Benign Lymphocytosis and Reactive Neutrophilia: Laboratory Features Provide Diagnostic Clues

Predictive significance of absolute lymphocyte count and morphology in adults with a new onset peripheral blood lymphocytosis

Aims

Lymphocytosis is commonly encountered in the haematology laboratory. Evaluation of blood films is an important screening tool for differentiating between reactive and malignant processes. The optimal lymphocyte number to trigger morphological evaluation of the smear has not been well defined in the literature. Likewise, the significance of lymphocyte morphology has not been well studied and there are no consensus guidelines or follow-up recommendations available. We attempt to evaluate the significance of lymphocyte morphology and to define the best possible cut-off value of absolute lymphocyte count for morphology review.

Methods

71 adult patients with newly detected lymphocytosis of 5.0×109/L or more were categorised to either a reactive process or a lymphoproliferative disorder. We performed statistical analysis and morphology review to compare the difference in age, gender, lymphocyte count and morphological features between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine an optimal lymphocyte number to trigger morphology review.

Results

Lymphoproliferative disorders are associated with advanced age and higher lymphocyte count. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of lymphocyte morphology as a screening test were 0.9, 0.59, 0.60, 0.58 and 0.71, respectively. The optimal cut-off of lymphocyte number for morphology review was found to be close to 7×109/L.

Conclusions

We found a moderate interobserver agreement for the morphological assessment. ‘Reactive’ morphology was very predictive of a reactive process, but ‘malignant’ morphology was a poor predictor of a lymphoproliferative disorder.

Transient CD4/CD8 ratio inversion and aberrant immune activation during dengue virus infection

The immune status after dengue virus infection was studied in dengue patients from an outbreak of serotype 3 dengue virus infection in the southern part of Taiwan during November and December 1998. Consecutive blood samples from 29 dengue patients, of whom 21 had dengue fever and 8 had dengue hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome, were collected, and the immunophenotypes of the peripheral blood mononuclear cells were determined by flow cytometry. The early activation marker CD69 appeared on lymphocytes and monocytes at day 4 after the onset of fever, and declined afterward. However, a transient reverse in the CD4/CD8 ratio occurred at days 6-10 after the onset of fever. The CD4/CD8 ratio inversion was manifested in 10 of 29 dengue patients and was encountered more frequently in dengue hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome than in dengue fever patients. Analysis of the clinical blood cell count of these 10 cases showed that increase of immature neutrophils developed at fever days 5-6, CD4(dim) or CD8(dim) monocytosis at days 6-7, and atypical lymphocytosis at days 8-10 after the onset of fever. Serum IL-6 was found at either day 7 or day 9-11. The PHA-stimulated T-cell response was depressed as well. These changes in immune parameters indicate aberrant immune activation during dengue virus infection and might be involved in the pathogenesis of dengue virus infection.

Peripheral blood manifestations of lymphoma and solid tumors

Although the peripheral blood film has limited use in this age of technologic testing, most new tests are ancillary and cannot be interpreted accurately without examining the peripheral blood film. The peripheral smear plays a critical role in the diagnosis and management of many lymphoproliferative disorders, although playing more of a general function in nonlymphoid malignancies to evaluate cytopenias.

Infectious diseases manifested in the peripheral blood

Although primary diagnosis of infectious disease is uncommonly made from morphologic examination of a blood smear in the United States, knowledge of the distinctive morphologic features of various organisms, coupled with an understanding of the clinical and epidemiologic features of various disorders, permits recognition and diagnosis of uncommonly encountered infections. Furthermore, nonspecific manifestations of infection may provide an important clue in guiding a further diagnostic work-up.