Application of an alternative approach for using the SOS chromotest to screen complex indeterminate mixtures

Bacterial worth in genotoxicity assessment studies

Bacterial-based genotoxicity test systems play a significant role in the detection and evaluation of genotoxicity in vitro and have gained importance due to attributes like wide applicability, speed, high sensitivity, good reproducibility, and simplicity. The Salmonella microsomal mutagenicity assay was created by Ames and colleagues at the beginning of the 1970s, and it was based on the fundamental notion that in auxotrophic bacterial strains with inhibited growth, a mutant gene would revert to its original state on exposure to genotoxicants. This is the most successful and widely used in vitro genotoxicity test. Later, a number of additional test systems that incorporated DNA repair mechanisms including the bacterial SOS response were created. Genetic engineering has further provided significant advancement in these test systems with the development of highly sophisticated bacterial tester strains with significantly increased sensitivity to evaluate the chemical nature of hazardous substances and pollutants. These bacterial bioassays render an opportunity to detect the defined effects of compounds at the molecular level. In this review, all the aspects related to the bacterial system in genotoxicity assessment have been summarized and their role is elaborated concerning real-time requirements and future perspectives.

A semi-automated, microplate version of the SOS Chromotest for the analysis of complex environmental extracts

Environmental monitoring for genotoxicity requires that a large number of measurements be made across space and time. This requirement demands a rapid and efficient bioassay system. The SOS Chromotest is a rapid, efficient bacterial system for the detection of DNA damaging agents. Over 100 publications have described its use on a variety of samples. Relatively few studies have used the test to examine complex mixtures. Effective testing of complex samples poses a variety of problems. Although solutions have been proposed, few have validated the resulting protocol. In this work we present a semi-automated microplate version of the SOS Chromotest for the examination of complex mixtures. Experiments were conducted to determine the optimal cell concentration, exposure time, substrate conversion time and S9 enzyme concentration. The performance of the method was evaluated using 6 reference genotoxins and 3 complex mixtures. The complex mixtures examined are extracts of diesel particulate matter, urban dust and coal tar. The results obtained indicate that optimal responses often require fewer cells (approximately equal to 5-10 x 10(6) CFU/ml) and a longer exposure (3 h) than that recommended in the original protocol. Interfering effects of colored and turbid samples are removed using centrifugation and initial optical density readings taken 60 min after cell resuspension and lysis. The performance of the established protocol was evaluated using mitomycin C and benzo[a]pyrene results for 207 microplates and solvent control results for 293 microplates. The results indicate that the established method is accurate, sensitive and precise. Coefficient of variation on mean SOSIP values for mitomycin C and benzo[a]pyrene are < 5%. Solvent control data indicate that the standard threshold for determination of a positive response (induction factor > 1.5) is excessively conservative. All liquid transfers were automated using the Biomek automated laboratory workstation. Automation permits a throughput of up to 72 samples per day and maintains excellent precision and accuracy.

SOS chromotest results in a broader context: empirical relationships between genotoxic potency, mutagenic potency, and carcinogenic potency

Environmental monitoring requires that large numbers of samples be processed in a relatively short period of time. While microbioassays facilitate rapid testing, the results are often difficult to interpret in the broader context of human or animal health. Determining the consequences of exposure to genotoxic substances will ultimately require in situ monitoring of exposed organisms. However, it is immediately possible to construct a broad empirical framework within which available microbioassay results can be interpreted. To do this for SOS Chromotest results, we investigated the empirical relationships between SOS genotoxic potency and mutagenic potency (as measured with the Salmonella/microsome assay), as well as between genotoxic potency and carcinogenic potency (as measured using standard, chronic animal bioassays). Strong relationships were identified between; 1) genotoxic potency and mutagenic potency for 268 direct-acting substances (r2=0.76) and 2) genotoxic potency and mutagenic potency for 126 S9-activated substances (r2=0.65). Ordinary least squares regression analyses of the SOS genotoxicity-Salmonella mutagenicity relationship revealed a significant effect of SOS genotoxicity as well as differences in mutagenic potency that can be attributed to the Salmonella strain used to measure mutagenic potency. Analyses of S9-activated substances revealed a significant interaction between the SOS genotoxic potency (SOSIP) effect and the Salmonella strain effect. Two regression models relating SOS genotoxicity and Salmonella mutagenicity were used to predict the mutagenic potency of several industrial effluent extracts previously analyzed for SOS genotoxicity by White et al. [(1996): Environ Mol Mutagen 27:116-139]. Predictions are consistent with published mutagenic potency values for similar industrial waste materials. A consistent relationship was also identified between genotoxic potency and carcinogenic potency for 51 substances. Linear regression analyses revealed an effect of SOS genotoxic potency as well as differences in carcinogenic potency that may be attributable to experimental animal and route of exposure. The correlation between genotoxicity and carcinogenicity was fairly weak (maximum r value = 0.51). Previous studies revealed similar strength of association between Ames mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. Predicted carcinogenic potencies of previously examined genotoxic, industrial effluent extracts are generally low compared to the pure substances included in the data set.

Genotoxicity assessment of waste products of aluminum plasma etching with the SOS chromotest

We evaluated 36 characteristic waste products from the plasma etching of aluminum for genotoxicity with the SOS chromotest. The majority of the samples showed genotoxic activity in tester strain Escherichia coli PQ37 without metabolic activation using S9 mix. In the presence of S9, a deactivation of the samples was regularly observed. Comparable studies with the Salmonella/microsome (Ames) test using tester strains Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 indicated actual mutagenicity of waste products. Gas chromatograms of the organic constituents of all waste products were performed in parallel with the genotoxicity assays. In contrast to the similarity of the peak patterns of all chromatograms, the biological effects of individual waste samples showed large differences. Information on chemical composition and the SOS chromotest results of a representative sample recovered over a period of 2 years is given. For this sample, the influences of sample preparation and cytotoxic matrix effects on the test parameters are also shown.

Modulation of the H2O2-induced SOS response in Escherichia coli PQ300 by amino acids, metal chelators, antioxidants, and scavengers of reactive oxygen species

The SOS chromotest is a simple colorimetric genotoxicity assay that monitors DNA repair by measuring the induction of the gene sfiA in Escherichia coli K-12. E. coli PQ300, a diagnostic SOS tester strain for the detection of oxidative genotoxins, carries a mutation in a key gene for antioxidative defense, oxyR. This mutation renders PQ300 more sensitive to oxidative genotoxins, particularly to H2O2. We found that induction of the SOS response by H2O2 in E. coli PQ300 is dependent on the composition of the incubation medium; a substantially reduced response was obtained in minimal phosphate buffered saline (PBS) as opposed to complex Luria broth (LB) medium. Supplementation of PBS with histidine or cysteine stimulated H2O2-induced SOS induction to levels exceeding those found in LB medium. Low concentrations of glutathione (20-70 microM) also enhanced the H2O2-induced SOS response in E. coli PQ300, whereas higher concentrations (> 150 microM) were protective. Preincubation of tester cells with the chelators o-phenanthroline, 2,2-dipyridyl, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) protected cells from the effects of H2O2, although EDTA was only partially effective. Pretreatment of PQ300 with the antioxidant ascorbic acid or the hydroxyl radical scavenger dimethyl sulfoxide also diminished the SOS response, whereas mannitol and glucose were ineffective. The results show that the net effect of H2O2-induced DNA damage is influenced by the balance of oxidative and antioxidative factors and, furthermore, can be modulated by constituents of the extracellular milieu.