Nicardipine is a safe and effective agent in pediatric hypertensive emergencies

Pharmacologic Control of Blood Pressure in Infants and Children

Alterations in blood pressure are common during the perioperative period in infants and children. Perioperative hypertension may be the result of renal failure, volume overload, or activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Concerns regarding end-organ effects or postoperative bleeding may mandate regulation of blood pressure. During the perioperative period, various pharmacologic agents have been used for blood pressure control including sodium nitroprusside, nitroglycerin, β-adrenergic antagonists, fenoldopam, and calcium channel antagonists. The following manuscript outlines the commonly used pharmacologic agents for perioperative BP including dosing regimens and adverse effect profiles. Previously published clinical trials are discussed and efficacy in the perioperative period reviewed.

A Practical Guide to the Management of Severe Hypertension in Children

Severe hypertension in children may result in life-threatening complications. Although there has not been extensive research in this area in children, and recommendations are mostly derived from adult data, in the last few years, there have been more pediatric studies on the safety and effectiveness of antihypertensives. The clinical presentation of a child with severe hypertension varies and may be completely asymptomatic or include signs and symptoms of end-organ damage. Treatment of a child with severe hypertension is emergent and should be done concomitantly with the evaluation.

Evaluation and management of elevated blood pressures in hospitalized children

Elevated blood pressures (BP) are common among hospitalized children and, if not recognized and treated promptly, can lead to potentially significant consequences. Even though we have normative BP data and well-developed guidelines for the diagnosis and management of hypertension (HTN) in the ambulatory setting, our understanding of elevated BPs and their relationship to HTN in hospitalized children is limited. Several issues have hampered our ability to diagnose and manage HTN in the inpatient setting including the common presence of physiologic conditions, which are associated with transient BP elevations (i.e., pain or anxiety), non-standard approaches to BP measurement, a lack of clarity regarding appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic thresholds, and marginal outcome data. The purpose of this review is to highlight the issues and challenges surrounding BP monitoring, assessment of elevated BPs, and the diagnosis of HTN in hospitalized children. Extrapolating from currently available clinical practice guidelines and utilizing the best data available, we aim to provide guidelines regarding evaluation and treatment of elevated BP in hospitalized children.

Evaluation and treatment of hypertensive crises in children

Hypertensive crises in children are medical emergencies that must be identified, evaluated, and treated promptly and appropriately to prevent end-organ injury and even death. Treatment in the acute setting typically includes continuous intravenous antihypertensive medications with monitoring in the intensive care unit setting. Medications commonly used to treat severe hypertension have been poorly studied in children. Dosing guidelines are available, although few pediatric-specific trials have been conducted to facilitate evidence-based therapy. Regardless of what medication is used, blood pressure should be lowered gradually to allow for accommodation of autoregulatory mechanisms and to prevent cerebral ischemia. Determining the underlying cause of the blood pressure elevation may be helpful in guiding therapy.

Therapy of acute hypertension in hospitalized children and adolescents

Acute hypertension (HTN) in hospitalized children and adolescents occurs relatively frequently, and in some cases, if not recognized and treated promptly, it can lead to hypertensive crisis with potentially significant morbidity and mortality. In contrast to adults, where acute HTN is most likely due to uncontrolled primary HTN, children and adolescents with acute HTN are more likely to have secondary HTN. This review will briefly cover evaluation of acute HTN and various age-specific etiologies of secondary HTN and provide more in-depth discussion on treatment targets, potential risks of acute HTN therapy, and available pediatric data on intravenous and oral antihypertensive agents, and it proposes treatment schema including unique therapy of specific secondary HTN scenarios.

Drug treatment of hypertensive crisis in children

Hypertensive crisis is a relatively rare event and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in adults and pediatric patients alike. Rapid, safe, and effective treatment is imperative to alleviate immediate presenting clinical symptoms, prevent devastating morbidity, preserve long-term quality of life, and prevent mortality. Many medications in the hypertensive crisis arsenal have been used for nearly half a century. Nearly all treatment options have been utilized in children for decades, yet reliable data and sound clinical literature remain elusive. Every agent considered to be a first-line, second-line, or adjunctive option has yet to be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial in pediatric patients. With a paucity of clinical data to form evidence-based decisions, the clinician must rely entirely on the extrapolation from adult data and small retrospective studies, case series, and case reports of medication use in pediatric patients. Although more research in the treatment of pediatric hypertensive crisis is desperately needed, current practice demands a sharp knowledge of the pediatric clinical literature and pharmacology in this area as an essential tool to consistently improve patient outcomes with respect to morbidity and mortality.

The management of hypertensive emergencies in children after stem cell transplantation

AIM OF THE REVIEW

This work presents a short overview on the available data about drugs that are currently used to treat hypertensive emergencies in children with a focus on incidents after stem cell transplantation. It shows that the pediatric use of all hypotensive agents appears to be mainly based on personal experience of the attending physicians rather than on convincing clinical trials.

METHOD

A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, through PubMed, using the medical subject headings (MeSH) hypertensive emergencies, nifedipine, nicardipine, and children. Further articles were identified by checking cross-references of articles and books.

RESULTS

Hypertensive emergencies in children after stem cell transplantation usually have a renal etiology, because of the treatment with the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus. In these severe cases an immediate action is necessary to avoid possible appearance or exacerbation of endorgan damage. Because of their mechanism of action and a potential nephroprotective effect calcium channel blockers may be particularly suitable in cases of hypertensive emergencies. An intravenous application of nifedipine may compensate the difficulties of accurate dosing, but keeping in mind possible severe side effects and the lack of published experience its use in children is at least questionable. Nicardipine appears to be the hypotensive agent of first choice. In adults, the treatment of hypertensive emergencies with intravenous nicardipine is well-documented, but for an evaluation of safety in pediatric use, the published studies and case reports appear to be barely adequate.

CONCLUSION

The actual treatment approaches vary widely, demonstrating the lack of hard science on which current treatment of hypertensive emergencies in children is based. The hypotensive agent for the individual situation should be chosen considering the properties, side effects, the limited experiences with its use and the patient's anamnesis.

Safety and efficacy of intravenous labetalol for hypertensive crisis in infants and small children

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of labetalol for hypertensive crisis in children ≤ 24 months of age.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review. Statistical analysis utilized analysis of variance for continuous data, chi-square tests for nominal data, and linear regression.

SETTING

A 737-bed pediatric teaching institution.

PATIENTS

Twenty-seven patients ≤ 24 months of age were treated with 37 intravenous infusions of labetalol, nicardipine, or nitroprusside for hypertensive crisis or hypertensive urgency.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary end point consisted of time to 20% reduction in systolic blood pressure. Primary safety end points measured the prevalence of deleterious effects of labetalol. Continuous infusion of labetalol reduced mean systolic blood pressure by at least 20% in < 8 hrs. This effect was similar to nicardipine and nitroprusside infusions. The reported side effects were similar in each group. Patients receiving labetalol and presenting with ischemic or traumatic brain injury were likely to develop hypotension requiring infusion discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous intravenous labetalol infusion is efficacious for treatment of hypertensive crisis in children ≤ 24 months of age. Aside from patients presenting with ischemic or traumatic brain injury, labetalol was safe to use in this population for hypertensive emergencies and had a satisfactory adverse effect profile. Labetalol may reach dose saturation at a much lower dose in young children in comparison to adults. Clinicians should use caution when initiating labetalol infusions in young patients with brain injury.

Severe hypertension in children and adolescents: pathophysiology and treatment

Severe, symptomatic hypertension occurs uncommonly in children, usually only in those with underlying congenital or acquired renal disease. If such hypertension has been long-standing, then rapid blood pressure reduction may be risky due to altered cerebral hemodynamics. While many drugs are available for the treatment of severe hypertension in adults, few have been studied in children. Despite the lack of scientific studies, some agents, particularly continuous intravenous infusions of nicardipine and labetalol, are preferred in many centers. These agents generally provide the ability to control the magnitude and rapidity of blood pressure reduction and should--in conjunction with careful patient monitoring--allow the safe reduction of blood pressure and the avoidance of complications. This review provides a summary of the underlying causes and pathophysiology of acute severe hypertension in childhood as well as a detailed discussion of drug treatment and the optimal clinical approach to managing children and adolescents with acute severe hypertension.

A review of calcium channel antagonists in the treatment of pediatric hypertension

All children aged > or = 3 years should have an annual blood pressure (BP) measurement taken during a routine physical examination. Physicians should become familiar with recommended pediatric normative BP tables. BP above the 95th percentile may require drug therapy. There are several categories of antihypertensives available to the clinician. Calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) are a class of drugs that exert their antihypertensive effect by inhibiting the influx of calcium ions across the cell membranes. This results in dilatation of peripheral arterioles. When given orally, CCAs are metabolised in the liver by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme CYP3A4; hence, some CCAs will affect the half-life of drugs that share this enzyme system for their metabolism. CCAs can be safely used in children with renal insufficiency or failure and as a general rule there is no need to modify drug dosage in this population. CCAs are generally well tolerated; most adverse effects appear to be dose related. Headache, flushing, gastrointestinal upset, and edema of the lower extremities are the most common symptoms reported with the use of CCAs. Pediatric data regarding safety and efficacy of CCAs have mostly been obtained from retrospective analyses. Extended-release nifedipine and amlodipine are the two most commonly used oral CCAs in the management of pediatric hypertension. These drugs can be given once a day, although many children require twice-daily administration. Extended-release nifedipine has to be swallowed whole; hence, its use in younger children who cannot swallow pills is limited. Amlodipine can be made into a solution without compromising its long duration of action; therefore, it is the CCA of choice for very young children. Oral short-acting nifedipine and intravenous nicardipine are safe and effective CCAs for the management of hypertensive crisis in children. Short-acting nifedipine can cause unpredictable changes in BP; hence, it should be used cautiously and in low doses. Intravenous nicardipine has a rapid onset of action and a short half-life. Intravenous infusion of nicardipine can be titrated for effective control of BP. Intravenous nicardipine has been used safely in hospitalized children and newborns for the management of hypertensive crisis, and for controlled hypotension during surgery. CCAs are a class of antihypertensives that are safe and effective in pediatric patients. They have relatively few adverse effects and are well tolerated by children. This article reviews CCAs as antihypertensives in the management of pediatric hypertension.

Intravenous Nicardipine

Nicardipine is a water soluble calcium channel antagonist, with predominantly vasodilatory actions. Intravenous (IV) nicardipine (Cardene IV), which demonstrates a relatively rapid onset/offset of action, is used in situations requiring the rapid control of blood pressure (BP). IV nicardipine was as effective as IV nitroprusside in the short-term reduction of BP in patients with severe or postoperative hypertension. A potential role for IV nicardipine in the intraoperative acute control of BP in patients undergoing various surgical procedures (including cardiovascular, neurovascular and abdominal surgery), and in the deliberate induction of reduced BP in surgical procedures in which haemostasis may be difficult (e.g. surgery involving the hip or spine) was demonstrated in preliminary studies. Preliminary studies also indicated the ability of a bolus dose of IV nicardipine to attenuate the hypertensive response, but not the increase in tachycardia, after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in anaesthetised patients. In large, well designed studies, IV nicardipine prevented cerebral vasospasm in patients with recent aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage; however, overall clinical outcomes at 3 months were similar to those in patients who received standard management. Small preliminary studies have investigated the use of IV nicardipine in a variety of other settings, including acute intracerebral haemorrhage, acute ischaemic stroke, pre-eclampsia, acute aortic dissection, premature labour and electroconvulsive therapy.In conclusion, the efficacy of IV nicardipine in the short-term treatment of hypertension in settings for which oral therapy is not feasible or not desirable is well established. The ability to titrate IV nicardipine to the tolerance levels of individual patients makes this agent an attractive option, especially in critically ill patients or those undergoing surgery. Potential exists for further investigation of the use of this agent in clinical settings where a vasodilatory agent with minimal inotropic effects is appropriate.

Advances in the pathogenesis and management of hypertensive crisis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes recent insights into to the pathophysiology of hypertensive crisis with the emphasis on newly discovered molecular mechanisms underlying hypertension and also updates current therapeutic options for treating hypertensive crisis in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is growing evidence that the renin-angiotensin system plays a key role in the pathogenesis of hypertensive crises. Recent studies have shown that oxidative stress and factors affecting endothelial function are also important. Treatment of hypertensive crisis still focuses on lowering of blood pressure in an expeditious but safe manner. There is growing experience with IV nicardipine, which is becoming a viable alternative to sodium nitroprusside in children.

SUMMARY

Current knowledge of hypertensive crisis emphasizes the need for additional animal and translational studies with the goal of identifying the underlying molecular pathogenesis and developing new therapies to optimize future treatment of hypertensive emergencies.