The 2-piece Le Fort I osteotomy for cranial base access: an evaluation of 9 patients

Epistaxis After Orthognathic Surgery: Literature Review and Three Case Studies

Study Design

This is a literature review with 3 case studies.

Objective

Intraoperative and postoperative bleeding are the most common complications of orthognathic surgery and have the potential to become life-threatening. The rarity of severe postoperative epistaxis has resulted in limited characterization of these cases in the literature. The purpose of this study is to 1) differentiate various presentations of epistaxis following orthognathic surgery in the literature, 2) identify management approaches, and 3) to synthesize a treatment algorithm to guide future management of postoperative epistaxis.

Methods

A literature search of PubMed was conducted and 28 cases from 17 studies were assessed.

Results

Bleeding within the first week may indicate isolated epistaxis, often resolved with local tamponade. Half of cases were attributed to pseudoaneurysm rupture (n = 14), with epistaxis onset ranging from postoperative day 6 to week 9. Angiography was used in most cases (n = 17), often as the primary imaging modality (n = 11). Nasal endoscopy is a less invasive and effective alternative to angiography with embolization. Proximal vessel ligation was used in 3 cases but is not preferred because collaterals may reconstitute flow through the defect and cause rebleeding. Repeat maxillary down-fracture with surgical exploration was described in 4 cases.

Conclusions

As outlined in our management algorithm, nasal packing and tamponade should be followed by either local electrocautery or vascular imaging. Angiography with embolization is the preferred approach to diagnosis and management, whereas surgical intervention is reserved for cases of embolization failure or unavailability.

Solitary lesions of the clivus: what else besides chordomas? An extensive clinical outlook on rare pathologies

BACKGROUND

Solitary non-chordomatous lesions of the clivus are rare pathologies, which represent a diagnostic challenge. This study provides an overview of the clinical, radiological and prognostic characteristics of non-chordomatous clival lesions, highlighting current therapeutic options.

METHODS

Twenty-two non-chordomatous lesions of the clivus were collected. A retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological patterns as well as survival data was conducted.

RESULTS

Clinical presentation was a result of local mass effect. Imaging features, although mainly specific, were not always diagnostic. Extent of surgery was gross total in 45.5 % of cases. Depending on the histology, biological behaviour and presence of seeding, adjuvant treatment was performed, tailoring the treatment strategy to the single patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Solitary non-chordomatous lesions of the clival bone are more prevalent than expected. They should be approached with a correct differential diagnosis, considering specific epidemiological, radiological, and histopathological characteristics, to minimise diagnostic bias and allow the planning of the best treatment strategy.

Quantification of clival and paraclival exposure in the Le Fort I transmaxillary transpterygoid approach: a microanatomical study

OBJECT

The authors describe a modified Le Fort I maxillotomy with medial and posterior antrectomy and removal of the pterygoid plates, aimed at improving the lateral surgical exposure during open transmaxillary surgery for pathological conditions involving the clivus. A cadaveric microanatomical study was conducted to compare the planimetric exposures allowed by the transmaxillary transpterygoid (TMTP) approach and the standard Le Fort I maxillotomy (STM).

METHODS

Six cadaveric specimens that had been fixed with glutaraldehyde and injected with latex were dissected to obtain morphometric measurements after both TMTP and STM approaches. The anatomical areas exposed by the surgical approaches were calculated using ImageJ 1.37a software.

RESULTS

As expected, the TMTP approach allowed for a greater surgical exposure, with an incremental area exposed ranging from 4.9 to 7.6 cm(2) (mean ± standard deviation 6.4 ± 1.2 cm(2), 95% CI 5.4-7.4 cm(2)). The amount of additional anatomical area visualized, as recorded as a percentage increase after the TMTP approach when compared with the STM approach, ranged from 83 to 109% (mean 99%).

CONCLUSIONS

The lateral surgical exposure allowed by the STM approach is limited by the pterygoid plates. The TMTP approach significantly improves the exposure of the anatomical regions lateral to the clivus, allowing access to the pterygopalatine and medial infratemporal fossae. In comparison with the STM, the TMTP approach allows for a surgical exposure that is nearly double. The authors conclude that the TMTP approach provides a significant improvement in the surgical exposure of the lateral paraclival areas, when compared with the STM approach.

Transmaxillary approach to the cranial base: an evaluation of 11 cases

Surgical access to the skull base is always difficult, especially because of the noble anatomic structures present there. Maxillary osteotomy provides direct view to the clivus region and the neck spine, and it also bears less morbidity when compared to the many other accesses described in the literature.

Aim

to assess 11 patients submitted to transmaxillary osteotomy, describing the surgical technique and postoperative results and complications.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study involving eleven patients submitted to transmaxillary approach to the brainstem. We studied dental occlusion, trans and postoperative bleeding, bone necrosis and soft tissue alterations. All followed the same surgical protocol and were followed up for two years.

Results

after treatment, all the patients improved in their clinical status and had no neurological complication, trans and postoperative hemorrhage or major complications were seen. Among the complications, two patients had incomplete maxilla fracture, two had laceration of their nasal mucosa and one had, as late complication, an oral-sinusal fistula.

Conclusion

Transmaxillary osteotomy provided proper access to the clivus for brainstem decompression with low rate of complications in this series.

Cranial base surgery

Surgery of the cranial base presents significant challenges for the surgeon and patient alike. The goal of ablative surgery-to obtain disease-free margins-contrasts with the patient's functional and esthetic needs. This comes into sharp juxtaposition in cranial base surgery. The technical and technologic advances of the last two decades have made surgical treatment of cranial base lesions possible. This article reviews the pathology, anatomy, and lateral and midline approaches to the cranial base.

Tratamiento quirúrgico de la impresión basilar mediante osteotomía tipo Le Fort I segmentada. A propósito de un caso

The expansive lesions, whether tumoral or not, originated at the level of the anatomical region of the skull base (SB), show a great histologic variety and clinicaly they cause a variable chronic neurological disfunction. Surgical treatment appears to be the best therapeutic option. An exhaustive knowledge of the topographic anatomy of this area is the mandatory in order to design an appropriate surgical strategy. In many cases, a narrow cooperation with specialists is necesary. As in any other surgical activity, a complete excision of the lesion and an optimal functional and aesthetic rehabilitation, without complications, is the challenge of the surgical team. The approach to the anatomical area of the SB is not single, but is based on a number of procedures, although none of them could be considered the best, or without technical difficulty or any complications. Within the group of transoral approaches, the Le Fort I-Palatal split (LFPS) technique has been considered by different authors an excellent way to approach the clivus and the occipito-vertebral joint. We report the case of a patient, treated in cooperation with the Department of Neurosurgery of our hospital. He was clinical and radiologically diagnosed of basilar impresion with bulbar compression, and the MRI revealed the presence of a located extradural fibrous injury above the odontoid apophysis. Therefore we chose the use of a LFPS to approach this lesion. With an optimal surgical field, a complete excision of the lesion was obtained. The postoperatory result in the subsequent follow-up was highly satisfactory.

Blindness as a complication of Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary distraction

High Le Fort I osteotomy and maxillary distraction has become an accepted method for the treatment of maxillary retrusion in children and teenagers with cleft lip and palate or craniofacial anomalies. This procedure effectively corrects the dentofacial deformity in these patients. No major surgical morbidity has been reported. During the past 4 years, 94 cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia received Le Fort I osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis at the authors' center. Two of them developed blindness after this operation. The first case was a girl with bilateral cleft lip and palate with median facial dysplasia. She received high Le Fort I osteotomy at age 12 years 4 months to correct maxillary retrusion. Right eye swelling and ecchymosis was found after surgery. The patient complained of vision loss in that eye 2 days later. Computed tomography showed subarachnoid hemorrhage and skull base hematoma. There were no atypical fractures in the orbit, pterygoid plates, sphenoid bone, and skull base. Angiogram revealed left ophthalmic and basilar artery aneurysm. The second case was a 12-year-old boy with left cleft lip and palate. He received Le Fort I osteotomy to correct maxillary retrusion. During surgery, abnormal pupil dilatation was found after the osteotomy and down-fracture of maxilla. Emergent computed tomography found no hemorrhage or atypical fractures. Examination revealed complete left optic neuropathy and partial right abducens nerve palsy with mydriasis. Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance angiography, and repeated computed tomography revealed no sign of orbital injury, vascular problem, or abnormal fractures. The cause of blindness was unknown. In both cases, a steroid was used. Maxillary distraction was continued. Recovery of meaningful visual sense did not occur after 3 and 2 years' follow-up, respectively. A review of the literature revealed five other patients who suffered from visual loss after Le Fort I osteotomy. Inadvertent skull base fractures were identified in two cases, but a cause for the blindness was not known in the others. Induced hypotension and indirect trauma may be responsible for the optic nerve injury. In none of the cases was meaningful visual sense recovered, although high-dose steroids were given. In conclusion, a total of seven cases developed blindness after Le Fort I osteotomy. Once blindness develops, the prognosis is poor. High Le Fort I osteotomy should be performed with extreme care, and perhaps the informed consent should include visual loss as a complication of the procedure.