Traitement des complications de la cholécystectomie

The Cost and the Effectiveness of Cholangiography for the Diagnosis and Treatment of a Bile Duct Injury After Difficult Identification of the Cystic Duct

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the cost and the effectiveness of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) for the diagnosis and treatment of a bile duct injury (BDI) after incorrect or difficult identification of the cystic duct (DICD) during a cholecystectomy.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2015, 810 surgeons reported 1161 treatment-related adverse events related to the DICD during cholecystectomy in the French REX database; 623 patients (54%) underwent IOC, and 30% (n = 348) of DICD had a BDI. The therapeutic procedures and the treatment costs have been compared between the IOC group (CG) and the group without IOC (WCG).

RESULTS

The BDI intraoperative diagnosis was significantly higher in the CG: 96% vs. 67% p = 0.001. The number of therapeutic procedure was significantly higher in the WCG OR: 6 (3-10.6). The rate of biliodigestive anastomosis (8.3%) was similar between the both groups. The average cost of cholecystectomy in the at-risk population of DICD was higher in the group that did not undergo IOC (6204 euros vs. 8831 euros). The estimated loss without IOC in the studied population was between 788,170 and 2,039,020 euros.

CONCLUSION

The IOC was an assurance of quality and cost reduction in the immediate management of the BDI and should be systematic in front of a DICD during a cholecystectomy.

Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy: Necessity to Learn How to Do and Interpret Intraoperative Cholangiography

Introduction: Biliary duct injury (BDI) is a serious complication during cholecystectomy. Perioperative cholangiography (POC) has recently been generating interest in order to prevent BDI. However, the current literature (including randomized controlled trials) cannot conclude whether POC is protective or not against the risk of BDI. The aim of our study was to investigate whether POC could demonstrate earlier BDI and which criteria are required to make that diagnosis.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study between 2005 and 2018 in our French tertiary referral center, which included all patients who had presented following BDI during cholecystectomy.

Results: Twenty-two patients were included. Nine patients had POC, whereas 13 did not. When executed, POC was interpreted as normal for three patients and abnormal for six. In this latter group, only two cases had a BDI diagnosed intraoperatively. In other cases, the interpretation was not adequate.

Conclusion: BDIs are rare but may reduce patients' quality of life. Our study highlights the surgeon's responsibility to learn how to perform and interpret POC in order to diagnose and manage BDIs and potentially avoid catastrophic consequences.

Drain after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized multicentre controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Routine drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still debatable. The present study was designed to assess the role of drains in laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed for nonacutely inflamed gallbladder.

METHODS

After laparoscopic gallbladder removal, 53 patients were randomized to have a suction drain positioned in the subhepatic space and 53 patients to have a sham drain. The primary outcome measure was the presence of subhepatic fluid collection at abdominal ultrasonography, performed 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative abdominal and shoulder tip pain, use of analgesics, nausea, vomiting, and morbidity.

RESULTS

Subhepatic fluid collection was not found in 45 patients (84.9 %) in group A and in 46 patients (86.8 %) in group B (difference 1.9 (95 % confidence interval -11.37 to 15.17; P = 0.998). No significant difference in visual analogue scale scores with respect to abdominal and shoulder pain, use of parenteral ketorolac, nausea, and vomiting were found in either group. Two (1.9 %) significant hemorrhagic events occurred postoperatively. Wound infection was observed in three patients (5.7 %) in group A and two patients (3.8 %) in group B (difference 1.9 (95 % CI -6.19 to 9.99; P = 0.997).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study was unable to prove that the drain was useful in elective, uncomplicated LC.

Visceral surgeon and intraoperative cholangiography: Survey about French Wild West surgeons

Cholecystectomy is one of the most common abdominal surgical procedures. No formal agreement has been reached about the routine practice of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). The purpose of this survey was to describe the practices and the opinions of surgeons in western France. A survey was conducted among 300 visceral surgeons practicing in western France who were asked to respond to a questionnaire with objective and subjective items. One hundred forty-eight answers were interpretable. Among these 148 surgeons, 125 (83.4%) performed IOC routinely (IOCr group) and 23 (15.4%) selectively (IOCs group). Mean age of responding surgeons was 49.3 years. Groups IOCr and IOCs were not significantly different concerning surgical experience. Surgeons in both groups responded that IOC effectively screens for intraoperative bile duct injury. In our survey, routine practice of IOC was more common than reported by our English-speaking colleagues. The routine users responded that IOC can screen for intraoperative bile duct injury or choledocholithiasis. The selective users responded that IOC has its own morbidity. IOC is commonly performed in France during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Although it may not be indispensable, it allows rapid screening for intraoperative bile duct injury. It also provides documented proof of good surgical practice in the event of a litigation claim after bile duct injury.