[Isotopic ventriculography in healthy young volunteers. Their response to different types of stress]

Stress imaging in congenital cardiac disease

In patients with coronary arterial disease, stress imaging is able to demonstrate abnormalities in the motion of the ventricular walls, and abnormalities in coronary arterial perfusion not apparent at rest. It can also provide information on prognostic factors. In patients with congenitally malformed hearts, stress imaging is used to determine contractile reserve, abnormalities of mural motion, and global systolic function, but also to assess diastolic and vascular function. In most of these patients, stress is usually induced using pharmacological agents, mainly dobutamine given in varying doses. The clinical usefulness of abnormal responses to the stress induced in such patients has to be addressed in follow-up studies. The abnormal stress might serve as surrogate endpoints, predicting primary endpoints at an early stage, which are useful for stratification of risk in this population of growing patients. We review here the stress imaging studies performed to date in patients with congenitally malformed hearts, with a special emphasis on echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Simultaneous assessment of function and perfusion during dipyridamole-handgrip Tc-99m sestamibi imaging in chronic coronary artery disease

The main goal of this work was to know the value of ventricular function in addition to perfusion Tc-99m sestamibi images in the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) when using dipyridamole (DIP) associated to isometric exercise. We analyzed 52 patients with suspected CAD; 40 of them had coronary lesions > or = 50% and 12 patients without CAD, conforming study and control groups, respectively. Twenty-eight patients had prior myocardial infarction. A two-day sestamibi protocol was employed with i.v. DIP-handgrip and rest injections, acquiring ECG-gated first pass and planar perfusion images. Sensitivity for perfusion images was 85% and specificity was 91.7%. There was no change between rest and DIP ejection fraction (EF) in controls. CAD patients presented a significant EF decrease with DIP (p: 0.0015). Patients with ischemia in perfusion images had larger EF decrease (p: 0.0001). For the analysis, an EF drop > or = 5% and any wall motion abnormality (WMA) were considered as having an abnormal response to DIP. CAD sensitivity improved significantly to 92.5% when adding EF drop and to 90% when adding WMA parameters, but specificity decreased to 75% with EF drop, and to 58.3% with WMA. In conclusion, first pass parameters from DIP-isometric exercise in addition to perfusion images are not a significant help in the assessment of CAD.