Lysine substitutions near photoactive cofactors in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center have opposite effects on the rate of triplet energy transfer

Consequences of saturation mutagenesis of the protein ligand to the B-side monomeric bacteriochlorophyll in reaction centers from Rhodobacter capsulatus

In bacterial reaction centers (RCs), photon-induced initial charge separation uses an A-side bacteriochlorophyll (BChl, B_A) and bacteriopheophytin (BPh, H_A), while the near-mirror image B-side B_B and H_B cofactors are inactive. Two new sets of Rhodobacter capsulatus RC mutants were designed, both bearing substitution of all amino acids for the native histidine M180 (M-polypeptide residue 180) ligand to the core Mg ion of B_B. Residues are identified that largely result in retention of a BChl in the B_B site (Asp, Ser, Pro, Gln, Asn, Gly, Cys, Lys, and Thr), ones that largely harbor the Mg-free BPh in the B_B site (Leu and Ile), and ones for which isolated RCs are comprised of a substantial mixture of these two RC types (Ala, Glu, Val, Met and, in one set, Arg). No protein was isolated when M180 is Trp, Tyr, Phe, or (in one set) Arg. These findings are corroborated by ground state spectra, pigment extractions, ultrafast transient absorption studies, and the yields of B-side transmembrane charge separation. The changes in coordination chemistries did not reveal an RC with sufficiently precise poising of the redox properties of the B_B-site cofactor to result in a high yield of B-side electron transfer to H_B. Insights are gleaned into the amino acid properties that support BChl in the B_B site and into the widely observed multi-exponential decay of the excited state of the primary electron donor. The results also have direct implications for tuning free energies of the charge-separated intermediates in RCs and mimetic systems.

The site-directed mutation I(L177)H in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction center affects coordination of P(A) and B(B) bacteriochlorophylls

To explore the influence of the I(L177)H single mutation on the properties of the nearest bacteriochlorophylls (BChls), three reaction centers (RCs) bearing double mutations were constructed in the photosynthetic purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, and their properties and pigment content were compared with those of the correspondent single mutant RCs. Each pair of the mutations comprised the amino acid substitution I(L177)H and another mutation altering histidine ligand of BChl P(A) or BChl B(B). Contrary to expectations, the double mutation I(L177)H+H(L173)L does not bring about a heterodimer RC but causes a 46nm blue shift of the long-wavelength P absorbance band. The histidine L177 or a water molecule were suggested as putative ligands for P(A) in the RC I(L177)H+H(L173)L although this would imply a reorientation of the His backbone and additional rearrangements in the primary donor environment or even a repositioning of the BChl dimer. The crystal structure of the mutant I(L177)H reaction center determined to a resolution of 2.9Å shows changes at the interface region between the BChl P(A) and the monomeric BChl B(B). Spectral and pigment analysis provided evidence for β-coordination of the BChl B(B) in the double mutant RC I(L177)H+H(M182)L and for its hexacoordination in the mutant reaction center I(L177)H. Computer modeling suggests involvement of two water molecules in the β-coordination of the BChl B(B). Possible structural consequences of the L177 mutation affecting the coordination of the two BChls P(A) and B(B) are discussed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Photosynthesis Research for Sustainability: from Natural to Artificial.

Replacement or exclusion of the B-branch bacteriopheophytin in the purple bacterial reaction centre: The HB cofactor is not required for assembly or core function of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides complex

All of the membrane-embedded cofactors of the purple bacterial reaction centre have well-defined functional or structural roles, with the exception of the bacteriopheophytin (H(B)) located approximately half-way across the membrane on the so-called inactive- or B-branch of cofactors. Sequence alignments indicate that this bacteriochlorin cofactor is a conserved feature of purple bacterial reaction centres, and a pheophytin is also found at this position in the Photosystem-II reaction centre. Possible structural or functional consequences of replacing the H(B) bacteriopheophytin by bacteriochlorophyll were investigated in the Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centre through mutagenesis of residue Leu L185 to His (LL185H). Results from absorbance spectroscopy indicated that the LL185H mutant assembled with a bacteriochlorophyll at the H(B) position, but this did not affect the capacity of the reaction centre to support photosynthetic growth, or change the kinetics of charge separation along the A-branch of cofactors. It was also found that mutation of residue Ala M149 to Trp (AM149W) caused the reaction centre to assemble without an H(B) bacteriochlorin, demonstrating that this cofactor is not required for correct assembly of the reaction centre. The absence of a cofactor at this position did not affect the capacity of the reaction centre to support photosynthetic growth, or the kinetics of A-branch electron transfer. A combination of X-ray crystallography and FTIR difference spectroscopy confirmed that the H(B) cofactor was absent in the AM149W mutant, and that this had not produced any significant disturbance of the adjacent ubiquinol reductase (Q(B)) site. The data are discussed with respect to possible functional roles of the H(B) bacteriopheophytin, and we conclude that the reason(s) for conservation of a bacteriopheophytin cofactor at this position in purple bacterial reaction centres are likely to be different from those underlying conservation of a pheophytin at the analogous position in Photosystem-II.