PCR were 44, 100% and 97.7%, respectively. The Predictive Negative Value was 100% and the Predictive Positive Value of 95.5%, the intra- and inter-assay variability values were 2.7% (at more than 30 MSG copies) and 11.7% (at 10,000 MSG copies), respectively. Quantitative PCR can help diagnose PCP even in cases of low Pneumocystis load and might decrease morbidity in association with very early specific treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernabé F F Chumpitazi
- Laboratory of Parasitology and Mycology, Grenoble University Hospital, Joseph Fourier University (Grenoble 1), France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|