Authors' reply

Phosphate binders: New products and challenges

Optimal phosphate control in dialysis patients is extremely challenging. A growing awareness of the deleterious effect of mineral metabolism imbalances together with the lack of a satisfactory explanation for the exaggerated mortality rate in patients undergoing renal replacement therapy has led to a renewed effort to refine our approach to hyperphosphatemia. However, despite the remarkable improvements in dialysis techniques, phosphate control has not substantially improved. Achieving normo-phosphatemia presents a multitude of practical and scientific challenges related to the optimal target level, cardiovascular health, and drug toxicities. It is the aim of the present review to summarize briefly the controversies associated with currently available phosphate binders, a cornerstone in the current management of hyperphosphatemia.

Control of serum phosphorus: implications for coronary artery calcification and calcific uremic arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis)

There is mounting evidence that elevated serum phosphorus is an important cardiovascular risk factor in patients with end stage renal disease. Recent work has shown that vascular smooth muscle cells have the ability to undergo osteoblastic differentiation and produce an environment conducive to mineralization. Serum phosphorus is an important stimulator of this process and the adverse cardiovascular effects of hyperphosphatemia are most likely mediated via its ability to enhance the development of vascular calcification. Arterial calcification, whether it is intimal or medial in location, is a strong independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Both coronary artery calcification and calciphylaxis are prototypical examples of arterial calcification that have been associated with poor phosphate control. Furthermore, several investigators have recently suggested that the prescription of large doses of calcium to achieve phosphate control may augment, rather than diminish, the risk of vascular calcification. This is more likely to be true in the presence of low turnover bone disease, a diagnosis difficult to make with routine laboratory testing. A brief review of the molecular biology of vascular calcification supports the concept that warfarin administration may exacerbate the calcific process, particularly in the setting of hyperphosphatemia, as has been reported in patients with calciphylaxis. Recognizing the consequences of poor phosphate control, it is time to adopt strict target levels that aim to normalize serum phosphorus levels. The available evidence supports that this control should not be achieved through the use of supraphysiologic doses of supplemental calcium.