Partial liquid ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome

Perfluorocarbons in Research and Clinical Practice: A Narrative Review

Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) are organic liquids derived from hydrocarbons in which some of the hydrogen atoms have been replaced by fluorine atoms. They are chemically and biologically inert substances with a good safety profile. They are stable at room temperature, easy to store, and immiscible in water. Perfluorocarbons have been studied in biomedical research since 1960 for their unique properties as oxygen carriers. In particular, PFCs have been used for liquid ventilation in unusual environments such as deep-sea diving and simulations of zero gravity, and more recently for drug delivery and diagnostic imaging. Additionally, when delivered as emulsions, PFCs have been used as red blood cell substitutes. This narrative review will discuss the multifaceted utilization of PFCs in therapeutics, diagnostics, and research. We will specifically emphasize the potential role of PFCs as red blood cell substitutes, as airway mechanotransducers during artificial placenta procedures, as a means to improve donor organ perfusion during the ex vivo assessment, and as an adjunct in cancer therapies because of their ability to reduce local tissue hypoxia.

Partial liquid ventilation for preventing death and morbidity in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are syndromes of severe respiratory failure that are associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. Artifical ventilatory support is commonly required and may exacerbate lung injury. Partial liquid ventilation (PLV) has been proposed as a less injurious form of ventilatory support for these patients. Although PLV has been shown to improve gas exchange and to reduce inflammation in experimental models of ALI, a previous systematic review did not find any evidence to support or refute its use in humans with ALI and ARDS.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to assess whether PLV reduced mortality (at 28 d, at discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU), at discharge from hospital and at one, two and five years) in adults with ALI or ARDS when compared with conventional ventilatory support.Secondary objectives were to determine how PLV compared with conventional ventilation with regard to duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, duration of respiratory support, duration of oxygen therapy, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, incidence of infection, long-term cognitive impairment, long-term health related quality of life, long- term lung function, long-term morbidity costs and adverse events. The following adverse events were considered: hypoxia (arterial PO2 <80 mm Hg), pneumothorax (any air leak into the pleural space requiring therapeutic intervention), hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg sustained for longer than two minutes or requiring treatment with fluids or vasoactive drugs), bradycardia (heart rate < 50 beats per minute sustained for longer than one minute or requiring therapeutic intervention) and cardiac arrest (absence of effective cardiac output).

SEARCH METHODS

In this updated review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL Issue 10, 2012, in The Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (Ovid SP, 1966 to November 2012); EMBASE (Ovid SP, 1980 to November 2012) and CINAHL (EBSCOhost,1982 to November 2012) for published studies. In our original review, we searched until May 2004.Grey literature was identified by searching conference proceedings and trial registries and by contacting experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

As in the original review, review authors selected randomized controlled trials that compared PLV with other forms of ventilation in adults (16 y of age or older) with ALI or ARDS, reporting one or more of the following: mortality; duration of mechanical ventilation, respiratory support, oxygen therapy, stay in the intensive care unit or stay in hospital; infection; long-term cognitive impairment or health-related quality of life; long-term lung function or cost.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently evaluated the quality of the relevant studies and extracted the data from included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

In this updated review, one new eligible study was identified and included, yielding a total of two eligible studies (including a combined total of 401 participants). Of those 401 participants, 170 received 'high'-dose partial liquid ventilation (i.e. a mean dose of at least 20 mL/kg), 99 received 'low-dose' partial liquid ventilation (i.e. a dose of 10 mL/kg) and 132 received conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Pooled estimates of effect were calculated for all those who received 'high'-dose PLV versus conventional ventilation. No evidence indicated that 'high'-dose PLV either reduced mortality at 28 d (risk ratio (RR) 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 1.85, P = 0.37) or increased the number of days free of CMV at 28 d (mean difference (MD) -2.24, 95% CI -4.71 to 0.23, P = 0.08). The pooled estimate of effect for bradycardia in those who received PLV was significantly greater than in those who received CMV (RR 2.51, 95% CI 1.31 to 4.81, P = 0.005). Pooled estimates of effect for the following adverse events- hypoxia, pneumothorax, hypotension and cardiac arrest- all showed a nonsignificant trend towards a higher occurrence of these events in those treated with PLV. Because neither eligible study addressed morbidity or mortality beyond 28 d, it was not possible to determine the effect of PLV on these outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No evidence supports the use of PLV in ALI or ARDS; some evidence suggests an increased risk of adverse events associated with its use.

Partial liquid ventilation for the prevention of mortality and morbidity in paediatric acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome are syndromes of severe respiratory failure. Children with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome have high mortality and the survivors have significant morbidity. Partial liquid ventilation is proposed as a less injurious form of respiratory support for these children. Uncontrolled studies in adults have shown improvements in gas exchange and lung compliance with partial liquid ventilation. A single uncontrolled study in six children with acute respiratory syndrome showed some improvement in gas exchange during three hours of partial liquid ventilation. This review was originally published in 2004, updated in 2009 and again in 2012.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether partial liquid ventilation reduces mortality or morbidity, or both, in children with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome.

SEARCH METHODS

In this updated review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 11); CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature) via Ovid (1982 to November 2011); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to November 2011); and Ovid EMBASE (1982 to November 2011). The search was last performed in August 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared partial liquid ventilation with other forms of ventilation in children (aged 28 days to 18 years) with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Trials had to report one or more of the following: mortality; duration of mechanical ventilation, respiratory support, oxygen therapy, stay in the intensive care unit, or stay in hospital; infection; long-term cognitive impairment, neurodevelopmental progress, or other long-term morbidities.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently evaluated the quality of the relevant studies and extracted the data from the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one study enrolling 182 patients (reported as an abstract in conference proceedings) was identified and found eligible for inclusion; the authors reported only limited results. The trial was stopped prematurely and was, therefore, under-powered to detect any significant differences and at high risk of bias. The only available outcome of clinical significance was 28-day mortality. There was no statistically significant difference between groups, with a relative risk for 28-day mortality in the partial liquid ventilation group of 1.54 (95% confidence interval 0.82 to 2.9).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from RCTs to support or refute the use of partial liquid ventilation in children with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Adequately powered, high quality RCTs are still needed to assess its efficacy. Clinically relevant outcome measures should be assessed (mortality at discharge and later, duration of both respiratory support and hospital stay, and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes). The studies should be published in full.

Partial Liquid Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

RATIONALE

Despite recent clinical trials demonstrating improved outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), mortality remains high. Partial liquid ventilation (PLV) using perfluorocarbons has been shown to improve oxygenation and decrease lung injury in various animal models.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if PLV would have an impact on outcome in patients with ARDS.

METHODS

Patients with ARDS were randomized to (1) conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV; n=107), (2) "low-dose" perfluorocarbon (10 ml/kg; n=99), and (3) "high-dose" perfluorocarbon (20 ml/kg; n=105). Patients in all three groups were ventilated using volume ventilation, Vt <or= 10 ml/kg predicted body weight, rate <or= 25/min, inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio <or= 1:1, Fi(O(2)) >or= 0.5, and positive end-expiratory pressure >or= 13 cm H(2)O.

RESULTS

The 28-d mortality in the CMV group was 15%, versus 26.3% in the low-dose (p=0.06) and 19.1% in the high-dose (p=0.39) PLV groups. There were more ventilator-free days in the CMV group (13.0+/-9.3) compared with both the low-dose (7.4+/-8.5; p<0.001) and high-dose (9.9+/-9.1; p=0.043) groups. There were more pneumothoraces, hypoxic episodes, and hypotensive episodes in the PLV patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PLV at both high and low doses did not improve outcome in ARDS compared with CMV and cannot be recommended for patients with ARDS.

Pulmonary applications of perfluorochemical liquids: ventilation and beyond

In this review of liquid ventilation, concepts and applications are presented that summarise the pulmonary applications of perfluorochemical liquids. Beginning with the question of whether this alternative form of respiratory support is needed and ending with lessons learned from clinical trials, the various methods of liquid assisted ventilation are compared and contrasted, evidence for mechanoprotective and cytoprotective attributes of intrapulmonary perfluorochemical liquid are presented and alternative intrapulmonary applications, including their use as vehicles for drugs, for thermal control and as imaging agents are presented.

Partial liquid ventilation for preventing death and morbidity in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Acute lung injury (ALI), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), are syndromes of severe respiratory failure. Adults with ALI or ARDS have high mortality and significant morbidity. Partial liquid ventilation (PLV) may be better (i.e., cause less lung damage) for these patients than other forms of respiratory support. Uncontrolled studies in adults have shown improvement in gas exchange and lung compliance with partial liquid ventilation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether partial liquid ventilation reduces morbidity and mortality in adults with ALI or ARDS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2004; MEDLINE (1966 to May 2004); and CINAHL (1982 to May 2004); intensive care journals and conference proceedings; reference lists and unpublished literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials which compared partial liquid ventilation with other forms of ventilation, in adults (16 years old or greater) with ALI or ARDS, reporting one or more of the following: mortality; duration of mechanical ventilation, respiratory support, oxygen therapy, stay in the intensive care unit, or stay in hospital; infection; long term cognitive impairment or health related quality of life; long term lung function; or cost.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the relevant studies and extracted the data from the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Problems with the inadequacy of the primary report of the one included study do not allow us to report any quantitative results for patients with ALI or ARDS. The only outcome we considered to be of clinical significance and reported for all enrolled patients (i.e., patients with ALI and ARDS and less severe respiratory insufficiency) was 28 day mortality. There was no statistically significant difference between groups for this outcome with a relative risk for 28 day mortality in the PLV group of 1.15 (95% confidence intervals of 0.64 to 2.10).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from randomized controlled trials to support or refute the use of partial liquid ventilation in adults with ALI or ARDS; adequately powered, high quality randomized controlled trials are still needed to assess its efficacy. Clinically relevant outcome measures should be assessed (especially mortality at discharge and later, duration of respiratory support and hospital stay, and long term cognitive and quality of life outcomes) and the studies should be published in full.

Partial liquid ventilation for the prevention of mortality and morbidity in paediatric acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Acute lung injury, and acute respiratory distress syndrome, are syndromes of severe respiratory failure. Children with acute lung injury or acute respiratory syndrome have high mortality and significant morbidity. Partial liquid ventilation is proposed as a less injurious form of respiratory support for these children. Uncontrolled studies in adults have shown improvement in gas exchange and lung compliance with partial liquid ventilation A single uncontrolled study in six children with acute respiratory syndrome showed some improvement in gas exchange during three hours of partial liquid ventilation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether partial liquid ventilation reduces either mortality or morbidity, or both, in children with acute lung injury or acute respiratory syndrome.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane Library issue 2, 2003; MEDLINE (1966 to April 2003); and CINAHL (1982 to April 2003); intensive care journals and conference proceedings; reference lists and 'grey literature'.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials which compared partial liquid ventilation with other forms of ventilation, in children (28 days - 18 years) with acute lung injury or acute respiratory syndrome, reporting one or more of the following: mortality; duration of mechanical ventilation, respiratory support, oxygen therapy, stay in the intensive care unit, or stay in hospital; infection; or long term cognitive impairment or neurodevelopmental progress or other long term morbidities.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the relevant studies and extracted the data from the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one study enrolling 182 patients (only reported as an abstract in conference proceedings) was identified and found eligible for inclusion: the authors report only limited results. The trial was stopped prematurely and therefore under-powered to detect any significant differences. The only outcome of clinical significance available was 28 day mortality: there was no statistically significant difference between groups with a relative risk for 28 day mortality in the partial liquid ventilation group of 1.54 (95% confidence intervals of 0.82 to 2.9).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from randomized controlled trials to support or refute the use of partial liquid ventilation in children with acute lung injury or acute respiratory syndrome: adequately powered, high quality randomized controlled trials are still needed to assess its efficacy. Clinically relevant outcome measures should be assessed (mortality at discharge and later, duration of respiratory support and hospital stay, and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes) and the studies should be published in full.

Drowning and near-drowning

Water immersion is a frequent cause of accidental death and hospital admission. This article outlines the pathogenesis and principles of treatment. Drowning is defined as death by asphyxia due to submersion in a liquid medium. Near-drowning is defined as immediate survival after asphyxia due to submersion.

Gas exchange in the ventilated patient

Increased knowledge of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of impaired gas exchange during acute respiratory failure during recent years has stimulated many studies that evaluate different treatments to improve oxygenation and outcome. Changes in body position (mainly prone positioning) can significantly improve gas exchange in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung failure, with few complications related to the maneuver; however, no survival advantage has yet been detected. A correlation between aerated lung tissue and oxygenation also confirms the importance of recruitment maneuvers in improving gas exchange. Recent suggestions that recruitment of alveoli proceeds during most of the inspired vital capacity and not only around the lower inflection point of the pressure-volume curve raises the question how to best perform recruitment maneuvers. New data support the hypothesis that maintenance of even small amount of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation (with airway pressure release ventilation or biphasic positive airway pressure) can improve gas exchange, whereas other unconventional ventilatory modes have not yet proved advantageous. Some mechanisms responsible for the high percentage of nonresponse to inhaled nitric oxide have recently been proposed, and combinations of inhaled nitric oxide with other therapies have been tested. Increased knowledge in this area may, in the future, make inhaled nitric oxide more attractive in the treatment of adult respiratory failure as well as in neonatal intensive care.

Pediatric ventilation outside the operating room

Various ventilatory techniques have been developed in recent years to treat severe respiratory disease states in the pediatric population. Techniques and strategies involving the use of conventional ventilation, high frequency ventilation, nitric oxide, partial liquid ventilation, and extracorporeal circulation are discussed.