Laboratory Diagnosis of Malaria

Laboratory diagnosis of malaria in nonhuman primates

Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are commonly used for biomedical research because of the high level of gene homology that underlies physiologic similarity to human beings. Malaria parasites of the genus Plasmodium cause one of the most frequent parasitic diseases of NHPs originating from tropical and subtropical areas and as such represent a significant research confounder. Malaria in NHPs presents a diagnostic challenge especially to those laboratories that see no more than a few malaria cases per year in NHPs. The accurate and timely diagnosis of malaria infection in NHPs facilitates the appropriate treatment of individuals infected with the malaria parasites. Conventional microscopy based on the examination of Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood films remains the mainstay of laboratory diagnosis of malaria infection because of the high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and also the capability for Plasmodium species identification and parasite counts. This procedure is recognized as technically difficult and time-consuming, requiring considerable training to obtain the necessary skills. In the past few years, efforts to replace the traditional but tedious reading of blood films have led to different techniques for the detection of malaria parasites, including fluorescence microscopy, detection of intraleukocytic hemozoin or malaria pigment using automated blood cell analyzers, immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic tests based on malaria antigen detection, and PCR assays. These techniques offer new approaches for diagnosing malaria in NHPs. This review focuses on the available laboratory diagnostic tools for malaria in NHPs.

A method for detecting microfilaraemia, filarial specific antigens and antibodies and typing of parasites for drug resistance and genotypes using finger prick blood sample

Monitoring and evaluation of programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (LF) depends on epidemiological assessment using appropriate indicators. Minimum efforts using reliable tests are necessary to guide the programme managers in decision-making. Impact of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) towards filariasis elimination can be assessed by the detection of microfilariae (mf) or parasite DNA (infective), filarial antigens (infected) and antibodies (exposure). It is also important to monitor drug resistance and variation in genetic structure of parasite populations using molecular markers. We developed a method to carry out parasitological, molecular, immunological and genetic analysis from a minimum volume of blood sample (about 150 microl) drawn from finger tip of an individual residing in LF endemic area. The method involves separation of sera for immunological assays and isolation of mf of Wuchereria bancrofti from the blood clots for counting, which were then used for W. bancrofti specific PCR, screening for albendazole sensitivity/resistance alleles by AS-PCR, RAPD profiling and ITS 2 PCR for genotyping. A protocol is also suggested for the separation of sera for assays to detect antigen and antibodies and isolation of mf from clots for genetic analysis. The protocol developed has shown potential application in monitoring several immunological, parasitological and molecular parameters from a limited amount of blood sample collected by finger prick, in large-scale operations.

False Positive Results in the Capillary Tube Fluorescent Staining Method for Malaria

Howell-Jolly bodies (HJB) are composed ofDNA which will apparently take the fluorescent dye used to stain the chromatin bodies of the malarial parasites (MP). While evaluating a capillary tube/fluorescent staining technique for malaria we came across this previously unreported false positive effect of HJB in ten cases, all negative microscopically for MP and not originally requested for that test All gave positive results, the degree of which correlated well with the frequency of HJB. The positivity concentrated in the upper red cell layer of the capillary tube where MP rings also concentrate.

Acridine Orange for malaria diagnosis: its diagnostic performance, its promotion and implementation in Tanzania, and the implications for malaria control

One hundred years ago, Giemsa's stain was employed for the first time for malaria diagnosis. Giemsa staining continues to be the method of choice in most malarious countries, although, in the recent past, several alternatives have been developed that exhibit some advantages. Considerable progress has been made with fluorescent dyes, particularly with Acridine Orange (AO). The literature on the discovery, development and validation of the AO method for malaria diagnosis is reviewed here. Compared with conventional Giemsa staining, AO shows a good diagnostic performance, with sensitivities of 81.3%-100% and specificities of 86.4%-100%. However, sensitivities decrease with lower parasite densities, and species differentiation may occasionally be difficult. The most notable advantage of the AO method over Giemsa staining is its promptness; results are readily available within 3-10 min, whereas Giemsa staining may take 45 min or even longer. This is an important advantage for the organization of health services and the provision of effective treatment of malaria cases. The national malaria control programme of Tanzania, together with the Japan International Co-operation Agency, began to introduce the AO method in Tanzania in 1994. So far, AO staining has been introduced in 70 regional and district hospitals, and 400 laboratory technicians have been trained to use the method. The results of this introduction, which are reviewed here and have several important implications, indicate that AO is a viable alternative technique for the laboratory diagnosis of malaria in highly endemic countries.

External quality assessment in the examination of blood films for malarial parasites within Ontario, Canada

OBJECTIVE

To assess laboratory practice in the examination of blood films for malarial parasites.

METHOD

Ontario medical laboratories, licensed by the Ministry of Health, are required to participate in external quality assessment by the Laboratory Proficiency Testing Program, which assesses performance of laboratory assays and also examines the total testing process. Educational strategies are used to improve performance.

RESULTS

A 1995 survey indicated shortcomings in detection and identification of malarial parasites in blood films. Consequently, recommendations for the investigation of malarial parasites in blood were issued. In 1996 and 1997, 16 workshops were conducted. A 1997 follow-up external quality assessment survey indicated that problems persist as 27% of laboratories failed to correctly speciate Plasmodium falciparum. Good Practice Guidelines were issued in 1998.

CONCLUSION

Further education and assessment are required. Laboratories lacking expertise must establish referral arrangements with more proficient laboratories.