Review of immunosuppression for lung transplantation. Novel drugs, new uses for conventional immunosuppressants, and alternative strategies

History of Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation remains the only available therapy for many patients with end-stage lung disease. The number of lung transplants performed has increased significantly, but development of the field was slow compared with other solid-organ transplants. This delayed growth was secondary to the increased complexity of transplanting lungs; the continuous needs for surgical, anesthetics, and critical care improvements; changes in immunosuppression and infection prophylaxis; and donor management and patient selection. The future of lung transplant remains promising: expansion of donor after cardiac death donors, improved outcomes, new immunosuppressants targeted to cellular and antibody-mediated rejection, and use of xenotransplantation or artificial lungs.

Historical perspectives of lung transplantation: connecting the dots

Lung transplantation is now a treatment option for many patients with end-stage lung disease. Now 55 years since the first human lung transplant, this is a good time to reflect upon the history of lung transplantation, to recognize major milestones in the field, and to learn from others' unsuccessful transplant experiences. James Hardy was instrumental in developing experimental thoracic transplantation, performing the first human lung transplant in 1963. George Magovern and Adolph Yates carried out the second human lung transplant a few days later. With a combined survival of only 26 days for these first 2 lung transplant recipients, the specialty of lung transplantation clearly had a long way to go. The first "successful" lung transplant, in which the recipient survived for 10.5 months, was reported by Fritz Derom in 1971. Ten years later, Bruce Reitz and colleagues performed the first successful en bloc transplantation of the heart and one lung with a single distal tracheal anastomosis. In 1988, Alexander Patterson performed the first successful double lung transplant. The modern technique of sequential double lung transplantation and anastomosis performed at the mainstem bronchus level was originally described by Henri Metras in 1950, but was not reintroduced into the field until Pasque reported it again in 1990. Since then, lung transplantation has seen landmark changes: evolving immunosuppression regimens, clarifying the definition of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), establishing the lung allocation score (LAS), introducing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to transplant, allowing donation after cardiac death, and implementing ex vivo perfusion, to name a few. This article attempts to connect the historical dots in this field of research, with the hope that our effort helps summarize what has been achieved, and identifies opportunities for future generations of transplant pulmonologists and surgeons alike.

Suppression of bronchiolitis obliterans in allogeneic rat lung transplantation--effectiveness of everolimus

BACKGROUND

Chronic rejection (CR) after lung transplantation (LTX) manifests pathologically by fibrotic airway remodelling and bronchiolitis obliterans (BO). The role of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus in preventing this process is poorly understood.

METHODS

A rat model of left lung allo-transplantation (Fisher 344 to Wistar Kyoto) was used to analyze the effect of everolimus (2.5 mg/kg/day) on the development of CR. Drug therapy began on postoperative day (POD) 0, 7 and 14 characterizing different grade of acute rejection (AR) of the allograft before drug treatment.

RESULTS

Non-treated recipients developed severe acute rejection (AR) and first signs of CR on POD 20 and a pronounced CR on POD 60. On POD 20, only application of everolimus from POD 0 to 60 significantly reduced acute inflammatory infiltration (p<0.001). Independent of treatment scheme, everolimus suppressed the development of early signs of chronic alterations (POD 20). However, neither early (POD 7-60) nor late (POD 14-60) application of everolimus affected the progression of CR (POD 60). Only its initial treatment (POD 0-60) inhibited the development of BO and vasculopathy (p<0.001). An additional finding was a decrease in body weight after drug application.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of everolimus after rat LTX depended on the grade of inflammation of the allograft before initiation of drug treatment. Only allografts with no or low grade AR benefit from long-term treatment with everolilmus in the prevention of BO after LTX. It could be speculated that conversion to an everolimus-based immunosuppression after LTX might only be successful in patients free of BO.

Intensivtherapie nach Organtransplantation

Nach langen Diskussionen bietet das Transplantationsgesetz, das seit 01.12.1997 in Kraft ist, Rechtssicherheit. Das Gesetz dient dem Schutz des Spenders und des Empfängers, und es bietet Rechtssicherheit für alle in der Transplantationsmedizin Tätigen. Das Gesetz legt die Rechte und Verpflichtungen der Beteiligten und die Wege der Organspende und -vermittlung fest. Das Gesetz unterscheidet zwischen der Organentnahme bei Lebenden und bei Verstorbenen und legt die Rahmenbedingungen fest. Die Umsetzung der Todesbestimmung soll nach den Erkenntnissen der medizinischen Wissenschaft erfolgen und ist in den Richtlinien der Bundesärztekammer (3. Fortschreibung 1997) festgelegt worden.

Population pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in cardiopulmonary transplant recipients

A population pharmacokinetic analysis of cyclosporine (CsA) was performed, and the influence of covariates on CsA oral clearance and relative bioavailability was investigated. Data from 48 recipients of heart-lung (n = 21) or single (n = 18) or double (n = 9) lung transplant were included in the study. Patients received oral CsA as either a conventional formulation (Sandimmune) or a microemulsion (Neoral). Steady-state CsA concentrations were measured before and at approximately 2 and 6 hours after the morning dose of CsA at the end of weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 26, 39, and 52 posttransplantation. A total of 1004 CsA concentration observations were analyzed using mixed effects-modeling (NONMEM). A 1-compartment pharmacokinetic model and first-order oral absorption were used to fit the data. The absorption rate constants were fixed at 0.25 L/h for Sandimmune and 1.35 L/h for Neoral formulations. Oral clearance (CL/F) was estimated to be 22.1 L/h (95% confidence intervals [CI] 19.5-24.7 L/h). Itraconazole (ITRA), cystic fibrosis (CF), and weight (WT) were identified as significant covariates for CL/F according to the final model: CL/F = 22.1 - 11.3 x ITRA + 23.5 x CF + 0.129 x (WT - 58.7) L/h; where ITRA = 1 if the patient was taking concomitant itraconazole, otherwise 0; CF = 1 if the patient had cystic fibrosis, otherwise CF = 0; and WT is patient weight in kilograms. The relative oral bioavailability of Sandimmune to Neoral was 0.82. The bioavailability of both preparations increased during the first month posttransplantation. Age, gender, and type of transplant (single, double, or heart-lung) were not identified as significant covariates for CsA clearance. The population pharmacokinetic model developed identified some sources of variability in CsA pharmacokinetics; however, an appreciable degree of variability is still present in this patient population.

Bronchiolitis obliterans

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bronchiolitis obliterans (BO) occurs in both post-lung transplant and nontransplant-related individuals, and is characterized by mainly irreversible airflow obstruction that is often ultimately progressive.

RECENT FINDINGS

While post-lung transplant BO is a major cause of lung allograft dysfunction, and hence is better characterized than nontransplant-related BO, it is likely that many similarities in pathogenesis and treatment apply to both categories.

SUMMARY

Optimal management for BO remains to be established, and the role of retransplantation in this disease requires further consensus. Minimization of risk factors for BO and earlier detection in the form of methacholine challenge testing and HRCT scans of the chest amongst other forms of detection, may help in the stabilization and possible resolution of early BO.

In vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory effects of microdispersed oxidized cellulose

The immune system can be manipulated specifically by vaccination or nonspecifically by immunomodulation. Many of biological response modifiers (BRM) have polysaccharidic structure similar to that of microdispersed oxidized cellulose (MDOC). We have investigated the immunomodulatory activity of different inorganic MDOC salts (H, Na, Ca, Mg, Zn, Al, Co, Ca/Na) and organic MDOC derivatives (urea, gelatine, arginine) both in vitro and in vivo. A dose-dependent stimulation by a number of MDOC derivatives was observed with spontaneous and mitogen-induced proliferation of human peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) and mouse splenocytes in vitro. In both primary cultures, the most intensive proliferation was induced by a Ca/Na salt at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. We have also demonstrated stimulatory effects of MDOC Ca/Na salt on the mouse mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR). The stimulatory activity of MDOC towards the immune system was further supported by the fact that in vitro the product stimulates the release of Th1 cytokine TNF-alpha, but not IFN-gamma, IL-4 or IL-6. In vivo MDOC application increases more than 50% the number of colony-forming units spleen (CFU-s), i.e., stimulates the stem cells in bone marrow, and increases relative percentage of monocytes and B lymphocytes in the mouse peripheral blood.

Psychiatric issues in pulmonary disease

This article has attempted to provide an overview of the clinical literature regarding the psychological issues facing patients with pulmonary disease, depending on when the illness begins in the life span, because different developmental tasks are disrupted. Patients must contend with side effects of medication that may mimic or exacerbate psychiatric disorders. The main drug interactions for psychiatrists to be aware of in this patient population occur between rifampin, or theophylline and psychotropic medications. In lung transplant recipients on cyclosporine therapy, the antidepressant drug nefazadone may cause increased cyclosporine levels. Psychiatrists must be aware of the risks, benefits, and survival statistics; educate patients; and ascertain whether the patient is competent to make medical decisions regarding treatment procedures.

Care before and after lung transplant and quality of life research

Lung transplantation is a growing surgical option for patients with end-stage lung and pulmonary vascular diseases. After completing an extensive evaluation and meeting the selection criteria, patients are listed for either single or bilateral-sequential lung transplantation. Immediate postoperative management requires detailed attention to fluid management, monitoring for infection, reperfusion injury, pulmonary hygiene, and pain management. Length of stay depends on the patient's condition before transplant and postoperative complications. Discharge from the hospital can be as early as 7 days after transplantation. Newer immunosuppressive medications offer more options for treating and preventing rejection. Advanced practice nurses, such as coordinators, case managers, nurse practitioners, and clinical nurse specialists, are uniquely positioned to play key roles in coordinating the care of transplant patients across settings and both before and after the transplant procedure. The perioperative needs of lung transplant patients and the impact of this complex procedure on the recipients' and family's quality of life merit further investigation by clinicians and researchers.

Lung transplantation at the turn of the century

Lung transplantation has become a viable treatment option for patients with end-stage lung disease. Donor selection and organ allocation must follow specific guidelines. Single, bilateral, and living-donor lobar transplantation have all been performed successfully for a variety of diseases. Complications include reimplantation response and airway complications. Rejection may occur in the hyperacute, acute, or chronic settings and requires judicious management with immunosuppression. Infection and malignancy remain potential complications of the commitment to lifelong systemic immunosuppression. Survival statistics have remained encouraging and continue to improve with experience. Improved exercise tolerance and quality of life have been demonstrated in the years following transplantation. Remaining obstacles include limited donor organ availability, long-term graft function, and patient survival. However, ongoing advances in immune tolerance and standardized training of physicians in the care of transplant patients should carry lung transplant forward in the twenty-first century.

Comparison of the in vitro antiproliferative effects of five immunosuppressive drugs on lymphocytes in whole blood from cats

OBJECTIVE

To compare the in vitro immunosuppressive effects of cyclosporine and 4 novel immunosuppressive drugs on lymphocytes in whole blood collected from healthy cats.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Whole blood samples collected from 10 healthy adult domestic shorthair cats.

PROCEDURE

Mitogen-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation in whole blood incubated with and without various concentrations of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolic acid (MPA), or A771726 was measured by use of [3H]thymidine incorporation. Drug concentrations that resulted in a 50% inhibition of mitogen-induced proliferation (IC50) were calculated. Lymphocyte viability was determined by use of the trypan blue dye exclusion method.

RESULTS

An obvious dose-response relationship for the antiproliferative effects of each drug was detected. Mean IC50 determined with concanavalin A was 46 nM for cyclosporine, 9 nM for tacrolimus, 12 nM for sirolimus, 16 nM for MPA, and 30 mM for A771726, whereas with pokeweed mitogen, mean IC50 was 33 nM for cyclosporine, 5 nM for tacrolimus, 15 nM for sirolimus, 14 nM for mycophenolic acid, and 25 mM for A771726. Mitogen-stimulated and nonstimulated lymphocytes remained viable, regardless of drug evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Tacrolimus, sirolimus, MPA, and A771726 inhibited in vitro mitogen-stimulated proliferation of feline lymphocytes in a dose-dependent manner. These novel immunosuppressive drugs may be useful for management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and prevention and treatment of rejection in cats that undergo organ transplantation.

Obliterative bronchiolitis after lung transplantation

Despite marked improvements in early survival, long-term outcome after lung transplantation is still threatened by obliterative bronchiolitis (OB). Thought to be a manifestation of chronic allograft rejection, OB affects up to 65% of patients at 5 years after surgery and produces a relentless airflow obstruction. Early and late acute rejection are the primary risk factors for OB, but cytomegalovirus infection and airway ischemia may also play a role. In most patients, OB responds poorly to augmented immunosuppression and eventually leads to infectious complications and terminal respiratory failure. Because early diagnosis is associated with better prognosis, every effort should be made to detect OB in a preclinical stage. This may be best achieved by combining several techniques, such as surveillance transbronchial biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage, measurements of ventilation distribution and exhaled nitric oxide, and expiratory computed tomography.

Combined immunosuppression with cyclosporine (neoral) and SDZ RAD in non-human primate lung transplantation: systematic pharmacokinetic-based trials to improve efficacy and tolerability

BACKGROUND

We studied the efficacy and tolerability of combined immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine A microemulsion (Neoral) plus the macrolide SDZ RAD 40-0 (2-hydroxyethyl) rapamycin (RAD) in a stringent cynomolgus monkey lung graft model in comparison with cyclosporine or SDZ RAD monotherapy.

METHODS

Thirty-nine cynomolgus monkeys received mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) mismatched unilateral lung transplants. Immunosuppressants were administered orally as single daily doses. The observation period was 28 days and follow-up included serial trough blood drug concentrations measured by high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, blood analyses, chest radiographs, open lung biopsies, as well as tissue drug concentrations and graft histology at necropsy.

RESULTS

Graft biopsies in monkeys treated with vehicle (n=4), Neoral (day 1-7: 150 mg/kg/day; day 8-28: 100 mg/kg/day; n=6; mean +/- SE trough level (MTL): 292+/-17 ng/ml) or SDZ RAD monotherapy (1.5 mg/kg/day; n=6; MTL: 15+/-1 ng/ml) showed severe rejection. Coadministration in two transplant monkeys of Neoral (150/100 mg/kg/day) and SDZ RAD (1.5 mg/kg/day) caused their early death. In both animals, SDZ RAD blood levels were more than 5-fold higher than under monotherapy (MTL: 82+/-18 ng/ml). Simultaneous administration (n=6) of Neoral (150/100 mg/kg/day; MTL: 217+/-16 ng/ml) and SDZ RAD (0.3 mg/kg/day; MTL: 24+/-2 ng/ml) improved graft outcome (mild rejection). Side effects included renal failure (n=2) and seizures (n=1). Three monkeys survived to day 28. In this group the MTL for cyclosporin was 143+/-13 and for RAD 38+/-3. Staggered treatment completely prevented rejection in four of six grafts. However, five of six monkeys had moderate to severe diarrhea. In a concentration-controlled trial of simultaneously administered Neoral and SDZ RAD in transplant monkeys (target SDZ RAD MTL: 20-40 ng/ml; cyclosporine MTL: 100-200 ng/ml) all six monkeys survived with improved drug tolerability and an average biopsy score of mild rejection.

CONCLUSION

Combination of orally administered SDZ RAD and Neoral showed excellent immunosuppressive efficacy in a stringent lung transplant model. The drug interaction and the narrow therapeutic index of this drug combination required careful dose adjustments to optimize tolerability and efficacy.

The histology of subcutaneously implanted donor bronchial rings correlates with rejection scores of lung allografts in a primate lung transplant model

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of acute rejection in lung transplantation generally relies on transbronchial biopsies. This invasive procedure may be associated with bronchial bleeding or pneumothorax and may not be feasible in patients with severely compromised lung function. The hypothesis of the current study was that histopathological findings of donor bronchial segments implanted into the subcutaneous tissue of lung allograft recipients would predict lung tissue rejection scores, thus providing the clinician with an alternate source of information.

METHODS

Unilateral left lung transplantation was performed in 34 cynomolgus monkeys as part of a drug efficacy study. After completion of the transplant procedure, 4 bronchial ring segments of the explanted recipient left lung and 4 bronchial ring segments of the non-transplanted right donor lung were implanted subcutaneously in the abdominal region. Lung allograft rejection was evaluated by open lung biopsies of the allograft performed on postoperative (PO) Day 14 and during sacrifice on PO Day 28. At the time of each biopsy, 2 donor and 2 recipient subcutaneous bronchial rings were explanted. Histologic evaluation of the lung tissue samples was performed according to the working formulation of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Bronchial rings were independently evaluated by assessing the degree of airway narrowing; percentage of intact epithelial coverage as well as its specific histology (respiratory ciliated, flattened cuboidal, squamous); presence of lymphocytes, macrophages or spindle cells; and presence of peribronchial inflammation, luminal fibrosis, lymphocytic bronchitis or luminal mucous. Statistical analysis was performed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

In the recipient bronchial rings, there was no evidence of airway narrowing. There was 98% epithelial coverage, 71% that were respiratory ciliated cells, and there was no inflammation. Donor bronchial rings showed no airway narrowing for monkeys with grade A0 to A2 rejection in tissue biopsies and a maximum narrowing (41.2%) with A4 rejection. Epithelial cell coverage was approximately 100% with grade A0-A2 and 44+/-11% with A4 rejection. Lymphocytic bronchitis was most severe in A4 rejection and minimal in A0 to A2 rejection. By logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of a likelihood of rejection were the degree of airway obliteration, the percentage of epithelial cell coverage, the degree of lymphocytic bronchitis and the product of respiratory and flattened cuboidal cell coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

The current data show that histologic alterations of subcutaneously implanted donor bronchial rings correlate with lung tissue biopsy scores based on the ISHLT working formulation. Because subcutaneous bronchial rings can be explanted under local anesthesia, they may provide useful information for the diagnosis of acute allograft rejection in patients with impaired lung function, patients that obtaining lung tissue samples may not be feasible.

Coadministration of neoral and the novel rapamycin analog, SDZ RAD, to rat lung allograft recipients: potentiation of immunosuppressive efficacy and improvement of tolerability of staggered versus simultaneous treatment

BACKGROUND

Neoral and rapamycin derivative (RAD) have complementary mechanisms for inhibition of lymphocyte activation and are substrates for the same pathways of drug metabolism. Therefore, we investigated treatment regimens designed to minimize pharmacokinetic interactions and to potentiate immunosuppressive efficacy in a highly stringent rat lung allograft model.

METHODS

Lewis recipients of Brown Norway lungs received the following daily oral doses: (A) RAD at 2.5 mg/kg (n=9); (B) Neoral at 7.5 mg/kg (n=8); (C) RAD at 2.5 mg/kg + Neoral at 7.5 mg/kg simultaneously (n=8); or (D) RAD at 2.5 mg/kg + Neoral at 7.5 mg/kg (n=6) staggered 6 hr apart. Rats were assessed by daily weights, chest radiographs, drug trough levels (high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry), and blinded scoring of graft histology at death (day 21).

RESULTS

Radiographs were completely opacified in all grafts of control and RAD monotherapy groups on days 7 and 14, respectively. Grafts were mildly opacified (Neoral monotherapy) and completely clear (both RAD + Neoral groups) on day 21. Simultaneous or staggered combined treatment dramatically reduced histologic rejection compared with treatment with either drug alone. Simultaneous treatment caused poor tolerability (poor grooming, lethargy) and significantly higher day-14 RAD and cyclosporine (CsA) trough levels (49+/-5 and 638+/-106 ng/ml; P<0.04) than in the staggered group (28+/-3 and 318+/-25 ng/ml) in which all animals were clinically normal. RAD and CsA day-14 trough levels in the staggered group were the same or lower than trough levels in animals treated with either drug alone (RAD 27+/-3/Neoral 815+/-67 ng/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Administration of RAD + Neoral suppressed lung rejection more effectively than treatment with either drug alone. (2) Trough levels did not differ between monotherapy and staggered combination therapy for RAD but were lower for CsA. These results suggested that pharmacological, rather than pharmacokinetic, interactions between the parent drugs were responsible for the potentiation of immunosuppression when these drugs were coadministered. 3) Staggered administration of RAD+Neoral avoided the pharmacokinetic interactions that caused the elevated drug blood levels and poor tolerability caused by simultaneous administration. Thus, we could potentiate efficacy and improve tolerability by staggering administration of RAD and Neoral.

Suppression of acute rejection in allogeneic rat lung transplantation: a study of the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of rapamycin derivative (SDZ RAD) used alone and in combination with a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine

BACKGROUND

The novel immunosuppressant SDZ RAD, 40-0 (2-hydroxyethyl)rapamycin, is an orally active rapamycin analogue developed for use in combination with cyclosporine (Neoral). The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of SDZ RAD, Neoral, or a combination of both drugs for suppression of acute rejection in an allogeneic, unilateral rat lung transplant model.

METHODS

Brown-Norway (RT1n) donor lungs were implanted into Lewis (RT1l) recipients that were observed for 21 days. Postoperative evaluation included daily weights, serial chest radiographs, drug trough levels, and histology scores of the transplanted lung on the day of sacrifice. Treatment groups were comprised of rats treated orally with the RAD vehicle as controls (n = 6); SDZ RAD 2.5 mg/kg/day (n = 9); Neoral 7.5 mg/kg/day (n = 8); Neoral 2.5 mg/kg/day (n = 6); SDZ RAD 2.5 mg/kg/day plus Neoral 7.5 mg/kg/day (n = 7); and Neoral 2.5 mg/kg/day plus SDZ RAD 2.5 mg/kg/day (n = 6).

RESULTS

The results of this study showed that neither monotherapy with 2.5 mg/kg/day of Neoral, nor 2.5 mg/kg/day of SDZ RAD prevented severe acute rejection in unilateral lung transplant recipients. Furthermore, despite high dose (7.5 mg/kg/day) Neoral treatment, graft histology showed moderate rejection. However, addition of 2.5 mg/kg/day of SDZ RAD to 7.5 mg/kg/day of Neoral completely prevented histologic rejection in four of seven grafts, although the remaining 3 grafts showed minimal rejection. This combination resulted in significantly higher RAD trough levels when compared to SDZ RAD treatment alone. Combining a lower dose of Neoral (2.5 mg/ kg/day) with 2.5 mg/kg/day of SDZ RAD resulted in less weight loss and improved animal health; however, the histology of lung grafts in these rats showed mild rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study on the efficacy of the novel rapamycin derivative SDZ RAD for the control of acute lung allograft rejection. Results showed that acute unilateral rat lung allograft rejection is refractory to monotherapy with either high dose Neoral or SDZ RAD. The two regimens of combined treatment with Neoral plus SDZ RAD used in these studies produced either minimal rejection and reduced tolerability or mild rejection and better tolerability and showed potentiation of immunosuppression when both drugs were used together. Additional investigation of these two drugs is needed, however, to devise regimens that produce both high immunosuppressive efficacy and good tolerability.