Platelet concentrate collection in a dual-stage channel using computer-generated algorithms for collection and prediction of yield

Effect of donor variables on yield in single donor plateletpheresis by continuous flow cell separator

The quality of single donor platelets (SDPs) in terms of yield influences platelet recovery in the recipient. Various donor factors such as pre-donation platelet count and hemoglobin (Hb) concentration affect the platelet yield. We studied the influence of pre-donation donor clinical and laboratory factors such as gender, age, weight of the donor, platelet count and Hb on the platelet yield. A total of 94 plateletpheresis procedures performed on continuous flow cell separator (CS3000, Baxter Healthcare, Round Lake, IL, USA) were evaluated for platelet yield. A relationship between pre-donation donor variables and yield of platelets was studied using the Pearson correlation. The mean platelet yield was 2.8+/-0.73x10(11). While a direct relationship was observed between pre-donation platelet count and yield (r=0.50, p<0.001), no such correlation was noticed with donor Hb concentration (r=-0.10, p>0.005). Similarly, no correlation was observed between gender (r=0.05), age (r=0.11) and weight (r=0.18) of the donor with yield. Optimization of platelet yield, which is influenced by pre-donation platelet count, is an emerging issue in blood transfusion services. Identification of such factors may help in selecting donors to obtain higher platelet yields and consequently better clinical outcome.

Effects of autologous platelet concentrate reinfusion after open heart surgery in patients with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Plasma pheresis and reinfusion of platelet-rich plasma has not been shown to reduce blood loss in cardiac patients. Recently, freshly prepared autologous platelet concentrates (PC) can be made from patient's blood and has a higher concentration than conventional platelet rich plasma. In this study, the effects of autologous PC reinfusion were examined after open heart surgery in patients with congenital heart disease.

METHODS

Eight patients with noncyanotic congenital heart disease, who underwent open heart surgery and reinfusion of autologous PC, were classified as the PC group. Eight other patients with noncyanotic congenital heart disease, who underwent only open heart surgery, were defined as the control group. Ages ranged from 2 to 24 years and were not significantly different between the two groups (9.3 +/- 5.1 years in the PC group and 12.6 +/- 7.9 years in the control group, p = 0.33). In the PC group, blood was collected from the femoral vein through a 6F catheter introducer; 9 to 20 U (13.0 +/- 5.4 U, 0.42 +/- 0.22 U/kg) of autologous PC were prepared and were reinfused after protamine administration. The time course of platelet counts was examined until postoperative day 7. Aggregation responses to adenosine diphosphate; (4 micromol/L and 8 micromol/L), collagen (1 micromol/L and 5 micromol/L), and epinephrine (5 micromol/L and 10 micromol/L) were evaluated after induction of anesthesia (individual references), after protamine administration, at the end of the operation; these responses were shown as recovery ratios.

RESULTS

Blood loss during surgery in the PC group was significantly less than in the control group (4.8 +/- 3.0 mL/kg versus 7.8 +/- 1.7 mL/kg, p = 0.044). Similarly blood loss on postoperative day 1 in the PC group was significantly less than in the control group (3.6 +/- 1.2 mL/kg versus 7.2 +/- 3.1 mL/kg, p = 0.013). The platelet counts in the PC group were larger than those in the control group until postoperative day 5, after reinfusion of prepared autologous PC. The recovery ratios of the aggregation responses to adenosine diphosphate, collagen, and epinephrine after protamine administration were not significantly different between the two groups. However, recovery in the PC group after reinfusion of the prepared autologous PC was greater than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Reinfusion of the freshly prepared autologous PC was followed by good aggregation responses and low blood loss in patients with noncyanotic congenital heart disease after open heart surgery. This procedure may be useful in pediatric open heart surgery without blood transfusion or with little administration of homologous blood products.

Efficacy and safety of plateletpheresis by donors with low-normal platelet counts

Our practice is to defer donors with blood platelet (PLT) counts of < 180 x 10(9)/L because PLT yields are low, when compared to PLT units collected from donors with higher counts. In an attempt to minimize deferral, we determined whether 33 donors, who repeatedly demonstrated low-normal PLT counts (150-180 x 10(9)/L) on multiple occasions during the prestudy period. might safely donate satisfactory apheresis PLT units simply by extending the apheresis collection time by 20 min (men) and 40 min (women). Repeat plateletpheresis procedures were scheduled at > or = 28-day intervals. The mean PLT yield (N = 92) was 5.8 x 10(11) with 97% of units containing > or = 4.0 x 10(11) PLTs. Although donors entered the study only after they had repeatedly exhibited predonation PLT counts of < 180 x 10(9)/L, PLT counts were not always below this level at the time of study collections. However, analyzing only donations with true predonation PLT counts of < 180 x 10(9)/L (N = 35), the mean PLT yield was excellent-5.4 x 10(11) with 97% of units containing > or = 4.0 x 10(11) PLTs. The average fall in donor blood PLT counts (pre-vs. postdonation) was 36%, with only ten of 99 postdonation counts being < 100 x 10(9)/L; the lowest was 69 x 10(9)/L. Thus, extending the apheresis collection time permitted donors who in the past were routinely deferred because of low PLT counts to safely donate satisfactory PLT units.

The collection of platelets by apheresis procedures

Collection of platelets by apheresis has been a major advance in transfusion medicine. It has allowed the supply of a therapeutically beneficial component to grow with medical needs. Donors find fulfillment in more frequent donations than are possible with whole blood and know that their donation fills a special need. New technology allows leukocyte reduction in the collection of the component with or without the use of filtration. Matching for refractory patients is possible. However, platelets collected by apheresis have not been shown to be hemostatically different from platelets separated from whole blood donations, and thus, do not represent an advance in therapeutic efficacy. The use of apheresis platelets does reduce donor exposure, but this has not been shown to be a safety advance, although it seems intuitively obvious that transfusion risk is statistically reduced in some patients requiring only a few platelet transfusions. Support of patients by apheresis platelets may or may not reduce the risk of alloimmunization. Apheresis platelets from some equipment have less white blood cell contamination even in the absence of filtration, which may be an advantage. Apheresis platelets could be a major step in the ultimate customization of blood collection, in which some donors would preferentially donate red blood cells, whereas others would donate platelets or plasma depending on their blood type and ability to donate frequently, and the current medical need of their donation. Perhaps this would be the most significant advance from the medical progress initiated by Cohn almost 50 years ago.

Plateletpheresis during Plasma Collection

New systems for collection of platelet concentrate (PC) and platelet poor plasma (PPP) are presently available. The aim of our work was to test the possibility of preparing PC routinely from normal plasma donors in a minimum amount of time and, at the same time, providing a second product that can be used as source-plasma or fresh-frozen plasma. Over a 3 year period (from 1990 to 1992) we performed 3503 procedures using 2 Haemonetics PCS machines (1236 procedures) and 3 Autopheresis-C (2267 procedures). With the PC produced we were able to satisfy all the requests coming from the hospitals of our region. The platelet yield was 1.95x10″ with PCS and 3.2x10″ with Auto-C in a PC volume of 150 and 200 ml respectively; collection times were quite similar (56 and 63 min). The results show that plasma-plateletpheresis is an efficient and competitive system. Regarding platelet yield, the best results were obtained with the Auto-C.