Wrist Arthrodesis Using a Synthes Wrist Fusion Plate

Wrist Arthrodesis Using the Medartis Carpometacarpal Joint Sparing Plate

BACKGROUND

Total wrist arthrodesis is a well-established surgical technique that provides reliable pain relief in patients with advanced wrist disease. Key limitations of existing plating systems include hardware pull-out, hardware failure, and nonunion. There is limited literature on the newer style carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) sparing plating system, produced by Medartis. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of wrist arthrodesis with a CMCJ sparing wrist plate.

METHODS

This study retrospectively identified 23 wrist arthrodeses using the Medartis CMCJ sparing plate for review. This study assessed the outcomes of 18 unilateral wrist fusions and 1 bilateral wrist fusion. The study group consisted of 12 men and 5 women with an average age of 56 years (range: 29-82 years) with a mean follow-up period of 17 months.

RESULTS

At the time of follow-up, all patients' wrists had fused without postsurgical complication. The final grip strength in the operative hand was 28.2 kg/cm2, which was 87% of the contralateral side. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score at follow-up was 23.9, with all patients returning to daily living activities and work. Patients reported minimal pain (1.3/10), with almost all (17/18) satisfied with the outcome of the surgery and describing that they would recommend this procedure.

CONCLUSION

Our case series highlights that the Medartis wrist arthrodesis plate is a newer design that is a well-tolerated option for wrist arthrodesis based on clinical assessment, functional hand assessment, and patient satisfaction, when compared with the existing literature on traditional plating systems.

Biomechanical Performance of Total Wrist Arthrodesis Plates With and Without Arthrodesis of the Carpometacarpal Joint

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether total wrist arthrodesis (TWA) should be performed with or without arthrodesis of the carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ). The aim of this study is to compare CMCJ-spanning TWA plates using 3D printed wrist arthrodesis model with and without arthrodesis of the CMCJ.

METHODS

Total wrist arthrodesis plates mounted to 3D printed models were tested under a 4-N bending load at 4 Hz for 50 000 cycles, increased by 15% every 10 000 cycles until failure.

RESULTS

Plates with arthrodesis CMCJ were stiffer and failed at a significantly greater load and number of cycles than plates mounted to models without CMCJ arthrodesis. The Synthes stainless steel locking TWA plate performed better than the Trimed plate applied to the model without CMCJ arthrodesis and the Acumed plate applied to the model with CMCJ arthrodesis. Based on these findings, we recommend arthrodesis of the CMCJ in TWA.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of the CMCJ in TWA may protect against plate failure. If arthrodesis of the CMCJ is not performed, plate removal should be considered before breakage occurs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The Effect of 3rd Carpometacarpal Arthrodesis in the Outcomes of Total Wrist Fusion Using Modern Plate Technology

Background  The inclusion of the third carpometacarpal (CMC) joint in the fusion mass in total wrist fusion (TWF) remains controversial. Our goal was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and effects of third CMC joint arthrodesis compared with bridging the CMC joint during TWF. A retrospective chart review was performed. Outcomes assessed included hardware loosening, hardware failure, symptomatic hardware necessitating removal, and need for revision arthrodesis. Case Description/Literature Review  We found that concomitant third CMC joint arthrodesis was associated with a significantly reduced rate of radiocarpal and midcarpal joint nonunion, hardware loosening, and symptomatic hardware removal when compared to bridging of the CMC joint. There was no significant difference in hardware failure rates or the need for revision arthrodesis. Clinical Relevance  When using a contoured dorsal spanning plate, concomitant CMC joint arthrodesis should be considered during TWF to mitigate against hardware loosening and symptomatic hardware. Level of Evidence  Level IV.

Total Wrist Arthrodesis: A Preoperative Test to Predict Functional Outcomes

Objective  The study aims to demonstrate an evaluation method to predict the functional success of total wrist arthrodesis (TWA) and assist its indication. Methods  A prospective study including ten patients submitted to (TWA) posttraumatic arthritis. Exclusion criteria were patients who lost postoperative follow-up or incomplete information in the medical record. The objective functional assessment (handgrip strength, three-point pinch, lateral pinch and pulp-pulp pinch) and the subjective functional assessment (DASH, PRWE, EVA) were evaluated in 3 different periods: (1) Before surgery without articular anesthesia, (2) Before surgery under articular anesthesia and (3) 12 weeks after the surgical procedure. Results  There was an increase in handgrip strength in all three pinches measurements after pain relief, both after joint anesthesia and after the consolidation of the arthrodesis (p < 0.05). In the comparisons between the subjective evaluations (DASH, PRWE and VAS), the patients had better scores in the postoperative evaluation after 12 weeks (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference when comparing the mean strength values found after anesthesia and after 12 weeks of TWA. Conclusion  the outcomes could propose an assessment protocol for patients with indication for TWA, in which patients with good response to intra-articular anesthetic infiltration would benefit from the effects of the surgical procedure.

Post-traumatic total wrist arthrodesis: Satisfaction study of 42 cases at a mean 97months' follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Total wrist arthrodesis is effective in reducing pain in osteoarthritic wrist, but at the cost of range of motion. The aim of the present study was to assess patient satisfaction after post-traumatic total wrist arthrodesis, complications and risk factors.

HYPOTHESIS

Post-traumatic total wrist arthrodesis provides a high rate of satisfaction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective observational satisfaction survey was carried out for the period 2005-2020 by telephone interview.

RESULTS

Forty-two post-traumatic dorsal plate total wrist arthrodeses were included. Mean follow-up was 97 months. Total arthrodesis achieved a mean 75% reduction in pain, with good functional results (QuickDASH: 23±9.1 [11-42]) and satisfaction (83% of patients very satisfied or satisfied). Seventy-two percent of patients continued in their previous work. The complications rate was 48%. Twenty patients had complications, including 14 (33%) requiring surgical revision. Thirteen patients (31%) had hardware removed due to plaque discomfort and 1 due to bone and joint infection. Seven patients showed CRPS.

CONCLUSION

Total wrist arthrodesis provided good results in terms of pain relief and satisfaction, at the cost of loss of motion. It is a reliable surgical technique, with an essential place in the therapeutic algorithm for post-traumatic osteoarthritic wrist, particularly in manual workers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, single-center retrospective observational study.

Total arthrodesis for non-rheumatoid wrists: Outcomes at 5 and 20years of follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Total wrist arthrodesis (TWA) aims to obtain a painless wrist with a strong grip. Its main disadvantage is compromised mobility and for many authors it remains a rescue intervention. However, after one or more palliative interventions, TWA confers poorer results. The objective of our study was to evaluate the medium-term results of TWA, and their long-term stability.

HYPOTHESIS

Our hypothesis was that the results are reliable and persistent for pain and strength, without repercussions to other joints.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a single-center consecutive series of TWA performed with a dedicated plate, excluding rheumatoid wrists, evaluated at 5.4 and 21.1years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty wrists were assessed at the first review and 17 reassessed at the last follow-up. At the mean follow-up of 5.4years, 93% of patients considered themselves "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with the TWA surgery. No infectious complications occurred. At the mean follow-up of 21.1years, all were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" and 88% of them considered their result stable or improved compared to the first revision. The average VAS had gone from 8.4/10 preoperatively to 1.8/10 at the first evaluation and to 0.3/10 at the last follow-up. Except for a patient with both wrists operated on for whom comparison was not possible, the strength of the operated side was on average 89.7% of that of the contralateral side (from 45% to 150%). The mean Quick DASH score was 30.3 (4.5 to 61.4) and the mean PRWE score was 32.5 (1 to 77).

DISCUSSION

TWA using a plate provides excellent results for both pain control and strength restoration. The clinical results remain stable over time, and arthrodesis at more than 20years of follow-up does not seem to have any impact on the other joints of the upper limb. After wrist surgery, the main complaint of patients is the limited range of motion, but the main cause of dissatisfaction is persistent pain. Arthrodesis can be performed first-line in case of questionable indication of partial arthrodesis on a stiff wrist because the results of TWA are better in the absence of a surgical history.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Results of the total wrist arthrodesis with contoured plate in a series of 41 wrists with median follow-up of 6 years

We present a comparative analysis between the pre and postoperative status of 41 wrists subjected to total arthrodesis with contoured plate, analysing the functional and radiological results, subjective satisfaction and return to work. The indications for surgery were post-traumatic arthritis (56.1%), Kien- böck's disease (17.1%), rheumatic disease (14.6%) or other reasons (12.2%). In 75.6% of the procedures, proximal row carpectomy took place prior to or at the same time as the surgical fusion procedure. The median follow-up was 6 years. Postoperatively, pain decreased by 7.5 points on the Visual Analogue Scale and grip strength increased by 6.3 kg. The improvement in the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand was 43.5 points and 53.2 in the Patient- Rated Wrist Evaluation. All changes were statistically significant. There were postoperative complications in 14.6% of the arthrodesis procedures. Radiocarpal fusion was complete in 97.6% of cases. Finally, 62.5% of patients were able to return to work, with 92.5% being satisfied or very satisfied. These results allow us to conclude that, in the medium term, total wrist arthrodesis with contoured plate is a reliable and safe technique for the treatment of advanced radiocarpal arthritis.

Does Proximal Row Carpectomy Improve Union in Wrist Arthrodesis? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background  Some surgeons advocate for concomitant proximal row carpectomy (PRC) with total wrist arthrodesis (TWA), though there are limited data to support or oppose this view. Questions/Purposes  Does concomitant PRC improve rates of union, revision, hardware loosening, hardware failure, and hardware removal in TWA? Patients and Methods  A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent TWA with and without concomitant PRC between January 2008 and December 2018 was undertaken. Patients were included if they underwent TWA using a dorsal spanning plate. Patients were excluded if they underwent partial wrist arthrodesis, revision TWA, or TWA with nondorsal spanning plate fixation. Results  A total of 183 wrists in 180 patients were included in the study, 96 (52.5%) in the TWA only and 87 (47.5%) in the TWA + PRC groups. Median clinical and radiographic follow-up was 18.0 months (3.0-133.0 months) in the TWA + PRC group and 18.5 months (2.0-126.0 months) in the TWA only group ( p  = 0.907). No difference in nonunion (TWA + PRC: 13/87 [14.9%], TWA only: 18/96 [18.8%], odds ratio: 0.76, p  = 0.494), revision (TWA + PRC: 5/87 [5.75%], TWA only: 8/96 [8.33%], hazard ratio [HR]: 0.73, p  = 0.586), loosening (TWA + PRC: 4/87 [4.60%], TWA only: 6/96 [6.25%], HR: 0.74, p  = 0.646), failure (TWA + PRC: 5/87 [5.75%], TWA only: 4/96 [4.17%], HR: 1.55, p  = 0.530), and removal (TWA + PRC: 12/87 [13.8%], TWA only: 16/96 [16.7%], HR: 0.84, p  = 0.634) were identified. Conclusion  Concomitant PRC might not improve rates of union or diminish complications in patient undergoing TWA. The role of PRC and the rationale for its use in TWA need to be individualized and discussed with patients prior to surgery. Level of Evidence  This is a Level IV, therapeutic study.

Comparative outcomes of total wrist arthrodesis for salvage of failed total wrist arthroplasty and primary wrist arthrodesis

A retrospective study compared outcomes of total wrist arthrodesis as a salvage for total wrist arthroplasty versus primary total wrist arthrodesis. Seventy-one wrists were reviewed after a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Thirty-two wrists with failed total wrist arthroplasty were converted to a wrist arthrodesis and 39 wrists received a primary wrist arthrodesis. Seven converted wrist arthrodeses and five primary arthrodeses failed to fuse. Mean patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation scores and work-related questionnaire for upper extremity disorders scores were 43 and 39 for converted total wrist arthrodesis and 38 and 33 for the primary total wrist arthrodesis. Overall, there were 25 complications in 15 patients in the converted wrist arthrodesis group and 21 complications in 16 patients after a primary wrist arthrodesis. The results between the two groups were slightly in favour of patients with a primary wrist arthrodesis. Therefore, we conclude that the timing, primary or conversion, of total wrist arthrodesis could influence patient outcomes.Level of evidence: III.

Total wrist arthrodesis with and without arthrodesis of the carpoMetacarpal joint (WAWWAM): study protocol

Background

It is controversial whether or not the carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) should be included in total wrist arthrodesis (TWA). Complications commonly occur at this site and studies examining its inclusion and exclusion are conflicting. A randomised clinical trial comparing wrist arthrodesis with CMCJ arthrodesis and spanning plate to wrist arthrodesis with CMCJ preservation and non-CMCJ spanning plate has not been performed.

Method

A single centre randomised clinical trial including 120 adults with end-stage isolated wrist arthritis will be performed to compare TWA with and without the CMCJ included in the arthrodesis. The primary outcome is complications in the first post-operative year. Secondary outcomes are Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and grip strength measured at 1, 2 and 5 years. Late complications, return to work and satisfaction will also be recorded.

Discussion

It is unknown whether the CMCJ should be included in TWA. This trial will contribute to an improved understanding of optimal management of the CMCJ in total wrist arthrodesis.

Trial registration

This trial was prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry with identifying number ACTRN12621000169842 on the 16th February 2021.

WHO: U1111–12626523.

ANZCTR:

ACTRN12621000169842

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04644-4.

Early Experience With Locked Intramedullary Wrist Arthrodesis

PURPOSE

The most common method of total wrist arthrodesis is dorsal compression plating, which can require revision for soft tissue or tendon irritation. A locked intramedullary system was developed to reduce this complication. The goal of this study was to investigate the complication rate of total wrist arthrodesis using this system in our center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing intramedullary wrist arthrodesis from January 2016 to February 2018 was performed.

RESULTS

Nine wrist arthrodeses were performed with locked intramedullary wrist fusion in 5 women and 4 men. The indications for fusion included posttraumatic arthritis in 7 and inflammatory arthritis in 2. Two patients underwent primary arthrodesis and 7 had revision from prior partial wrist fusions. Local bone graft at the radiocarpal joint was used in all cases. The mean follow-up was 27 weeks. Radiocarpal fusion was achieved in 8 patients after the initial procedure and in the ninth patient after revision. There were 6 complications in 4 patients with revision reoperation required in 3. The complications were metacarpal locking screw migration in 3, metacarpal fracture in 1, radiocarpal nonunion in 1, and symptomatic middle finger carpometacarpal nonunion in 1. The revision surgeries include distal screw removal in 1, distal screw removal with replacement in 1, and bone grafting in the radiocarpal nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the locked intramedullary wrist fusion system yields high fusion rates. However, based on the high complication rate, particularly from distal screw migration, and the high revision rate in this series, we recommend caution with the use of this system.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic V.

Union of Radiocarpal Fusion With and Without Proximal Row Carpectomy: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Wrist fusion provides a solution to the painful, arthritic wrist, and can be concomitantly performed with or without a proximal row carpectomy (PRC). The benefits of combining a PRC with fusion include a large amount of local bone graft for fusion and a lower number of joints needed to fuse. We hypothesized that wrist fusion combined with PRC will have a higher fusion rate than wrist fusion performed without PRC.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify all papers involving wrist arthrodesis using the following databases: PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and COCHRANE. A literature search was performed using the phrases "wrist" OR "radiocarpal" and "fusion" OR "arthrodesis". Inclusion criteria included complete radiocarpal fusion performed for rheumatoid, posttraumatic, or primary arthritis; union rates available; English-language study. Studies were excluded if case reports; diagnoses other than the ones listed previously; inability to abstract the data. Data collected included wrist fusions with PRC or without PRC, union rate, patient age, underlying diagnosis, and method of fixation.

RESULTS

A total of 50 studies were included in the analysis. There were 41 studies with no PRC, 8 studies with PRC, and 1 study with and without PRC. There were 347 patients with a PRC and 339 patients had a successfully fused wrist (97.7%). There were 1,355 patients who had a wrist fusion with no PRC, and1,303 patients had successful wrist fusion (96.2%). The difference in fusion rate between the 2 groups, 97.7% versus 96.2%, was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no statistically significant difference with regards to union rate in wrist fusion with a PRC versus wrist fusion without a PRC.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

High re-operation and complication rates 11 years after arthrodesis of the wrist for non-inflammatory arthritis

AIMS

Plate and screw fixation has been the standard treatment for painful conditions of the wrist in non-rheumatoid patients in recent decades. We investigated the complications, re-operations, and final outcome in a consecutive series of patients who underwent wrist arthrodesis for non-inflammatory arthritis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 76 patients, including 53 men and 23 women, with a mean age of 50 years (21 to 79) underwent wrist arthrodesis. Complications and re-operations were recorded. At a mean follow-up of 11 years (2 to 18), 63 patients completed questionnaires, and 57 attended for clinical and radiological assessment.

RESULTS

Of the 76 patients, 46 (60.5%) had complications, resulting in 65 re-operations, mainly related to the plate and screws. In the 63 patients who completed the questionnaires, the mean Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score was 36 (0 to 91), the mean Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) score was 40 (0 to 96), and 14 patients (22%) reported no wrist pain. Grip strength, pinch strength, and pronation and supination were significantly reduced compared with the contralateral forearm. The outcome was worse in patients who had previously undergone surgery to the wrist, and those with complications. A total of 13 are awaiting further re-operations, giving a total re-operation rate of 63% (40/63).

CONCLUSION

We observed complications and re-operations throughout the follow-up period and therefore consider wrist arthrodesis to be more complicated than previously assumed. Many of the patients never got used to or accepted their stiff wrists and reported a substantial reduction in function and residual pain. Motion-sparing surgery should be offered prior to wrist arthrodesis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:852-859.

Assessment of Wrist Function After Simulated Total Wrist Arthrodesis: A Comparison of 6 Wrist Positions

Background: There is poor consensus in the literature regarding associated functional limitation and the preferred wrist position for total wrist arthrodesis. The purpose of the current investigation was twofold: (1) to assess the functional limitations of wrist arthrodesis and (2) to determine the optimal position for wrist arthrodesis using a simulated wrist fusion model. Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers underwent simulated wrist arthrodesis in 6 different positions using custom-molded wrist splints: 15° extension with 0° radio-ulnar deviation, 15° extension with 10° ulnar deviation, 15° extension with 10° radial deviation, 0° extension with 0° radio-ulnar deviation, 0° extension with 10° ulnar deviation, and 0° extension with 10° radial deviation. Each volunteer was independently assessed for wrist function using the Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, grip strength, and satisfaction in the simulated wrist fusion positions. Comparisons between all simulated fusion wrists and the baseline unsplinted wrist as well as among the 6 simulated fusion positions were performed. Results: Turning over a card (5.1 vs 4.3 seconds), picking up small objects (7.1 vs 5.8 seconds), and simulated feeding (8.3 vs 7.1 seconds) as well as total Jebsen-Taylor test duration (41.8 vs 37.9 seconds) was significantly longer in simulated fusion wrists. Both grip strength (55.9 vs 80.7 kg) and satisfaction scores (6.4 vs 9.6) were lower in simulated fusion wrists. Wrists in 0° extension also demonstrated significantly shorter durations in stacking checkers than wrists in 15° extension. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that wrist arthrodesis may only compromise select wrist functions. Among the tested wrist fusion positions, wrists fused in neutral may demonstrate better function than wrist fused in slight extension. However, grip strength and satisfaction seem to be unaffected by wrist fusion position.

Factors predictive of patient outcome following total wrist arthrodesis

Aims

Total wrist arthrodesis (TWA) produces a spectrum of outcomes. We investigated this by reviewing 77 consecutive TWA performed for inflammatory and post-traumatic arthropathies, wrist instability and as a salvage procedure.

Patients and Methods

All operations were performed by a single surgeon using a specifically designed pre-contoured dorsally applied non-locking wrist arthrodesis plate at a single centre.

Results

Median post-operative Buck-Gramcko Lohman (BGL), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation scores at six years (interquartile range (IQR) 3 to 11) were 9 (IQR = 6 to 10), 19 (IQR = 7 to 45) and 13 (IQR = 1 to 31) respectively. Polyarticular inflammatory arthritis and female gender were associated with poorer patient-reported outcomes, although the effect of gender was partly explained by higher rates of inflammatory disease among women. Return to work was negatively influenced by workers’ compensation and non-inflammatory wrist pathology. There was no difference in complication rates for inflammatory and non-inflammatory indications. Take home message: Polyarticular inflammatory arthritis is a risk factor for adverse patient-reported outcomes in TWA. Furthermore, when compared with patients without inflammatory arthritis, dorsally applied pre-contoured plates can be used for wrist arthrodesis in patients with inflammatory arthritis without an increased risk of complications. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:647–53.

Is arthrodesis still a good indication for non-inflammatory arthrosis of the wrist?

Objective

The aim of this study was to objectively and subjectively evaluate wrist function after total arthrodesis, among patients with sequelae of non-inflammatory arthritis who were treated with rigid internal fixation using a DCP plate.

Methods

Thirty-two patients with sequelae of non-inflammatory degenerative arthritis were treated using total arthrodesis of the wrist. Of these, two patients were treated with Kirschner wires and four discontinued the treatment, thus leaving 26 patients. The indication for arthrodesis of the wrist was the presence of intracarpal pathological conditions: eight wrists presented sequelae from fractures of the distal radius; 13 had sequelae from fractures of the scaphoid; and five had sequelae from Kienbock's disease. The cases were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the muscle strength test, the Jebsen–Taylor functional test and the Buck-Gramcko test.

Results

It was observed that there were no significant differences at the level of 5%, in the variables of grip strength, VAS, Jebsen–Taylor functional test or Buck-Gramcko/Lohmann test, between the pathological conditions.

Conclusion

Total arthrodesis of the wrist using a plate in the dorsal region was shown to be a safe and efficient technique for patients with different types of pathological arthrosis of the wrist, since it did not cause any important functional incapacity and brought great pain relief.

Management of complications of wrist arthroplasty and wrist fusion

The human wrist joint is unique from functional and anatomic standpoints. Numerous articulations exist within the wrist that allow for many options for partial wrist fusion and arthroplasty. In cases of pancarpal disease, fusion or arthroplasty of the entire wrist joint can be performed. Because of the high functional demand of the wrist, many of these surgical options can fail, leading to devastating complications. This article addresses the types of fusions and arthroplasties available for the wrist and discusses the potential complications associated with each. Methods to prevent these complications are presented and those to treat them once they have occurred are discussed.

Long-term functional outcomes after bilateral total wrist arthrodesis

PURPOSE

To report on the long-term outcomes of bilateral total wrist arthrodeses.

METHODS

We conducted a review of all living patients who underwent bilateral wrist arthrodeses from 1980 to 2010 within a single institution. Outcome measures included pain, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Michigan Hand Questionnaire, satisfaction scores, complications, and revision surgeries.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (26 wrists) were treated with an average follow-up of 14 years (range, 3-28 y). Average time for contralateral wrist arthrodesis was 16 months after initial wrist arthrodesis. Eleven wrists had undergone prior surgery. Eleven patients had a primary diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis. Wrists were fused from 5° flexion to 30° extension, with all but one patient's wrist fused within 10° of the contralateral wrist. There was a significant improvement in postoperative grip strength and pain levels. Postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, and Michigan Hand Questionnaire scores were 21, 29, and 73, respectively. Increasing age, preoperative steroid usage, and concomitant shoulder or elbow disorders were associated with worse outcomes. Twelve patients (93%) were satisfied and would repeat the surgery and 9 returned to full-time work. The major functional limitation was turning a doorknob or tight jar lid. Seven patients underwent additional surgery including 5 revision arthrodeses and 2 plate removals. Revision surgeries were more common in patients with prior surgeries or preoperative steroid usage, women, smokers, those with ipsilateral elbow dysfunction, and those with fixation with a dorsal locking plate.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral total wrist arthrodesis improved pain while enabling patients with severe carpal arthrosis to maintain a satisfactory level of extremity function and quality of life. In general, patients adapted and were satisfied with functional capabilities. This is a viable salvage option for patients with severe bilateral disease.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Clinical outcomes of arthrodesis and arthroplasty for the treatment of posttraumatic wrist arthritis

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes of wrist arthrodesis and total wrist arthroplasty in the treatment of pancarpal posttraumatic arthritis. We hypothesized that arthroplasty would demonstrate better clinical outcomes than wrist arthrodesis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 22 patients treated (15 arthrodeses and 7 arthroplasties) for pancarpal posttraumatic arthritis. We measured clinical outcomes with the visual analog pain scale; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire; the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation; and a study-specific questionnaire. Postoperative complications were recorded from chart review.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 68 months for arthrodesis and 56 months for arthroplasty. The mean visual analog scale pain score was 2 for each group. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 38 for the arthrodesis group and 29 for the arthroplasty group. The mean Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation was 73 for the arthrodesis group and 31 for the arthroplasty group. The results from the study-specific questionnaire revealed that the majority of patients in both groups were satisfied. Complication rates were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Total wrist arthroplasty as an alternative to arthrodesis for the treatment of pancarpal posttraumatic arthritis may offer improved functional outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Midcarpal fusion is also indicated in patients with advanced carpal collapse and already highly restricted range of motion preoperatively

Although midcarpal fusion is a well-accepted treatment of advanced carpal collapse, 1 question remains unanswered: is this technically demanding procedure worthwhile in wrists with an already highly restricted flexion-extension arc (FEA) of less than 60 degrees preoperatively? Therefore, a retrospective analysis of the records of 142 consecutive patients who had had a midcarpal fusion of the wrist was performed. There were 50 patients in group 1 (FEA < 60 degrees) and 92 patients in group 2 (FEA ≥ 60 degrees) with a mean follow-up of 23 months. Flexion-extension arc preoperatively and postoperatively, pain evaluated by a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 as well as the patients' upper extremity functioning captured with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire were statistically analyzed. Functional range of motion was defined as 5-degree wrist flexion and 30-degree wrist extension. Median wrist flexion before versus after midcarpal fusion was 18 versus 22 degrees and 23 versus 25 degrees for wrist extension in group 1. In group 2, the data were 42 versus 27 degrees and 43 versus 30 degrees, respectively. Midcarpal fusion led to an improvement of FEA in 52% of patients in group 1 but only in 5.4% of patients in group 2. In group 1, the median FEA improved by 122%, whereas the median FEA declined to 69% in group 2. Preoperatively 20% of patients in group 1 and 95% of patients in group 2 reached a functional range of motion for flexion/extension, which changed to 36% in group 1 versus 62% in group 2 postoperatively. The visual analog scale score improved for group 1 from 5.7 to 2.4 and for group 2 from 5.7 to 3.2, respectively. The postoperative DASH score was for both groups 33 points. Our data demonstrate that even in patients with a highly restricted range of motion in advanced carpal collapse, it is still reasonable to perform a midcarpal fusion instead of total wrist fusion.

Locked intramedullary total wrist arthrodesis

Total wrist arthrodesis is commonly performed using fixation plates, which can produce soft tissue irritation, often require removal, and limit the ability to position the hand in space. The Skeletal Dynamics IMPLATE is an intramedullary total wrist fusion device designed to provide stable fixation while avoiding the problems associated with plates. Radial and metacarpal locked intramedullary nails are inserted and joined by a connector. Desired hand placement is achieved by selecting the proper connector length and angle, then orienting it appropriately. Fusion mass compression is obtained by virtue of longitudinal threads on the radial nail that allow for length adjustment. Seven wrists in three men and four women were treated with this device and followed for a minimum of 24 weeks. In all cases, local cancellous bone graft was used and the third carpometacarpal (CMC) joint incorporated into the fusion. The median age was 49 (range, 28-71) years. Indications for fusion were two posttraumatic arthritides, three rheumatoid arthritides, one spastic deformity, and one infection. Patients were evaluated before surgery and at final follow-up using the Fernandez pain score and grip strength measurements using a hand-held dynamometer. All patients improved their grip strength and decreased their pain scores. All fusions united, and none of the patients presented dorsal soft tissue problems or required implant removal. One rheumatoid patient required secondary surgery for removal of a retained palmar osteophyte. This device delivers stable fixation, facilitates hand placement, and does not require removal.

Amandys(®) implant: novel pyrocarbon arthroplasty for the wrist

OBJECTIVES

Post-traumatic, arthritic or degenerative destruction of the midcarpal and radiocarpal joints are difficult to treat. A new arthroplasty with a free interposition pyrocarbon implant, Amandys(®), is proposed for the treatment of extensive destruction of midcarpal and radiocarpal joints. Preliminary results are reported.

METHODS

The prospective series included 25 patients, 15 males and 10 females with a mean age of 60. The indications were degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatoid destruction of the wrist. Sixty percent of the patients had already had surgery on their wrist before the operation. The mean follow-up was 24months.

RESULTS

Three patients had a reoperation: two for a repositioning of the implant and one for a styloidectomy. At the last follow-up, the mean grip strength was 16kg (51% of the contralateral side), the mean range of motion in flexion-extension was 68°. Mean strength and range of motion did not change significantly with the operation. Pain and function showed significant improvement. The mean pain score decreased from 6.7/10 to 3.7/10 postoperatively. The mean PRWE score decreased from 61/100 to 32/100.The mean QuickDash score decreased from 63/100 to 36/100. Ninety-six percent of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied. No dislocation or subsidence of the implant was noticed.

CONCLUSIONS

This minimally invasive pyrocarbon interposition increases the possibilities for the treatment of extensive articular destructions of the wrist. Indications must be limited to a well-aligned wrist with competent capsuloligamentous structure. This new arthroplasty is a reliable alternative to other surgical options, which are more radical or invasive such as total arthrodesis or total wrist prosthesis.

"Remotion" total wrist arthroplasty: preliminary results of a prospective international multicenter study of 215 cases

This study reports the current results of an international multicenter study of one last generation total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) ("ReMotion," Small Bone Innovation, Morristown, PA). The two first authors (G.H. and M.B.) built a Web-based prospective database including clinical and radiological preoperative and postoperative reports of "ReMotion" TWA at regular intervals. The cases of 7 centers with more than 15 inclusions were considered for this article. A total of 215 wrists were included. In the rheumatoid arthritis (RA; 129 wrists) and nonrheumatoid arthritis (non-RA; 86 wrists) groups, there were respectively 5 and 6% complications requiring implant revision with a survival rate of 96 and 92%, respectively, at an average follow-up of 4 years. Within the whole series, only one dislocation was observed in one non-RA wrist. A total of 112 wrists (75 rheumatoid and 37 nonrheumatoid) had more than 2 years of follow-up (minimum: 2 years, maximum: 8 years). In rheumatoid and non-RA group, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score improved by 48 and 54 points, respectively, and QuickDASH score improved by 20 and 21 points, respectively, with no statistical differences. Average postoperative arc of wrist flexion-extension was 58 degrees in rheumatoid wrists (loss of 1 degree) compared with 63 degrees in non-RA wrists (loss of 9 degrees) with no statistical differences. Grip strength improved respectively by 40 and 19% in rheumatoid and non-RA groups (p = 0.033). Implant loosening was observed in 4% of the rheumatoid wrists and 3% of the non-RA wrists with no statistical differences. A Web-based TWA international registry was presented. Our results suggest that the use of the "ReMotion" TWA is feasible in the midterm both for rheumatoid and non-RA patients. This is a significant improvement compared with the previous generation TWA. The level of evidence for this study is IV.

Midcarpal hemiarthroplasty for wrist arthritis: rationale and early results

Midcarpal hemiarthroplasty is a novel motion-preserving treatment for radiocarpal arthritis and is an alternative to current procedures that provide pain relief at the expense of wrist biomechanics and natural motion. It is indicated primarily in active patients with a well-preserved distal row and debilitating arthritic symptoms. By resurfacing the proximal carpal row, midcarpal arthroplasty relieves pain while preserving the midcarpal articulation and the anatomic center of wrist rotation. This technique has theoretical advantages when compared with current treatment options (i.e., arthrodesis and total wrist arthroplasty) since it provides coupled wrist motion, preserves radial length, is technically simple, and avoids the inherent risks of nonunion and distal component failure. The KinematX midcarpal hemiarthroplasty has an anatomic design and does not disrupt the integrity of the wrist ligaments. We have implanted this prosthesis in nine patients with promising early results. The indications for surgery were as follows: scapholunate advanced collapse wrist (three), posttraumatic osteoarthritis (three), inflammatory arthritis (two), and Keinböck disease (one). Prospective data has been collected and the results are preliminary given the infancy of the procedure. The mean follow-up was 30.9 weeks (range: 16 to 56 weeks). The mean Mayo wrist score increased from 31.9 preoperatively to 58.8 (p < 0.05) and the mean DASH score improved significantly from 47.8 preoperatively to 28.7 (p < 0.05). There was a trend toward increased motion but statistical significance was not reached. Two patients required manipulation for wrist stiffness. There was no evidence of prosthetic loosening or capitolunate narrowing. The procedure is simple (average surgical time was 49 minutes) and maintains coupled wrist motion through preservation of the midcarpal articulation. The preliminary data show that it appears safe but considerably longer follow-up is required before conclusions can be drawn as to its durability, reliability, and overall success. The level of evidence for this study is therapeutic level IV (case series).

The use of bone grafts and substitutes in the treatment of distal radius fractures

The interest in developing biomaterials to augment fracture healing continues to grow. New products promise early return to function with minimal morbidity; however, indications to use these products remain unclear. An ideal bone graft material stimulates bone healing and provides structural stability while being biocompatible, bioresorbable, easy to use, and cost-effective. This article reviews the biology of bone grafts and the clinical evidence in the use of bone graft substitutes for the treatment of distal radius fractures.

Role of wrist arthrodesis in patients receiving double free muscle transfers for reconstruction following complete brachial plexus paralysis

PURPOSE

We reviewed 18 patients who had received double free muscle transfers and wrist arthrodesis to determine the effect of the stiff wrist on digital motion and function.

METHODS

The patients were 15 men and 3 women with a mean age of 24 years. We determined the total active motion of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints just before performing the arthrodesis and at final follow-up. We recorded the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand functional score at the same times.

RESULTS

All of our patients showed evidence of fusion at a mean of 12 ± 2 weeks (range, 10-15 wk). The digital mean total active motion was 39° ± 21° before arthrodesis and 49° ± 25° after arthrodesis. Preoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores significantly decreased after fusion. Three cases were complicated postoperatively by wound hematoma. Five patients required wrist arthrodesis hardware removal because of skin irritation.

CONCLUSIONS

Wrist fusion in patients receiving double free muscle transfers resulted in improved finger range of motion and overall hand function.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Imaging assessment of the postoperative arthritic wrist

Wrist arthritis is a common disease entity that can result in severe pain, swelling, and decreased wrist motion, leading to the impairment of daily activities and vocational functions. Nonsurgical treatment for wrist arthritis can improve function and provide pain relief in some cases. With disease progression, however, conservative therapy may become ineffective, and surgical treatment may be required. The three main surgical options for wrist arthritis are arthrodesis, carpectomy, and arthroplasty. Because of the high prevalence of wrist arthritis, radiologists will commonly encounter images that were obtained in patients who have undergone one or more of these surgical options. All three options are common in contemporary orthopedic practice and have evolved in recent years, making it imperative that radiologists understand current procedures and stay abreast of advances in techniques and hardware. In addition, familiarity with both normal and abnormal postoperative imaging findings can aid in the assessment of complications and early failure.

Current concepts and treatment for the rheumatoid wrist

Wrist involvement in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is common. Within 2 years of diagnosis, more than half of patients will have wrist pain, and more than 90% will have wrist disease by 10 years. Although wrist involvement is generally thought to be less disabling than RA of the fingers and hand, it can be a significant cause of pain and disability. Severe disease with bony destruction and synovitis in the wrist can also result in soft-tissue problems including tendon ruptures. In addition to musculoskeletal involvement, systemic manifestations of RA can occur. Felty syndrome can result in a low white blood count and splenomegaly in association with RA. New generation, disease-modifying pharmacologic agents offer promise in controlling the disease progression. Surgical treatments for the diseased wrist are aimed at relieving pain and restoring function. Common procedures include: synovectomy and tenosynovectomy, tendon reconstruction, distal ulnar resection and/or distal radioulnar joint reconstruction, partial and full wrist arthrodesis, and total wrist arthroplasty.

Wrist arthrodesis with volar plate fixation in cerebral palsy

Wrist arthrodesis can obtain better appearance, hygiene, and ease of daily care, with some degree of functional improvement in patients with cerebral palsy with a severe wrist flexion deformity. Rigid fixation using a dorsal plate and screws has been accepted as a reliable technique, although hardware-related problems are relatively common. We describe a volar plate fixation technique for wrist arthodesis in cerebral palsy, which can allow concomitant flexor tendon release and avoid a prominent hardware and a cosmetically undesirable scar on the dorsum of the wrist.

Complications of limited and total wrist arthrodesis

Partial and total wrist arthrodeses have become common procedures for treating degenerative diseases arising from numerous conditions, including posttraumatic arthrosis, intercalated segment instability, inflammatory arthropathy, and carpal osteonecrosis. The goals of these two procedures are to provide pain relief and improved function by fusing arthritic or unstable joints. A thorough understanding of the complications and the best practices to avoid them is critical for the surgeon in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management of candidates for total or limited wrist arthrodesis.

Wrist arthrodesis for brachial plexus palsy using an external fixator and a cannulated screw (Ioannina technique)

PURPOSE

To present a new technique for wrist arthrodesis and review its treatment outcomes in 33 patients with brachial plexus palsy.

METHODS

26 men and 7 women (mean age, 26 years) with global brachial plexus palsy underwent wrist arthrodesis using an external fixator and a cannulated screw. All surgeries were performed under local anaesthesia by a single senior surgeon. An external fixator was applied to the radius and the metacarpal of the index finger. The articular surfaces of the radius, scaphoid, lunate, and capitate were debrided, and a cannulated screw inserted from the base of the radial styloid to the carpo-metacarpal joint of the ring finger. Cancellous allografts mixed with demineralised bone matrix were added to the decorticated wrist bones. The external fixator was removed at week 8 and the wrist protected with a short-arm splint until solid wrist fusion.

RESULTS

All patients achieved wrist fusion after a mean of 14 (range, 12-16) weeks. Two patients had delayed fusion and slight wrist instability, because the shorter screw was embedded in the cancellous bone and not self-tapped to the cortex. Fusion was achieved after replacement with a longer screw. No patient developed a superficial or deep wound infection; 2 developed pin track infections. All patients were satisfied with the outcome and able to perform simple daily activities after one year.

CONCLUSION

Our new technique for wrist arthrodesis is less invasive. Blood loss, the risk of postoperative infection, and adhesions at the extensors are decreased.

[Total wrist fusion using the AO wrist fusion plate]

OBJECTIVE

Arthrodesis of the wrist in order to improve functional use of the hand by reducing pain and improving grip strength.

INDICATIONS

Painful destruction of both the radiocarpal and mediocarpal joint combined with contraindications to motion-preserving procedures. Conservative treatment insufficient.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Patients who are pain-free and satisfied with a motion-preserving procedure (e.g., Wilhelm's denervation procedure) or conservative management (casting).

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Dorsal approach to the wrist. Removal of destroyed articular surfaces down to cancellous bone, filling the resulting defects with cancellous bone graft taken either from the the radius or the iliac crest. Stable fixation using the AO wrist fusion plate.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Immediate active motion exercises of the fingers. Below-elbow cast for 2 weeks. 6 weeks postoperatively, X-ray control to judge bony healing. Normal use of the hand in daily life but avoiding pain-provoking activities.

RESULTS

26 (18 men, eight women) of the authors' first patients with arthrodesis of the wrist using the AO fusion plate were reexamined after a mean follow-up time of 18 months (minimum 6, maximum 32 months). The mean modified Mayo Wrist Score was 47 points (minimum 20, maximum 70 points), the DASH Score (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) averaged 46 points (minimum 4, maximum 81 points). 20 of the 26 patients were satisfied, but not all patients were completely free of pain. Eight out of a total of ten patients (seven men, three women) with a bilateral wrist arthrodesis were reexamined after a mean follow-up time of 66 months (minimum 27, maximum 74 months). The DASH Score was 55 points on average (minimum 38, maximum 73 points). All patients stated that their clinical situation had improved and that they were able to manage their daily activities without help. So it can be concluded that bilateral arthrodesis of the wrist is a valuable option, if all other possibilities are exhausted.

Wrist arthrodesis after double free-muscle transfer in traumatic total brachial plexus palsy

Double free-muscle transfer is a technique used to treat patients with total brachial plexus palsy to restore hand prehension. It involves the reconstruction of shoulder stability, the transfer of 2 functioning gracilis muscles, and other complementary procedures to optimize the function of the transferred muscles. Wrist arthrodesis is one of these complementary procedures. Our technique of wrist arthrodesis in these patients is different from the standard technique. In this article, we describe our technique and experience of wrist arthrodesis in patients with complete brachial plexus palsy treated with double free-muscle transfer technique. In our procedure, the plate is fixed from the second metacarpal--and not the third as is the usual practice--to the radius to avoid friction with the extensor digitorum communis tendons. A very small bone graft, prepared from the removed Lister tubercle, is needed because of the very thin articular cartilage in these patients. A short arm splint is used for only 1 week postoperatively to avoid finger stiffness. There were no major complications such as pseudoarthrosis or metal failure in our patients because the affected limb is subjected only to mild stresses.

The rheumatoid wrist

Wrist involvement is common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Individual patient assessment is important in determining functional deficits and treatment goals. Patients with persistent disease despite aggressive medical management are candidates for surgery. Soft-tissue procedures offer good symptomatic relief and functional improvement in the short term. Extensor and flexor tendons may rupture because of synovial infiltration and bony irritation. When rupture occurs, direct repair usually is not possible. However, when joints that are motored by the ruptured tendon are still functional, tendon transfer or grafting may be considered. Because of the progressive nature of the disease, dislocation and end-stage arthritis often require stabilization with bony procedures. The distal radioulnar joint is usually affected first and is commonly treated with either the Darrach or the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure. Partial wrist fusion offers a compromise between achieving stability of the affected radiocarpal joint and maintaining motion at the midcarpal joint. For pancarpal arthritis, total wrist fusion offers reliable pain relief at the cost of motion. Total wrist arthroplasty is an alternative that preserves motion; however, the outcomes of total wrist replacement are still being evaluated.

Wrist arthrodesis

Wrist arthrodesis results in a high degree of patient satisfaction and predictable pain relief in most patients. Most patients are able to return to gainful employment, many without impairment. Some patients require restrictions and employment in a less strenuous occupation. Successful fusion rates have been reported in the vast majority of patients overall. Although the functional outcome is acceptable for most patients,some adaptation is necessary, because certain activities such as perineal care and manipulating the hand in tight spaces are difficult. Activities that require forceful gripping with the hand ina fully pronated or supinated position also may be difficult to accomplish. Preoperative counseling of the patient should include a candid discussion of the potential postoperative functional difficulties. The most common indication for a wrist arthrodesis is advanced symptomatic arthritis secondary to a degenerative, post-traumatic, inflammatory, or postinfectious condition. Wrist arthrodesis also may improve function, hygiene,and cosmesis in the patient who has a contracted or flail wrist associated with cerebral palsy, traumatic brain injury, or brachial plexus injury.Various techniques have been described for achieving a successful arthrodesis. The type of operative technique used depends on the underlying condition, quality of bone, presence of bi-lateral disease, condition of the remaining joints of the involved extremity, and surgeon's preference. Intramedullary rod or Steinman pin fixation has been successful in patients who have inflammatory arthritis. Dorsal plate and screw fixation is preferred for patients who have post-traumatic or degenerative arthrosis. Rigid fixation with a dorsal plate is advocated because of the ease of implant application, the high rates of fusion achieved, and the avoidance of prolonged postoperative cast immobilization. Precontoured low profile plates have been developed to position the hand appropriately and to minimize extensor tendon irritation. Controversy still exists as to the ideal position of the hand. Generally the wrist is placed in slight dorsiflexion and ulnar deviation to optimize power grip. In cases of bilateral involvement, the nondominant hand may be placed in 5 degrees -10 degrees of flexion to better assist in such activities as perineal care. Complications are frequent but can be minimized with attention to detail and good surgical technique. Fortunately most complications are amenable to nonoperative treatment. Major complications include nonunion, deep wound infection, neuroma formation, DRUJ arthritis,ulnocarpal impaction, CTS, and painful retained hardware. Minor complications include hematoma formation, partial wound dehiscence, and transient paresthesias involving the radial, ulnar,or median nerves. Donor site morbidity remains a concern when the iliac crest is used. Complications include hematoma formation, infection, injury to the lateral cutaneous femoral nerve, and prolonged discomfort. Successful outcomes have been reported with the use of local autogenous cancellous bone graft from the distal radius metaphyseal region.

Canine carpal joint fusion: a model for four-corner arthrodesis using a porous tantalum implant

PURPOSE

Interest has focused on porous materials that promote bony ingrowth. In this study a porous tantalum implant was used as an adjunct to intercarpal stabilization in a canine model of wrist arthrodesis.

METHODS

A defect was created at the junction of the radiocarpal, ulnocarpal, and fourth carpal bones, analogous to a four-corner fusion site in humans. A tantalum cylinder was press-fit and stabilized with K-wires. Controls were represented by creating the defect without implant placement. Animals were killed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Histology showed bony ingrowth as early as 4 weeks and mechanical testing showed a statistically significant increase in strength of the construct over time. Controls failed to achieve union at any time point.

CONCLUSIONS

The implant served as an adjunct to stabilization of the carpus in this model of four-corner fusion, suggesting a novel application of this material in conditions in which bone graft has been required previously. This study represents a preliminary investigation of the use of a tantalum device for intercarpal stabilization; it does not compare this technique with conventional methods.