1
|
Duarte F, Silva JN, Ramos C, Hopper C. Evaluation of occlusal force changes in orthognathic surgery using force-sensing sensors in 3 years of follow-up. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2024; 86:5199-5205. [PMID: 39238991 PMCID: PMC11374265 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000002386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to test a prototype device called occlusal force diagnostic system in relation to occlusal force adaptation following orthognathic surgery. Methods Retrospective study of 10 patients scheduled for a bimaxillary osteotomy involving a combination of maxillary Le Fort I impaction procedure coupled with a sagittal split advancement of the mandible; in a 3 years follow-up period. Results The selection of examiner is not a variable that affects the occlusal force (N) measured by FSS sensors in any of the experimental conditions tested. The sensor position and the surgery recovery time affect the occlusal force irrespective of the examiner selection and/or the surgery recovery time. Conclusion The piezoelectric sensors used in the present study have shown high reliability and validity of measurement. The surgery recovery time impacts the occlusal force (N), with a 50% increase in occlusal force (N) measured after 6 months post-surgery, with the value keeping stable at 36 months. This suggests that the patient is only fully recovered from the functional point-of-view at 6 months, having from that point on an improved and stable masticatory function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Duarte
- Eastman Dental Institute, University College of London
- Universitá Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Clitrofa, Trofa
| | | | - Carina Ramos
- Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Joo YH, Cho JK, Koo BS, Kwon M, Kwon SK, Kwon SY, Kim MS, Kim JK, Kim H, Nam I, Roh JL, Park YM, Park IS, Park JJ, Shin SC, Ahn SH, Won S, Ryu CH, Yoon TM, Lee G, Lee DY, Lee MC, Lee JK, Lee JC, Lim JY, Chang JW, Jang JY, Chung MK, Jung YS, Cho JG, Choi YS, Choi JS, Lee GH, Chung PS. Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Oral Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 12:107-144. [PMID: 30703871 PMCID: PMC6453784 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2018.01816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to provide guidance on the implementation of a surgical treatment of oral cancer. MEDLINE databases were searched for articles on subjects related to “surgical management of oral cancer” published in English. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. The quality of evidence was rated with use RoBANS (Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies) and AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Evidence-based recommendations for practice were ranked according to the American College of Physicians grading system. Additional directives are provided as expert opinions and Delphi questionnaire when insufficient evidence existed. The Committee developed 68 evidence-based recommendations in 34 categories intended to assist clinicians and patients and counselors, and health policy-makers. Proper surgical treatment selection for oral cancer, which is directed by patient- and subsite-specific factors, remains the greatest predictor of successful treatment outcomes. These guidelines are intended for use in conjunction with the individual patient’s treatment goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Hoon Joo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Keun Cho
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Bon Seok Koo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Minsu Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Seong Keun Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soon Young Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min-Su Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jeong Kyu Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Heejin Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Innchul Nam
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong-Lyel Roh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Min Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Il-Seok Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Je Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Sung-Chan Shin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Soon-Hyun Ahn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seongjun Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Chang Hwan Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Tae Mi Yoon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Giljoon Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Doh Young Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung-Chul Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Kyoo Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Jin Choon Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jae-Yol Lim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Won Chang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jeon Yeob Jang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Man Ki Chung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yuh-Seok Jung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae-Gu Cho
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Seok Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jeong-Seok Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Guk Haeng Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Phil-Sang Chung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tarkowska A, Katzer L, Ahlers MO. Assessment of masticatory performance by means of a color-changeable chewing gum. J Prosthodont Res 2016; 61:9-19. [PMID: 27211494 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2015] [Revised: 03/20/2016] [Accepted: 04/14/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous research determined the relevance of masticatory performance with regard to nutritional status, cognitive functions, or stress management. In addition, the measurement of masticatory efficiency contributes to the evaluation of therapeutic successes within the stomatognathic system. However, the question remains unanswered as to what extent modern techniques are able to reproduce the subtle differences in masticatory efficiency within various patient groups. The purpose of this review is to provide an extensive summary of the evaluation of masticatory performance by means of a color-changeable chewing gum with regard to its clinical relevance and applicability. STUDY SELECTION A general overview describing the various methods available for this task has already been published. This review focuses in depth on the research findings available on the technique of measuring masticatory performance by means of color-changeable chewing gum. Described are the mechanism and the differentiability of the color change and methods to evaluate the color changes. Subsequently, research on masticatory performance is conducted with regard to patient age groups, the impact of general diseases and the effect of prosthetic and surgical treatment. RESULTS The studies indicate that color-changeable chewing gum is a valid and reliable method for the evaluation of masticatory function. CONCLUSION Apart from other methods, in clinical practice this technique can enhance dental diagnostics as well as the assessment of therapy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marcus Oliver Ahlers
- CMD-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vijayaraghavan NV, Ramesh G, Thareja A, Patil S. Masticatory efficiency after rehabilitation of acquired maxillary and mandibular defects. Indian J Dent 2015; 6:139-46. [PMID: 26392731 PMCID: PMC4558749 DOI: 10.4103/0975-962x.155880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The effect of oral cancer with its therapeutic intervention involves significant facial and functional disabilities. It is customary to rehabilitate these patients by surgical or prosthetic means. Studies have been done to assess mastication and other functions after rehabilitation. A review of these studies for assessing masticatory function has been done under separate sections for maxillary and mandibular defects. Different masticatory tests are mentioned. Further scope for research has been highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ganesh Ramesh
- Department of Prosthodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Amit Thareja
- Department of Prosthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Seema Patil
- Department of Prosthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Speksnijder CM, van der Bilt A, Abbink JH, Merkx MAW, Koole R. Mastication in patients treated for malignancies in tongue and/or floor of mouth: A 1-year prospective study. Head Neck 2010; 33:1013-20. [PMID: 20967870 DOI: 10.1002/hed.21573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2010] [Revised: 06/01/2010] [Accepted: 07/09/2010] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People confronted with oral cancer run a high risk of deteriorated masticatory performance. Reduced masticatory function may affect quality of life and food choice. An altered food choice may result in lower intakes for key nutrients and weight loss. METHODS Dental state, bite force, and masticatory performance were determined in a group of 45 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and/or floor of mouth. Measurements were performed before surgery and at various moments after surgery and/or radiotherapy. RESULTS Surgical intervention had a large negative impact on oral function. Radiotherapy further worsened oral function. Also, the recovery of oral function 1 year after surgery was less prominent for the surgery-radiotherapy group than for the surgery group. CONCLUSION Objective determination of oral function 1 year after surgery showed that patients treated for malignancies in the tongue and/or floor of mouth had significantly deteriorated masticatory performance, bite force, and dental state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline M Speksnijder
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics, and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85.060, NL 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Garrett N, Roumanas ED, Blackwell KE, Freymiller E, Abemayor E, Wong WK, Gerratt B, Berke G, Beumer J, Kapur KK. Efficacy of conventional and implant-supported mandibular resection prostheses: study overview and treatment outcomes. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96:13-24. [PMID: 16872926 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM While surgical restoration of mandibular resections has advanced dramatically with free-flap techniques, oral function and patient perceptions of function, as well as treatment outcomes, often indicate significant impairment. PURPOSE This longitudinal prospective study was designed to determine whether conventional prostheses (CP) or implant-supported prostheses (IP) and current surgical reconstructive procedures restore patients' oral functions and quality of life to their status prior to segmental mandibulectomy with immediate fibula free-flap reconstruction. Study design and implementation, characteristics of the study sample, treatment completion rates, and selected presurgical and postsurgical functional and perceptual outcomes are presented. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-six subjects were enrolled. Longitudinal evaluations of medical and dental histories, oromaxillofacial examinations, questionnaires, and sensory and functional tests were planned before and after surgery and after CP and IP treatment. Sample characteristics are described with descriptive statistics and comparisons of subject responses to questionnaire items at entry and postsurgical intervals were made with Fisher exact tests (alpha=.05). RESULTS Conventional prostheses were completed in 33 of 46 subjects, and 16 of 33 CP subjects were treated with IP. Reasons for noncompletion of IP were recurrent/metastatic disease (16), refusal of implant therapy (7), lost to follow-up (4), treatment with a reconstruction plate (1), excessive radiation at implant sites (1), and death (1). All 16 recurrences/metastases occurred within 13 months of surgery. Only 3 of the 58 implants placed in 17 participants were considered failures. One failed due to lack of integration 31 weeks following placement, and 2 were buried due to unacceptable positioning for prosthetic restoration during denture fabrication. The remaining 55 implants were successful at final evaluation, ranging from 58 to 123 weeks following implant placement (mean duration=78.9 +/- 16.0 weeks). CONCLUSIONS While 72% (33/46) of the subjects enrolled were able and willing to complete treatment with CP, only 35% (16/46) completed IP treatment. Careful consideration must be given to selection of the type of prosthetic rehabilitation and the timing of implant placement if an IP is planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Garrett
- Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, Biomaterials and Hospital Dentistry, UCLA School of Dentistry, University of California-Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Roumanas ED, Garrett N, Blackwell KE, Freymiller E, Abemayor E, Wong WK, Beumer J, Fueki K, Fueki W, Kapur KK. Masticatory and swallowing threshold performances with conventional and implant-supported prostheses after mandibular fibula free-flap reconstruction. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96:289-97. [PMID: 17052474 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Significant strides in microvascular surgical techniques allow predictable restoration of bony and soft tissue orofacial defects. In combination with prosthetic rehabilitation, varying degrees of improvement in esthetics, speech intelligibility, and swallowing have been noted; however, the relative impact of conventional and implant-supported prostheses on restoration of masticatory function are not known. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine whether conventional or implant-supported dental prostheses and current surgical reconstructive procedures restore patients' masticatory function to presurgical levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS Of the 46 subjects enrolled in this study, 23 (7 edentulous and 16 partially dentate) completed conventional prosthesis (CP) treatment and masticatory evaluation, and of these, 15 (3 edentulous and 12 partially dentate) completed treatment and evaluation with an implant-supported prosthesis (IP). Standardized masticatory performance tests with peanuts and carrots as the test food were made on the defect and nondefect sides. Tests of swallowing threshold performance were made with carrots as the test food. Statistical analysis included repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Tukey HSD tests (alpha=.05). RESULTS Masticatory function at entry was markedly compromised. Further performance declines were noted following surgery (PS) on both the defect and nondefect sides. Restoration with CP and IP produced improvements (significant for defect side only, P<.05) in performance over the PS interval and were not significantly different from performances at entry prior to surgery. In addition, the performance on the defect side with the IP was significantly greater than the performance with the CP (P<.001). CONCLUSION Impairment in masticatory ability remains following free-flap reconstruction prior to prosthetic rehabilitation. Both CP and IP may provide improved masticatory ability, permitting patients to regain the functional level they possessed prior to surgical intervention. The IP may contribute to greater support and stability of the prosthesis, resulting in increased use for mastication and superior performance on the defect side compared to the CP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni D Roumanas
- Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, Biomaterials and Hospital Dentistry, The Jane and Jerry Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|