A pre-seasonal birch/hazel sublingual immunotherapy can improve the outcome of grass pollen injective treatment in bisensitized individuals. A case-referent, two-year controlled study

Efficacy of dual sublingual immunotherapy with Japanese cedar pollen and house dust mite allergens in patients with allergic rhinitis sensitized to multiple allergens

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we examined the effects of dual sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with Japanese cedar pollen (JCP) and house dust mite (HDM) allergens on nasal symptoms during the peak pollen period (PPP) and in late fall (LF) in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) sensitized to both JCP and HDM. We then compared the efficacy of dual-SLIT with JCP and HDM to that of mono-SLIT with JCP at PPP.

METHODS

Twenty-five bisensitized patients with AR who showed positive serum specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) against both JCP and HDM were enrolled. In dual-SLIT, 16 patients received JCP drops/tablets and HDM tablets concurrently. In mono-SLIT with JCP, nine patients received JCP drops/tablets. Nasal symptoms were scored on a 0-4 point scale.

RESULTS

The nasal scores at PPP and in LF in the bisensitized patients with AR who received dual-SLIT with JCP and HDM in 2019 were significantly lower than those in the same patients who received antihistamines only in 2018. The decrease in scores of nasal obstruction at PPP from 2018 to 2019 in patients who received dual-SLIT was significantly greater than those in patients who received mono-SLIT with JCP. Dual-SLIT was well tolerated and only had mild adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that dual-SLIT suppressed both JCP-induced seasonal and HDM-induced perennial nasal symptoms in bisensitized patients with AR. Dual-SLIT was more effective in suppressing nasal obstruction at PPP than mono-SLIT with JCP with limitation of baseline characteristics not to be controlled between the two groups, suggesting that dual-SLIT suppressed HDM-induced priming effects, thus resulting in further suppression of nasal obstruction at PPP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b, a case-controlled study.

Recent Advances in Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy as Treatment for Allergic Asthma: A Practical Overview

The Global Initiative for Asthma Report updated in 2019 stated that potential benefits of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), compared to pharmacological and avoidance options, must be weighed against the risk of adverse effects and the inconvenience and cost of the prolonged course of therapy in asthma. Thus, with the aim of clarifying some aspects with regard to the possible use of AIT in allergic asthma treatment armamentarium, a group of expert allergists from the Spanish Allergy and Clinical Immunology Scientific Society (SEAIC), particularly from the Immunotherapy and Asthma Interest Groups developed a frequently asked questions in clinical practice. This document updates relevant topics on the use of AIT in asthma and could facilitate physician clinical decisions and improve health outcomes for individual patients.

Immunological mechanisms in specific immunotherapy

Specific immunotherapy (SIT) represents the only curative treatment of allergy and is, therefore, of particular interest for immunological and pharmacological research. The current understanding of immunological mechanisms underlying SIT focuses on regulatory T cells (T regs), which balance Th1 and Th2 effector functions. This ensures that allergens are recognized, but tolerated by the immune system. There is clear evidence that SIT restores the disturbed balance of T regs and effector cells in allergic patients. Current efforts are focused to improve SIT regimens to make them more applicable in atopy and asthma. The current review provides an overview on the mechanisms of SIT and possible adjuvant treatment strategies on the background of the T reg concept.