Intradialytic hypotension: is midodrine beneficial in symptomatic hemodialysis patients?

Management of patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure are often co-existing conditions due to a shared pathophysiological process involving neurohormonal activation and hemodynamic maladaptation. A wide range of pharmaceutical and interventional tools are available to patients with CKD, consisting of traditional ones with decades of experience and newer emerging therapies that are rapidly reshaping the landscape of medical care for this population. Management of patients with heart failure and CKD requires a stepwise approach based on renal function and the clinical phenotype of heart failure. This is often challenging due to altered drug pharmacokinetics interactions with various degrees of kidney function and frequent adverse effects from the therapy that lead to poor patient tolerance. Despite a great body of clinical evidence and guidelines that have offered various treatment options for patients with heart failure and CKD, respectively, patients with CKD are still underrepresented in heart failure clinical trials, especially for those with advanced CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Future studies are needed to better understand the generalizability of these therapeutic options among heart failures with different stages of CKD.

A Systematic Review of Biological Mechanisms of Fatigue in Chronic Illness

Fatigue, a commonly reported symptom, is defined as an overwhelming, debilitating, and sustained sense of exhaustion that decreases the ability to function and carry out daily activities. To date, cancer researchers have been in the forefront in investigating the possible biological mechanisms of fatigue, identifying inflammation, dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and activation of the autonomic nervous system. The purpose of this systematic review is to describe fatigue and what is known about the biological mechanisms described in cancer in five chronic, noninfectious illnesses: heart failure, multiple sclerosis, chronic kidney disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We searched PubMed and EMBASE using fatigue as a major Medical subject headings (MeSH) heading with each individual disease added as a search term followed by each biological mechanism. We included only primary research articles published in English between 1996 and 2016 describing studies conducted in adult humans. We identified 26 relevant articles. While there is some evidence that the biological mechanisms causing fatigue in cancer are also associated with fatigue in other chronic illnesses, more research is needed to explore inflammation, the HPA axis, and the autonomic nervous system, and other mechanisms in relation to fatigue in a variety of chronic illnesses.

Dialytic hemodynamics are associated with changes in gait speed

INTRODUCTION

Functional impairment and reduced mobility are prevalent in patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD). The impact of HD on physical performance and mobility needs evaluation.

METHODS

We measured gait speed in a cohort of chronic HD patients both pre and post an HD session. We collected demographic and laboratory data and dialytic hemodynamic parameters for the HD session. Participants completed the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) survey to assess concern for falling. We used linear regression analysis to tests for associations between our predictor variables of intra-dialytic hemodynamic change and change in gait speed from pre to post HD (primary outcome) and FES-I score (secondary outcome).

FINDINGS

Twenty-eight participants completed the study. The mean (SD) age was 64.0 (10.5) years. The majority were male (71.4%), had hypertension (85.7%) and diabetes (57.1%). The mean (SD) change in gait speed from pre to post dialysis was -0.06 (0.08) m/s. A greater decrease in gait speed was associated with greater decrease in SBP and DBP from pre to post HD (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively) and greater maximum drop in SBP and DBP during HD (p = 0.01 and p <0.01, respectively). The association between maximum drop in SBP and DBP and gait speed remained significant after adjustment for covariates. There was no association between BP change and FES-I score.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that HD patients who have greater decrease in BP during HD are at risk for decreased gait speed post HD.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study of the efficacy and safety of droxidopa in patients with intradialytic hypotension

INTRODUCTION

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is the most common complication of hemodialysis (HD), and it plays a significant role in the morbidity and mortality associated with maintenance HD.

METHODS

This was a placebo-controlled, parallel-group study evaluating efficacy and safety of droxidopa in improving intradialytic blood pressure (BP) responses in 85 adults with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and prone to IDH. Following screening and baseline periods, patients received 400 mg or 600 mg droxidopa, or placebo, orally 1 hour before HD for 4 weeks. Primary outcome endpoint was the change between baseline and last 2 treatment weeks in average mean arterial pressure (MAP) during HD. Also assessed were changes from baseline in systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) during and after HD; number of hypotension-induced interventions and symptoms; and adverse events.

RESULTS

Increase in droxidopa intra-HD MAP were not significantly different from placebo, although droxidopa groups showed significant improvements in mean SBP after HD of +4.8 ± 11.6 mm Hg (600-mg) and +3.4 ± 13.1 (400-mg) compared with -4.4 ± 17.9 mm Hg in placebo, and the drop seen in mean nadir SBP pre- to intra-HD was also reduced. Changes in mean DBP pre- and post-HD, changes in mean nadir SBP post-HD, or intra-HD SBP were not significant over the treatment period. HD terminations decreased 5-fold in the 600-mg group and 2-fold in the 400-mg group, whereas the number of discontinuations stayed unchanged in the placebo group. Overall, treatment with 600-mg or 400-mg droxidopa was well tolerated in this population.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that droxidopa may have a role in reducing IDH complications in patients with ESRD on chronic HD.

Comparison of vitamin e and L-carnitine, separately or in combination in patients with intradialytic complications

BACKGROUND

The most common complications during dialysis are hypotension and muscle cramps. There are many strategies to prevent and treat these complications.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to evaluate effects of vitamin E and L-carnitine supplementation alone and in combination on intradialytic complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective study, 20 patients with end stage renal disease on chronic hemodialysis that had intradialytic complications such as hypotension, muscle cramp, nausea, vomiting and headache were studied. These patients were studied in four 45 day periods, beginning with no treatment (step 1), receiving vitamin E (200 IU/d) (step 2), receiving L-carnitine (500 mg/d) (step 3) and their combination (step 4). Intradialytic complications were recorded in each step and compared between treatments.

RESULTS

All three treatments significantly reduced frequency of muscle cramps in comparison to baseline values. Vitamin E alone and in combination with L-carnitine reduced the frequency of muscle cramps more effectively. Hypotension was significantly lower in combination therapy in comparison to baseline values and vitamin E treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin E and L-carnitine both have comparative effects on intradialytic complications. As the combination use of vitamin E and L-carnitine could more effectively reduce the intradialytic complications, it is recommended for daily use in hemodialysis patients.

Hemodialysis in hypotensive heart failure using midodrine

BACKGROUND

Dialysis in patients with severe congestive heart failure and low blood pressure is difficult even in a hospital setting. We retrospectively recorded the effects and usefulness of an alpha (1) agonist in an outpatient dialysis unit in 5 patients with end-stage renal disease with symptomatic heart failure and low blood pressure. To provide outpatient dialysis, they were given midodrine before and during their dialysis sessions.

METHODS

The volume of fluid removed, the lowest blood pressure, and postdialysis blood pressure measurements were recorded during a 3- to 4-week period just before initiating therapy (control period) and were compared with the measurements while using midodrine (treatment period). The blood pressures were expressed as the average of the mean arterial pressures (MAP).

RESULTS

All patients had an increase in the lowest MAP during dialysis and in the postdialysis MAP. Each was significant at P = 0.03. Fluid removal was significant at P = 0.04. All the patients improved in their symptoms of orthopnea and shortness of breath.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient dialysis is possible and relieves the symptoms of congestive heart failure in patients with poor heart function, low blood pressure, and advanced age when midodrine is given immediately before and during the procedure.

Midodrine-induced vascular ischemia in a hemodialysis patient: a case report and literature review

Midodrine is an alpha-agonist that causes peripheral vasoconstriction, resulting in increased blood pressure. It has been reported to be safe and effective in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) and is widely used for hemodialysis-associated hypotension. We report a case report of midodrine-induced ischemia in a patient on hemodialysis and review the literature relating to the safety of midodrine in patients with end stage renal disease.

Serum vasopressin response in patients with intradialytic hypotension: a pilot study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Arginine vasopressin (AVP), an endogenous hormone with vasopressor properties, may be inadequately secreted during episodes of intradialytic hypotension (IDH).

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS

To evaluate this, we performed a prospective, observational pilot study of 20 chronic hemodialysis patients assessing the baseline AVP level and trend of AVP with ultrafiltration in patients with a diagnosis of IDH compared with patients without IDH. Ten symptomatic IDH patients and 10 controls were enrolled and matched for age, gender, and dialysis vintage. AVP levels were obtained hourly throughout the dialysis session and during hypotensive episodes.

RESULTS

We observed that IDH patients experienced greater decreases in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure during the dialysis session despite equivalent ultrafiltration in both groups. AVP concentration did not increase in the IDH patients (5.0 +/- 1.8) compared with controls (6.4 +/- 6.0) (P = 0.5) despite hypotensive events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that symptomatic IDH patients are unable to mount an appropriate increase in AVP secretion in the setting of hypotension. These findings support the possibility of AVP as a mechanism driven therapy for patients with symptomatic IDH.

Midodrine appears to be safe and effective for dialysis-induced hypotension: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Dialysis-induced hypotension is an important complication of haemodialysis. Midodrine is an oral alpha-1 agonist that has been used in several small studies to prevent intradialytic hypotension (IDH).

METHODS

The authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, ASN conference proceedings, and references of potentially relevant articles, and contacted industry (Shire Pharmaceuticals) for unpublished data. Observational studies, randomized controlled trials, crossover studies and pre- and post-intervention design studies with >/=5 haemodialysis patients were included. Study outcomes assessed were: hypotensive symptoms, changes in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure, dry weight and length of stay after treatment. Data were abstracted on: study design, patient characteristics, intradialytic changes in blood pressure, nadir blood pressure and symptom improvement with midodrine. Thirty-seven full text articles were retrieved and nine met the selection criteria, in addition to one unpublished study. Midodrine dosing regimens ranged from 2.5 to 10 mg of midodrine given 15-30 min before dialysis.

RESULTS

Post-dialysis systolic blood pressure was higher by 12.4 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.5-17.7] and diastolic pressure was higher by 7.3 mmHg (95% CI 3.7-10.9) during midodrine treatment vs control. Likewise, the nadir systolic blood pressure was higher by 13.3 mmHg (95% CI 8.6-18.0), with a difference in nadir diastolic pressure of 5.9 mmHg (95% CI 2.7-9.1). Six of 10 studies report improvement in symptoms of IDH, and there were no reported serious adverse events ascribed to midodrine.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review would suggest that midodrine has a role in the therapy of haemodialysis patients experiencing IDH. This conclusion must be viewed with caution, however, given the quality and sample size of the studies included in this review.

Efficacy and safety of midodrine in the treatment of dialysis-associated hypotension

Dialysis-associated hypotension is a morbid problem in haemodialysis patients. Employment of midodrine at the start of dialysis has reduced the severity and frequency of hypotensive episodes in these patients. Through selective alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor-binding, desglymidodrine, the active metabolite of midodrine, raises blood pressure by enhancing venous and arterial tone. This medication has been demonstrated to be effective and safe in the acute and chronic treatment of haemodialysis-associated hypotension in end stage renal disease patients.

Intradialytic hypotension: an overview of recent, unresolved and overlooked issues

The etiology and management of intradialytic hypotension has become an increasingly complex issue. Volume depletion due to ultrafiltration remains the predominant underlying etiologic factor. However, patients vary markedly in their hemodynamic tolerance to fluid removal. While many risk factors have been identified, the issues of sodium and thermal balance and variability in left ventricular filling have not been adequately emphasized or investigated.

Hemodynamics in patients with intradialytic hypotension treated with cool dialysate or midodrine

Cool dialysate and midodrine have been used successfully to treat intradialytic hypotension (IDH) in the end-stage renal disease population. However, the exact mechanisms by which these interventions improve hemodynamic stability are not well known. We undertook a study to evaluate the effect of these modalities on intradialytic hemodynamics in patients with documented dialysis-associated hypotension. We used the ultrasound dilution technique to measure cardiac output (CO), central blood volume (CBV), and peripheral vascular resistance (PVR) in these patients. The study was performed in two phases. Phase 1 consisted of control (1A) and cool dialysate (1B) studies, whereas phase 2 consisted of control (2A) and midodrine (2B) studies. CO, CBV, and PVR were measured 30 minutes after the initiation of hemodialysis (HD) and 30 minutes before the termination of HD using the HD01 monitor. Blood pressure was measured pre-HD and post-HD. Fourteen patients with documented IDH completed the study. CO and CBV were significantly more preserved in the cool dialysate and midodrine phases compared with control phases. PVR increased in all phases of the study. Declines in mean arterial pressures from pre-HD to post-HD were less with cool dialysate versus control and midodrine versus control. Ultrafiltration volumes were not significantly different between phases. Cool dialysate and midodrine appear to improve intradialytic hemodynamics in patients with dialysis-associated hypotension, mainly through the preservation of CBV and CO, rather than significantly elevating PVR.

Pharmacologic options available to treat symptomatic intradialytic hypotension

Treatment of symptomatic intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a difficult task for the practicing nephrologist. Minimizing patient factors that precipitate IDH as well as dialysis procedure-related components that lower blood pressure are the initial approaches to this problem. However, despite these maneuvers, hypotension often persists in a group of high-risk patients. Pharmacologic interventions are often used to reduce IDH. Unfortunately, many of the available therapies are marginally effective and/or poorly tolerated. A few therapies appear to be efficacious and well tolerated-carnitine, sertraline, and midodrine. This article reviews the various pharmacologic therapies used for IDH and makes recommendations for treatment of this difficult problem.

Preventing dialysis hypotension: a comparison of usual protective maneuvers

BACKGROUND

Intradialytic hypotension (IH) is a common adverse event. Currently, there are several commonly utilized therapies of IH, but they have not been compared directly in the same group of patients. We performed the present study in order to learn which of these techniques is most effective so that a rational approach to treating IH could then be formulated.

METHODS

A single-blinded, crossover study design of five different protocols was undertaken in 10 hemodialysis patients with a prior history of IH. Each patient first underwent one week (three dialyses) of standard dialysis (dialysate sodium 138 mEq/L). Then each patient was subjected to one week each (three dialyses) of the four test protocols, performed in random order in a blinded fashion. The specific protocols were as follows: high sodium dialysate, in which the patient was dialyzed using a dialysate sodium of 144 mEq/L; sodium modeling, during which the dialysate sodium declined from 152 to 140 mEq/L in the last half hour of dialysis; one hour of isolated ultrafiltration followed by three hours of isovolemic dialysis; and cool temperature dialysis in which the dialysate was cooled to 35 degrees C.

RESULTS

Weight loss in each of the five protocols was essentially identical, varying between 2.9 and 3 kg. There were significantly fewer hypotensive episodes per treatment in the sodium modeling, high sodium, and cool temperature protocols as compared with the standard protocol (P < 0.05). Ultrafiltration followed by dialysis was associated with a significantly greater number of hypotensive episodes per treatment than any of the three test protocols (P < 0.05). Similarly, the number of nursing interventions required for IH per treatment was significantly greater in the standard dialysis and in the isolated ultrafiltration protocols compared with sodium modeling and cool temperature protocols (P < 0.05). The number of hypotensive signs and symptoms per treatment was also significantly reduced during the sodium modeling and cool temperature protocols compared with the standard protocol (P < 0.004 and P < 0.02, respectively). Again, the isolated ultrafiltration protocol resulted in significantly more hypotensive symptoms and signs than the three test protocols (P < 0.005). Finally, the nadir mean arterial pressures were significantly lower in the standard and isolated ultrafiltration protocols when compared with the three test protocols (P < 0.05). The upright postdialysis blood pressure was best preserved in the sodium modeling and cool temperature protocols compared with the standard and isolated ultrafiltration protocols (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of sodium modeling as a first step in combating IH. Also effective were the use of cool-temperature dialysate and a high-sodium dialysate. All three test protocols were well tolerated. As applied in this study, isolated ultrafiltration followed by isovolemic dialysis was notably less effective in reducing IH.

Midodrine: a selective alpha-adrenergic agonist for orthostatic hypotension and dialysis hypotension

Midodrine is an oral agent which acts as a selective peripherally-acting alpha-receptor agonist. Midodrine is a prodrug that is almost completely absorbed after oral administration and converted into its active drug de-glymidodrine in the systematic circulation, with a bioavailability of 93%. It has been used successfully in the treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and more recently, in the treatment of dialysis hypotension. It acts through vasoconstriction of the arterioles and the venous capacitance vessels, thereby increasing peripheral vascular resistance and augmenting venous return, respectively. It is a unique agent in the armamentarium against orthostatic hypotension since it has minimal cardiac and CNS effects. This article will review the literature on midodrine for conditions of autonomic dysfunction, with focus on recent studies on its use in haemodialysis patients.

A protocol-based treatment for intradialytic hypotension in hospitalized hemodialysis patients

Human serum albumin is used in hemodialysis (HD) units as treatment for hypotension despite its high cost and undetermined efficacy. During a 4-month period in 1995, albumin was used in 22% of 1,296 consecutive HD treatments in the HD unit or intensive care units (ICUs) at our tertiary-care hospital. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a protocol designed to minimize albumin use for treating HD-associated hypotension (HDAH). The protocol consisted of the stepwise use of saline, mannitol, and albumin for the purpose of achieving physician-determined ultrafiltration goals. Patients were exempted from receiving the protocol for age younger than 18 years, freshly declotted angioaccess, or cardiovascular instability. The protocol was evaluated prospectively in 2,559 consecutive dialysis sessions (15% in ICUs) in 442 patients. Hypotension occurred during 608 sessions (24%), and attending nephrologists elected to initiate the protocol in 71% of these cases. Of the 433 instances in which the protocol was begun, reversal of hypotension was achieved without the need for albumin in 91% and with the addition of albumin in an additional 2%. Protocol treatment was not completed because of nursing error in 1% or clotting of filter or angioaccess in 4%. Use of the protocol failed to reverse hypotension in only 2% of the cases in which it was completed. Albumin was administered in only 6% of the 2,559 HD treatments. In summary, our protocol-based approach to HDAH was effective, easy for nurses to use, albumin sparing, and cost reducing.

Midodrine and cool dialysate are effective therapies for symptomatic intradialytic hypotension

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a morbid complication of hemodialysis (HD). Both midodrine, an oral selective alpha1 agonist, and cool dialysate have been reported as useful therapies for this problem. We performed this prospective crossover study to compare the efficacy of these two therapies, alone and in combination, for IDH. The study consisted of a control phase and three treatment phases: midodrine phase (10 mg oral dose pre-HD), cool dialysate phase (35.5 degrees C), and combination therapy phase (midodrine, 10 mg, and dialysate temperature, 35.5 degrees C). Each phase consisted of nine consecutive HD treatments. Eleven patients (six men, five women; mean age, 67.5 years) with known symptomatic IDH were studied. This cohort was followed up in terms of blood pressure measurements (pre-HD blood pressure, lowest intradialytic blood pressure, post-HD blood pressure), weights, laboratory values, and interventions for IDH. The lowest intradialytic blood pressures were significantly better with midodrine and cool dialysate compared with the control phase (systolic blood pressure [SBP], 103.9 +/- 4.1 [mean +/- standard error of the mean] and 102.6 +/- 2.9 v 90.6 +/- 2.5 mm Hg, respectively; P < 0.001), as were the post-HD blood pressures (SBP, 116.9 +/- 4.0 and 118.2 +/- 3.5 v 109.0 +/- 2.1 mm Hg; P < 0.01). In addition, the lowest intradialytic blood pressures were significantly better with the combination phase compared with the control phase (SBP, 103.7 +/- 4.2 v 90.6 +/- 2.5 mm Hg; P < 0.001), as were the post-HD blood pressures (SBP, 122.1 +/- 4.6 v 109.0 +/- 2.1 mm Hg; P < 0.01). There was a significant reduction in the number of nursing interventions performed and volume of saline infused for IDH with midodrine and cool dialysate compared with control. There was a trend toward amelioration of hypotensive symptoms with both therapies. Laboratory values, including Kt/V, did not change significantly with either midodrine or cool dialysate. This prospective study shows that both midodrine and cool dialysate are effective therapies for symptomatic IDH. There does not seem to be additional benefit when these two therapies are used in combination.