Incidence of cleft lip and cleft palate in 39,696 Japanese babies born during 1983

Evaluation of the Effects of Cheiloplasty on Maxillary Arch in UCLP Infants Using Three-Dimensional Digital Models

OBJECTIVE

To analyze and identify changes in the maxillary dental arch before and after cheiloplasty in a group of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP) infants.

DESIGN

This is a cohort study.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Study models from 16 infants with nonsyndromic UCLP, who were treated at Khon Kaen University, were taken before (T1) and after cheiloplasty (T2). The dental models underwent a process of scanning through a 3D scanner, from which 9 linear and 2 angular landmarks were evaluated. Paired t test was used to compare the measurement statistically between T1 and T2.

RESULTS

Alveolar cleft gap (G-L), anterior basal angle (∠GC-CC'), and anterior arch curvature angle on greater segment (∠GIC) were significantly decreased (P < .05). Contrarily, anterior ridge length of greater segment (C-I), anterior ridge length of lesser segment (L-C'), and posterior arch width (T-T') were significantly increased (P < .05) after cheiloplasty. While, anterior portion of greater segment (I-G), anterior arch width (C-C'), anterior arch depth (I⊥CC'), arch length (G⊥TT'), and arch circumference (T-C-I-G-L-C'-T') showed no significant difference. The measurements were tested using the Intraclass correlation coefficient. The coefficients indicated high reliability.

CONCLUSION

Cleft gap significantly decreased after lip repair, and the anterior part of maxillary dental arch was also bent palatally after cheiloplasty without any other intervention except cheiloplasty. More studies are needed to assess the amount of lip pressure. If any convincing force is presented, an appliance to prevent undesirable pressure is indicated.

Trends in Rhinoplasty Research: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty is a popular aesthetic and reconstructive surgical procedure. It is one of the top five surgical cosmetic procedures performed worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate global trends in rhinoplasty research spanning 20 years between 1994 and 2013.

METHODS

The top 15 plastic surgery and otolaryngology journals containing rhinoplasty research were determined using impact factors (IF). A database of rhinoplasty articles from 1994 to 2013 was created to include the following classifications: IF, authors' geographic location, study design, level of evidence (LOE), and pertinence to aesthetic or reconstructive rhinoplasty. Productivity index and productivity share were calculated for each region.

RESULTS

A total of 1244 rhinoplasty articles were included in the database. The mean IF among the 15 journals increased from 0.75 in 1994 to 1.90 in 2013 (p < 0.001). The majority of rhinoplasty publications were clinical in study design (91.0%) and were predominantly of weaker LOE (level IV: 42.4%; level V: 33.2%). The USA led in proportion of total rhinoplasty publications by volume and productivity index (37.9%, 41.2%), followed by Asia (29.1%, 28.2%) and Western Europe (18.8%, 18.2%). The majority of articles published were classified as aesthetic (60.4%), whereas 30.6% were reconstructive; there was a significant increase in the proportion of aesthetic rhinoplasty articles published per year (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The USA has consistently been the most productive country in rhinoplasty research. However, its lead has diminished over the last 20 years. The trend in rhinoplasty research appears to be toward aesthetic rather than reconstructive topics. Attention should be given to producing stronger LOE studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Assessment of Patients’ Level of Satisfaction with Cleft Treatment Using the Cleft Evaluation Profile

Objectives:

Determination of the psychosocial status and assessment of the level of satisfaction in Malaysian cleft palate patients and their parents.

Design:

Cross-sectional study.

Participants and Methods:

Sixty cleft lip and palate patients (12 to 17 years of age) from Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia and their parents were selected. The questionnaires used were the Child Interview Schedule, the Parents Interview Schedule, and the Cleft Evaluation Profile (CEP), administered via individual interviews.

Results:

Patients were teased because of their clefts and felt their self-confidence was affected by the cleft condition. They were frequently teased about cleft-related features such as speech, teeth, and lip appearance. Parents also reported that their children were being teased because of their clefts and that their children's self-confidence was affected by the clefts. Both showed a significant level of satisfaction with the treatment provided by the cleft team. There was no significant difference between the responses of the patients and their parents. The features that were found to be most important for the patients and their parents, in decreasing order of priority, were teeth, nose, lips, and speech.

Conclusions:

Cleft lip and/or palate patients were teased because of their clefts, and it affected their self-confidence. The Cleft Evaluation Profile is a reliable and useful tool to assess patients’ level of satisfaction with treatment received for cleft lip and/or palate and can identify the types of cleft-related features that are most important for the patients.

Asian Oral-Facial Cleft Birth Prevalence

Objective:

To determine the clefting birth prevalence among Asian populations, specifically Chinese and Japanese, using raw counts from nonoverlapping published studies of Asian populations, and to investigate whether Asian clefting rates have been interpreted accurately as being up to twice the Caucasian rate.

Design:

A literature review of articles giving raw counts of clefting in Asian populations, primarily Japanese and Chinese.

Main Outcome Measures:

Where possible, clefts were identified by the patients’ ethnicity, country of origin, cleft type, syndromic status, and birth status.

Results:

Prevalence rates of cleft lip with or without cleft palate per 1000 live births are reported. Syndromic plus nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: Chinese, 1.30; Japanese, 1.34; Other Asian, 1.47; and total, 1.33. Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: Chinese, 1.20; Japanese, 1.18; Other Asian, 1.22; and total, 1.19.

Conclusions:

Overall, Chinese and Japanese live birth prevalence rates for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate, based on the published reports of birth prevalence, are significantly lower than the oft-quoted rate of 2 per 1000 for Asians. The apparent reason for the discrepancy is that many published prevalence rates included all pregnancies (live births plus pregnancy losses) and do not distinguish between syndromic and nonsyndromic clefts or between cleft palate alone and cleft lip with or without cleft palate. These results demonstrate that it is extremely important for current population-based studies of clefts to include careful delineation of population groups, syndromes, cleft type, and birth status.

Chromosome 17: gene mapping studies of cleft lip with or without cleft palate in Chinese families

OBJECTIVE

Involvement of loci on chromosome 17, including retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARA) in nonsyndromic oral clefts has been reported in Caucasian populations, although never investigated in Asian populations. The purpose of the present study was to investigate several loci on chromosome 17, including RARA, in Chinese families.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-six multiplex families (310 individuals), ascertained through nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate surgical probands from hospitals in Shanghai, China, participated in the present study. There were 23 families whose probands had cleft lip and cleft palate (CLP) and 13 with cleft lip alone (CL).

RESULTS

Seventeen markers, spanning chromosome 17 and about 10 cM apart were assessed. Logarithm of odds ratio (LOD) scores (two point and multipoint), model-free linkage analyses, and allelic association tests (transmission/disequilibrium, Fisher's exact tests, and chi-square) were performed on the total family sample, families with CLP probands (CLP subgroup), and families with CL probands (CL subgroup). LOD scores from the two-point analyses were inconclusive. Multipoint analyses rejected linkage except for a few regions in the CL subgroup. However, positive results were found using the model-free linkage and association methods (p < .05). The markers with positive results varied across the CL and CLP subgroups. However, the RARA region and loci nearby yielded consistently positive results.

CONCLUSION

Genetic variation within the RARA locus or nearby appears to be involved in the pathogenesis of nonsyndromic oral clefts in this population. Furthermore, based on the differing pattern of results in the CL versus CLP subgroups, it appears that the formation of CL and CLP is because of either differing alleles at the same genetic locus or different but related (and/or linked) genes that modify the severity and expression of oral clefting.

Prevalência de fissuras orais de 1975 a 1994

OBJETIVO: Estimar a prevalência de fissuras orais no Brasil, segundo etiologia e região geográfica. MÉTODOS: Foram levantados os registros de casos de fissura oral entre recém-nascidos no período de 1975 a 1994. As fontes de dados foram o Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais da Universidade de São Paulo, o Ministério da Saúde -- Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde (Datasus) e a Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. RESULTADOS/CONCLUSÕES: Foram encontrados 16.853 casos novos de fissura oral, estimando-se a prevalência de 0,19 por mil nascidos vivos, com tendência ascendente para os qüinqüênios do período. As regiões Centro-Oeste, Sudeste e Sul apresentaram as maiores taxas. A fissura labial ou lábio-palatina foi mais freqüente (74%) do que a fissura palatina isolada (26%).

Survey of congenital anomalies associated with cleft lip and/or palate in 701,181 Japanese people

There have been many reports on congenital anomalies associated with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/CLP) in Japan. However, these reports included data only on patients who came to hospitals; thus the real situation regarding these anomalies remains unclear. Therefore, we surveyed newborns at all delivery facilities in the central area of Japan for the presence of these anomalies, following their progress for 12 consecutive years; at the end of that time, questionnaires were collected and analyzed. In this article, we describe our results.

[Cleft lip and palate: case-control study]

This study relates to a case-control analysis for the purpose of verifying the association between oral clefts and possible risk factors. The analysed variables were: place of mother's residence (urban/rural), pollution, parental diseases, mother's diseases during the first four months of pregnancy, intake of drugs related to this period, heredity, smoking habits, alcohol consumption and X-ray examinations during pregnancy or X-ray examinations prior to pregnancy. There were 450 cases of clefts of whom 354 had a cleft lip with or without cleft palate and 96 had a cleft palate. The relative risk (RR) for each variable by was estimated points and at a 95% of confidence interval and multivariate analysis was applied. As regards cleft lip with or without cleft palate, the risk factors are heredity (RR = 4.96), epilepsy in the mother (RR = 2.39) and the intake of drugs such as anti-inflammatory substance in the first four months of pregnancy (RR = 2.59). Related to cleft palate, the risk factors are heredity (RR = 2.82) and pollution (RR = 2.58).

The prevalence of cleft lip and plate in Japanese

To determine the prevalence of cleft lip and palate (CL/P) among the Japanese, 43,821 babies born between 1 January, 1985, and 31 December, 1985, were investigated. Sixty-four infants (0.146%) were found to demonstrate these abnormalities, a birth prevalence rate of 1.46/1000. Among 326 infants in whom it was possible to classify the types of cleft, born between 1 January, 1981, and 31 December, 1985, there were 111 (34.0%) with cleft lip (CL), 154 (47.3%) with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and 61 (18.7%) with cleft palate (CP).