Factors determining the specificity of the tRNA aminoacylation reaction. Non-absolute specificity of tRNA-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase recognition and particular importance of the maximal velocity

Biochemistry of Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetase and tRNAs and Their Engineering for Cell-Free and Synthetic Cell Applications

Cell-free biology is increasingly utilized for engineering biological systems, incorporating novel functionality, and circumventing many of the complications associated with cells. The central dogma describes the information flow in biology consisting of transcription and translation steps to decode genetic information. Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (AARSs) and tRNAs are key components involved in translation and thus protein synthesis. This review provides information on AARSs and tRNA biochemistry, their role in the translation process, summarizes progress in cell-free engineering of tRNAs and AARSs, and discusses prospects and challenges lying ahead in cell-free engineering.

Expansion of the Genetic Code Through the Use of Modified Bacterial Ribosomes

Biological protein synthesis is mediated by the ribosome, and employs ~20 proteinogenic amino acids as building blocks. Through the use of misacylated tRNAs, presently accessible by any of several strategies, it is now possible to employ in vitro and in vivo protein biosynthesis to elaborate proteins containing a much larger variety of amino acid building blocks. However, the incorporation of this broader variety of amino acids is limited to those species utilized by the ribosome. As a consequence, virtually all of the substrates utilized over time have been L-α-amino acids. In recent years, a variety of structural and biochemical studies have provided important insights into those regions of the 23S ribosomal RNA that are involved in peptide bond formation. Subsequent experiments, involving the randomization of key regions of 23S rRNA required for peptide bond formation, have afforded libraries of E. coli harboring plasmids with the rrnB gene modified in the key regions. Selections based on the use of modified puromycin derivatives with altered amino acids then identified clones uniquely sensitive to individual puromycin derivatives. These clones often recognized misacylated tRNAs containing altered amino acids similar to those in the modified puromycins, and incorporated the amino acid analogues into proteins. In this fashion, it has been possible to realize the synthesis of proteins containing D-amino acids, β-amino acids, phosphorylated amino acids, as well as long chain and cyclic amino acids in which the nucleophilic amino group is not in the α-position. Of special interest have been dipeptides and dipeptidomimetics of diverse utility.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are an essential and universally distributed family of enzymes that plays a critical role in protein synthesis, pairing tRNAs with their cognate amino acids for decoding mRNAs according to the genetic code. Synthetases help to ensure accurate translation of the genetic code by using both highly accurate cognate substrate recognition and stringent proofreading of noncognate products. While alterations in the quality control mechanisms of synthetases are generally detrimental to cellular viability, recent studies suggest that in some instances such changes facilitate adaption to stress conditions. Beyond their central role in translation, synthetases are also emerging as key players in an increasing number of other cellular processes, with far-reaching consequences in health and disease. The biochemical versatility of the synthetases has also proven pivotal in efforts to expand the genetic code, further emphasizing the wide-ranging roles of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family in synthetic and natural biology.

Molecular dynamics simulations of cognate and non-cognate AspRS-tRNAAsp complexes

Aspartyl tRNA synthetase (AspRS), one of the 20 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, plays an important role in protein synthesis by catalyzing the aminoacylation reaction and synthesises Aspartyl-tRNA (tRNA^Asp). A typical three-dimensional structure of AspRS comprises three distinct domains for the recognition of cognate tRNA and catalysis, namely, anti-codon binding domain/N-terminal domain, hinge domain and catalytic domain through their interactions with anti-codon loop, D-stem and acceptor arm of cognate tRNA, respectively. In this work, we have studied the structural characteristics of each domain of AspRS to understand the recognition mechanism of tRNA^Asp using molecular dynamics simulations. The dynamics of AspRS-tRNA^Asp complexes from E.coli (cognate and non-cognate), S.cerevisiae (cognate) and T.thermophilus (non-cognate) were compared to understand the differences in recognition of cognate and non-cognate tRNAs. Our results explain that the conformational changes associated with the recognition of tRNA occur only in the cognate complexes. Among the cognate complexes, the conformational changes in yeast AspRS are highly controlled during tRNA^Asp recognition than that of in the E. coli AspRS. Moreover, the functional motions required for the tRNA recognition are observed only in the cognate complexes, and the conformational changes in AspRS and their recognition of tRNA^Asp are organism specific.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

History of tRNA research in strasbourg

The tRNA molecules, in addition to translating the genetic code into protein and defining the second genetic code via their aminoacylation by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, act in many other cellular functions and dysfunctions. This article, illustrated by personal souvenirs, covers the history of ~60 years tRNA research in Strasbourg. Typical examples point up how the work in Strasbourg was a two-way street, influenced by and at the same time influencing investigators outside of France. All along, research in Strasbourg has nurtured the structural and functional diversity of tRNA. It produced massive sequence and crystallographic data on tRNA and its partners, thereby leading to a deeper physicochemical understanding of tRNA architecture, dynamics, and identity. Moreover, it emphasized the role of nucleoside modifications and in the last two decades, highlighted tRNA idiosyncrasies in plants and organelles, together with cellular and health-focused aspects. The tRNA field benefited from a rich local academic heritage and a strong support by both university and CNRS. Its broad interlinks to the worldwide community of tRNA researchers opens to an exciting future. © 2019 IUBMB Life, 2019 © 2019 IUBMB Life, 71(8):1066-1087, 2019.

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases in the Bacterial World

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are modular enzymes globally conserved in the three kingdoms of life. All catalyze the same two-step reaction, i.e., the attachment of a proteinogenic amino acid on their cognate tRNAs, thereby mediating the correct expression of the genetic code. In addition, some aaRSs acquired other functions beyond this key role in translation. Genomics and X-ray crystallography have revealed great structural diversity in aaRSs (e.g., in oligomery and modularity, in ranking into two distinct groups each subdivided in 3 subgroups, by additional domains appended on the catalytic modules). AaRSs show huge structural plasticity related to function and limited idiosyncrasies that are kingdom or even species specific (e.g., the presence in many Bacteria of non discriminating aaRSs compensating for the absence of one or two specific aaRSs, notably AsnRS and/or GlnRS). Diversity, as well, occurs in the mechanisms of aaRS gene regulation that are not conserved in evolution, notably between distant groups such as Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria. The review focuses on bacterial aaRSs (and their paralogs) and covers their structure, function, regulation, and evolution. Structure/function relationships are emphasized, notably the enzymology of tRNA aminoacylation and the editing mechanisms for correction of activation and charging errors. The huge amount of genomic and structural data that accumulated in last two decades is reviewed, showing how the field moved from essentially reductionist biology towards more global and integrated approaches. Likewise, the alternative functions of aaRSs and those of aaRS paralogs (e.g., during cell wall biogenesis and other metabolic processes in or outside protein synthesis) are reviewed. Since aaRS phylogenies present promiscuous bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal features, similarities and differences in the properties of aaRSs from the three kingdoms of life are pinpointed throughout the review and distinctive characteristics of bacterium-like synthetases from organelles are outlined.

MIST, a Novel Approach to Reveal Hidden Substrate Specificity in Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) constitute a family of RNA-binding proteins, that participate in the translation of the genetic code, by covalently linking amino acids to appropriate tRNAs. Due to their fundamental importance for cell life, AARSs are likely to be one of the most ancient families of enzymes and have therefore been characterized extensively. Paradoxically, little is known about their capacity to discriminate tRNAs mainly because of the practical challenges that represent precise and systematic tRNA identification. This work describes a new technical and conceptual approach named MIST (Microarray Identification of Shifted tRNAs) designed to study the formation of tRNA/AARS complexes independently from the aminoacylation reaction. MIST combines electrophoretic mobility shift assays with microarray analyses. Although MIST is a non-cellular assay, it fully integrates the notion of tRNA competition. In this study we focus on yeast cytoplasmic Arginyl-tRNA synthetase (yArgRS) and investigate in depth its ability to discriminate cellular tRNAs. We report that yArgRS in submicromolar concentrations binds cognate and non-cognate tRNAs with a wide range of apparent affinities. In particular, we demonstrate that yArgRS binds preferentially to type II tRNAs but does not support their misaminoacylation. Our results reveal important new trends in tRNA/AARS complex formation and potential deep physiological implications.

Bacterial transfer RNAs

Transfer RNA is an essential adapter molecule that is found across all three domains of life. The primary role of transfer RNA resides in its critical involvement in the accurate translation of messenger RNA codons during protein synthesis and, therefore, ultimately in the determination of cellular gene expression. This review aims to bring together the results of intensive investigations into the synthesis, maturation, modification, aminoacylation, editing and recycling of bacterial transfer RNAs. Codon recognition at the ribosome as well as the ever-increasing number of alternative roles for transfer RNA outside of translation will be discussed in the specific context of bacterial cells.

Enhanced amino acid selection in fully evolved tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase, relative to its urzyme, requires domain motion sensed by the D1 switch, a remote dynamic packing motif

We previously showed (Li, L., and Carter, C. W., Jr. (2013) J. Biol. Chem. 288, 34736-34745) that increased specificity for tryptophan versus tyrosine by contemporary Bacillus stearothermophilus tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (TrpRS) over that of TrpRS Urzyme results entirely from coupling between the anticodon-binding domain and an insertion into the Rossmann-fold known as Connecting Peptide 1. We show that this effect is closely related to a long range catalytic effect, in which side chain repacking in a region called the D1 Switch, accounts fully for the entire catalytic contribution of the catalytic Mg(2+) ion. We report intrinsic and higher order interaction effects on the specificity ratio, (kcat/Km)Trp/(kcat/Km)Tyr, of 15 combinatorial mutants from a previous study (Weinreb, V., Li, L., and Carter, C. W., Jr. (2012) Structure 20, 128-138) of the catalytic role of the D1 Switch. Unexpectedly, the same four-way interaction both activates catalytic assist by Mg(2+) ion and contributes -4.4 kcal/mol to the free energy of the specificity ratio. A minimum action path computed for the induced-fit and catalytic conformation changes shows that repacking of the four residues precedes a decrease in the volume of the tryptophan-binding pocket. We suggest that previous efforts to alter amino acid specificities of TrpRS and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) by mutagenesis without extensive, modular substitution failed because mutations were incompatible with interdomain motions required for catalysis.

Emergence and evolution

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are essential components of the protein synthesis machinery responsible for defining the genetic code by pairing the correct amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. The aaRSs are an ancient enzyme family believed to have origins that may predate the last common ancestor and as such they provide insights into the evolution and development of the extant genetic code. Although the aaRSs have long been viewed as a highly conserved group of enzymes, findings within the last couple of decades have started to demonstrate how diverse and versatile these enzymes really are. Beyond their central role in translation, aaRSs and their numerous homologs have evolved a wide array of alternative functions both inside and outside translation. Current understanding of the emergence of the aaRSs, and their subsequent evolution into a functionally diverse enzyme family, are discussed in this chapter.

Synthetic and editing mechanisms of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) ensure the faithful transmission of genetic information in all living cells. The 24 known aaRS families are divided into 2 structurally distinct classes (class I and class II), each featuring a catalytic domain with a common fold that binds ATP, amino acid, and the 3'-terminus of tRNA. In a common two-step reaction, each aaRS first uses the energy stored in ATP to synthesize an activated aminoacyl adenylate intermediate. In the second step, either the 2'- or 3'-hydroxyl oxygen atom of the 3'-A76 tRNA nucleotide functions as a nucleophile in synthesis of aminoacyl-tRNA. Ten of the 24 aaRS families are unable to distinguish cognate from noncognate amino acids in the synthetic reactions alone. These enzymes possess additional editing activities for hydrolysis of misactivated amino acids and misacylated tRNAs, with clearance of the latter species accomplished in spatially separate post-transfer editing domains. A distinct class of trans-acting proteins that are homologous to class II editing domains also perform hydrolytic editing of some misacylated tRNAs. Here we review essential themes in catalysis with a view toward integrating the kinetic, stereochemical, and structural mechanisms of the enzymes. Although the aaRS have now been the subject of investigation for many decades, it will be seen that a significant number of questions regarding fundamental catalytic functioning still remain unresolved.

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases in the Bacterial World

Aminoacyl-tRNAsynthetases (aaRSs) are modular enzymesglobally conserved in the three kingdoms of life. All catalyze the same two-step reaction, i.e., the attachment of a proteinogenic amino acid on their cognate tRNAs, thereby mediating the correct expression of the genetic code. In addition, some aaRSs acquired other functions beyond this key role in translation.Genomics and X-ray crystallography have revealed great structural diversity in aaRSs (e.g.,in oligomery and modularity, in ranking into two distinct groups each subdivided in 3 subgroups, by additional domains appended on the catalytic modules). AaRSs show hugestructural plasticity related to function andlimited idiosyncrasies that are kingdom or even speciesspecific (e.g.,the presence in many Bacteria of non discriminating aaRSs compensating for the absence of one or two specific aaRSs, notably AsnRS and/or GlnRS).Diversity, as well, occurs in the mechanisms of aaRS gene regulation that are not conserved in evolution, notably betweendistant groups such as Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria.Thereview focuses on bacterial aaRSs (and their paralogs) and covers their structure, function, regulation,and evolution. Structure/function relationships are emphasized, notably the enzymology of tRNA aminoacylation and the editing mechanisms for correction of activation and charging errors. The huge amount of genomic and structural data that accumulatedin last two decades is reviewed,showing how thefield moved from essentially reductionist biologytowards more global and integrated approaches. Likewise, the alternative functions of aaRSs and those of aaRSparalogs (e.g., during cellwall biogenesis and other metabolic processes in or outside protein synthesis) are reviewed. Since aaRS phylogenies present promiscuous bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal features, similarities and differences in the properties of aaRSs from the three kingdoms of life are pinpointedthroughout the reviewand distinctive characteristics of bacterium-like synthetases from organelles are outlined.

Structural diversity and protein engineering of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) are the enzymes that ensure faithful transmission of genetic information in all living cells, and are central to the developing technologies for expanding the capacity of the translation apparatus to incorporate nonstandard amino acids into proteins in vivo. The 24 known aaRS families are divided into two classes that exhibit functional evolutionary convergence. Each class features an active site domain with a common fold that binds ATP, the amino acid, and the 3'-terminus of tRNA, embellished by idiosyncratic further domains that bind distal portions of the tRNA and enhance specificity. Fidelity in the expression of the genetic code requires that the aaRS be selective for both amino acids and tRNAs, a substantial challenge given the presence of structurally very similar noncognate substrates of both types. Here we comprehensively review central themes concerning the architectures of the protein structures and the remarkable dual-substrate selectivities, with a view toward discerning the most important issues that still substantially limit our capacity for rational protein engineering. A suggested general approach to rational design is presented, which should yield insight into the identities of the protein-RNA motifs at the heart of the genetic code, while also offering a basis for improving the catalytic properties of engineered tRNA synthetases emerging from genetic selections.

Competition of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases for tRNA ensures the accuracy of aminoacylation

The accuracy of protein biosynthesis rests on the high fidelity with which aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases discriminate between tRNAs. Correct aminoacylation depends not only on identity elements (nucleotides in certain positions) in tRNA (1), but also on competition between different synthetases for a given tRNA (2). Here we describe in vivo and in vitro experiments which demonstrate how variations in the levels of synthetases and tRNA affect the accuracy of aminoacylation. We show in vivo that concurrent overexpression of Escherichia coli tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase abolishes misacylation of supF tRNA(Tyr) with glutamine in vivo by overproduced glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase. In an in vitro competition assay, we have confirmed that the overproduction mischarging phenomenon observed in vivo is due to competition between the synthetases at the level of aminoacylation. Likewise, we have been able to examine the role competition plays in the identity of a non-suppressor tRNA of ambiguous identity, tRNA(Glu). Finally, with this assay, we show that the identity of a tRNA and the accuracy with which it is recognized depend on the relative affinities of the synthetases for the tRNA. The in vitro competition assay represents a general method of obtaining qualitative information on tRNA identity in a competitive environment (usually only found in vivo) during a defined step in protein biosynthesis, aminoacylation. In addition, we show that the discriminator base (position 73) and the first base of the anticodon are important for recognition by E. coli tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase.

Identification of amino acids in the N-terminal domain of atypical methanogenic-type Seryl-tRNA synthetase critical for tRNA recognition

Seryl-tRNA synthetase (SerRS) from methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina barkeri, contains an idiosyncratic N-terminal domain, composed of an antiparallel beta-sheet capped by a helical bundle, connected to the catalytic core by a short linker peptide. It is very different from the coiled-coil tRNA binding domain in bacterial-type SerRS. Because the crystal structure of the methanogenic-type SerRSxtRNA complex has not been obtained, a docking model was produced, which indicated that highly conserved helices H2 and H3 of the N-terminal domain may be important for recognition of the extra arm of tRNA(Ser). Based on structural information and the docking model, we have mutated various positions within the N-terminal region and probed their involvement in tRNA binding and serylation. Total loss of activity and inability of the R76A variant to form the complex with cognate tRNA identifies Arg(76) located in helix H2 as a crucial tRNA-interacting residue. Alteration of Lys(79) positioned in helix H2 and Arg(94) in the loop between helix H2 and beta-strand A4 have a pronounced effect on SerRSxtRNA(Ser) complex formation and dissociation constants (K(D)) determined by surface plasmon resonance. The replacement of residues Arg(38) (located in the loop between helix H1 and beta-strand A2), Lys(141) and Asn(142) (from H3), and Arg(143) (between H3 and H4) moderately affect both the serylation activity and the K(D) values. Furthermore, we have obtained a striking correlation between these results and in vivo effects of these mutations by quantifying the efficiency of suppression of bacterial amber mutations, after coexpression of the genes for M. barkeri suppressor tRNA(Ser) and a set of mMbSerRS variants in Escherichia coli.

A C-truncated glutamyl-tRNA synthetase specific for tRNA(Glu) is stimulated by its free complementary distal domain: mechanistic and evolutionary implications

Faithful translation of the genetic code is mainly based on the specificity of tRNA aminoacylation catalyzed by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. These enzymes are comprised of a catalytic core and several appended domains. Bacterial glutamyl-tRNA synthetases (GluRS) contain five structural domains, the two distal ones interacting with the anticodon arm of tRNA(Glu). Thermus thermophilus GluRS requires the presence of tRNA(Glu) to bind ATP in the proper site for glutamate activation. In order to test the role of these two distal domains in this mechanism, we characterized the in vitro properties of the C-truncated Escherichia coli GluRSs N(1-313) and N(1-362), containing domains 1-3 and 1-4, respectively, and of their N-truncated complements GluRSs C(314-471) (containing domains 4 and 5) and C(363-471) (free domain 5). These C-truncated GluRSs are soluble, aminoacylate specifically tRNA(Glu), and require the presence of tRNA(Glu) to catalyze the activation of glutamate, as does full-length GluRS(1-471). The k(cat) of tRNA glutamylation catalyzed by N(1-362) is about 2000-fold lower than that catalyzed by the full-length E. coli GluRS(1-471). The addition of free domain 5 (C(363-471)) to N(1-362) strongly stimulates this k(cat) value, indicating that covalent connectivity between N(1-362) and domain 5 is not required for GluRS activity; the hyperbolic relationship between domain 5 concentration and this stimulation indicates that these proteins and tRNA(Glu) form a productive complex with a K(d) of about 100 microM. The K(d) values of tRNA(Glu) interactions with the full-length GluRS and with the truncated GluRSs N(1-362) and free domain 5 are 0.48, 0.11, and about 1.2 microM, respectively; no interaction was detected between these two complementary truncated GluRSs. These results suggest that in the presence of these truncated GluRSs, tRNA(Glu) is positioned for efficient aminoacylation by the two following steps: first, it interacts with GluRS N(1-362) via its acceptor-TPsiC stem loop domain and then with free domain 5 via its anticodon-Dstem-biloop domain, which appeared later during evolution. On the other hand, tRNA glutamylation catalyzed by N(1-313) is not stimulated by its complement C(314-471), revealing the importance of the covalent connectivity between domains 3 and 4 for GluRS aminoacylation activity. The K(m) values of N(1-313) and N(1-362) for each of their substrates are similar to those of full-length GluRS. These C-truncated GluRSs recognize only tRNA(Glu). These results confirm the modular nature of GluRS and support the model of a "recent" fusion of domains 4 and 5 to a proto-GluRS containing the catalytic domain and able to recognize its tRNA substrate(s).

Interaction of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases with tRNA: general principles and distinguishing characteristics of the high-molecular-weight substrate recognition

This review summarizes results of numerous (mainly functional) studies that have been accumulated over recent years on the problem of tRNA recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Development and employment of approaches that use synthetic mutant and chimeric tRNAs have demonstrated general principles underlying highly specific interaction in different systems. The specificity of interaction is determined by a certain number of nucleotides and structural elements of tRNA (constituting the set of recognition elements or specificity determinants), which are characteristic of each pair. Crystallographic structures available for many systems provide the details of the molecular basis of selective interaction. Diversity and identity of biochemical functions of the recognition elements make substantial contribution to the specificity of such interactions.

Kinetic discrimination of tRNA identity by the conserved motif 2 loop of a class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase

The selection of tRNAs by their cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is critical for ensuring the fidelity of protein synthesis. While nucleotides that comprise tRNA identity sets have been readily identified, their specific role in the elementary steps of aminoacylation is poorly understood. By use of a rapid kinetics analysis employing mutants in tRNA(His) and its cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, the role of tRNA identity in aminoacylation was investigated. While mutations in the tRNA anticodon preferentially affected the thermodynamics of initial complex formation, mutations in the acceptor stem or the conserved motif 2 loop of the tRNA synthetase imposed a specific kinetic block on aminoacyl transfer and decreased tRNA-mediated kinetic control of amino acid activation. The mechanistic basis of tRNA identity is analogous to fidelity control by DNA polymerases and the ribosome, whose reactions also demand high accuracy.

Evolutionary conservation of a functionally important backbone phosphate group critical for aminoacylation of histidine tRNAs

All histidine tRNA molecules have an extra nucleotide, G-1, at the 5' end of the acceptor stem. In bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotic organelles, G-1 base pairs with C73, while in eukaryotic cytoplasmic tRNAHis, G-1 is opposite A73. Previous studies of Escherichia coli histidyl-tRNA synthetase (HisRS) have demonstrated the importance of the G-1:C73 base pair to tRNAHis identity. Specifically, the 5'-monophosphate of G-1 and the major groove amine of C73 are recognized by E. coli HisRS; these individual atomic groups each contribute approximately 4 kcal/mol to transition state stabilization. In this study, two chemically synthesized 24-nucleotide RNA microhelices, each of which recapitulates the acceptor stem of either E. coli or Saccharomyces cervisiae tRNAHis, were used to facilitate an atomic group "mutagenesis" study of the -1:73 base pair recognition by S. cerevisiae HisRS. Compared with E. coli HisRS, microhelixHis is a much poorer substrate relative to full-length tRNAHis for the yeast enzyme. However, the data presented here suggest that, similar to the E. coli system, the 5' monophosphate of yeast tRNA(His) is critical for aminoacylation by yeast HisRS and contributes approximately 3 kcal/mol to transition state stability. The primary role of the unique -1:73 base pair of yeast tRNAHis appears to be to properly position the critical 5' monophosphate for interaction with the yeast enzyme. Our data also suggest that the eukaryotic HisRS/tRNAHis interaction has coevolved to rely less on specific major groove interactions with base atomic groups than the bacterial system.

tRNA-balanced expression of a eukaryal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase by an mRNA-mediated pathway

Aminoacylation of transfer RNAs is a key step during translation. It is catalysed by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) and requires the specific recognition of their cognate substrates, one or several tRNAs, ATP and the amino acid. Whereas the control of certain aaRS genes is well known in prokaryotes, little is known about the regulation of eukaryotic aaRS genes. Here, it is shown that expression of AspRS is regulated in yeast by a feedback mechanism that necessitates the binding of AspRS to its messenger RNA. This regulation leads to a synchronized expression of AspRS and tRNA(Asp). The correlation between AspRS expression and mRNA(AspRS) and tRNA(Asp) concentrations, as well as the presence of AspRS in the nucleus, suggests an original regulation mechanism. It is proposed that the surplus of AspRS, not sequestered by tRNA(Asp), is imported into the nucleus where it binds to mRNA(AspRS) and thus inhibits its accumulation.

tRNAs and tRNA mimics as cornerstones of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase regulations

Structural plasticity of transfer RNA (tRNA) molecules is essential for interactions with their biological partners in aminoacylation reactions and during ribosome-dependent protein synthesis. This holds true when tRNAs are recruited for other functions than translation. Here we review regulation pathways where tRNAs and tRNA mimics play a pivotal role. We further discuss the importance of the identity signals used in aminoacylation that are also required to specify regulatory mechanisms. Such mechanisms are diverse and intervene in transcription, splicing and translation. Altogether, the review highlights the many manners architectural features of tRNA were selected by evolution to control biological key processes.

Post-transfer editing in vitro and in vivo by the beta subunit of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase

Translation of the genetic code requires attachment of tRNAs to their cognate amino acids. Errors during amino-acid activation and tRNA esterification are corrected by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase-catalyzed editing reactions, as extensively described for aliphatic amino acids. The contribution of editing to aromatic amino-acid discrimination is less well understood. We show that phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase misactivates tyrosine and that it subsequently corrects such errors through hydrolysis of tyrosyl-adenylate and Tyr-tRNA(Phe). Structural modeling combined with an in vivo genetic screen identified the editing site in the B3/B4 domain of the beta subunit, 40 angstroms from the active site in the alpha subunit. Replacements of residues within the editing site had no effect on Phe-tRNA(Phe) synthesis, but abolished hydrolysis of Tyr-tRNA(Phe) in vitro. Expression of the corresponding mutants in Escherichia coli significantly slowed growth, and changed the activity of a recoded beta-galactosidase variant by misincorporating tyrosine in place of phenylalanine. This loss in aromatic amino-acid discrimination in vivo revealed that editing by phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase is essential for faithful translation of the genetic code.

A yeast arginine specific tRNA is a remnant aspartate acceptor

High specificity in aminoacylation of transfer RNAs (tRNAs) with the help of their cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) is a guarantee for accurate genetic translation. Structural and mechanistic peculiarities between the different tRNA/aaRS couples, suggest that aminoacylation systems are unrelated. However, occurrence of tRNA mischarging by non-cognate aaRSs reflects the relationship between such systems. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, functional links between arginylation and aspartylation systems have been reported. In particular, it was found that an in vitro transcribed tRNAAsp is a very efficient substrate for ArgRS. In this study, the relationship of arginine and aspartate systems is further explored, based on the discovery of a fourth isoacceptor in the yeast genome, tRNA4Arg. This tRNA has a sequence strikingly similar to that of tRNAAsp but distinct from those of the other three arginine isoacceptors. After transplantation of the full set of aspartate identity elements into the four arginine isoacceptors, tRNA4Arg gains the highest aspartylation efficiency. Moreover, it is possible to convert tRNA4Arg into an aspartate acceptor, as efficient as tRNAAsp, by only two point mutations, C38 and G73, despite the absence of the major anticodon aspartate identity elements. Thus, cryptic aspartate identity elements are embedded within tRNA4Arg. The latent aspartate acceptor capacity in a contemporary tRNAArg leads to the proposal of an evolutionary link between tRNA4Arg and tRNAAsp genes.

Single amino acid changes in AspRS reveal alternative routes for expanding its tRNA repertoire in vivo

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are enzymes that are highly specific for their tRNA substrates. Here, we describe the expansion of a class IIb aaRS-tRNA specificity by a genetic selection that involves the use of a modified tRNA displaying an amber anticodon and the argE(amber) and lacZ(amber) reporters. The study was performed on Escherichia coli aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) and amber tRNA(Asp). Nine AspRS mutants able to charge the amber tRNA(Asp) and to suppress the reporter genes were selected from a randomly mutated library. All the mutants exhibited a new amber tRNA(Asp) specificity in addition to the initial native tRNA(Asp). Six mutations were found in the anticodon-binding site located in the N-terminal OB-fold. The strongest suppressor was a mutation of residue Glu-93 that contacts specifically the anticodon nucleotide 34 in the crystal structure. The other mutations in the OB-fold were found at close distance from the anticodon in the so-called loop L45 and strand S1. They concern residues that do not contact tRNA(Asp) in the native complex. In addition, this study shows that suppressors can carry mutations located far from the anticodon-binding site. One such mutation was found in the synthetase hinge-module where it increases the tRNA(Asp)-charging rate, and two other mutations were found in the prokaryotic-specific insertion domain and the catalytic core. These mutants seem to act by indirect effects on the tRNA acceptor stem binding and on the conformation of the active site of the enzyme. Altogether, these data suggest the existence of various ways for modifying the mechanism of tRNA discrimination.

Complementation of yeast Arc1p by the p43 component of the human multisynthetase complex does not require its association with yeast MetRS and GluRS

Yeast Arc1p, human p43 and plant methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MetRS) possess an EMAPII-like domain capable of non-specific interactions with tRNA. Arc1p interacts with MetRS (MES1) and GluRS and operates as a tRNA-interacting factor (tIF) in trans of these two synthetases. In plant MetRS, the EMAPII-like domain is fused to the catalytic core of the synthetase and acts as a cis-acting tIF for aminoacylation. We observed that the catalytic core of plant MetRS expressed from a centromeric plasmid cannot complement a yeast arc1(-) mes1(-) strain. Overexpression of the mutant enzyme from a high-copy number plasmid restored cell growth, suggesting that deletion of its C-terminal tIF domain was responsible for the poor aminoacylation efficiency of that enzyme in vivo. Accordingly, expression of full-size plant MetRS from a centromeric plasmid, but also of fusion proteins between its catalytic core and the EMAPII-like domains of yeast Arc1p or of human p43 restored cell viability. These data showed that homologous tIF domains from different origins are interchangeable and may act indifferently in trans or in cis of the catalytic domain of a synthetase. Unexpectedly, co-expression of Arc1p with the catalytic core of plant MetRS restored cell viability as well, even though Arc1p did not associate with plant MetRS. Because Arc1p also interacts with yeast GluRS, restoration of cell growth could be due at least in part to its role of cofactor for that enzyme. However, co-expression of human p43, a tIF that did not associate with plant MetRS or with yeast GluRS and MetRS, also restored cell viability of a yeast strain that expressed the catalytic core of plant MetRS. These results show that p43 and Arc1p are able to facilitate tRNA aminoacylation in vivo even if they do not interact physically with the synthetases. We propose that p43/Arc1p may be involved in sequestering tRNAs in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells, thereby increasing their availability for protein synthesis.

Two distinct domains of the beta subunit of Aquifex aeolicus leucyl-tRNA synthetase are involved in tRNA binding as revealed by a three-hybrid selection

The Aquifex aeolicus alphabeta-LeuRS is the only known heterodimeric class Ia aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. In this study, we investigated the function of the beta subunit which is believed to bind tRNA(Leu). A yeast three-hybrid system was constructed on the basis of the interaction of the beta subunit with its cognate tRNA(Leu). Then, seven mutated beta subunits exhibiting impaired tRNA binding capacities were selected out from a randomly mutated library. Two mutations were identified in the class Ia-helix-bundle-domain, which might interact with the D-hairpin of the tRNA analogous to other class Ia tRNA:synthetases complexes. The five other mutations were found in the LeuRS-specific C-terminal domain of which the folding is still unknown. tRNA affinity measurements and kinetic analyses performed on the isolated beta subunits and on the co-expressed alphabeta-heterodimers showed for all the mutants an effect in tRNA affinity in the ground state. In addition, an effect on the transition state of the aminoacylation reaction was observed for a 21-residues deletion mutant of the C-terminal end. These results show that the genetic approach of the three hybrid system is widely applicable and is a powerful tool for the investigation of tRNA:synthetase interactions.

The Escherichia coli YadB gene product reveals a novel aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase like activity

In the course of a structural genomics program aiming at solving the structures of Escherichia coli open reading frame products of unknown function, we have determined the structure of YadB at 1.5A using molecular replacement. The YadB protein is 298 amino acid residues long and displays 34% sequence identity with E.coli glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS). It is much shorter than GluRS, which contains 468 residues, and lacks the complete domain interacting with the tRNA anticodon loop. As E.coli GluRS, YadB possesses a Zn2+ located in the putative tRNA acceptor stem-binding domain. The YadB cluster uses cysteine residues as the first three zinc ligands, but has a weaker tyrosine ligand at the fourth position. It shares with canonical amino acid RNA synthetases a major functional feature, namely activation of the amino acid (here glutamate). It differs, however, from GluRSs by the fact that the activation step is tRNA-independent and that it does not catalyze attachment of the activated glutamate to E.coli tRNAGlu, but to another, as yet unknown tRNA. These results suggest thus a novel function, distinct from that of GluRSs, for the yadB gene family.

Yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase binds specifically its own mRNA

Dimeric class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) from yeast has a modular architecture and includes an N-terminal appendix of 70 amino acid residues that protrudes from the anticodon-binding module. This extension, of predicted helical structure, is not essential for aminoacylation but contains an RNA-binding motif that promotes non-specific interactions with tRNAs. As shown here, this protein extension can also interact with the 5' end of the AspRS mRNA. In vitro, optimal binding occurs on an mRNA domain comprising part of the 87 nucleotide long 5'UTR and the sequence encoding the N-terminal appendix. At the protein side, only the appendix and the anticodon-binding module participate in the interaction between AspRS and the mRNA domain. Binding is specific, since only tRNA(Asp) can dissociate the complex. In vivo, AspRS also binds specifically this mRNA domain and in doing so triggers a reduced translation of a fused GFP mRNA. From that, a mechanism for the regulation of this eukaryotic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is proposed. Implications for aspartylation accuracy in yeast are given.

Yeast tRNA(Asp) charging accuracy is threatened by the N-terminal extension of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase

This study evaluates the role of the N-terminal extension from yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase in tRNA aspartylation. The presence of an RNA-binding motif in this extension, conserved in eukaryotic class IIb aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, provides nonspecific tRNA binding properties to this enzyme. Here, it is assumed that the additional contacts the 70 amino acid-long appendix of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase makes with tRNA could be important in expression of aspartate identity in yeast. Using in vitro transcripts mutated at identity positions, it is demonstrated that the extension grants better aminoacylation efficiency but reduced specificity to the synthetase, increasing considerably the risk of noncognate tRNA mischarging. Yeast tRNA(Glu(UUC)) and tRNA(Asn(GUU)) were identified as the most easily mischarged tRNA species. Both have a G at the discriminator position, and their anticodon differs only by one change from the GUC aspartate anticodon.

tRNA discrimination by T. thermophilus phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase at the binding step

The extent of tRNA recognition at the level of binding by Thermus thermophilus phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS), one of the most complex class II synthetases, has been studied by independent measurements of the enzyme association with wild-type and mutant tRNA(Phe)s as well as with non-cognate tRNAs. The data obtained, combined with kinetic data on aminoacylation, clearly show that PheRS exhibits more tRNA selectivity at the level of binding than at the level of catalysis. The anticodon nucleotides involved in base-specific interactions with the enzyme prevail both in the initial binding recognition and in favouring aminoacylation catalysis. Tertiary nucleotides of base pair G19-C56 and base triple U45-G10-C25 contribute primarily to stabilization of the correctly folded tRNA(Phe) structure, which is important for binding. Other nucleotides of the central core (U20, U16 and of the A26-G44 tertiary base pair) are involved in conformational adjustment of the tRNA upon its interaction with the enzyme. The specificity of nucleotide A73, mutation of which slightly reduces the catalytic rate of aminoacylation, is not displayed at the binding step. A few backbone-mediated contacts of PheRS with the acceptor and anticodon stems revealed in the crystal structure do not contribute to tRNA(Phe) discrimination, their role being limited to stabilization of the complex. The highest affinity of T. thermophilus PheRS for cognate tRNA, observed for synthetase-tRNA complexes, results in 100-3000-fold binding discrimination against non-cognate tRNAs.

Transfer RNA-dependent amino acid biosynthesis: an essential route to asparagine formation

Biochemical experiments and genomic sequence analysis showed that Deinococcus radiodurans and Thermus thermophilus do not possess asparagine synthetase (encoded by asnA or asnB), the enzyme forming asparagine from aspartate. Instead these organisms derive asparagine from asparaginyl-tRNA, which is made from aspartate in the tRNA-dependent transamidation pathway [Becker, H. D. & Kern, D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 12832-12837; and Curnow, A. W., Tumbula, D. L., Pelaschier, J. T., Min, B. & Söll, D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 12838-12843]. A genetic knockout disrupting this pathway deprives D. radiodurans of the ability to synthesize asparagine and confers asparagine auxotrophy. The organism's capacity to make asparagine could be restored by transformation with Escherichia coli asnB. This result demonstrates that in Deinococcus, the only route to asparagine is via asparaginyl-tRNA. Analysis of the completed genomes of many bacteria reveal that, barring the existence of an unknown pathway of asparagine biosynthesis, a wide spectrum of bacteria rely on the tRNA-dependent transamidation pathway as the sole route to asparagine.

Domain-domain communication in aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are modular proteins, with domains that have distinct roles in the aminoacylation reaction. The catalytic core is responsible for aminoacyl adenylate formation and transfer of the amino acid to the 3' end of the bound transfer RNA (tRNA). Appended and inserted domains contact portions of the tRNA outside the acceptor site and contribute to the efficiency and specificity of aminoacylation. Some aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases also have distinct editing activities that are localized to unique domains. Efficient aminoacylation and editing require communication between RNA-binding and catalytic domains, and can be considered as a signal transduction system. Here, evidence for domain-domain communication in aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is summarized, together with insights from structural analysis.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis

Aminoacyl-tRNAs are substrates for translation and are pivotal in determining how the genetic code is interpreted as amino acids. The function of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis is to precisely match amino acids with tRNAs containing the corresponding anticodon. This is primarily achieved by the direct attachment of an amino acid to the corresponding tRNA by an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, although intrinsic proofreading and extrinsic editing are also essential in several cases. Recent studies of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis, mainly prompted by the advent of whole genome sequencing and the availability of a vast body of structural data, have led to an expanded and more detailed picture of how aminoacyl-tRNAs are synthesized. This article reviews current knowledge of the biochemical, structural, and evolutionary facets of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis.

The free yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase differs from the tRNA(Asp)-complexed enzyme by structural changes in the catalytic site, hinge region, and anticodon-binding domain

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the specific charging of amino acid residues on tRNAs. Accurate recognition of a tRNA by its synthetase is achieved through sequence and structural signalling. It has been shown that tRNAs undergo large conformational changes upon binding to enzymes, but little is known about the conformational rearrangements in tRNA-bound synthetases. To address this issue the crystal structure of the dimeric class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) from yeast was solved in its free form and compared to that of the protein associated to the cognate tRNA(Asp). The use of an enzyme truncated in N terminus improved the crystal quality and allowed us to solve and refine the structure of free AspRS at 2.3 A resolution. For the first time, snapshots are available for the different macromolecular states belonging to the same tRNA aminoacylation system, comprising the free forms for tRNA and enzyme, and their complex. Overall, the synthetase is less affected by the association than the tRNA, although significant local changes occur. They concern a rotation of the anticodon binding domain and a movement in the hinge region which connects the anticodon binding and active-site domains in the AspRS subunit. The most dramatic differences are observed in two evolutionary conserved loops. Both are in the neighborhood of the catalytic site and are of importance for ligand binding. The combination of this structural analysis with mutagenesis and enzymology data points to a tRNA binding process that starts by a recognition event between the tRNA anticodon loop and the synthetase anticodon binding module.

Misactivated amino acids translocate at similar rates across surface of a tRNA synthetase

Certain aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have a second active site that destroys (by hydrolysis) errors of amino acid activation. For example, isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase misactivates valine (to produce valyl adenylate or Val-tRNA(Ile)) at its active site. The misactivated amino acid is then translocated to an editing site located >25 A away. The role of the misactivated amino acid in determining the rate of translocation is not known. Valyl-tRNA synthetase, a close homolog of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, misactivates threonine, alpha-aminobutyrate, and cysteine. In this paper, we use a recently developed fluorescence-energy-transfer assay to study translocation of misactivated threonine, alpha-aminobutyrate, and cysteine. Although their rates of misactivation are clearly distinct, their rates of translocation are similar. Thus, the rate of translocation is independent of the nature of the misactivated amino acid. This result suggests that the misactivated amino acid per se has little or no role in directing translocation.

Sequence analysis and modular organization of threonyl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus and its interrelation with threonyl-tRNA synthetases of other origins

The gene encoding threonyl-tRNA synthetase (Thr-tRNA synthetase) from the extreme thermophilic eubacterium Thermus thermophilus HB8 has been cloned and sequenced. The ORF encodes a polypeptide chain of 659 amino acids (Mr 75 550) that shares strong similarities with other Thr-tRNA synthetases. Comparative analysis with the three-dimensional structure of other subclass IIa synthetases shows it to be organized into four structural modules: two N-terminal modules specific to Thr-tRNA synthetases, a catalytic core and a C-terminal anticodon-binding module. Comparison with the three-dimensional structure of Escherichia coli Thr-tRNA synthetase in complex with tRNAThr enabled identification of the residues involved in substrate binding and catalytic activity. Analysis by atomic absorption spectrometry of the enzyme overexpressed in E. coli revealed the presence in each monomer of one tightly bound zinc atom, which is essential for activity. Despite strong similarites in modular organization, Thr-tRNA synthetases diverge from other subclass IIa synthetases on the basis of their N-terminal extensions. The eubacterial and eukaryotic enzymes possess a large extension folded into two structural domains, N1 and N2, that are not significantly similar to the shorter extension of the archaebacterial enzymes. Investigation of a truncated Thr-tRNA synthetase demonstrated that domain N1 is not essential for tRNA charging. Thr-tRNA synthetase from T. thermophilus is of the eubacterial type, in contrast to other synthetases from this organism, which exhibit archaebacterial characteristics. Alignments show conservation of part of domain N2 in the C-terminal moiety of Ala-tRNA synthetases. Analysis of the nucleotide sequence upstream from the ORF showed the absence of both any anticodon-like stem-loop structure and a loop containing sequences complementary to the anticodon and the CCA end of tRNAThr. This means that the expression of Thr-tRNA synthetase in T. thermophilus is not regulated by the translational and trancriptional mechanisms described for E. coli thrS and Bacillus subtilis thrS and thrZ. Here we discuss our results in the context of evolution of the threonylation systems and of the position of T. thermophilus in the phylogenic tree.

Yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase residues interacting with tRNA(Asp) identity bases connectively contribute to tRNA(Asp) binding in the ground and transition-state complex and discriminate against non-cognate tRNAs

Crystallographic studies of the aspartyl-tRNA synthetase-tRNA(Asp)complex from yeast identified on the enzyme a number of residues potentially able to interact with tRNA(Asp). Alanine replacement of these residues (thought to disrupt the interactions) was used in the present study to evaluate their importance in tRNA(Asp)recognition and acylation. The results showed that contacts with the acceptor A of tRNA(Asp)by amino acid residues interacting through their side-chain occur only in the acylation transition state, whereas those located near the G73 discriminator base occur also during initial binding of tRNA(Asp). Interactions with the anticodon bases provide the largest free energy contribution to stability of the enzyme-tRNA complex in its ground state. These contacts also favour catalysis, by acting connectively with each other and with those of G73, as shown by multiple mutant analysis. This implies structural communication transmitting the anticodon recognition signal to the distally located acylation site. This signal might be conveyed via tRNA(Asp)as suggested by the observed conformational change of this molecule upon interaction with AspRS. From binding free energy values corresponding to the different AspRS-tRNA(Asp)interaction domains, it might be concluded that upon complex formation, the anticodon interacts first. Finally, acylation efficiencies of AspRS mutants in the presence of pure tRNA(Asp)and non-fractionated tRNAs indicate that residues involved in the binding of identity bases also discriminate against non-cognate tRNAs.

L-arginine recognition by yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase

The crystal structure of arginyl-tRNA synthetase (ArgRS) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS), with L-arginine bound to the active site has been solved at 2.75 A resolution and refined to a crystallographic R-factor of 19.7%. ArgRS is composed predominantly of alpha-helices and can be divided into five domains, including the class I-specific active site. The N-terminal domain shows striking similarity to some completely unrelated proteins and defines a module which should participate in specific tRNA recognition. The C-terminal domain, which is the putative anticodon-binding module, displays an all-alpha-helix fold highly similar to that of Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase. While ArgRS requires tRNAArg for the first step of the aminoacylation reaction, the results show that its presence is not a prerequisite for L-arginine binding. All H-bond-forming capability of L-arginine is used by the protein for the specific recognition. The guanidinium group forms two salt bridge interactions with two acidic residues, and one H-bond with a tyrosine residue; these three residues are strictly conserved in all ArgRS sequences. This tyrosine is also conserved in other class I aaRS active sites but plays several functional roles. The ArgRS structure allows the definition of a new framework for sequence alignments and subclass definition in class I aaRSs.

Structural requirements of tRNALys for its import into yeast mitochondria

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, one of the two cytoplasmic lysine tRNAs, tRNACUULys, is partially associated with the mitochondrial matrix. Mitochondrial import of this tRNA requires binding to the precursor of the mitochondrial lysyl-tRNA synthetase, pre-MSK, and aminoacylation by the cytoplasmic lysyl-tRNA synthetase, KRS, appears to be a prerequisite for this binding. The second lysine isoacceptor tRNAmnmLys5s2UUU [where 5-[(methylamino)-methyl]-2-thiouridine is mnm5s2U] is exclusively localized in the cytoplasm. To study import determinants within the tRNACUULys molecule, we introduced a panel of replacements in the original sequences of the imported and nonimported lysine tRNAs that correspond to domains or individual residues that differ between these two isoacceptors. The mutant transcripts were tested for import, aminoacylation, and binding to pre-MSK. Import and aminoacylation efficiencies correlate well for the majority of mutant transcripts. However, some poorly aminoacylated transcripts were rather efficiently imported. Surprisingly, these transcripts retained binding capacity to pre-MSK. In fact, all imported transcripts retained pre-MSK binding capacity but nonimported versions did not, suggesting that this binding, rather than aminoacylation, is essential for import. Substitution of the anticodon arm of tRNACUULys with that of tRNAmnmLys5s2UUU abolished import without affecting aminoacylation. A version of tRNAmnmLys5s2UUU with an anticodon CUU was efficiently imported in vitro and was also found to be imported in vivo. This implies that the anticodon arm, especially position 34, is important for recognition by the import machinery. A nicked tRNACUULys transcript is still imported but its import requires reannealing of the two tRNA moieties, which implies that tRNACUULys is imported as a folded molecule.

A conserved domain within Arc1p delivers tRNA to aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Two yeast enzymes that catalyze aminoacylation of tRNAs, MetRS and GluRS, form a complex with the protein Arc1p. We show here that association of Arc1p with MetRS and GluRS is required in vivo for effective recruitment of the corresponding cognate tRNAs within this complex. Arc1p is linked to MetRS and GluRS through its amino-terminal domain, while its middle and carboxy-terminal parts comprise a novel tRNA-binding domain. This results in high affinity binding of cognate tRNAs and increased aminoacylation efficiency. These findings suggest that Arc1p operates as a mobile, trans-acting tRNA-binding synthetase domain and provide new insight into the role of eukaryotic multimeric synthetase complexes.

Mirror image alternative interaction patterns of the same tRNA with either class I arginyl-tRNA synthetase or class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase

Gene cloning, overproduction and an efficient purification protocol of yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase (ArgRS) as well as the interaction patterns of this protein with cognate tRNAArgand non-cognate tRNAAspare described. This work was motivated by the fact that the in vitro transcript of tRNAAspis of dual aminoacylation specificity and is not only aspartylated but also efficiently arginylated. The crystal structure of the complex between class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) and tRNAAsp, as well as early biochemical data, have shown that tRNAAspis recognized by its variable region side. Here we show by footprinting with enzymatic and chemical probes that transcribed tRNAAspis contacted by class I ArgRS along the opposite D arm side, as is homologous tRNAArg, but with idiosyncratic interaction patterns. Besides protection, footprints also show enhanced accessibility of the tRNAs to the structural probes, indicative of conformational changes in the complexed tRNAs. These different patterns are interpreted in relation to the alternative arginine identity sets found in the anticodon loops of tRNAArgand tRNAAsp. The mirror image alternative interaction patterns of unmodified tRNAAspwith either class I ArgRS or class II AspRS, accounting for the dual identity of this tRNA, are discussed in relation to the class defining features of the synthetases. This study indicates that complex formation between unmodified tRNAAspand either ArgRS and AspRS is solely governed by the proteins.

Aspartate identity of transfer RNAs

Structure/function relationships accounting for specific tRNA charging by class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Escherichia coli and Thermus thermophilus are reviewed. Effects directly linked to tRNA features are emphasized and aspects about synthetase contribution in expression of tRNA(Asp) identity are also covered. Major identity nucleotides conferring aspartate specificity to yeast, E coli and T thermophilus tRNAs comprise G34, U35, C36, C38 and G73, a set of nucleotides conserved in tRNA(Asp) molecules of other biological origin. Aspartate specificity can be enhanced by negative discrimination preventing, eg mischarging of native yeast tRNA(Asp by yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase. In the yeast system crystallography shows that identity nucleotides are in contact with identity amino acids located in the catalytic and anticodon binding domains of the synthetase. Specificity of RNA/protein interaction involves a conformational change of the tRNA that optimizes the H-bonding potential of the identity signals on both partners of the complex. Mutation of identity nucleotides leads to decreased aspartylation efficiencies accompanied by a loss of specific H-bonds and an altered adaptation of tRNA on the synthetase. Species-specific characteristics of aspartate systems are the number, location and nature of minor identity signals. These features and the structural variations in aspartate tRNAs and synthetases are correlated with mechanistic differences in the aminoacylation reactions catalyzed by the various aspartyl-tRNA synthetases. The reality of the aspartate identity set is verified by its functional expression in a variety of RNA frameworks. Inversely a number of identities can be expressed within a tRNA(Asp) framework. From this emerged the concept of the RNA structural frameworks underlying expression of identities which is illustrated with data obtained with engineered tRNAs. Efficient aspartylation of minihelices is explained by the primordial role of G73. From this and other considerations it is suggested that aspartate identity appeared early in the history of tRNA aminoacylation systems.