A six-year retrospective analysis of shoulder dystocia and delivery of the shoulders

Prescriptive and proscriptive lessons for managing shoulder dystocia: a technical and videographical tutorial

This tutorial of the intrapartum management of shoulder dystocia uses drawings and videos of simulated and actual deliveries to illustrate the biomechanical principles of specialized delivery maneuvers and examine missteps associated with brachial plexus injury. It is intended to complement haptic, mannequin-based simulation training. Demonstrative explication of each maneuver is accompanied by specific examples of what not to do. Positive (prescriptive) instruction prioritizes early use of direct fetal manipulation and stresses the importance of determining the alignment of the fetal shoulders by direct palpation, and that the biacromial width should be manually adjusted to an oblique orientation within the pelvis-before application of traction to the fetal head, the biacromial width is manually adjusted to an oblique orientation within the pelvis. Negative (proscriptive) instructions includes the following: to avoid more than usual and/or laterally directed traction, to use episiotomy only as a means to gain access to the posterior shoulder and arm, and to use a 2-step procedure in which a 60-second hands-off period ("do not do anything") is inserted between the emergence of the head and any initial attempts at downward traction to allow for spontaneous rotation of the fetal shoulders. The tutorial presents a stepwise approach focused on the delivering clinician's tasks while including the role of assistive techniques, including McRoberts, Gaskin, and Sims positioning, suprapubic pressure, and episiotomy. Video footage of actual deliveries involving shoulder dystocia and permanent brachial plexus injury demonstrates ambiguities in making the diagnosis of shoulder dystocia, risks of improper traction and torsion of the head, and overreliance on repeating maneuvers that prove initially unsuccessful.

Shoulder Dystocia during Delivery and Long-Term Neurological Morbidity of the Offspring

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate risk factors and implications of shoulder dystocia (SD) on the neurological outcome of successfully delivered offspring.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a cohort analysis including 207,571 deliveries. Risk factors for SD were evaluated using general estimation equation multivariable analyses. Offspring hospitalization incidence up to age 18 years due to neurological conditions was compared between both groups. Kaplan-Meyer curve was used to assess the cumulative hospitalization incidence. Cox proportional hazards model was used to control for confounders.

RESULTS

SD complicated 0.2% (n = 353) of deliveries included in the study (n = 207,571). Risk factors for SD were fetal macrosomia, maternal diabetes mellitus, male gender, and advanced maternal age (p < 0.05 for all). Higher perinatal mortality was observed among SD cases (2.8 vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001). In most of the investigated neurological conditions no significant differences were found between the groups. Comparable rates of cumulative neurological-related hospitalization were observed (log rank p-value = 0.342) as well as lack of association between SD and neurological hospitalization (adjusted HR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.36-1.47; p = 0.381) when controlled for gestational age.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for SD are macrosomia, diabetes mellitus, male gender, and advanced maternal age. SD is not associated with long-term neurological morbidity of the offspring.

Neonatal outcomes of two-step delivery in low-risk pregnancy: A prospective observational study

AIM

Extraction of the fetal body is typically performed immediately after delivery of the head in Western obstetric care. Reports justifying immediate extraction are few. Two-step delivery entails waiting for the next uterine contraction after delivery of the head. The present study evaluates neonatal asphyxia and respiratory impairment in two-step delivery using the head-to-body delivery interval.

METHODS

This prospective observational study performed at a single birth clinic used the data of 262 low-risk pregnant women with two-step delivery. We measured the time interval of head-to-body delivery and correlation analysis and simple linear regression analysis between the head-to-body delivery interval and umbilical artery pH. The women were divided into two groups according to the head-to-body delivery interval: ≤60 or >60 s. The prevalence of neonatal asphyxia and neonatal respiratory impairment was compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The mean head-to-body delivery interval was 88.9 ± 71.3 s. The umbilical artery pH tended to decrease with increasing head-to-body delivery interval; however, there was almost no correlation and the decline of pH was only 0.010 for every additional minute. Low Apgar score incidence at 5 min did not differ significantly between the groups. No cases of shoulder dystocia were reported, and tachypnea at 4 h after birth occurred in 3% of the births.

CONCLUSIONS

A longer head-to-body delivery interval is not associated with negative outcomes in two-step delivery. We believe that two-step delivery could have some superior outcomes compared with one-step delivery outcomes, particularly as to improving fetal circulation and preventing shoulder dystocia.

Simulation of Shoulder Dystocia for Skill Acquisition and Competency Assessment: A Systematic Review and Gap Analysis

STATEMENT

Mastery of shoulder dystocia management skills acquired via simulation training can reduce neonatal brachial plexus injury by 66% to 90%. However, the correlation between simulation drills and reduction in clinical injuries has been inconsistently replicated, and establishing a causal relationship between simulation training and reduction of adverse clinical events from shoulder dystocia is infeasible due to ethical limitations. Nevertheless, professional liability insurance carriers increasingly are mandating simulation-based rehearsal and competency assessment of their covered obstetric providers' shoulder dystocia management skills-a high-stakes demand that will require rapid scaling up of access to quality shoulder dystocia simulation. However, questions remain about differing simulation training schemes and instructional content used among clinically effective and ineffective educational interventions. This review of original research compares curricular content of shoulder dystocia simulation and reveals several critical gaps: (1) prescriptive instruction prioritizing maneuvers shown to decrease strain on the brachial plexus is inconsistently used. (2) Proscriptive instruction to avoid placing excessive and laterally directed traction on the head or to observe a brief hands-off period before attempting traction is infrequently explicit. (3) Neither relative effectiveness nor potential interaction between prescriptive and proscriptive elements of instruction has been examined directly. (4) Reliability of high-fidelity mannequins capable of objective measurement of clinician-applied traction force as compared with subjective assessment of provider competence is unknown. Further study is needed to address these gaps and inform efficient and effective implementation of clinically translatable shoulder dystocia simulation.

Shoulder dystocia: incidence, mechanisms, and management strategies

Shoulder dystocia can lead to death or brain damage for the baby. Traction on the head can damage the brachial plexus. The diagnosis should be made when the mother cannot push the shoulders out with her own efforts with the next contraction after delivery of the head. There should be no traction on the head to diagnose shoulder dystocia. McRoberts’ position is acceptable but it should not be accompanied by any traction on the head. If the posterior shoulder is in the sacral hollow then the best approach is to use posterior axillary traction to deliver the posterior shoulder and arm. If both shoulders are above the pelvic brim, the posterior arm should be brought down with Jacquemier’s maneuver. If that fails, cephalic replacement or symphysiotomy is the next step. After shoulder dystocia is resolved, one should wait 1 minute or so to allow placental blood to return to the baby before cutting the umbilical cord.

Shoulder dystocia and range of head-body delivery interval (HBDI): The association between prolonged HBDI and neonatal outcomes: Protocol for a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Shoulder dystocia (SD) is an obstetric emergency which if not carefully diagnosed and managed, can contribute to lifelong neonatal morbidities. Despite current guidelines on the definition of SD (impaction of the fetal shoulder behind the maternal symphysis pubis and need for ancillary manoeuvres or head-body delivery interval (HBDI) >60 s) its accurate diagnosis requires clinical expertise as well as overall consideration of feto-maternal condition. Based on the literature available, our study aims to determine (1) the range of HBDI as an indicator of SD and (2) the neonatal complications occurring following prolonged HBDI in normal or SD-complicated births.

STUDY DESIGN

A comprehensive literature search will be conducted in the following databases MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus (Elsevier) as well as international obstetric guidelines to find English language published data since 1970 that evaluate HBDI, prolonged HBDI and associated neonatal outcomes. Retrospective/prospective observational studies and randomized controlled trials will be recruited. As heterogeneity in definitions of SD among studies is expected, we will categorize our results according to the following two definitions: 1-Bony obstruction of fetal shoulder behind the maternal symphysis pubis or less commonly, posterior shoulder on sacral promontory and need for ancillary manoeuvres or 2- Head-body delivery interval (HBDI)> 60 s). Two reviewers will independently identify eligible studies, assess risk of bias and extract data based on predefined checklists. Outcomes of interest will be the HBDI in normal and SD-complicated births and associated neonatal consequences.

DISCUSSION

Findings of this systematic review will provide reliable information regarding (1) the interval between birth of the head and birth of the shoulders and (2) neonatal outcomes attributed to either true SD or prolonged HBDI. Our findings will add to the knowledge of whether prolonged HBDI is an appropriate definition for SD and whether/what level of prolongation of HBDI results in adverse neonatal outcomes. This increased understanding will better inform the clinical practice of midwives and obstetricians.

Correlating head-to-body delivery intervals with neonatal depression in vaginal births that result in permanent brachial plexus injury

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate which variables predict neonatal depression in vaginal deliveries that result in permanent brachial plexus injury.

STUDY DESIGN

With the use of a data set of litigated vaginal deliveries (n = 103 deliveries) from 1978 through 1999 that resulted in permanent brachial plexus injury, detailed delivery and neonatal and pediatric information was obtained by chart review. Neonatal depression was defined as a 5-minute Apgar score of <7. Data that were extrapolated from neonates with low Apgar scores at 5 minutes were compared with neonates with Apgar scores of > or =7 with the use of the Fisher exact test, chi(2) test, or one-way analysis of variance; a two-tailed probability value of <.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Nine of 89 neonates (10%) had low 5-minute Apgar scores. Head-to-body delivery intervals (available for 36 deliveries) were significantly longer in neonates with 5-minute Apgar scores of <7 vs > or =7 (294 +/- 68 seconds vs 147 +/- 82 seconds, P <.001). Differences in other clinical variables (ie, maternal weight, gestational age, diabetes mellitus, parity, birth weight, and sex) were not significant. None of the infants in this data set, which includes those infants with neonatal depression) died or had long-term asphyxia-related sequelae in the form of speech impediments, seizures, cerebral palsy, coma, or organ dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

The head-to-body delivery interval was the only significant factor in the prediction of 5-minute Apgar score of <7 in a data set of deliveries that resulted in permanent brachial plexus injury. Despite extended times (< or =6 minutes) on the perineum that resulted in a higher reduced Apgar score rate, there was no asphyxia-related morbidity.