Ranitidine-induced acute interstitial nephritis with epithelial cell foot process fusion

Drug-Induced Lupus Secondary to Ethosuximide in Association with Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis and Nephrotic Syndrome

Background. Drug-induced lupus (DIL) is an autoimmune phenomenon where the patient develops lupus-like symptoms after exposure to a long-term medication. Case Summary. Here we describe a 10-year-old female with absence seizures who developed a lupus-like syndrome after being on ethosuximide for three months. She presented with nephrotic syndrome (NS) and acute kidney injury. Four weeks prior to presentation, she had been prescribed a seven-day course of oral amoxicillin for submental swelling after dental extraction. Investigations showed high titer of antinuclear antibody (ANA) and anti-double stranded DNA, elevated serum IgE level, and positive Coombs' test, along with positive anti-histone antibodies. Renal biopsy showed features of acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) and partial podocyte foot process effacement without evidence of lupus nephritis. The patient had an excellent response to the steroid therapy with remission within two weeks. The patient remained in remission for two months as evaluated during the most recent follow-up; the autoimmune antibodies and immunoglobulin E trended down. Ethosuximide has been reported to cause DIL, however its possible association with TIN has not been reported. Although amoxicillin could have caused the TIN and NS in this patient, a possible novel association of ethosuximide with this nephrotic-nephritic presentation (NNP) cannot be ruled out. Conclusions. A renal histology is important to determine the accurate etiology of NNP in patients with DIL. Further studies are necessary to determine any possible causal effect of ethosuximide with NNP.

The footprints of mitochondrial impairment and cellular energy crisis in the pathogenesis of xenobiotics-induced nephrotoxicity, serum electrolytes imbalance, and Fanconi's syndrome: A comprehensive review

Fanconi's Syndrome (FS) is a disorder characterized by impaired renal proximal tubule function. FS is associated with a vast defect in the renal reabsorption of several chemicals. Inherited and/or acquired conditions seem to be connected with FS. Several xenobiotics including many pharmaceuticals are capable of inducing FS and nephrotoxicity. Although the pathological state of FS is well described, the exact underlying etiology and cellular mechanism(s) of xenobiotics-induced nephrotoxicity, serum electrolytes imbalance, and FS are not elucidated. Constant and high dependence of the renal reabsorption process to energy (ATP) makes mitochondrial dysfunction as a pivotal mechanism which could be involved in the pathogenesis of FS. The current review focuses on the footprints of mitochondrial impairment in the etiology of xenobiotics-induced FS. Moreover, the importance of mitochondria protecting agents and their preventive/therapeutic capability against FS is highlighted. The information collected in this review may provide significant clues to new therapeutic interventions aimed at minimizing xenobiotics-induced renal injury, serum electrolytes imbalance, and FS.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase-2, and the kidneys

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most commonly used classes of medications in the world, which function by inhibiting the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes and downregulating the inflammatory pathway. COX enzymes are constitutively expressed in the kidneys and function to maintain a homeostatic environment in terms of maintaining the glomerular filtration rate, blood pressure, sodium, water, and osmotic regulation. When the COX enzymes are inhibited by NSAIDs, a multitude of renal and vascular complications occur. This article aims to enlighten primary care physicians of the complications that arise with NSAIDs from a renal perspective and to present some management strategies.

Ranitidine-induced acute interstitial nephritis in a cadaveric renal allograft

Ranitidine frequently is used for preventing peptic ulceration after renal transplantation. This drug occasionally has been associated with acute interstitial nephritis in native kidneys. There are no similar reports with renal transplantation. We report a case of ranitidine-induced acute interstitial nephritis in a recipient of a cadaveric renal allograft presenting with acute allograft dysfunction within 48 hours of exposure to the drug. The biopsy specimen showed pathognomonic features, including eosinophilic infiltration of the interstitial compartment. Allograft function improved rapidly and returned to baseline after stopping the drug.

Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity of histamine H2 receptor antagonists

The extensive use of selective histamine H2 receptor antagonists provides a unique opportunity to describe very rare adverse drug reactions. Although mild elevation of serum creatinine level following the administration of cimetidine is relatively common, acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a rare hypersensitivity reaction. There have been 25 published reports of AIN associated with H2 antagonist therapy and we also identified 16 cases from the Australian Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee (ADRAC) database. AIN was reported most commonly following cimetidine administration. AIN was supported by renal biopsy in 28 patients and by rechallenge in 6. H2 antagonist-induced AIN was more commonly reported in men older than 50 years. In the majority of cases the onset was within 2 weeks of initiation of therapy (1 day to 11 months). The clinical manifestations were nonspecific including sterile pyuria, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fatigue, proteinuria and leucocytosis whereas rash, arthralgia and flank pain were rarely reported. There were 170 cases of hepatotoxicity following H2 antagonist administration reported to ADRAC. These were more common following ranitidine and included cholestatic, hepatocellular and mixed reactions. Hepatotoxicity was proven following liver biopsy in several cases published in the literature and in 15 cases reported to ADRAC. Hepatotoxicity recurred upon rechallenge in 6 cases. Generally, renal and hepatic adverse effects resolved quickly after cessation of H2 antagonist therapy and did not require specific treatment. Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity following administration of an H2 antagonist is rare and a high index of suspicion is necessary for early detection. Now that many H2 antagonists are available over the counter, awareness of these conditions and early detection with cessation of H2 antagonist therapy would appear paramount.

Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a form of inflammatory renal disease affecting predominantly the tubules and the interstitium. Drugs, particularly beta-lactam antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, are currently the most common causes. The pathogenesis of drug-induced AIN is complex but there is good clinical evidence for an immune-mediated reaction. Clinical findings may be variable depending on the drug involved and the individual response. Most patients recover from the acute renal failure; however, in older patients or in patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency the recovery of renal function may be incomplete.

Probable diltiazem-induced acute interstitial nephritis

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) probably related to administration of diltiazem.

CASE SUMMARY

A 53-year-old white man presented to the hospital experiencing abdominal pain radiating to both renal fossae, as well as dysuria. Diltiazem and atenolol had been prescribed to treat an episode of precordial pain associated with effort. An erythematous maculopapular rash developed approximately 2 hours after administration of a single dose of diltiazem, and acute renal failure, associated with elevated liver function test results, developed 6 days later.

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the third reported case of acute renal failure believed to be induced by diltiazem. In all cases, there was an obvious temporal relationship between administration of diltiazem and the onset of acute renal failure. Previous reports failed to discuss a probable pathogenic mechanism. AIN is the most likely etiology of acute renal failure in our patient. Favorable resolution with no relapse, the presence of the skin rash, and the liver sequelae suggest a common immunoallergic mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professionals should consider diltiazem-induced AIN in the differential diagnosis of a patient taking diltiazem who develops acute renal failure.