1
|
Levesque A, Bautrant E, Quistrebert V, Valancogne G, Riant T, Beer Gabel M, Leroi AM, Jottard K, Bruyninx L, Amarenco G, Quintas L, Picard P, Vancaillie T, Leveque C, Mohy F, Rioult B, Ploteau S, Labat JJ, Guinet-Lacoste A, Quinio B, Cosson M, Haddad R, Deffieux X, Perrouin-Verbe MA, Garreau C, Robert R. Recommendations on the management of pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: A formalised expert consensus. Eur J Pain 2021; 26:7-17. [PMID: 34643963 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the development and publication of diagnostic criteria for pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) syndrome in 2008, no comprehensive work has been published on the clinical knowledge in the management of this condition. The aim of this work was to develop recommendations on the diagnosis and the management of PNE. METHODS The methodology of this study was based on French High Authority for Health Method for the development of good practice and the literature review was based on the PRISMA method. The selected articles have all been evaluated according to the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians assessment grid. RESULTS The results of the literature review and expert consensus are incorporated into 10 sections to describe diagnosis and management of PNE: (1) diagnosis of PNE, (2) patients advice and precautions, (3) drugs treatments, (4) physiotherapy, (5) transcutaneous electrostimulations (TENS), (6) psychotherapy, (7) injections, (8) surgery, (9) pulsed radiofrequency, and (10) Neuromodulation. The following major points should be noted: (i) the relevance of 4+1 Nantes criteria for diagnosis; (ii) the preference for initial monotherapy with tri-tetracyclics or gabapentinoids; (iii) the lack of effect of opiates, (iv) the likely relevance (pending more controlled studies) of physiotherapy, TENS and cognitive behavioural therapy; (v) the incertitudes (lack of data) regarding corticoid injections, (vi) surgery is a long term effective treatment and (vii) radiofrequency needs a longer follow-up to be currently proposed in this indication. CONCLUSION These recommendations should allow rational and homogeneous management of patients suffering from PNE. They should also allow to shorten the delays of management by directing the primary care. SIGNIFICANCE Pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) has only been known for about 20 years and its management is heterogeneous from one practitioner to another. This work offers a synthesis of the literature and international experts' opinions on the diagnosis and management of PNE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amélie Levesque
- Urology Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Eric Bautrant
- Pelvi-Perineal Surgery and Rehabilitation Department, Private Medical Centre "l'Avancée-Clinique Axium", Aix en Provence, France
| | | | | | - Thibault Riant
- Maurice Bensignor Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France
| | - Marc Beer Gabel
- Neurogastroenterology and Pelvic Floor Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | | | | | - Luc Bruyninx
- Department of Surgery, Brugmann Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gerard Amarenco
- GRC 001, GREEN Groupe de Recherche Clinique en Neuro-Urologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Lara Quintas
- Department of Gynecology, Clinical Institute of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pascale Picard
- Neurology Department, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Inserm, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Thierry Vancaillie
- School of Women and Children, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christine Leveque
- Pelvi-Perineal Surgery and Rehabilitation Department, Private Medical Centre "l'Avancée-Clinique Axium", Aix en Provence, France
| | - Frédérique Mohy
- Pain Management Center, University Hospital Felix Guyon, SAINT DENIS, La Reunion, France
| | - Bruno Rioult
- Maurice Bensignor Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France
| | - Stéphane Ploteau
- Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | | | - Amandine Guinet-Lacoste
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Henry Gabrielle, Plate-forme Mouvement et Handicap, Lyon, France
| | - Bertrand Quinio
- Pain Center, Regional University Hospital la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
| | - Michel Cosson
- Departement of Gynecology, University Hopsital Jeanne De Flandre, Lille, France
| | - Rebecca Haddad
- GRC 001, GREEN Groupe de Recherche Clinique en Neuro-Urologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Xavier Deffieux
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antoine Beclere Hospital, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Clamart University Paris-Saclay, Clamart, France
| | | | | | - Roger Robert
- Maurice Bensignor Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Labat JJ, Riant T, Lassaux A, Rioult B, Rabischong B, Khalfallah M, Volteau C, Leroi AM, Ploteau S. Adding corticosteroids to the pudendal nerve block for pudendal neuralgia: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. BJOG 2016; 124:251-260. [PMID: 27465823 PMCID: PMC5215631 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective To compare the effect of corticosteroids combined with local anaesthetic versus local anaesthetic alone during infiltrations of the pudendal nerve for pudendal nerve entrapment. Design Randomised, double‐blind, controlled trial. Setting Multicentre study. Population 201 patients were included in the study, with a subgroup of 122 women. Methods CT‐guided pudendal nerve infiltrations were performed in the sacrospinous ligament and Alcock's canal. There were three study arms: patients in Arm A (n = 68) had local anaesthetic alone, those in Arm B (n = 66) had local anaesthetic plus corticosteroid and those in Arm C (n = 67) local anaesthetic plus corticosteroid with a large volume of normal saline. Main outcome measures The primary end‐point was the pain intensity score at 3 months. Patients were regarded as responders (at least a 30‐point improvement on a 100‐point visual analogue scale of mean maximum pain over a 2‐week period) or nonresponders. Results Three months’ postinfiltration, 11.8% of patients in the local anaesthetic only arm (Arm A) were responders versus 14.3% in the local anaesthetic plus corticosteroid arms (Arms B and C). This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.62). No statistically significant difference was observed in the female subgroup between Arm A and Arms B and C (P = 0.09). No significant difference was detected for the various pain assessment procedures, functional criteria or quality‐of‐life criteria. Conclusions Corticosteroids provide no additional therapeutic benefits compared with local anaesthetic and should therefore no longer be used. Tweetable abstract Steroid infiltrations do not improve the results of local anaesthetic infiltrations in pudendal neuralgia. Steroid infiltrations do not improve the results of local anaesthetic infiltrations in pudendal neuralgia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J Labat
- Federative Centre of Pelvi-Perineology, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - T Riant
- Federative Centre of Pelvi-Perineology, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.,Pain Unit, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France
| | - A Lassaux
- Pain Clinic, Hôpital Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - B Rioult
- Pain Unit, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France
| | - B Rabischong
- Gynaecology Department, Polyclinique Hôtel-Dieu, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - M Khalfallah
- Centre Hospitalier de la Cote Basque, Bayonne, France
| | | | - A-M Leroi
- Digestive Physiology Department, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
| | - S Ploteau
- Federative Centre of Pelvi-Perineology, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.,Gynaecology Department, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|