[Clinical safety and efficacy of single-chamber atrial pacing in sick sinus syndrome: long-term follow-up]

Pacing mode survival in patients with single chamber atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Single chamber atrial pacemaker should be sufficient for patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) with normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction. However, most patients undergo dual chamber pacemaker implantation because of concern of new onset AV block. The annual incidence of new AV block has been reported from 0.6 to 4.4 % in various studies.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim is to assess mode survival in sinus node dysfunction with normal AV conduction patients implanted with AAIR.

METHODS

Patients who underwent single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation for SND with normal AV conduction between January 2014 and December 2021 were followed up for pacemaker device change, new onset AV block, bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation (AF), lead complications, reoperation and mortality rate.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients underwent single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation for SND during the study period. Mean age was 55.6 ± 12.7 years. During a mean follow up of 48.7 ± 24.9 months, none of the patients required pacemaker device change to VVIR/DDDR. Nine patients underwent reoperation, 5 for lead dislodgment, 1 for high threshold, 1 for pocket site erosion and 3 for pulse generator change. None developed AV block or AF with slow ventricular rate. Only 4 patients developed AF (3 paroxysmal,1 permanent). There were 3 deaths during follow up and none were sudden deaths.

CONCLUSION

Single chamber atrial pacing is an acceptable mode of pacing in patients with SND in developing countries. Development of AV conduction abnormalities is rare in this relatively younger population.

System upgrade and its complications in patients with a single lead atrial pacemaker: data from the DANPACE trial

AIMS

To investigate the indications for system upgrade with single lead atrial pacing (AAIR), complications associated with these re-interventions, and possible predictors for system upgrade among patients included in the Danish Multicenter Randomized Trial on AAIR vs. dual-chamber pacing (DDDR) in sick sinus syndrome (DANPACE).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 707 of 1415 patients were randomized to AAIR pacing. Mean follow-up was 5.5 ± 2.6 years. Information on indications for system upgrade and complications were collected by reviewing patient charts. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between predictors and system upgrade. Sixty-six patients (9.3%) in the AAIR group underwent system upgrade. Fifty-nine of these patients (89.3%) had a documented class I indication for system upgrade. Age (aOR 0.98 for each 1-year increase in age; 95% CI 0.6-1.0), and left atrial enlargement (aOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.0-3.8) were predictors for system upgrade. No single clinically applicable predictor for upgrade was identified. A total of 11 patients (16.7%) experienced at least one major complication after system upgrade.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients with AAIR pacing who underwent system upgrade had a class I indication. The incidence of major complications after system upgrade was high. The present data support the use of DDDR pacing rather than AAIR pacing in sick sinus syndrome.

Novedades en estimulación cardiaca 2006

This article summarizes progress in cardiac pacing that has taken place in the last year, such as the incorporation of navigation technology into programmers, systems for monitoring hemodynamic parameters, and new developments in patient follow-up, principally home monitoring and the use of treatment guidelines. In addition, the article covers recent findings in resynchronization therapy, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and the management of patients with pacemakers who need to undergo magnetic resonance imaging.