The effect of D-penicillamine on CCl4-induced experimental liver cirrhosis

Serum ceruloplasmin levels correlate negatively with liver fibrosis in males with chronic hepatitis B: a new noninvasive model for predicting liver fibrosis in HBV-related liver disease

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate associations between ceruloplasmin (CP) levels, inflammation grade and fibrosis stages in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and to establish a noninvasive model to predict cirrhosis.

METHODS

Liver biopsy samples and sera were collected from 198 CHB patients randomized into a training group (n=109) and a validation group (n=89). CP levels were determined using nephelometric immunoassays. Relationships between CP and liver inflammation and fibrosis were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of CP for determining liver fibrosis in CHB. The liver pathology-predictive model was built using multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify relevant indicators.

RESULTS

CP levels were lower in males than in females, lower in patients with inflammation stage G4 compared to other stages and lower in cirrhotic compared to non-cirrhotic patients. Using area under the curve (AUC) values, CP levels distinguished different stages of inflammation and fibrosis. Multivariate analysis showed that CP levels were all significantly associated with cirrhosis in males. A model was developed combining routine laboratory markers APPCI (alpha-fetoprotein [AFP], prothrombin time, and platelets [PLT] with CP) to predict fibrosis in CHB patients. The APPCI had a significantly greater AUC than FIB-4 (aspartate aminotransferase [AST]/ alanine aminotransferase [ALT]/PLT/age), APRI (AST/PLT ratio index), GPI (globin/PLT), and APGA (AST/PLT/gammaglutamyl transpeptidase [GGT]) models (all P-values<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CP levels correlate negatively and indirectly with inflammation and fibrosis stages in male CHB patients. The APPCI model uses routine laboratory variables with CP to accurately predict liver fibrosis in CHB.

Translating an understanding of the pathogenesis of hepatic fibrosis to novel therapies

The response to injury is one of wound healing and fibrogenesis, which ultimately leads to fibrosis. The fibrogenic response to injury is a generalized one across virtually all organ systems. In the liver, the injury response, typically occurring over a prolonged period of time, leads to cirrhosis (although it should be pointed out that not all patients with liver injury develop cirrhosis). The fact that many different diseases result in cirrhosis suggests a common pathogenesis. The study of hepatic fibrogenesis over the past 2 decades has been remarkably active, leading to a considerable understanding of this process. It clearly has been shown that the hepatic stellate cell is a central component in the fibrogenic process. It also has been recognized that other effector cells are important in the fibrogenic process, including resident fibroblasts, bone marrow-derived cells, fibrocytes, and even perhaps cells derived from epithelial cells (ie, through epithelial to mesenchymal transition). A key aspect of the biology of fibrogenesis is that the fibrogenic process is dynamic; thus, even advanced fibrosis (or cirrhosis) is reversible. Together, an understanding of the cellular basis for liver fibrogenesis, along with multiple aspects of the basic pathogenesis of fibrosis, have highlighted many exciting potential therapeutic opportunities. Thus, although the most effective antifibrotic therapy is simply treatment of the underlying disease, in situations in which this is not possible, specific antifibrotic therapy is likely not only to become feasible, but will soon become a reality. This review highlights the mechanisms underlying fibrogenesis that may be translated into future antifibrotic therapies and to review the current state of clinical development.

Copper deficiency exacerbates bile duct ligation-induced liver injury and fibrosis in rats

Copper levels are elevated in a variety of liver fibrosis conditions. Lowering copper to a certain level protects against fibrosis. However, whether severe copper deficiency is protective against liver fibrosis is not known. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate this question by inducing severe copper deficiency using the copper chelator, tetrathiomolybdate (TM), in a bile duct ligation (BDL) rat model. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups: sham, sham plus TM, BDL, and BDL plus TM. TM was given in a daily dose of 10 mg/kg by body weight by means of intragastric gavage, beginning 5 days after BDL. All animals were killed 2 weeks after surgery. Severe copper deficiency was induced by TM overdose in either sham or BDL rats, as shown by decreased plasma ceruloplasmin activity. Liver injury and fibrosis were exacerbated in BDL rats with TM treatment, as illustrated by robustly increased plasma aspartate aminotransferase and hepatic collagen accumulation. Iron stores, as measured by plasma ferritin, were significantly increased in copper-deficient BDL rats. Moreover, hepatic heme oxygenase-1 expression was markedly down-regulated by copper deficiency in BDL rats. In addition, hepatic gene expression involving mitochondrial biogenesis and β-oxidation was significantly up-regulated in BDL rats, and this increase was abolished by copper deficiency. In summary, severe copper deficiency exacerbates BDL-induced liver injury and liver fibrosis, probably caused by increased iron overload and decreased antioxidant defenses and mitochondrial dysfunction.

Current and future anti-fibrotic therapies for chronic liver disease

Chronic injury results in a wound healing response that eventually leads to fibrosis. The response is generalized, with features common among multiple organ systems. In the liver, various different types of injury lead to fibrogenesis, implying a common pathogenesis. Although several specific therapies for patients who have different liver diseases have been successfully developed, including antiviral therapies for those who have hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infection, specific and effective antifibrotic therapy remains elusive. Over the past 2 decades, great advances in the understanding of fibrosis have been made and multiple mechanisms underlying hepatic fibrogenesis uncovered. Elucidation of these mechanisms has been of fundamental importance in highlighting novel potential therapies. Preclinical studies have indicated several putative therapies that might abrogate fibrogenesis. This article emphasizes mechanisms underlying fibrogenesis and reviews available and future therapeutics.

New therapies in hepatitis C virus and chronic liver disease: antifibrotics

Fibrotic liver disease occurs after any of the various forms of injury to the liver. Fibrosis is a critical factor leading to hepatic dysfunction and portal hypertension and its complications. The fibrogenic cascade is complex but leads to accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins, followed by nodular fibrosis, tissue contraction, and alteration in blood flow. A critical concept emerging is that activation of effector cells, which produce extracellular matrix, underlies the fibrogenic process. The aggregate data has not only helped lead to an understanding of the pathophysiologic basis of hepatic fibrogenesis, but it has also provided an important context with which to base novel antifibrotic therapy.

Antifibrotic therapy in chronic liver disease

The response to injury is one of wound healing and, subsequently, fibrosis. This response is generalized, occurring in diverse organ systems. Injury and wounding in the liver ultimately lead to cirrhosis in many patients (although not all patients), and are the result of many different diseases. The fact that various diseases result in cirrhosis suggests a common pathogenesis. Study over the past 2 decades has shed considerable light on the pathogenesis of fibrosis and cirrhosis. A growing body of literature indicates that the hepatic stellate cell is a central component in the fibrogenic process. Stellate cells undergo a transformation during injury that has been termed activation. Activation is complex and multifaceted, but one of its most prominent features is the synthesis of large amounts of extracellular matrix, resulting in deposition of scar or fibrous tissue. The fibrogenic process is dynamic; it is noteworthy that even advanced fibrosis (or cirrhosis) is reversible. The best antifibrotic therapy is treatment of the underlying disease. For example, eradication of hepatitis B or C virus can lead to the reversal of fibrosis. In situations in which treating the underlying process is not possible, specific antifibrotic therapy is desirable. A number of specific antifibrotic therapies have been tried, but have been met with poor or mediocre success. However, elucidation of the mechanisms responsible for fibrogenesis, with particular emphasis on stellate cell biology, has highlighted many putative novel therapies. This article emphasizes mechanisms underlying fibrogenesis, and reviews current antifibrotic therapies as well as potential future approaches.

The cell and molecular biology of hepatic fibrogenesis. Clinical and therapeutic implications

Much has been learned in the past 2 decades about the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying hepatic fibrogenesis and about potential therapeutic approaches in patients with liver disease. The central event in fibrogenesis seems to be the activation of hepatic stellate cells. Stellate cell activation is characterized by several important features, including enhanced matrix synthesis and a prominent contractile phenotype, processes that probably contribute to the physical distortion and dysfunction of the liver in advanced disease. It is important to emphasize that the factors controlling activation are multifactorial and complex. The extracellular matrix is a dynamic, active constituent of the fibrogenic response and undergoes active remodeling, including synthesis and degradation. Effective therapy for hepatic fibrogenesis will probably also be multifactorial, based on the basic mechanisms underlying the fibrogenic process. The most effective therapies will probably be directed at the stellate cell. Approaches that address matrix remodeling (i.e., by enhancing matrix degradation or by inhibiting factors that prevent matrix breakdown) may be effective.