Fractures of the condylar process: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment

Comparative Evaluation of Open Reduction with Internal Fixation Against Closed Reduction Methods for Condylar Fracture Management: A Systematic Review and Meta- analysis

Background

Mandibular fractures are frequent in facial trauma. Management of mandibular condylar fractures (MCF) remains an ongoing matter of controversy in maxillofacial injury. A number of techniques, from closed reduction (CR) to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), can be effectively used to manage these fractures. The best treatment strategy, that is, closed reduction or open reduction with internal fixation, remains controversial.

Aim

The aim of this study is to systematically review the existing scientific literature to determine whether open reduction with internal fixation or closed reduction is a better treatment alternative for the patients with condylar fractures through a meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases like PubMed, google scholar and Ebsco Host were searched from 2000 to December 2021 for studies reporting management of condylar fractures through open reduction with internal fixation against closed reduction and reporting the outcome in terms of mean and standard deviation (SD). Quality assessment of included case control and cohort studies was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and randomized studies were evaluated using Cochrane risk-of-bias (ROB)-2 tool through its domains. The risk of bias summary graph and risk of bias summary applicability concern was plotted using RevMan software version 5.3. The standardized mean difference (SDM) was used as summary statistic measure with random effect model and p value <0.05 as statistically significant.

Results

Seventeen studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in qualitative synthesis, of which only nine studies were suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled estimate through the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) of 0.80, 0.36 and 0.42 for maximum inter incisal opening, laterotrusion and protrusion favours CR compared to ORIF for condylar fracture management. Also, most results of heterogeneity tests were poor and most of the funnel plots showed asymmetry, indicating the presence of possible publication bias.

Conclusion

The results of our meta-analysis suggest that CR provides superior outcomes in terms of maximum inter incisal opening, laterotrusion and protrusion compared to ORIF in condylar fractures management. It is necessary to conduct more prospective randomized studies and properly control confounding factors to achieve effective results and gradually unify clinical guidelines.

Analysis of Mandibular Muscle Variations Following Condylar Fractures: A Systematic Review

This review analyzes muscle activity following mandibular condylar fracture (CF), with a focus on understanding the changes in masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) functioning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was performed on online databases using the keywords "masticatory muscles" AND ("mandibular fracture" OR "condylar fracture"). The eligibility criteria included clinical trials involving human intervention and focusing on muscle activity following a condylar fracture.

RESULTS

A total of 13 relevant studies were reviewed. Various studies evaluated muscle activity using clinical evaluation, bite force measurement, electromyography (EMG), magnetic sensors and radiological examinations to assess the impact of mandibular fractures on masticatory muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandibular condylar fractures can lead to significant changes in muscle activity, affecting mastication and TMJ functioning. EMG and computed tomography (CT) imaging play crucial roles in assessing muscle changes and adaptations following fractures, providing valuable information for treatment planning and post-fracture management. Further research is required to explore long-term outcomes and functional performance after oral motor rehabilitation in patients with facial fractures. Standardized classifications and treatment approaches may help improve the comparability of future studies in this field.

Comparative evaluation of post treatment CT scan and clinical parameters in open reduction and closed reduction treatment of condylar fractures

Background

Mandibular fracture is the second most common fracture of facial bone, next to nasal bone. Twenty-five to forty percent of mandibular fractures involve the condyle. In the literature, there exists no consensus "gold standard" treatment for mandibular condylar fractures, and there is a continuing debate on whether condylar fractures should undergo closed or open reduction.

Materials and Method

Twenty patients who had undergone open reduction and closed reduction treatment were included in the study. Clinically maximal interincisal opening, laterotrusive and protrusive movements, pain on mouth opening, malocclusion, chin deviation on mouth opening, facial nerve palsy, hematoma, infected implant, and bite force were evaluated after a minimum of 3 months postoperatively. Also, a postoperative CT is done to evaluate the anatomical position of fragment.

Results

On evaluation of clinical parameters, both groups had comparable results. However, none of the patients in open reduction group had deviation of mandible from midline on mouth opening. Also, better anatomical repositioning is obtained in open reduction group.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that the open reduction method is a better alternative to closed reduction in treatment of mandibular condylar fractures.

Complications of the Transmasseteric Anteroparotid Approach for Subcondylar Fractures: A Retrospective Study

Study Design

A retrospective analysis of patients with subcondylar fractures treated via a transmasseteric anteroparotid approach by the Oral and Maxillofacial Department at the University of Oklahoma.

Objective

The goal of this study was to evaluate complications, morbidity, and safety with the transmasseteric anteroparotid approach for treatment of subcondylar fractures, and compare it to other findings previously reported in the literature.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted that consisted of 23 surgically treated patients in the past 2 years for subcondylar fractures. Only patients with pre-operative malocclusion and who underwent open reduction with internal fixation with the transmasseteric anteroparotid (TMAP) approach were included. Exclusion criteria included 1) patients treated with closed reduction 2) patients who failed the minimum of 1, 3, and 6-week post-operative visits. The examined parameters were the degree of mouth opening, occlusal relationship, facial nerve function, incidence of salivary fistula and results of imaging studies.

Results

20 of the surgically treated patients met the inclusion criteria. Two patients were excluded due to poor post-operative follow up and 1 was a revision of an attempted closed reduction by an outside surgeon that presented with pre-existing complications. There were no cases of temporary or permanent facial nerve paralysis reported. There were 3 salivary fistulas and 2 sialoceles, which were managed conservatively and resolved within 2 weeks, and 2 cases of inadequate post-surgical maximal incisal opening (<40 mm) were observed.

Conclusion

The transmasseteric anteroparotid approach is a safe approach for open reduction and internal fixation of low condylar neck and subcondylar fractures, and it has minimal complications.

Comparative evaluation of bite force in patients treated for unilateral mandibular condylar fractures by open and closed methods

BACKGROUND/AIM

Condylar fractures account for a large proportion (20% to 52%) of mandibular injuries. The goal of treating these fractures is to restore the occlusion, thereby re-establishing the masticatory function as close as possible to the patient's pre-trauma state. The aim of this study was to compare the bite forces following unilateral condylar fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with those managed by the closed method.

METHOD

Patients with unilateral mandibular condylar fractures were divided into two groups (n = 20) using a simple randomization method. Patients in group I were treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using titanium miniplates and screws. Patients in group II were treated by the closed method with inter-maxillary fixation. Patients in both groups were evaluated pre-operatively and then post-operatively at one week, one month and three months for maximum bite force achieved at the central incisor, premolar and molar regions.

RESULTS

Pre-operative bite forces on the unaffected site were significantly higher than the affected site in both groups, whereas no significant difference was observed in bite forces between the unaffected and affected sites in both groups post-operatively. The bite forces achieved at both the unaffected and affected sites in the ORIF group were significantly higher than in the closed group.

CONCLUSION

Maximum bite forces differed significantly when the treatment was done with the open method, and the patients treated with the open method needed less time to achieve the maximum bite forces, thereby making an earlier return to function.

Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Sacrosanct in the Management of Subcondylar Fractures: A Comparative Study

PURPOSE

This paper is intended to compare and evaluate the better treatment option in the management of subcondylar fractures of the mandible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 20 patients who were diagnosed clinically and radiologically to have sustained an isolated subcondylar fracture of the mandible. They were divided into two groups randomly. Group I included 10 patients who underwent treatment by intermaxillary fixation alone followed by active physiotherapy in the form of conservative management. Group II included 10 patients who underwent treatment by surgical intervention for open reduction and internal fixation under general anesthesia following elastic guidance. Factors such as maximal mouth opening, pain scores, and deviation of mandible on mouth opening were taken into consideration and evaluated.

RESULTS

It is observed that the patients in Group I had weight loss and restrictions in their social well-being in the early recovery phase, in addition to delay in return to function. In spite of the early return to function, patients in Group II were subjected to all kinds of surgical complications such as transient facial nerve injury, infection, and unesthetic scar. The maximal mouth opening and deviation of the mandible on mouth opening remained almost the same in both groups.

CONCLUSION

A regular follow up of operated patients post trauma is essential to obtain morphological and functional recovery. When the respective advantages and disadvantages of both treatment options were compared and evaluated, it was observed that patients treated by closed reduction had a better clinical and psychological outcome.

Unilateral Condylar Fracture with Review of Treatment Modalities in 30 Cases - An Evaluative Study

Introduction:

The treatment of subcondylar mandible fractures is a topic of debate and can be variable even though these fractures are commonly seen. The present study aimed at evaluation of various treatment modalities for unilateral condylar fracture in adults.

Materials and Methods:

Thirty patients with unilateral condylar fractures between the age of 18 and 60 years were evaluated. Treatment protocol included closed reduction for 15 patients and open reduction for 15 patients.

Results:

Assessment was done functionally for maximum interincisal mouth opening, deviation on maximum interincisal mouth opening, occlusion and facial nerve function, and radiologically for ramus height shortening. In general, there were no statistically significant differences between closed and open methods.

Discussion:

Both the treatment options for condylar fractures of the mandible yielded acceptable results. Closed treatment appears to be a safe and appropriate modality for most unilateral condylar fractures. Although the open group, in general, showed similar outcomes, this treatment should be reserved for limited indications. The present study has confirmed that both treatment options can yield acceptable results. On clinical examination, there was no significant difference in mouth opening measures, the incidence of occlusal disturbances or in the degree of pain perception.

Outcomes of the Nonendoscopic Transoral Approach to Subcondylar Mandible Fractures

PURPOSE

The transoral approach (TRA) to subcondylar fractures without any endoscopic or transbuccal assistance is not a common technique. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the quality of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) between the TRA and the retromandibular approach (RMB), including types and frequencies of postoperative complications.

METHODS

In our retrospective cohort study, we enrolled a sample of patients with displaced subcondylar mandible fractures treated by ORIF. The predictor was the approach mode: TRA or RMB. In postoperative computed tomography (CT) data sets, we measured the angles of the condylar process in relation to references: 1) midline, 2) lateral ramus border, and 3) posterior ramus border. The primary outcome variable was the reduction outcome, which was calculated as the difference between the total of all angles of the operated side and the non-affected side. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications extracted from patients' files. Other variables were age, gender, number of plates, operation time and a modified AO trauma score. In bivariate analysis, we compared the outcome between both groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were included in total, with TRA performed in 50%. Patients with TRA were younger (31 vs 41, P = .003), and the trauma score was lower (1.9 vs 3.3, P < .001). Reduction outcome remained comparable between both techniques (mean 3.7° for both, P = .92). Complication rates were similar, although facial nerve palsy was absent for TRA (0 vs 4, P = .039).

CONCLUSION

We suggest TRA for selected patients with displaced, single fragmented subcondylar fractures. Reduction outcome shows a comparable exactness to RMB, while TRA is safer for the facial nerve.

Changing trends in the management of condylar fractures

Our aim was to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications of mandibular condylar fractures managed surgically and non-surgically. Patients were identified retrospectively from audit data and clinical records from 2005-2018, and functional outcomes were evaluated based on the development of complications at clinical follow up. Patients were categorised into three treatment groups: conservative (management with soft diet, analgesia, and monitoring), closed (management with intermaxillary fixation), and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). A total of 358 patients were included with a median age of 33 years (mean 38), and a male:female ratio of 2.7:1. A total of 72 patients (20%) were treated conservatively, 177 (49%) were treated with closed management, and 109 (31%) with ORIF. The ORIF group demonstrated better outcomes than the closed group in terms of reduced protrusive and lateral excursive movements, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain; and in terms of occlusal derangement when compared with the conservative group. The ORIF group had poorer outcomes than both the closed and conservative groups in terms of maximum mouth opening, and temporary facial nerve injury occurred in 5/109 (5%) and condylar resorption in 2/109 (2%) of patients in the ORIF group. There was no incidence of permanent facial nerve injury, Frey syndrome, or paraesthesia of the auricular nerve. The trend that favours ORIF can be justified, as it offers improved functional outcomes in severe or displaced condylar fractures. However, this must be evaluated against the risk of potential surgical complications. Careful case selection is therefore necessary to optimise management of these injuries.

Will Closed Treatment Provide Better Mandibular Motion Than Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Cases of Unilateral Displaced Subcondylar Fracture? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of the present systematic review was to determine whether closed treatment (CLT) with intermaxillary fixation (IMF) is superior or equivalent to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the management of unilateral displaced subcondylar fractures regarding the range of mandibular motion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To address our question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the reported data after a comprehensive manual and electronic database search of studies reported up to 2017 in the English language that had compared CLT and ORIF of mandibular condyle fractures in adults. The following outcomes were recorded: maximum interincisal opening (MIO), protrusive movement (PM), lateral excursion toward the fractured side (LEFS), and lateral excursion toward the nonfractured side (LENFS).

RESULTS

The search resulted in 8 studies, 4 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The MIO and PM showed no statistically significant differences, with an effect size of -0.823 (P = .112) and -0.633 (P = .079), respectively. However, the LEFS and LENFS were superior after CLT, with an effect size of -0.710 (P = .031) and -0.682 (P = .017), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from the present review suggest that both ORIF and CLT can provide comparable MIO and PM in subjects with unilateral displaced subcondylar fractures. However, CLT was superior to ORIF for both LEFS and LENFS.

Condylar Fractures: Surgical Versus Conservative Management

Background and Objectives

Condylar fractures can be treated with one of the two methods, including the conservative (closed reduction and immobilization) and/or surgical (open reduction and internal fixation) methods. Both these modalities of treatment have their indications and contraindications and merits and demerits. The present study was designed with the purpose of comparing the outcomes of surgical versus conservative management of moderately displaced subcondylar and condylar neck fractures.

Materials and Methods

The present study included a total of 20 patients with moderately displaced condylar fractures in patients > 18 years of age who were randomly divided into nonsurgical and surgical group and were managed accordingly. In the present study, the outcomes of conservative versus surgical management of subcondylar and condylar neck fractures were discussed in terms of seven parameters, including the maximal interincisal mouth opening, protrusive and lateral excursive movements of the mandible, status of occlusion, deviation of mandible during mouth opening, pain (in terms of visual analog scale) and the height of ascending ramus (radiographically) which were measured and evaluated pre- and post-operatively at different intervals of time. The follow-up was done for a period of up to 6 weeks postoperatively.

Statistical Analysis Used

Descriptive and analytical statistics were calculated using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 19. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess the significance of the difference between the groups, whereas the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the significance of the difference between the paired observations in each group.

Results

Patients treated surgically showed better improvement in maximal interincisal mouth opening, lateral excursions with minimal deviation, early relief from pain, and restoration of height of the ramus with symmetry in comparison with the patients managed conservatively where prolonged periods of pain apart from obvious deviation and minimal restoration of height of the ramus was observed over a follow-up period of 6 weeks postoperatively. The results were also found to be statistically significant with the value of P < 0.05.

Interpretation and Conclusion

Surgery is inarguably preferred over conservative management of moderately displaced condylar fractures as per the results of the present study. The present study provided valuable information and mandated further studies with larger sample sizes to come to definitive conclusions.

Non-surgical Treatment of Condylar Fracture in an 11-Year-Old Patient: a Case Report

Background

Mandibular condylar fractures commonly occur after trauma and account for 25 to 35% of all mandibular fractures; its appropriate therapy still remains a point of controversy in children. The purpose of this paper is to describe the treatment of an 11-years-old male patient affected by neck-condylar fracture as result of trauma in evolutive age.

Methods

No surgical treatment was performed. A functional therapy was applied with a jaw splint. A closed treatment for mandibular condyle fractures was preferred because the amount of condylar displacement wasn’t considerable.

Results

The early treatment with functional therapy generated a functional adaptation of the condyle in the glenoid fossa and a normal mandibular function. After a 12-month follow-up the fracture resolution and an optimal condylar position were recorded.

Conclusions

The current case report and literature review showed that non-surgical therapy of neck-condylar fracture in a child with lower resin splint can restore mandibular movements and aesthetics. Facial growth after one year treatment resulted normal. A conservative treatment may be appropriate for children in selected cases with minimally displaced condyle.

Mandible Fractures

Mandible fractures account for a significant portion of maxillofacial injuries and the evaluation, diagnosis, and management of these fractures remain challenging despite improved imaging technology and fixation techniques. Understanding appropriate surgical management can prevent complications such as malocclusion, pain, and revision procedures. Depending on the type and location of the fractures, various open and closed surgical reduction techniques can be utilized. In this article, the authors review the diagnostic evaluation, treatment options, and common complications of mandible fractures. Special considerations are described for pediatric and atrophic mandibles.

Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures: A Review on Treatment Strategies

Condylar injuries are often subjected to discussion and controversy in maxillofacial surgery as they constitute many of the facial fractures. The condylar area has a great clinical value due to its important components. Vital components in this area are susceptible to functional disability due to either the fracture itself or the subsequent surgical intervention. Each of the strategies for the management of these fractures has its advantages and disadvantages. As there are controversies around management of condylar fractures, different treatment modalities are suggested in literature, so this paper reviews different treatment strategies of the following types of fractures in adults: 1-Closed reduction with maxillomandibular fixation, 2-Open reduction with internal fixation, 3-Endoscopic-assisted reduction with internal fixation. In conclusion, we declare that the endoscopic surgery is certainly a good replacement for approaches through the skin, for subcondylar fractures, but still more randomized clinical trials are needed to be carried out on this issue.

Evaluation of the Mandibular Function, after Nonsurgical Treatment of Unilateral Subcondylar Fracture: A 1-Year Follow-Up Study

There are no clearly defined guidelines for when an open or closed treatment is indicated for treatment of mandibular condylar fractures. The aim of the study is to analyze the mandibular function after nonsurgical treatment of unilateral subcondylar fractures, in a prospective study. A prospective study was conducted on 30 patients with unilateral mandibular subcondylar fracture undergoing nonsurgical treatment. Clinical and radiographic examinations were done prior to treatment and at 12-month follow-up. Pain, perceived occlusion, mouth opening, protrusion, and horizontal movements of the mandible were evaluated by clinical examination. Radiologic evaluation was done using Panoramic and Reverse Towne's radiographs. At 12-month follow-up, there was minimal pain in the temporomandibular joint region, there was an improvement in the perceived occlusion, and mouth opening did not reduce. There was insignificant absolute difference between left and right lateral mandibular movements. The amount of increase in the protrusion of mandible was insignificant. On radiographic evaluation, the degree of coronal and sagittal displacement was insignificant at follow-up. Mean ramus height pretreatment and 12 months posttreatment were 0.98 ± 0.50 and 0.87 ± 0.47, respectively. Based on this study, patients had adequate mandibular function and minimal pain after nonsurgical treatment. Unilateral subcondylar fractures of the mandible can be treated nonsurgically in patients with minimal occlusal discrepancies, adequate mouth opening, minimal displacement of condyle, and minimal ramus height shortening.

Controversies in the Management of the Trauma Patient

Facial trauma is a significant cause of morbidity in the United States. Despite the large volume of trauma surgeries at most academic institutions, there is still controversy regarding management of many traumatic injuries. The literature lacks clear-cut best practices for most fractures. In orbital trauma, there is debate about the optimal timing of repair, preferred biomaterial to be used, and the utility of evaluation afterward with intraoperative computed tomographic scan. In repair of mandible fractures, there is debate regarding open versus closed reduction of subcondylar fractures, or alternatively, endoscopic repair.

Unilateral superior condylar neck fracture with dislocation in a child treated with an acrylic splint in the upper arch for functional repositioning of the mandible

BACKGROUND

To present the outcomes for a case of unilateral mandibular subcondylar fracture with dislocation in an 11-year-old female treated with an acrylic splint for functional repositioning of the mandible.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A splint was placed in the upper arch to restore the functional repositioning of the mandible. The splint's height was increased up to 5.5 mm on the side of the fracture to stimulate growth on the deficient side. To correct the mandibular asymmetry, a construction bite was made by 4 mm advancing. The total treatment time was 16 months. Long-term five-year follow up showed complete healing. A portion of the ramus appeared lateral with respect to the condylar head, whereas the mandibular deviation to the right side was fully corrected.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment may be an appropriate method for children in select cases, as they have an increased potential for spontaneous regeneration.

Comparison of Different Fixation Types Used in Unilateral Mandibular Condylar Fractures: An In Vivo Study With New Biomechanical Model

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this in vivo study is to compare the single-titanium, double-titanium mini plate, and single resorbable plate systems used in internal rigid fixation of the unilateral mandibular condylar fractures on new design biomechanical model.

METHODS

Thirty synthetic polyurethane models were used for biomechanical testing. Fracture lines were created for each model. Fragments were fixed with single-titanium plates in Group A (n = 10), double-titanium plates in Group B (n = 10), and single biodegradable plate (PPLA) in Group C (n = 10). Masticatory forces were applied to the models and the biomechanical properties of the titanium plate and screws, resorbable plate, and screws were evaluated.

RESULTS

The average failure force for Group A, Group B, and Group C is 199, 324, 177N and the average bone displacement for Group A, Group B, Group C is 1.9, 0.3, 2.1 mm, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Double titanium plates showed the most acceptable results in the fixation of unilateral subcondylar fractures where the single titanium and biodegradable plate systems failed to provide enough stability in unilateral subcondylar fracture fixation. Biodegradable plate systems are still not an alternative in fixation of unilateral condylar fractures.

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF RESORBABLE AND TITANIUM MINIPLATES USED FOR FIXATION OF MANDIBULAR CONDYLE FRACTURES

In this paper, comparative evaluation of the mechanical properties of resorbable and titanium miniplates, which are used for the fixation of the mandibular condyle fractures, was carried out using finite element analysis (FEA). To do so, first two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) images of mandibles recorded from 10 adult patients were converted into three-dimensional (3D) solid body models. Then these models were transferred to the finite element software. In the finite element stage of the study, a condyle fracture was created onto the mandible and double-titanium and double-resorbable miniplates were separately fixed to the mandible surface such that the fractured sites to be firmly attached. Stress distribution over the plates and interfragmentary displacements between adjacent surfaces, which stem from the clenching force applying to the mandible, were calculated using FEA. It was observed from the results that maximum tensile stresses occurred in the titanium miniplates were significantly higher than those obtained from resorbable miniplates (p < 0.01). Higher maximum displacements between fractured surfaces were observed in the case of resorbable plate systems (p < 0.01). Maximum stress and displacement values obtained from both titanium and resorbable plate systems were under clinically acceptable limits. According to results, resorbable plates showed a similar reliability with titanium miniplates in terms of withstanding various stress and strain deformations.

Comparison of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Bilateral Condylar Fractures Based on Maximal Mouth Opening

This study presents a comparative analysis of the open surgical and nonsurgical treatment of patients with bilateral condylar fractures. Sixty-seven (67) patients were treated, and the completed data on 55 patients were reviewed to compare both therapeutic modalities, which consisted of nonsurgical and surgical treatment in 37 and 18 patients, respectively. In the nonsurgical group, 23 patients (23/37, 62%) had normal mouth opening. Functional success rate was 79% (15/19) and 44% (8/18) in young adult patients (-29yrs) and older patients (30+yrs), respectively, and there was a significant difference of outcome between the two groups. In nonsurgically treated young patients with disorders, bilateral dislocation and existence of concomitant mandibular fractures were commonly observed. In the open surgical group, seven (7/11, 64%) young adult and three (3/7, 43%) older patients gained normal mouth opening, and no significant difference was observed. Additionally, there was no difference between non-surgical and surgical treatment in any category. Patients undergoing rigid fixation benefited from restoring maximum mouth opening, although there was no significant difference between the rigid and non-rigid fixation groups. Based on these findings, nonrigid fixation should be avoided, and rigid fixation might improve outcome in young adult patients with severe fracture pattern, such as bilateral dislocation and concomitant mandibular fracture.

Evaluation of clinical use of indigenously developed delta plate in management of subcondylar fracture

Condylar fractures account for 25-35% of mandibular fractures and deserve a special consideration apart from rest of the mandible due to their anatomical differences and healing potential. Previous clinical and biomechanical studies have recommended using two miniplates for fixation of condyle fractures. Two miniplates require a certain size of the proximal condyle fragment and thus are applicable mainly in cases involving low fractures. The present study evaluates the clinical use of indigenously developed titanium delta-shaped miniplate in open reduction and internal fixation of subcondylar fracture.

Setbacks of bio-resorbable plates and screws in the management of condylar fractures: our experience

PURPOSE

Fractures of the condyle can be managed by open or by closed reduction. This study was designed to mention the complications of the bio-resorbable material we had experienced while using them in the management of condylar fractures.

METHODS

Fifteen (11 men and four women) patients with subcondylar fractures were included in the study. Resorbable poly-l-lactide plates and screws were used for the fracture fixation. Patients were followed up clinically and radiographically for a period of 2 years.

RESULTS

Seven patients had a satisfactory reduction following the placement of bio-resorbable plates. Three patients had developed a swelling in the pre-auricular region, extending till the angle. Two patients had a screw breakage whereby leading to malunion and three other patients had bone resorption, at the fractured site that was appreciated radiographically.

CONCLUSION

Inspite of the advantages of these materials, certain complications has been experienced in our study with regard to the resorption and degradation of the material which has been mentioned and explained in our article.

Complications in pediatric facial fractures

Despite recent advances in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of pediatric facial fractures, little has been published on the complications of these fractures. The existing literature is highly variable regarding both the definition and the reporting of adverse events. Although the incidence of pediatric facial fractures is relative low, they are strongly associated with other serious injuries. Both the fractures and their treatment may have long-term consequence on growth and development of the immature face. This article is a selective review of the literature on facial fracture complications with special emphasis on the complications unique to pediatric patients. We also present our classification system to evaluate adverse outcomes associated with pediatric facial fractures. Prospective, long-term studies are needed to fully understand and appreciate the complexity of treating children with facial fractures and determining the true incidence, subsequent growth, and nature of their complications.

Three-dimensional mandibular motion after closed and open reduction of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures

OBJECTIVE

To detect the changes in 3D mandibular motion after two types of condylar fracture therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a 3D motion analyzer, free mandibular border movements were recorded in 21 patients successfully treated for unilateral fractures of the mandibular condylar process (nine patients: open reduction, rigid internal fixation, and functional treatment; 12 patients: closed reduction and functional treatment; follow-up: 6-66 months), and in 25 control subjects.

RESULTS

No differences were found among the groups at maximum mouth opening (MO), protrusion and in lateral excursions. During opening, the patients had a larger maximal deviation to the fractured side than the controls (controls 2.3 mm, open treatment 3.9 mm, closed treatment 4.2 mm; Kruskal-Wallis test, p=0.014; closed treatment vs. controls, p=0.004), with a larger coronal plane angle (controls 2.4°, open treatment 3.6°, closed treatment 4.4°; p=0.016; closed treatment vs. controls, p=0.013). In the closed treatment patients, a longer follow-up was related to increased maximum MO (p=0.04), sagittal plane angle (p=0.03), and reduced lateral mandibular deviation during MO (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Mandibular condylar fractures can recover good function; some kinematic variables of mandibular motion were more similar to the norm in the open treatment patients than in closed treatment patients.

Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes for the surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures

PURPOSE

This retrospective study evaluated the long-term results and complications of open reduction and internal fixation of displaced and dislocated fractures of the condylar process.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred four patients were treated via various surgical approaches between 1991 and 2005. Fifty patients with a total of 57 treated condylar fractures who underwent complete clinical and radiological documentation were included in this study. Follow-up clinical and radiological evaluations were carried out after an average period of 88 months.

RESULTS

We found that 12% of our patients reported temporary weakness of the facial nerve and 4% had mild permanent facial nerve palsy. Clinical and radiological assessment showed satisfactory recovery of facial symmetry. Excellent recovery of function was observed, and very few patients complained of temporomandibular joint-related symptoms. Severe condylar remodeling was observed in 8% of the patients, 47% showed slight or moderate remodeling, and 45% showed no remodeling. A statistically significant association was observed between the presence of condylar remodeling and poor mouth opening at the follow-up examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of condylar fractures, in association with postoperative functional therapy, promotes the recovery of function, occlusion, and facial symmetry with few complications. However, some difficulties remain related to the surgeon, the patient, and the objective complexity of this pathology.

Prospective closed treatment of nondisplaced and nondislocated condylar neck and head fractures versus open reposition internal fixation of displaced and dislocated fractures

OBJECTIVE

assessment of open reduction internal fixation in displaced or dislocated fractures of the condylar neck and head assessed versus closed treatment of nondisplaced, nondislocated fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients suffering from 158 fractures; classes II to V according to Spiessl and Schroll, e.g., displaced and dislocated fractures were operated on; classes I and VI nondisplaced, nondislocated fractures were treated conservatively. At 1year, facial symmetry, pain, facial nerve function, and scarring were assessed clinically; reossification and fragment angulation were assessed from radiographs; vertical position, incisal maximum movements, and condyle translation were judged by millimeters.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Clinical courses were uncomplicated in classes I to IV and did reach horizontal and vertical fragment reposition with minor remodeling in follow-up. Single cases evinced persistent pain, dysocclusion, facial nerve palsy, and plate fractures. Results were less successful in classes V and VI: although open reposition internal fixation showed good repositioning in class V, marked vertical bone remodeling occurred; single cases suffered from pain, dysocclusion, and plate fracture. Class VI cases had the worst translation, likewise marked condyle remodeling, and frequent dysocclusion.

CONCLUSION

Classes V and VI remain challenging to treat, while the other classes can be treated reliably with this study's rationale. Condyle remodeling in classes V and VI, translation in class VI may benefit prospectively from even more careful mobilization, improved osteofixation as minimalized operation trauma.

The treatment of condylar fractures: to open or not to open? A critical review of this controversy

The treatment of condylar process fractures has generated a great deal of discussion and controversy in oral and maxillofacial trauma and there are many different methods to treat this injury. For each type of condylar fracture, the techniques must be chosen taking into consideration the presence of teeth, fracture height, patient's adaptation, patient's masticatory system, disturbance of occlusal function, deviation of the mandible, internal derangements of the temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) and ankylosis of the joint with resultant inability to move the jaw, all of which are sequelae of this injury. Many surgeons seem to favor closed treatment with maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), but in recent years, open treatment of condylar fractures with rigid internal fixation (RIF) has become more common. The objective of this review was to evaluate the main variables that determine the choice of method for treatment of condylar fractures: open or closed, pointing out their indications, contra-indications, advantages and disadvantages.

A New 3-Dimensional Plate for Transoral Endoscopic-Assisted Osteosynthesis of Condylar Neck Fractures

PURPOSE

Transoral surgical treatment of condylar neck fractures minimizes the risk of damaging the facial nerve. But fracture reduction and plate osteosynthesis remain challenging, especially when using 2 plates, although endoscopic assistance has proven helpful. To further improve and simplify osteosynthesis at the condylar neck, a new delta-shaped osteosynthesis plate that mimics the function of 2 plates has been developed. The present clinical follow-up study was conducted to evaluate this new plate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 16 patients with 19 condylar neck fractures (3 Spiessl I, 13 Spiessl II, 1 Spiessl III, 2 Spiessl IV) and 3 bilateral fractures were treated through an endoscopic-assisted transoral approach. After reduction, the plate was applied, with the screws inserted either transcutaneously or with angulated instruments.

RESULTS

The operation time ranged between 55 and 120 minutes. More than 6 months after the operation, functional parameters returned to normal, with an average mouth opening of 41 mm, protrusion of 5 mm, and laterotrusion of 6 mm. Radiographic controls showed good fracture alignment in 15 of 19 cases immediately after the operation, and in 14 of 19 cases 6 months after the operation. No plate fracture or bending was observed. In 3 patients, loose screws were found on plate removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical data and the engineering and biomechanical background suggest that the new delta-shaped plate can be regarded as 2 miniplates. The new plate is suitable for treatment of condylar neck fractures, particularly when used in an endoscopic-assisted transoral approach.