Survival to discharge following open chest cardiac compression (OCCC). A 4-year retrospective audit in a cardiothoracic specialist centre--Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, United Kingdom

Simulation Training for Emergency Sternotomy in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Emergency resternotomy in the intensive care unit for a patient who has undergone cardiac surgery can be daunting for surgeons and critical care staff. Clinicians involved are often unfamiliar with the surgical instruments and techniques needed.

LOCAL PROBLEM

After an emergency intensive care unit resternotomy resulted in suboptimal performance and outcome, protocols for emergency resternotomy were established and improved.

METHODS

Education and simulation training were used to improve staff comfort and familiarity with the needed techniques and supplies. The training intervention included simulations to provide hands-on experience, improve staff familiarity with resternotomy trays, and streamline emergency sternotomy protocols. Preintervention and postintervention surveys were used to assess participants' familiarity with the implemented plans and algorithms.

RESULTS

All 44 participants (100%) completed the preintervention survey, and 41 of 44 participants (93%) returned the postintervention survey. After the intervention, 95% of respondents agreed that they were prepared to be members of the team for an emergency intensive care unit sternotomy, compared with 52% of respondents before the intervention. After the intervention, 95% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that they could identify patients who might need emergency sternotomy, compared with 50% before the intervention. The results also showed improvement in staff members' understanding of team roles, activation and use of the emergency sternotomy protocol, and differences between guidelines for resuscitating patients who experience cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery and the post-cardiac arrest Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support protocol.

CONCLUSION

Results of this quality improvement project suggest that simulation training improves staff comfort with and understanding of emergency resternotomy.

Resuscitation after cardiac surgery awareness: an Egyptian national survey

Background

Cardiac surgery patients have different resuscitative needs than other patients who experience in-hospital cardiac arrest; this was addressed in the guidelines. However, it is unknown how widely the guidelines are practiced, or a training protocol is followed in different cardiac surgery units in Egypt.

Methods

A 21-question survey was created and included: Participant demographics, prevalence of cardiac arrest, cardiac arrest protocol, emergency resternotomy technique, training protocols. Survey was disseminated through social media messaging platforms during the period between November 2020 and January 2021.

Results

Ninety-five responses were from 11 centres across Egypt. In total, 68.5% of the respondents were surgeons, 76.8% of participants were junior surgeons. For patients who go into VF after cardiac surgery, respondents would attempt a median of 3 shocks with only 24.2% commencing defibrillation shocks before external cardiac massage, whilst the majority initiating CPR immediately and performing emergency resternotomy in a median time of 10 min. In total, 56.8% would give 1 mg of adrenaline as soon as the cardiac arrest was established. If a surgeon was not available, only 36.8% of respondents would allow any trained personnel to perform the emergency resternotomy. Only 9.5% practice regularly on emergency sternotomies. Seventy-five percent think tailored training is important and staff should be oriented about it in the future.

Conclusion

An action plan is required to improve the training of the junior surgeons regarding the Cardiac Advanced Life Support Protocol to implement it in a timely organised manner. This should be endorsed and audited by a national society or body by keeping a national registry and mandatory recertification.

Cardiac Surgical Resuscitation: State of the Science

Cardiac surgical patients risk arrest from tamponade, profound bleeding, and hypovolemia, typically occurring within hours of intensive care admission and associated with diminished response to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The Society of Thoracic Surgeons' evidence-based Expert Consensus Statement establishes a new standard for postsurgery arrest management, prioritizing defibrillation or pacing before CPR, restricting epinephrine use, and calling for prompt resternotomy if initial efforts fail. The protocol is summarized in a simple algorithm replacing advanced cardiac life support. This US cardiac surgical resuscitation standard is aligned with worldwide guidelines. Important information for protocol adoption and training is provided.

Predicting cardiovascular intensive care unit readmission after cardiac surgery: derivation and validation of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) cardiovascular intensive care unit clinical prediction model from a registry cohort of 10,799 surgical cases

Introduction

In medical and surgical intensive care units, clinical risk prediction models for readmission have been developed; however, studies reporting the risks for cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) readmission have been methodologically limited by small numbers of outcomes, unreported measures of calibration or discrimination, or a lack of information spanning the entire perioperative period. The purpose of this study was to derive and validate a clinical prediction model for CVICU readmission in cardiac surgical patients.

Methods

A total of 10,799 patients more than or equal to 18 years in the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry who underwent cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass or valvular surgery) between 2004 and 2012 and were discharged alive from the first CVICU admission were included. The full cohort was used to derive the clinical prediction model and the model was internally validated with bootstrapping. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using the AUC c index and the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, respectively.

Results

A total of 479 (4.4%) patients required CVICU readmission. The mean CVICU length of stay (19.9 versus 3.3 days, P <0.001) and in-hospital mortality (14.4% versus 2.2%, P <0.001) were higher among patients readmitted to the CVICU. In the derivation cohort, a total of three preoperative (age ≥70, ejection fraction, chronic lung disease), two intraoperative (single valve repair or replacement plus non-CABG surgery, multivalve repair or replacement), and seven postoperative variables (cardiac arrest, pneumonia, pleural effusion, deep sternal wound infection, leg graft harvest site infection, gastrointestinal bleed, neurologic complications) were independently associated with CVICU readmission. The clinical prediction model had robust discrimination and calibration in the derivation cohort (AUC c index = 0.799; Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.192). The validation point estimates and confidence intervals were similar to derivation model.

Conclusions

In a large population-based dataset incorporating a comprehensive set of perioperative variables, we have derived a clinical prediction model with excellent discrimination and calibration. This model identifies opportunities for targeted therapeutic interventions aimed at reducing CVICU readmissions in high-risk patients.

Resuscitative thoracotomies and open chest cardiac compressions in non-traumatic cardiac arrest

Since the popularisation of closed chest cardiac compressions in the 1960s, open chest compressions in non-traumatic cardiac arrest have become a largely forgotten art. Today, open chest compressions are only rarely performed outside operating theatres. Early defibrillation and high quality closed chest compressions is the dominating gold standard for the layman on the street as well as for the resuscitation specialist. In this paper we argue that the concept of open chest direct cardiac compressions in non-traumatic cardiac arrest should be revisited and that it might be due for a revival. Numerous studies demonstrate how open chest cardiac compressions are superior to closed chest compressions in regards to physiological parameters and outcomes. Thus, by incorporating resuscitative thoracotomies and open chest compressions in our algorithms for non-traumatic cardiac arrest we may improve outcomes.

Therapeutic Hypothermia after Perioperative Cardiac Arrest in Cardiac Surgical Patients

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) has been established as an effective treatment for preserving neurological function after out of hospital cardiac arrest (CA). Use of TH has been limited in cardiac surgery patients in particular because of concern about adverse effects such as hemorrhage and dysrhythmia. Little published data describe efficacy or safety of TH in cardiac surgical patients who suffer unintentional CA. However, the benefits of TH are such as may suggest clinical equipoise, even in this high risk patient population. OBJECTIVE: To report a series of three patients in our institution's cardiac surgery intensive care unit who suffered unintentional CA within 48 hours of cardiac surgery and were treated with TH. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, study patients were identified by diagnosis of undesired intraoperative CA or arrest on ICU days 1-2, as well as having documented TH. The institution's electronic medical record and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database were retrospectively reviewed for demographic information, comorbid diagnoses, surgical procedure, and outcomes including hemorrhage, re-warming dysrhythmias, infection, in-hospital mortality, and neurologic outcome were assessed. TH was initiated and monitored using active cooling pads according to written institutional protocol. RESULTS: Four patients received TH after perioperative arrest. One patient was inadequately cooled and had massive surgical bleeding, and was therefore excluded from this review. The remaining three patients had a predicted mortality of 14.6% (±13.3) based on Euroscore calculation, and were cooled for 17.6±4.0 hours after CA. Coagulopathy, hypovolemia, severe electrolyte abnormalities, and re-warming dysrhythmias were not identified in any patient. 2 patients were discharged home and 1 was discharged to a long-term care facility. CONCLUSION: Herein we report the safe and successful use of TH after unintentional perioperative CA in 3 cardiac surgery patients. These data suggest that further investigation of this therapy may be warranted given the potential benefit and apparent safety in a small series.

Six-year prospective audit of 'scoop and run' for chest-reopening after cardiac arrest in a cardiac surgical ward setting

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to identify which cardiac surgical ward patients benefit from 'scoop and run' to the operating room for chest reopening.

METHODS

In-hospital arrests in a cardiothoracic hospital were prospectively audited over a 6-year period. The following pieces of information were collected for every patient who was scooped to the operating room following cardiac arrest on the postoperative cardiac surgical wards: type of arrest, time since surgery, patient physiology before arrest, time to chest reopening, location of chest opening, surgical findings on reopening, time to cardiopulmonary bypass (if used) and patient outcomes.

EXCLUSIONS

arrests in intensive care unit (ICU) and operating rooms. The primary outcome measure was survival to discharge from the hospital.

RESULTS

There were 99 confirmed ward arrests in 97 cardiac surgical patients. The overall survival rates to discharge and at 1 year were 53.6% (52 of 97 patients) and 44.3% (43 of 97 patients), respectively. Twenty-one of the 97 (21.6%) patients underwent scoop and run to the operating room or ICU. Five of 12 daytime 'scoop and runs' survived to discharge, whereas none of nine survived where scoop and run was undertaken at night (P < 0.05). There was a trend towards increased survival when 'scoop and run' was undertaken following ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia arrests (P = 0.06) and in younger patients (P = 0.12) but neither achieved statistical significance. The median time out from surgery of survivors was 4 days (range 2-14 days). The median time to chest opening in survivors was 22 min. Cardiopulmonary bypass was utilized in four of five survivors. The median ICU and hospital lengths of stay were 176 h (range 34-857) and 28 days (range 13-70), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The key determinant of a favourable 'scoop and run' outcome was whether the arrest occurred during daytime or night-time hours (P < 0.05). Despite a median time to chest opening of 22 min, all five survivors were discharged neurologically intact. The median time from surgery in these survivors was 4 days. Because of the risk of hypoxic brain damage, 'scoop and run' should be restricted to patients suffering witnessed arrests. The study has potential implications for resuscitation training and out-of-hours medical staffing in cardiothoracic hospitals.

Part 7: CPR techniques and devices: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

A variety of CPR techniques and devices may improve hemodynamics or short-term survival when used by well-trained providers in selected patients. All of these techniques and devices have the potential to delay chest compressions and defibrillation. In order to prevent delays and maximize efficiency, initial training, ongoing monitoring, and retraining programs should be offered to providers on a frequent and ongoing basis. To date, no adjunct has consistently been shown to be superior to standard conventional (manual) CPR for out-of-hospital basic life support, and no device other than a defibrillator has consistently improved long-term survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

In Situ Simulation-based Team Training for Post-cardiac Surgical Emergency Chest Reopen in the Intensive Care Unit

Emergency chest reopen of the post cardiac surgical patient in the intensive care unit is a high-stakes but infrequent procedure which requires a high-level team response and a unique skill set. We evaluated the impact on knowledge and confidence of team-based chest reopen training using a patient simulator compared with standard video-based training. We evaluated 49 medical and nursing participants before and after training using a multiple choice questions test and a questionnaire of self-reported confidence in performing or assisting with emergency reopen.

Both video- and simulation-based training significantly improved results in objective and subjective domains. Although the post-test scores did not differ between the groups for either the objective (P=0.28) or the subjective measures (P=0.92), the simulation-based training produced a numerically larger improvement in both domains. In a multiple choice question out of 10, participants improved by a mean of 1.9 marks with manikin-based training compared to 0.9 with video training (P=0.03). On a questionnaire out of 20 assessing subjective levels of confidence, scores improved by 3.9 with manikin training compared to 1.2 with video training (P=0.002).

Simulation-based training appeared to be at least as effective as video-based training in improving both knowledge and confidence in post cardiac surgical emergency resternotomy.

[The new 2005 resuscitation guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council: comments and supplements]

The new CPR guidelines are based on a scientific consensus which was reached by 281 international experts. Chest compressions (100/min, 4-5 cm deep) should be performed in a ratio of 30:2 with ventilation (tidal volume 500 ml, Ti 1 s, FIO2 if possible 1.0). After a single defibrillation attempt (initially biphasic 150-200 J, monophasic 360 J, subsequently with the respective highest energy), chest compressions are initiated again immediately for 2 min. Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard; other airway devices may be employed as well depending on individual skills. Drug administration routes for adults and children: first choice IV, second choice intraosseous, third choice endobronchial [epinephrine dose 2-3x (adults) or 10x (pediatric patients) higher than IV]. Vasopressors: 1 mg epinephrine every 3-5 min IV. After the third unsuccessful defibrillation attempt amiodarone IV (300 mg); repetition (150 mg) possible. Sodium bicarbonate (1 ml/kg 8.4%) only in excessive hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, or intoxication with tricyclic antidepressants. Consider atropine (3 mg) and aminophylline (5 mg/kg). Thrombolysis during spontaneous circulation only in myocardial infarction or massive pulmonary embolism; during CPR only during massive pulmonary embolism. Cardiopulmonary bypass only after cardiac surgery, hypothermia or intoxication. Pediatrics: best improvement in outcome by preventing cardiocirculatory collapse. Alternate chest thumps and chest compression (infants), or abdominal compressions (>1-year-old) in foreign body airway obstruction. Initially five breaths, followed by chest compressions (100/min; approximately 1/3 of chest diameter): ventilation ratio 15:2. Treatment of potentially reversible causes (4 "Hs", "HITS": hypoxia, hypovolemia, hypo- and hyperkaliemia, hypothermia, cardiac tamponade, intoxication, thrombo-embolism, tension pneumothorax). Epinephrine 10 microg/kg IV or intraosseously, or 100 microg (endobronchially) every 3-5 min. Defibrillation (4 J/kg; monophasic oder biphasic) followed by 2 min CPR, then ECG and pulse check. Newborns: inflate the lungs with bag-valve mask ventilation. If heart rate<60/min chest compressions:ventilation ratio 3:1 (120 chest compressions/min). Postresuscitation phase: initiate mild hypothermia [32-34 degrees C for 12-24 h; slow rewarming (<0.5 degrees C/h)]. Prediction of CPR outcome is not possible at the scene; determining neurological outcome within 72 h after cardiac arrest with evoked potentials, biochemical tests and physical examination. Even during low suspicion for an acute coronary syndrome, record a prehospital 12-lead ECG. In parallel to pain therapy, aspirin (160-325 mg PO or IV) and in addition clopidogrel (300 mg PO). As antithrombin, heparin (60 IU/kg, max. 4000 IU) or enoxaparine. In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, define reperfusion strategy depending on duration of symptoms until PCI (prevent delay>90 min until PCI). Stroke is an emergency and needs to be treated in a stroke unit. A CT scan is the most important evaluation, MRT may replace a CT scan. After hemorrhage exclusion, thrombolysis within 3 h of symptom onset (0.9 mg/kg rt-PA IV; max 90 mg within 60 min, 10% of the entire dosage as initial bolus, no aspirin, no heparin within the first 24 h). In severe hemorrhagic shock, definite control of bleeding is the most important goal. For successful CPR of trauma patients, a minimal intravascular volume status and management of hypoxia are essential. Aggressive fluid resuscitation, hyperventilation, and excessive ventilation pressure may impair outcome in severe hemorrhagic shock. Despite bad prognosis, CPR in trauma patients may be successful in select cases. Any CPR training is better than nothing; simplification of contents and processes remains important.

The Cardiac Surgery Advanced Life Support Course (CALS): Delivering Significant Improvements in Emergency Cardiothoracic Care

BACKGROUND

A 3-day cardiac surgery advanced life support course was designed with a series of protocols to manage critically ill cardiac surgical patients and patients who suffer a cardiac arrest. We sought to determine the effect of this course on the management of simulated critically ill and cardiac arrest patients.

METHODS

Twenty-four candidates participated in the course. Critically ill patients were simulated using intubated mannikins, with lines and drains in situ, and a laptop with an intensive care unit monitor simulation program. Candidates were tested before and after the course with rigidly predesigned clinical situations. Candidates were split into groups of 6, and cardiac arrests were simulated in the same fashion, with all required surgical equipment immediately available. All scenarios were videotaped, and after blinding, an independent surgeon assessed the times to achieve predetermined clinical endpoints.

RESULTS

The time to successful definitive treatment was significantly faster postcourse for the critically ill patient scenarios: (565 secs [SD 27 secs] precourse, compared with 303 secs [SD 24 secs] postcourse; p < 0.0005). In addition, the times taken to achieve a wide range of predetermined objectives, including airway check, assessing breathing, circulation assessment, treating with oxygen, appropriate treatment of the circulation, and requesting blood gases, chest radiographs, and electrocardiograms, were also significantly faster in the postcourse scenarios. Times to successful chest reopening and internal cardiac massage were also significantly improved in cardiac arrest patients: (451 secs [SD 39 secs] precourse and 228 secs [SD 17 secs] postcourse; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Structured training and practice in the management of critically ill cardiac surgical patients and patients suffering a cardiac arrest leads to significant improvements in the speed and quality of care for these patients.

Open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation: past, present and future

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests account for approximately 1000 sudden cardiac deaths per day in the United States. Since its introduction in 1960 closed-chest cardiac massage (CCCM) often takes place as an attempt at resuscitation, although its survival rates are low. Other resuscitation techniques are available to physicians such as open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OCCPR). OCCPR has been shown by several scientists to be hemodynamically superior to CCCM as it increases arterial pressures, cardiac output, coronary perfusion pressures, return of spontaneous circulation and cerebral blood flow. Improved neurological and cardiovascular outcome and an increase in survival rate compared to CCCM have been described. Timing is one of the key variables in determining patient outcome when performing OCCPR. The American Heart Association in association with the International Liaison Committee (ILCOR) has specific indications for the use of OCCPR. Some investigators recommend starting OCCPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests on arrival at the scene instead of CCCM. Surprisingly, the incidence of infectious complications after thoracotomy in an unprepared chest is low. The vast majority of the patients' families accept OCCPR as a therapeutic choice for cardiac arrests and it has been showed to be economically viable. This paper reviews some of the basic and advanced concepts of this evolving technique.