Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery: a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical study

Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical wound infections in clean and clean-contaminated surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and necessity of prophylactic antibiotics in clean and clean-contaminated surgery remains controversial.

METHODS

The studies were screened and extracted using databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials.gov according to predefined eligibility criteria. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of preoperative and postoperative prophylactic antibiotic use on the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing any clean or clean-contaminated surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 16 189 participants in 48 RCTs were included in the primary meta-analysis following the eligibility criteria. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for SSI with antibiotic prophylaxis versus placebo was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.53-0.68). The pooled OR among gastrointestinal, oncology, orthopedics, neurosurgery, oral, and urology surgery was 3.06 (95% CI: 1.05-8.91), 1.16 (95% CI: 0.89-1.50), 2.04 (95% CI: 1.09-3.81), 3.05 (95% CI: 1.25-7.47), 3.55 (95% CI: 1.78-7.06), and 2.26 (95% CI: 1.12-4.55), respectively. Furthermore, the summary mean difference (MD) for patients' length of hospitalization was -0.91 (95% CI: -1.61, -0.16). The results of sensitivity analyses for all combined effect sizes showed good stability.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotics are both effective, safe, and necessary in preventing surgical wound infections in clean and clean-contaminated procedures, attributed to their reduction in the incidence of surgical site infections as well as the length of patient hospitalization.

Preventing Surgical Site Infections in the Era of Escalating Antibiotic Resistance and Antibiotic Stewardship

Importance

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and governing bodies within the American College of Surgeons, the administration of antibiotics as prophylaxis against infection prior to a planned elective procedure is, with rare exception, routinely recommended. The goal of "getting to zero" infections remains a high priority for policymakers, practitioners, and certainly for patients.

Observations

Despite the many advances in surgical technique, skin decontamination, sterile procedure, and enhanced recovery programs, surgical site infections continue to adversely affect procedures as diverse as dental implant surgery, joint arthroplasty, and major abdominal surgery. Although surgical site infection rates are at historically low levels, progress has stalled in recent reporting periods and such infections remain disabling, costly, and occasionally lethal. Stakeholders in the field, including surgeons, infectious diseases specialists, and industry, advocate for strategies emphasizing greater levels of intraoperative sterility or broader-spectrum antibiotic coverage as the most appropriate path forward.

Conclusions and Relevance

The current emphasis on ever-increasing levels of intraoperative sterility and extended-spectrum antibiotic use are not sustainable long-term solutions. Continuing to escalate these approaches may contribute to unintended consequences including antimicrobial resistance. Principles of antimicrobial stewardship and microbiome sciences can be applied to inform a more effective and sustainable approach to infection prevention in the field of surgery.

Optimizing drug regimens and supplementation in orthognathic surgery: A comprehensive and practical guide

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to comprehensively review the literature and provide a practical guide for optimizing drug regimens and supplementation related to orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

The authors conducted a thorough review of the existing literature, following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Various types of studies except case reports and reviews were included. The study applied specific inclusion criteria, focusing on perioperative and/or postoperative drugs, medications, or supplementation related to orthognathic surgery.

RESULTS

This guide included 78 studies on various medications in orthognathic surgery. It encompasses clinical trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, prospective and retrospective studies. The topics covered include antibiotics, analgesics, corticosteroids, antiemetics, hemostatic agents, local anesthetics, herbal medicine, and botulinum toxin. Pain and edema control involved specific medications, while local anesthesia utilized ropivacaine and bupivacaine. The guide also discusses mineral and vitamin supplementation. The effectiveness of hemostatic agents and antiemetics was highlighted.

CONCLUSION

Pain management, reduced swelling, enhanced wound healing, and faster recovery are among the advantages. In addition to the standard drugs and medications, the inclusion of vitamin and mineral supplements, tranexamic acid, postoperative anesthetic blocks, and preemptive antiemetics is anticipated to offer various benefits in orthognathic surgery, despite the limited available evidence.

Evidence-Based Medicine: Systemic Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Prevention of Surgical-Site Infections in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

BACKGROUND

After nearly a decade of new data, the Evidence-Based Consensus Conference Statement from the American Association of Plastic Surgeons was updated for prophylactic systemic antibiotics to prevent surgical-site infections (SSI). Pharmacotherapeutic concepts using antimicrobial stewardship were applied for clinical interpretation and management to optimize patient outcomes and minimize resistance.

METHODS

PRISMA, Cochrane, and GRADE certainty of evidence guidelines were implemented for the structure and synthesis of the review. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were systematically and independently searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The authors included patients who had plastic and reconstructive surgery and were treated with prophylactic systemic antibiotics administered perioperatively (preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively). Comparisons were made between active interventions and nonactive interventions (placebo) at different prespecified durations to determine the development of an SSI. Meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The authors included 138 RCTs that met eligibility criteria. RCTs consisted of 18 breast, 10 cosmetic, 21 hand/peripheral nerve, 61 pediatric/craniofacial, and 41 reconstructive studies. The authors examined bacterial data extracted from studies for patients who did or did not take prophylactic systemic antibiotics for prevention of SSI. Clinical recommendations were provided using level I evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons have long been overprescribing systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Evidence supports antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent SSI for specific indications and durations. Prolonged antibiotic use has not been linked to reductions in SSIs, and misuse may increase the bacterial diversity of infections. Greater efforts should focus on transitioning from practice-based to pharmacotherapeutic evidence-based medicine.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Risk factors for postoperative infection after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

This retrospective clinical study investigated risk factors for infection following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) as orthognathic surgery, including the patients' general condition, local factors, and surgical factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The cases of 160 mandibular sites of 80 Japanese patients (26 males, 54 females; mean ± SD age: 25.3 ± 7.7 years, range 16-55 yrs) with a jaw deformity who underwent BSSO orthognathic surgery at our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery between Jan. 2017 and Dec. 2022 were analyzed. Potential risk factors were classified as clinical predictive variables. Descriptive and univariate statistics were computed. A multivariate analysis was performed with logistic regression.

RESULTS

Fifteen mandibular sites (9.4 %) were complicated with postoperative infection. The multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in facial asymmetry (OR 24.0, p = 0.0002) and the amount of mandibular movement (OR 0.664, p = 0.011) between the sites with and without infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Among clinical variables, facial asymmetry was the strongest risk factor for post-BSSO infection, followed by the amount of mandibular movement.

The outcome of prolonged postoperative antibiotics on wound healing in orthognathic surgery: A meta-analysis

We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the outcome of prolonged postoperative antibiotics (PA) on wound healing in orthognathic surgery (OS). A systematic literature search up to January 2023 was performed and 1021 related studies were evaluated. The chosen studies comprised 1057 OS subjects who participated in the selected studies' baseline, 446 of them used short-term PA, and 611 used long-term PA. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of prolonged PA on wound infection after OS by the dichotomous methods with a random or fixed effect model. The short-term PA resulted in significantly higher wound infection (OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 2.97-6.14, P < 0.001) with low heterogeneity (I²  = 27%) compared to the long-term PA in OS. The short-term PA resulted in significantly higher wound infection compared to the long-term PA in OS. Though care should be taken when dealing with the results since a large number of the selected studies had <100 subjects as a sample size.

Surgical site infections in orthognathic surgery: prolonged versus single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis

The oral cavity is densely populated with microorganisms. As a result, intraoral surgical sites are prone to contamination by pathogens, potentially triggering surgical site infections (SSIs). Prophylactic antibiotics have proven beneficial in reducing the rate of SSIs. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the most effective regimen. The purpose of this study was to investigate two different antibiotic regimens - single-dose and prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis - regarding the rate and severity of postoperative SSIs in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Data were analysed retrospectively. Patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy or bimaxillary surgery in the study department in 2017 were screened for eligibility. Ninety-nine patients were included in the study and were divided into two groups. The prolonged-antibiotic prophylaxis group (PAP; n = 49) received a 5-day antibiotic prophylaxis regimen, while the single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis group (SDAP; n = 50) received single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. The groups were assessed for the rate and severity of SSIs following orthognathic surgery. Five patients (10.2%) in the PAP group and seven (14%) in the SDAP group developed infections; no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of SSIs was found (P = 0.380). Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is as effective as a 5-day antibiotic prophylaxis regimen in preventing SSIs in orthognathic surgery and is a suitable antibiotic prophylaxis option when considering the risk of antibiotic resistance.

Systematic mapping review of orthognathic surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic mapping review AIM AND SCOPE: The objective of this mapping review was to identify, describe, and organize clinical research currently available from systematic reviews and primary studies regarding co-interventions and different surgical modalities used in orthognathic surgery (OS) and their outcomes.

METHODS

Systematic reviews (SRs), randomized controlled trials, and observational studies that evaluated perioperative OS co-interventions and surgical modalities were identified in an exhaustive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Epistemonikos, Lilacs, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. Grey literature was also screened.

RESULTS

Included were 35 SRs and 253 primary studies, 103 from SRs, and another 150 identified in our search. Overall, SR quality was rated as critically low, with only two SRs rated as of high quality. 19 questions on population, interventions, comparisons, and outcomes (PICO) extracted from the SRs focused on osteosynthesis methods, surgical cutting devices, and use of antibiotics, corticosteroids, and induced hypotension. Also identified were 15 research gaps. Evidence bubble maps were created to graphically depict the available evidence.

CONCLUSION

Future high-quality research, both primary and secondary, is needed to address the knowledge gaps identified in this systematic mapping review.

Risk Factors for Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and Delayed Extubation Following Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Bimaxillary orthognathic surgery bears the risk of severe postoperative airway complications. There are no clear recommendations for immediate postoperative follow-up and monitoring. Objective: to identify potential risk factors for prolonged mechanical ventilation and delayed extubation in patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Methods: The data of all consecutive patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery between May 2012 and October 2019 were analyzed in a single-center retrospective cohort study. The clinical data were evaluated regarding baseline characteristics and potential factors linked with delayed extubation. Results: A total of 195 patients were included; 54.9% were female, and the median age was 23 years (IQR 5). The median body mass index was 23.1 (IQR 8). Nine patients (4.6%) were of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System III or higher. The median duration of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit was 280 min (IQR, 526 min). Multivariable analysis revealed that premedication with benzodiazepines (odds ratio (OR) 2.60, 95% confidence interval (0.99; 6.81)), the male sex (OR 2.43, 95% confidence interval (1.10; 5.36)), and the duration of surgery (OR 1.54, 95% confidence interval (1.07; 2.23)) were associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation. By contrast, total intravenous anesthesia was associated with shorter ventilation time (OR 0.19, 95% confidence interval (0.09; 0.43)). Conclusion: premedication with benzodiazepines, the male sex, and the duration of surgery might be considered to be independent risk factors for delayed extubation in patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Neonates and Children Undergoing Dental, Maxillo-Facial or Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) Surgery: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study

Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a potential complication in surgical procedures, mainly because clean/contaminated surgery involves organs that are normally colonized by bacteria. Dental, maxillo-facial and ear-nose-throat (ENT) surgeries are among those that carry a risk of SSIs because the mouth and the first respiratory tracts are normally colonized by a bacterial flora. The aim of this consensus document was to provide clinicians with recommendations on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in neonates (<28 days of chronological age) and pediatric patients (within the age range of 29 days−18 years) undergoing dental, maxillo-facial or ENT surgical procedures. These included: (1) dental surgery; (2) maxilla-facial surgery following trauma with fracture; (3) temporo-mandibular surgery; (4) cleft palate and cleft lip repair; (5) ear surgery; (6) endoscopic paranasal cavity surgery and septoplasty; (7) clean head and neck surgery; (8) clean/contaminated head and neck surgery and (9) tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Due to the lack of pediatric data for the majority of dental, maxillo-facial and ENT surgeries and the fact that the recommendations for adults are currently used, there is a need for ad hoc studies to be rapidly planned for the most deficient areas. This seems even more urgent for interventions such as those involving the first airways since the different composition of the respiratory microbiota in children compared to adults implies the possibility that surgical antibiotic prophylaxis schemes that are ideal for adults may not be equally effective in children.

Current Concepts in Prophylactic Antibiotics in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Antibiotic prophylaxis is the use of antibiotics in the perioperative period to prevent surgical site infections from local flora. Specific guidelines and criteria exist to prevent these infections while also practicing antimicrobial stewardship. Most dentoalveolar procedures do not require antibiotic prophylaxis. For nondentoalveolar procedures, the decision to provide antibiotic prophylaxis is based on involvement of the respiratory, oral, or pharyngeal mucosa. Special considerations exist for patients at high risk for infective endocarditis, patients with head and neck cancer, and temporomandibular joint replacement procedures. This article discusses indications for antibiotic prophylaxis during oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures.

Intraoperative removal of third molars does not affect the postoperative infections after BSSO - Randomized controlled trial

The goal of this study was to evaluate the incidence of postoperative wound infection and timing of mandibular third molar removal in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). This wis a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial. All patients were divided into two groups: Group I, where pre-operative removal of the third molars were done 6 months prior to BSSO and Group II, where intra-operative removal of contralateral third molars were done for the same patients during the osteotomy. The primary outcome variable studied was postoperative infection rate and the secondary outcome variable was bad split during BSSO. Among the seventy five patients (150 sites), one site in group II developed infection whereas none of the sites in group I developed infection (p = 1.000). No sites had bad split in both the groups. The results from the present study show that there is no difference between the presence or absence of mandibular third molars on post-operative wound infection following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, and the authors hence suggest removing third molars during BSSO for patient comfort.

Decreasing Surgical Site Infections in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Level 1 Evidence

BACKGROUND

Although many interventions are implemented to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs) in plastic surgery, their supporting evidence is inconsistent.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of methods for decreasing SSIs in plastic surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the effects of SSI prevention methods. All the studies were assessed for quality of evidence according to the GRADE assessment.

RESULTS

Fifty Level 1 randomized controlled trials were included. The most common interventions for preventing SSIs were antibiotic prophylaxis, showering, prepping, draping, and the use of dressings. Current evidence suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis is largely unnecessary and overused in many plastic surgical procedures, with the exception of head and neck oncologic, oral craniofacial, and traumatic hand surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in plastic surgery is dependent on surgery type. There is a lack evidence that showering and prepping with chlorohexidine and povidone reduces SSIs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1

Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery: an overview of systematic reviews

The purpose of this overview was to assess different antibiotic regimens used in orthognathic surgery and to establish an evidence-based protocol so that beneficial and adverse effects can be determined. A comprehensive literature search for systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library until March 2020. Grey literature was investigated in Google Scholar, and a manual search was done of references lists. Two meta-analyses and four systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. The AMSTAR-2-tool was used to ascertain the potential risk of bias in the included studies, which presented moderate to high methodological quality. Lower infection rates were associated with long-term therapies of penicillin, cefazolin-cephalexin, and amoxicillin-clavulanic-acid, with rates varying from 0% - 3.13%. Higher rates were reported in placebo groups (52.6%) and short-term penicillin therapy (60%). Side effects were reported with cefazolin, clindamycin, and penicillin therapies, including nausea, pain, swelling, headache, vomiting, and skin rash. Evidence suggests that long-term antibiotics can reduce the risk of a surgical site infection (SSI) in orthognathic surgery, but there is uncertainty regarding the effects of one dose of antibiotics preoperatively versus short-term antibiotics. In the same way, intravenous penicillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid kept the infection rates associated with bimaxillary procedures under 3.5%.

Administration of Single-Dose Antibiotic Does Not Decrease Oronasal Fistula Rates After Primary Palatoplasty

OBJECTIVE

Oronasal fistula (ONF) is a known complication after primary palatoplasty (PP). Studies investigating the effect of perioperative antibiotics on fistula rates after PP are limited by inadequate sample size or reliance on self-reporting through national databases. In this study, the authors evaluated the association between single-dose perioperative antibiotics and postoperative fistula rates after PP at a single institution.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Children younger than 2 years who underwent PP from April 2009 to September 2019 were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were divided into 2 categories: Group 1 received a single intraoperative dose of IV antibiotic, while group 2 did not.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Outcome measures included ONF formation, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission rates. Multivariable firth logistic regression, quantile regression, and χ² tests were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 424 patients, 215 and 209 patients were in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The overall ONF rate was 1.9% among all patients. Patients in group 1 experienced an ONF rate of 3.3%, while patients in group 2 had an ONF rate of 0.5%. After correcting for confounding variables, the difference in ONF rates was not statistically different (P = .68). Median LOS was 35.7 hours and 35.5 hours (P = .17), while the rate of readmission within 30 days was 4.7% and 2.4% for group 1 and 2, respectively (P = .96).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of a single-dose perioperative antibiotic did not decrease fistula formation after PP, nor did it affect the patient's LOS or 30-day readmission rate.

Antibiotics in orthognathic surgery: a retrospective analysis and identification of risk factors for postoperative infection

This study was undertaken to evaluate the infection rate following orthognathic surgery and to identify possible risk factors. A retrospective study was conducted. Patients undergoing orthognathic surgery from August 1, 2017 to July 31, 2018 were included. The outcome variable was surgical site infection (SSI). All data were analysed with respect to demographics and procedure specifications. A total of 137 patients (mean age 28.5±12.69 years) were included in this study, of whom 20 (14.6%) developed a SSI. The only risk factor identified was the type of surgery: those undergoing mandibular osteotomies (in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) or bimaxillary osteotomies) were far more likely to develop infections. Third molar teeth were removed during orthognathic surgery in 28.5% of the procedures, and a genioplasty was performed in 10.9%. Removal of osteosynthesis material because of infectious reasons was necessary in 10.2% of patients, with a strong association to previous SSI. In conclusion, this study showed an infection rate of 14.6% with no link to any demographic risk factor. Neither the simultaneous removal of third molar teeth nor genioplasty was found to be a risk factor for SSI. For literature comparison purposes, there is a clear need for the international guidelines defining SSI to be used.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for sagittal split ramus osteotomy using resorbable plate and screw fixation: a randomised trial to compare extended dual-agent and inpatient single-agent regimens

Resorbable materials are used to fix bony fragments after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), but to our knowledge, there is no clear regimen for antibiotic prophylaxis when such materials are used. The purpose of this study therefore was to compare inpatient single-agent and extended dual-agent antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) in patients after SSRO. This prospective study included 100 patients who underwent SSRO for deformities of the jaw. Cephalometric analysis was performed preoperatively, and at one month and one year postoperatively. Patients were divided into two groups of 50 each. Group A was given cefazolin sodium 1g preoperatively and every eight hours for 48 hours postoperatively. Group B was given cefazolin sodium 1g preoperatively and every eight hours for 48 hours postoperatively, after which they were provided with oral amoxicillin for three days. Both groups were assessed for SSIs for one year postoperatively using the Clavien-Dindo classification. SSIs were documented in seven patients in Group A and six in Group B, with no significant difference between the groups. The two regimens had no significant association with SSI. In conclusion, our results suggest that the inpatient, single-agent, postoperative antibiotic regimen is sufficient to prevent SSI in patients who have SSRO with resorbable plate and screw fixation.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review

Surgical site infections are a complication of oral and maxillofacial procedures, with the potential for significant morbidity and mortality. Use of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections must be balanced with considerations of a patients' risk of antibiotic-related adverse events. This review aimed to provide evidence-based recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis. Searches were conducted using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PUBMED for maxillofacial procedures including: treatment of dental abscesses, extractions, implants, trauma, temporomandibular joints, orthognathics, malignant and benign tumour removal, and bone grafting, limited to articles published since 2000. A total of 98 out of 280 retrieved papers were included in the final analysis. Systematic reviews were assessed using AMSTAR criteria. Randomised controlled trials were assessed for bias using Cochrane Collaborative tools. The overall quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Prophylactic antibiotic use is recommended in surgical extractions of third molars, comminuted mandibular fractures, temporomandibular joint replacements, clean-contaminated tumour removal, and complex implants. Prophylactic antibiotic use is not routinely recommended in fractures of the upper or midface facial thirds. Further research is required to provide recommendations in orthognathic, cleft lip, palate, temporomandibular joint surgery, and maxillofacial surgical procedures in medically-compromised patients.

Severity and long-term complications of surgical site infections after orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study

Surgical site infections (SSI) occur in 1.4% to 33.4% of cases after orthognathic surgery. This type of complication is a major concern to surgical teams, but there is no consensus for the prevention and treatment of SSI in orthognathic surgery. The purpose of this descriptive study was to evaluate the severity and the consequences of postoperative infections. The charts of all the patients operated on by the orthognathic surgery team between January 2015 and July 2017 were collected. All types of orthognathic procedures (Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split mandibular osteotomy, and genioplasty) were screened, and patients diagnosed with SSI were included. Demographic data, timing and severity of the infection, as well as long-term complications were recorded. Five hundred and twelve patients were screened. Forty-one patients (8%) presenting with SSI were included. There were 18 men and 23 women. The site of the infection was mandibular for 38 patients (92.7%) and maxillary for 3 patients (7.3%). The average time between surgery and infection was 31.5 days. Twenty-four patients received isolated oral antibiotics for inflammatory cellulitic reaction (58.8%), 15 patients had a localized collection treated by incision and drainage under local anesthesia (36.6%), and 2 patients had an extensive collection requiring surgical drainage under general anesthesia (4.9%). Five patients (12.2%) needed hardware removal for plate loosening, and 2 patients (4.9%) developed chronic osteomyelitis. Infection following orthognathic surgery is easily treated most of the time with no long-term complications. In cases of patients with potential risk factors for severe infection, antibiotics may be given with curative intents.

Evaluation of Drug Susceptibility of Microorganisms in Odontogenic Inflammations and Dental Surgery Procedures Performed on an Outpatient Basis

Bacterial infections are the most common cause of purulent soft tissue inflammations in the head and neck area. These bacteria are also responsible for the majority of inflammatory complications after third molar removal. The key to success of antibacterial treatment in both cases is the use of an appropriate antibacterial agent. The aim of the study was to evaluate the susceptibility profile of bacteria isolated from material collected from patients with intraoral odontogenic abscesses. The test material consisted of swabs taken from the odontogenic abscesses, after their incision and drainage. Another swab was collected from the lesion area, 10 days after the initial visit. Results were compared with an identical study conducted on a control group of healthy patients, who had undergone third molar removal. Bacteria identified in this study consisted of aerobic and anaerobic strains, both Gram-positive and Gram-negative. According to the EUCAST guidelines, none of the tested antibiotics was recommended for all identified bacteria. The percentage of bacterial strains sensitive to amoxicillin and clavulanic acid was 78.13% and 81.48% in the study and control groups, respectively, whereas, the percentage of those sensitive to clindamycin was 96.43% and 80.00%, respectively. For Gram-negative aerobic bacteria, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin were among medications affecting all cultured species. 100.00% of strains were found to be susceptible to these antibiotics. Statistically significant relationship between the presence of Gram-negative aerobic strains and the occurrence of complications was found. In the case of the most frequently occurring bacteria in the study, amoxicillin with clavulanic acid and clindamycin were shown to be very effective. In cases of severe purulent odontogenic inflammations, it is recommended to use a combination of antibiotics. Amoxicillin with ciprofloxacin and clindamycin with cefuroxime seem to be the proper choices based on the results of this study.

Early Complications From the Use of Calcium Phosphate Paste in Mandibular Lengthening Surgery. A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

Calcium phosphate paste is used in mandibular lengthening surgery to avoid unesthetic notching at the lower border and to help stabilize the segments when osteosynthesis slippage is a concern. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the hardened paste increases the incidence of infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of medical charts of all patients who underwent a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy from February 2012 through July 2015. The outcome and predictor variables were postoperative infection and calcium phosphate paste use, respectively. Other study variables included age, gender, tobacco use, type of fixation, type of surgery, antibiotic prophylaxis regimen, third molar extraction, and medical comorbidities. Variables were analyzed using the Fisher exact test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

The sample included 196 patients (115 female and 81 male) 9 to 57 years old. The overall infection rate was 12.2%. Of the 102 patients who received calcium phosphate paste, 18.6% developed an infection compared with 5.3% in the control group. The difference in infection rate was statistically significant (odds ratio = 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.48; P = .002) after adjusting for the other variables. Of the 392 surgical sites, 204 had received calcium phosphate paste, of which 10.3% became infected. Of the 188 sites without defect reconstruction, 6 (3.2%) became infected (P = .008 by bivariate analysis). There was a statistically significant association between third molar removal and infections (odds ratio = 8.01; 95% CI, 1.28-50.1; P = .026) and between the use of amoxicillin plus clavulanate and the use of cefazolin (odds ratio = 3.92; 95% CI, 0.87-17.63; P = .07).

CONCLUSION

There was a relevant trend of increased infection with calcium phosphate paste use. Third molar removal also was identified as a risk factor. Prospective studies after procedural modifications are recommended to determine whether the benefits of using calcium phosphate paste outweigh the risks.

Surgical Site Infections Following Bimaxillary Orthognathic, Osseous Genioplasty, and Intranasal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Frequency estimates of surgical site infection (SSI) after orthognathic surgery vary considerably. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and site of SSIs and associated risk factors after bimaxillary orthognathic, osseous genioplasty, and intranasal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors executed a retrospective cohort study of patients with a bimaxillary developmental dentofacial deformity (DFD) and symptomatic chronic obstructive nasal breathing. All patients underwent at a minimum Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomies (SROs), septoplasty, inferior turbinate reduction, and osseous genioplasty. The primary outcome variable studied was the incidence and site of SSI. Predictor variables were type and extent of prophylactic antibiotic used, demographic (age and gender), and anatomic (pattern of DFD, surgical site, and presence of third molar).

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Their average age at surgery was 25 years (range, 13 to 63 yr) and there were 134 female patients (51%). The major presenting patterns of DFD included long face (30%) and maxillary deficiency (25%). Forty percent of patients undergoing an SRO and 47% of those undergoing a Le Fort I osteotomy underwent simultaneous removal of a third molar. Ninety percent of patients received cefazolin or cephalexin antibiotics. Overall, 5 of 1,048 (0.5%) osteotomy sites sustained an infection, including 1 chin and 4 ramus SSIs. There were no delays in bone healing. Fixation hardware removal was not required in any patient who developed an infection. Two of the 25 patients (8%) given clindamycin prophylaxis developed an SSI, whereas 3 of 237 patients (1%) receiving cefazolin did. Three of the 4 patients who developed an SRO SSI underwent simultaneous removal of an erupted or partially erupted mandibular third molar (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the incidence of SSI was limited to 1% of patients who were given cefazolin or cephalexin extended for 5 days. The removal of an erupted or partially erupted mandibular third molar in conjunction with an SRO was associated with risk of SSI, but the incidence remains low.

Prevalence of Surgical Site Infections Following Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the prevalence of surgical site infection (SSI) after orthognathic surgery at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Capital Health and Dalhousie University (Halifax, NS, Canada).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing orthognathic surgery from October 2005 through April 2013 was performed. The outcome variable was SSI. The primary predictor variable was the antibiotic used for prophylaxis. The secondary predictor variables were patient demographics, such as age, gender, medical comorbidities, and smoking status; duration of surgery; wisdom teeth extractions; single-jaw or bimaxillary surgery; and type of surgery. Data also were gathered on the diagnosis of SSIs and the treatment to resolve these infections.

RESULTS

In total, 2,521 patients underwent surgery, and 253 patients did not meet the inclusion criteria; therefore, the charts of 2,268 patients were reviewed (mean ± standard deviation, 26.9 ± 11.7 yr of age). Eight percent of patients developed an SSI. None of the patient demographics was associated with an increased risk for infection. Most initial infections (62%) and most recurrent infections (78%) occurred in the mandible. Twenty-six percent of patients who developed SSIs had recurrent infections after antibiotic treatment. SSIs necessitated hardware removal for 14% of patients. Adverse effects from the antibiotics were seen in 4.2% of patients. Infection was most frequently diagnosed 11 to 15 days postoperatively. The average length of surgery for patients who did not have an SSI was 136 minutes compared with an average of 157 minutes for patients who had an SSI (odds ratio = 1.0051; 95% confidence interval, 1.0026 to 1.0076; P < .001). Wisdom teeth were extracted in 49.6% of the 2,268 cases. The mean SSI prevalence for multiple jaw procedures (9.2%) was significantly higher than that for single surgical procedures (5.3%; P = .0013). Isolated Le Fort surgeries had a significantly lower prevalence of infection compared with the mean prevalence (3.9%; P = .02), whether they were single piece or segmented (3.5 and 4.3%, respectively; P = .98). The prevalence of infection was significantly lower in the cefazolin group (6.2%) compared with the penicillin (14.3%; P < .0001) and clindamycin (10.4%; P < .02) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The prophylactic use of first-generation cephalosporins, such as cefazolin, appears to be more effective than penicillin and clindamycin for preventing SSIs in orthognathic surgery. In addition, bimaxillary surgery, mandibular procedures, and duration of surgery might demand antibiotic prophylaxis that is more effective. The presence of third molars and patient demographics are not risk factors for SSIs. A prospective randomized controlled study is underway to investigate the findings of this study.

The Role of Microfat Grafting in Facial Contouring

BACKGROUND

Congenital hypoplasia of facial bones has traditionally been treated by orthognathic surgery. However, the inherent invasiveness of orthognathic surgery often leads to a high complication rate. Facial fat grafting could be a less invasive method to correct facial deformities.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of microfat grafting for facial contouring.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review evaluated 166 patients who were treated with microfat grafting for maxillary and/or mandibular hypoplasia. Pretreatment and posttreatment photographs were compared regarding improvement of facial contour, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The follow-up period ranged from 4 months to 10 years (mean, 2 years 7 months). Thirty-eight percent of the patients had a refill procedure 6 or more months after the first procedure. A majority of the evaluated patients stated that they benefited from the microfat grafting, with ratings of excellent (50%), sufficient (48%), and poor (2%). Complications included visible fat lobules under the lower eyelid skin (7%), which was seen during the first 4 years and was resolved by changing the injection cannulae and technique, and fat resorption, which was seen in all patients, with a clinical range from ±15% in the immobile malar area and chin region to ±50% in the mobile lip area.

CONCLUSIONS

Facial microfat grafting is a valuable alternative to more complicated advancement osetotomies being performed in patients solely for aesthetic reasons. The low morbidity and rapid recovery make facial microfat grafting a welcome tool in the armamentarium of the modern facial aesthetic surgeon.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing infectious complications in orthognathic surgery

BACKGROUND

Orthognathic surgery (OS) is a term that refers to many elective surgical techniques to correct facial deformity; the associated malocclusion and functional disorders related to the stomatognathic system. Whilst such surgery is classed as "clean-contaminated", the usefulness of and the most appropriate regimen for antibiotic prophylaxis in these patients are still debated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing surgical site infection (SSI) in people undergoing orthognathic surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

In June 2014, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL. We also searched Google Scholar and performed manual searches in journals relevant to the topic, conference proceedings and lists of references of potentially included articles. We did not restrict the search and study selection with respect to language, date of publication or study setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving people undergoing orthognathic surgery comparing one regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis with any other regimen or placebo. The primary outcome was SSI, and secondary outcomes were systemic infections, adverse events, duration of hospital stay and health-related quality of life. Two review authors screened articles independently.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were abstracted independently by two review authors, and agreement was checked. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Antibiotic regimens were classified as preoperative (one dose before surgery), short-term (before or during surgery and/or during the same day of surgery) and long-term (before or during surgery and longer than one day after surgery) antibiotic prophylaxis. Random-effects meta-analyses using inverse variance methods were undertaken when possible. We report risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 11 trials were included in this review. Most of the studies had an unclear risk of bias prompting us to downgrade the quality of evidence for our outcomes. Seven of these trials provided evidence for the main comparison and the primary outcome and these were pooled. Overall, long-term antibiotic prophylaxis probably reduces the risk of SSI (plausible effects range between a 76% to a 0.26% relative reduction in SSI with long-term antibiotic prophylaxis) (472 participants; RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.74; moderate-quality evidence). There is uncertainty surrounding the relative effects of short-term antibiotics compared with a single dose (220 participants; RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.22; low-quality evidence). No reports described adverse effects associated with the drugs in those trials that reported in this outcome. None of these trials assessed or reported data regarding other outcomes, and information was insufficient to show whether a specific antibiotic is better than another.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For people undergoing orthognathic surgery, long term antibiotic prophylaxis decreases the risk of SSI compared with short-term antibiotic prophylaxis and the is uncertainty of whether short-term antibiotic prophylaxis decreases SSi risk relative to a single pre-operative dose of prophylactic antibiotics.

Indications of antibiotic prophylaxis in dental practice- review

Antibiotics are frequently used in dental practice. Clinical and bacteriological epidemiological factors determine the indications of antibiotics in dentistry. Antibiotics are used in addition to appropriate treatment to aid the host defences in the elimination of remaining bacteria. It is indicated when there is evidence of clinical sign involvement and spread of infection. Antibiotics are prescribed in dental practice for treating odontoge nic infections, non-odontogenic infections, as prophylaxis against focal and local infection. Special care needs to be addressed to patients with organ transplants, poorly controlled diabetes and pregnancy. Antibiotics should be used only as an adjunct to dental treatment and never alone as the first line of care. The present paper reviews the indications of antibiotics in dental practice.

Prospective, multi-center study of the effectiveness of orthodontic/orthognathic surgery care in the United Kingdom

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of orthodontic/orthognathic surgical care provided in the North West region of England. It was an observational, prospective cohort study at 13 maxillofacial clinics in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

The 131 patients comprised 47 males (35.9%) and 84 females (64.1%), with an average age of 22.6 years. They received orthodontic/orthognathic treatment according to the normal protocols of the operators. They were then followed until all orthodontic treatment was completed. Final skeletal pattern, final peer assessment rating score, number of attendances, and duration of treatment were recorded.

RESULTS

At the end of the 5-year study, 94 patients had completed treatment, and 71 had complete data. Data analysis showed that, overall, the treatments provided were effective in terms of skeletal and dental occlusal outcomes; the final mean peer assessment rating score was 10.58. However, treatment duration was longer than commonly expected, with a mean length of 32.8 months (SD,11.3). The outcome of treatment was influenced by only pretreatment skeletal discrepancy.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective investigation showed that orthodontic/orthognathic surgical care was effective. The outcome of treatment was influenced only by the severity of the pretreatment skeletal discrepancy.

The efficacy of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in orthognathic surgery: a prospective study in Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy

PURPOSE

This study examined the efficacy of the postoperative prophylactic antibiotics used in orthognathic surgery. The prevalence of surgical site infections (SSIs) was determined according to the use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients were divided into 2 groups. Each patient intravenously received 1.0 g of a third-generation cephalosporin (Cefpiramide) 30 minutes before surgery. Among them, 28 patients in the control group received 1.0 g Cefpiramide twice daily until the third day after surgery. The postoperative wounds were examined regularly for the presence of infectious signs.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infections between patients who had received postoperative prophylactic antibiotic administration and those who had not (p = 0.639).

CONCLUSION

Prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use after orthognathic surgery may not be necessary, provided that there are no other significant factors for wound infections.

Mandibular Osteotomies in Orthognathic Surgery

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy is the most commonly used osteotomy of the mandible in orthognathic surgery. The authors describe their experience in evaluating the orthognathic patient with a mandibular deformity. The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy surgical technique used by the authors is reviewed along with postoperative management.

Prevalence of Postoperative Complications After Orthognathic Surgery: A 15-Year Review

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of postoperative complications after orthognathic surgery and evaluate the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in relation to the infection rate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients undergoing orthognathic procedures between 1990 and 2004 were studied retrospectively by retrieving their individual medical records. Demographic data, intraoperative data (specific orthognathic procedures and duration of operation), and postoperative data (type and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis and presence of postoperative complications) were recorded. Patients noted to have suffered any postoperative complications were studied in detail, and various factors, including gender, age, duration of operation, and use of prophylactic antibiotics, were analyzed using statistical tests in relation to postoperative infection.

RESULTS

A total of 2,910 orthognathic procedures were performed on 1,294 consecutive patients in the 15-year period, with 1,070 patients undergoing bimaxillary procedures and 224 patients undergoing single-jaw surgery. The orthognathic surgery-related complication rate was 9.7%, of which 7.4% was related to postoperative infection. Of the cases of infection, 58.3% were acute infection and 41.7% were chronic infection. Patients who received a single preoperative dose of antibiotics had a significantly higher infection rate (17.3%) than those who received postoperative antibiotics for various durations.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of infection after orthognathic surgery was relatively low given the complexity of the procedures. No particular orthognathic procedure was more susceptible to infection. A preoperative dose of prophylactic antibiotics together with at least 2 days of postoperative doses was useful in reducing the infection rate compared with only a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics.

A Systematic Review of Prophylactic Antibiotics in the Surgical Treatment of Maxillofacial Fractures

PURPOSE

A systematic review was performed to find evidence for prophylactic administration of antibiotics in relation to treatment of maxillofacial fractures.

METHODS

Four studies were retrieved that fulfilled most of the requirements of being randomized controlled clinical trials.

RESULTS

An analysis of these studies showed a 3-fold decrease in the infection rate of mandibular fractures in the antibiotic treated groups compared with the control groups. A variety of antibiotics had been used with an apparently uniform effect. A "1-shot" regimen or a 1-day treatment course had a similar or perhaps even better effect than 7 days of treatment. No infections were related to condylar, maxillary, or zygoma fractures.

CONCLUSION

A 1-shot or 1-day administration of prophylactic antibiotics seem to be the best documented to reduce infections in the management of mandibular fractures not involving the condylar region.

The Incidence of Postoperative Wound Healing Problems Following Sagittal Ramus Osteotomies Stabilized With Miniplates and Monocortical Screws

PURPOSE

Titanium plates and monocortical screws are commonly used to stabilize the mandible following sagittal split ramus osteotomies. Despite widespread use of this type of fixation, there is a paucity of large studies evaluating the infection rate and need for hardware removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort evaluation of 1,066 consecutive mandibular sagittal ramus osteotomies in 533 patients, performed between January 2002 and December 2003. All osteotomies were stabilized with 4-hole miniplates and 2.0 mm x 5.0 mm monocortical screws. Study variables included disturbances of wound healing, age, gender, plate and screw position, direction of mandibular movement, adjunctive procedures performed, and the patient's medical history. Data were collected by chart and radiographic review. The above variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, Chi-square, Cochran-Armitage Trend Test, and multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 533 patients 26% (138) demonstrated wound healing problems. This occurred in 15% of all 1,066 osteotomy sites. 6.5% of plates required removal in 10% of patients. In no case did disturbance of wound healing or plate removal result in non-union or relapse of the osteotomy. Wound healing problems were fewer when mandibular osteotomies were done in conjunction with maxillary surgery (18.9% versus 29.1%). Disturbances of wound healing were not related to the direction of movement of the mandible and were lower when hardware was placed closer to the inferior border.

CONCLUSION

An overall low incidence (6.5%) of hardware infection requiring plate removal was found in this study. Screw proximity to the osteotomy site did not correlate with higher rates of healing problems, but there was a statistically significant trend of fewer disturbances of healing when the hardware was placed closer to the inferior border of the mandible.

Orthognathic surgery: is there a future?

BACKGROUND

Despite significant clinical advances in orthognathic surgery, a perceived decrease in recent years in the number of orthognathic cases was noted at the authors' institution. Word of mouth suggested that this phenomenon was region-wide. To explore this possible dichotomy, a one-page questionnaire was designed and sent to all plastic surgeons in the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons and to all active practicing oral surgeons and orthodontists in the state of Ohio.

METHODS

The questionnaire was designed to estimate both the surgeons' and the orthodontists' perception of whether the number of orthognathic cases was increasing, decreasing, or remaining the same over a 5-year period (from 1996 to 2000). A second questionnaire was then sent only to plastic surgeons and oral surgeons to further evaluate reasons for this possible increase or decrease.

RESULTS

The overall response to the first survey was 39 percent (236 of 601 surveys sent); 87 responses (32 percent) were from plastic and oral surgeons, and 132 (40 percent) were from orthodontists. Seventy-five percent of responders perceived a decrease in the number of orthognathic operations. Of those, more than 80 percent claimed that reimbursement was the major reason for the reduction in the number of surgical procedures. The degree of reduction in reimbursement over this 5-year period was documented at the authors' institution, and the perceived reduction over this 5-year period was estimated by the respondents. Finally, reimbursement per hour was calculated for orthognathic cases and compared with three other standard plastic surgery procedures.

CONCLUSION

Implications of this reduction in orthognathic surgery in Ohio are discussed, and suggestions for better documentation of this health care issue are suggested.