Single-dose pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin during continuous venovenous hemofiltration in critical care patients

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Anti-infective Agents during Continuous Veno-venous Hemofiltration in Critically Ill Patients: Lessons Learned from an Ancillary Study of the IVOIRE Trial

Background

Hemofiltration rate, changes in blood and ultrafiltration flow, and discrepancies between the prescribed and administered doses strongly influence pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of antimicrobial agents during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) in critically ill patients.

Methods

Ancillary data were from the prospective multicenter IVOIRE (hIgh VOlume in Intensive caRE) study. High volume (HV, 70 mL/kg/h) was at random compared with standard volume (SV, 35 mL/kg/h) CVVH in septic shock patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). PK/PD parameters for all antimicrobial agents used in each patient were studied during five days.

Results

Antimicrobial treatment met efficacy targets for both percentage of time above the minimal inhibitory concentration and inhibitory quotient. A significant correlation was observed between the ultrafiltration flow and total systemic clearance (Spearman test: P < 0.005) and between CVVH clearance and drug elimination half-life (Spearman test: P < 0.005). All agents were easily filtered. Mean sieving coefficient ranged from 38.7% to 96.7%. Mean elimination half-life of all agents was significantly shorter during HV-CVVH (from 1.29 to 28.54 h) than during SV-CVVH (from 1.51 to 33.85 h) (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

This study confirms that CVVH influences the PK/PD behavior of most antimicrobial agents. Antimicrobial elimination was directly correlated with convection rate. Current antimicrobial dose recommendations will expose patients to underdosing and increase the risk for treatment failure and development of resistance. Dose recommendations are proposed for some major antibiotic and antifungal treatments in patients receiving at least 25 mL/kg/h CVVH.

Ex vivo Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Clearance during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To determine ceftolozane/tazobactam transmembrane clearances (CLTM) in continuous hemofiltration (CHF) and continuous hemodialysis (CHD) and to determine optimal ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing regimens for patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

METHOD

Validated, ex vivo CHF and CHD bovine blood models using polysulfone (HF1400) and AN69 (Multiflow 150-M) hemofilters were used to evaluate adsorption and CLTM at different effluent flow rates. Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) using pharmacokinetic parameters from published studies and CLTM from this study were used to generate ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing for patients receiving CRRT.

RESULTS

CHF and CHD CLTM did not differ at equivalent effluent rates. CLTM approximated effluent flow rates. No adsorption of ceftolozane/tazobactam occurred for either hemofilter. Effluent flow was the most important determinant of MCS-derived doses.

CONCLUSION

CRRT clearances of ceftolozane/tazobactam depended on effluent flow rates but not hemofilter types. MCS-derived ceftolozane/tazobactam doses of 750 (500/250)-1,500 (1,000/500) mg every 8 h met pharmacodynamic targets for virtual patients receiving CRRT at contemporary effluent rates.

Quality of pharmacokinetic studies in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the preferred renal replacement therapy modality in the critically ill. We aimed to reveal the literature on the pharmacokinetic studies in critically ill patients receiving CRRT with special reference to quality assessment of these studies and the CRRT dose. We conducted a systematic review by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases to December 2009 and bibliographies of relevant review articles. We included original studies reporting from critically ill adult subjects receiving CRRT because of acute kidney injury with a special emphasis on drug pharmacokinetics. We used the minimum reporting criteria for CRRT studies by Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) and, second, the Downs and Black checklist to assess the quality of the studies. We calculated the CRRT dose per study. We included pharmacokinetic parameters, residual renal function, and recommendations on drug dosing. Of 182 publications, 95 were considered relevant and 49 met the inclusion criteria. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] number of reported criteria by ADQI was 7.0 (5.0-8.0) of 12. The median (IQR) Downs and Black quality score was 15 (14-16) of 32. None of the publications reported CRRT dose directly. The median (IQR) weighted CRRT dose was 23.7 (18.8-27.9) ml/kg/h. More attention should be paid both to standardizing the CRRT dose and reporting of the CRRT parameters in pharmacokinetic studies. The general quality of the studies during CRRT in the critically ill was only moderate and would be greatly improved by reports in concordant with the ADQI recommendations.

Antimicrobial dosing strategies in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury and high-dose continuous veno-venous hemofiltration

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Delivery of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is a great challenge during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH), particularly if the recommended higher doses are applied. The present contribution discusses the principles of drug dosing during CVVH and compares the various proposed dosing strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The basic principles underlying removal of antibiotics during CVVH and the published dosing strategies are reviewed. The key factor to consider is the fractional CVVH clearance (FrCVVH). Critical illness and acute kidney injury, however, may dramatically affect the pharmacokinetic properties of a drug and thus FrCVVH. Five dosing strategies have been proposed on the basis of either available references, total creatinine clearance, the reduction in total body clearance, the maintenance dose multiplication factor, or therapeutic drug monitoring. Dose predictions according to the various strategies show reasonable approximations for some but not all antibiotics.

SUMMARY

The delivery of appropriate antimicrobial therapy during CVVH leaves us with uncertainty and presents a great challenge. To ensure efficacy and prevent toxicity, therapeutic drug monitoring is highly recommended. In the absence of therapeutic drug monitoring, adequate concentrations can only be inferred from clinical response. For nontoxic antibiotics overdosing is preferred to underdosing because the danger of underdosing is far greater than that of overdosing.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of enoxaparin removal by continuous renal replacement therapies with acrylonitrile and polysulfone membranes

BACKGROUND

Enoxaparin is a low-molecular-weight heparin for which the degree of elimination through hemofilters during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is not well established.

OBJECTIVE

The elimination of enoxaparin by CRRT, using acrylonitrile (AN69) or polysulfone (PS) membranes, was studied in vitro and among critically ill patients.

METHODS

In vitro procedures were carried out using Ringer's lactate, bovine albumin-containing Ringer's lactate, or fresh human plasma as enoxaparin vehicle, using AN69 or PS membranes, and following continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) or continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD). Prefilter and ultrafiltrate samples were collected over 60 minutes. All procedures were carried out in triplicate. Patients undergoing CRRT entered the in vivo study. Enoxaparin was administered subcutaneously once daily. The sieving coefficient (Sc) and saturation coefficient (Sa) were calculated as the relation between anti-factor Xa activity in simultaneously collected dialysate/ultrafiltrate samples and plasma samples.

RESULTS

Mean Sc (for CVVH) or Sa (for CVVHD) values in the in vitro procedures ranged from 0.16 to 0.57. Sc values during CVVH were significantly higher than Sa values during CVVHD in the Ringer's lactate procedures for both membranes (AN69 membrane, P = 0.014; PS membrane, P < 0.001) and in the plasma procedures with the PS membrane (P < 0.001). Six male and 2 female patients (all white) participated in the in vivo study. Their mean body weight ranged from 55 to 80 kg, and their age ranged from 71 to 82 years. In patients, Sc or Sa achieved values between 0.26 and 0.67. No significant differences were found in vivo in the permeability of the 2 membranes to enoxaparin.

CONCLUSIONS

In these studies, the Sc and Sa values suggested that enoxaparin passed through AN69 and PS membranes during CRRT. Further pharmacokinetic and clinical studies are needed to determine whether a dose adjustment for enoxaparin is needed for patients undergoing CRRT.

Elimination of piperacillin and tazobactam by renal replacement therapies with AN69 and polysulfone hemofilters: evaluation of the sieving coefficient

BACKGROUND/AIM

Piperacillin-tazobactam is commonly used to treat infections in ICU patients. Controversial data have been published about the sieving/saturation coefficient (Sc/Sa) of piperacillin during continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). The objective was to evaluate the Sc/Sa of piperacillin-tazobactam during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) using AN69 and polysulfone.

METHODS

Ringer lactate, BSA-containing Ringer lactate and plasma were circulated at 150 ml/min. The ultrafiltrate/dialysis flow was kept at 1,500 ml/min. A bolus was injected and samples were taken. Drugs were measured using HPLC. Sc/Sa was calculated according to standard formula.

RESULTS

Free passage of drugs through the membranes was reported with protein free solutions. In the presence of proteins the Sc/Sa lowered and correlated to protein free fraction. Polysulfone had a significantly higher permeability than AN69 during CVVH.

CONCLUSION

Drug binding to albumin contributes to the decrease of the Sc/Sa of piperacillin but it does not completely justify the in vivo value obtained by some authors.