Treatment with the atypical antipsychotic, olanzapine, prevents the expression of amphetamine-induced place conditioning in the rat

The Benefits of Olanzapine in Palliating Symptoms

OPINION STATEMENT

Olanzapine has become a major drug in the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting as a prophylactic agent. In addition, a recent randomized trial has demonstrated its benefits in treating nausea and vomiting associated with advanced cancer. The added benefit to olanzapine is that it also stimulates appetite. As a result, since it treats multiple symptoms associated with advanced cancer, it is likely to become the antiemetic of choice in palliative care at least in the USA. The added benefit of treating insomnia and the avoidance of benzodiazepines should place olanzapine in at the top of the list of drugs to use for patients who do complain of insomnia. There is no good evidence that it potentiates the respiratory depression of opioids unlike benzodiazepines. The evidence is weak that olanzapine in as an adjuvant analgesic. Hopefully, future trials will explore this in greater depth. The benefits of adding olanzapine to potent opioids are that it may reduce craving, drug cues, and opioid misuse. Other symptoms like anxiety and depression may be addressed by the addition of olanzapine to standard antidepressants.

The effect of quetiapine (Seroquel™) on conditioned place preference and elevated plus maze tests in rats when administered alone and in combination with (+)-amphetamine

RATIONALE

Recent case reports describe recreational use of quetiapine and drug-seeking behaviour to obtain quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the hypothesis that quetiapine (10, 20 or 40 mg/kg) alone or co-administered with (+)-amphetamine (0.25, 0.5, 0.75 or 2.0 mg/kg) will affect reward and/or decrease anxiety in rats, as measured by conditioned place preference (CPP) and elevated plus maze (EPM) test, respectively.

RESULTS

Quetiapine (20 mg/kg) produced greater open arm time and entries in the EPM test compared to 10 and 40 mg/kg, and quetiapine (10 mg/kg) significantly increased open arm entries and time when co-administered with (+)-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) compared to (+)-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) alone, suggesting decreased anxiety. Quetiapine (10, 20 or 40 mg/kg) produced no CPP when administered alone; the lowest dose of quetiapine (10 mg/kg) reduced CPP produced by a low dose of (+)-amphetamine (0.25 mg/kg), but had no significant effect on CPP produced by a higher dose (0.5 mg/kg).

DISCUSSION

The quetiapine-induced anxiolytic effect in the EPM might explain why humans are misusing quetiapine and combining it with (+)-amphetamine. It is possible that humans experience an anxiolytic effect of the combined drugs and relatively unaltered rewarding effects of (+)-amphetamine. The results shed some light on the question of why humans are abusing and misusing quetiapine, despite its dopamine (DA) D2 receptor antagonism; it will be the task of future studies to identify the pharmacological mechanism mediating this behaviour.

Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade

Conditioned place preference (CPP) continues to be one of the most popular models to study the motivational effects of drugs and non-drug treatments in experimental animals. This is obvious from a steady year-to-year increase in the number of publications reporting the use this model. Since the compilation of the preceding review in 1998, more than 1000 new studies using place conditioning have been published, and the aim of the present review is to provide an overview of these recent publications. There are a number of trends and developments that are obvious in the literature of the last decade. First, as more and more knockout and transgenic animals become available, place conditioning is increasingly used to assess the motivational effects of drugs or non-drug rewards in genetically modified animals. Second, there is a still small but growing literature on the use of place conditioning to study the motivational aspects of pain, a field of pre-clinical research that has so far received little attention, because of the lack of appropriate animal models. Third, place conditioning continues to be widely used to study tolerance and sensitization to the rewarding effects of drugs induced by pre-treatment regimens. Fourth, extinction/reinstatement procedures in place conditioning are becoming increasingly popular. This interesting approach is thought to model certain aspects of relapse to addictive behavior and has previously almost exclusively been studied in drug self-administration paradigms. It has now also become established in the place conditioning literature and provides an additional and technically easy approach to this important phenomenon. The enormous number of studies to be covered in this review prevented in-depth discussion of many methodological, pharmacological or neurobiological aspects; to a large extent, the presentation of data had to be limited to a short and condensed summary of the most relevant findings.