The combination of urinary and recombinant HCG improves outcome in patients with decreased oocyte/follicle ratio in previous cycles

Does Double Dose of Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin for Final Follicular Maturation in In vitro Fertilization Cycles Improve Oocyte Quality: A Prospective Randomized Study

Context

In in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, the recommended dose of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (r-hCG), for triggering final follicular maturation is 250 μg, although there is some disagreement.

Aims

The aim of our study was to assess the effect on the number of mature oocytes retrieved after triggering ovulation in IVF cycles using 250 μg or 500 μg of r-hCG.

Settings and Design

Prospective, single-center, randomized study.

Subjects and Methods

100 women undergoing IVF with embryo transfer. The primary outcome measure was the total number of oocytes retrieved per follicle, number of mature oocytes, and number of embryos generated. The secondary outcomes included clinical and biochemical pregnancy rates and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Results

Mean number of oocytes retrieved (6.5 ± 4.0 vs. 6.4 ± 3.9, P = 0.3) and mean number of mature oocytes (4.0 ± 2.3 vs. 3.2 ± 2.3, P = 0.09) were similar in the two groups; however, mean number of oocytes retrieved per follicle was found to be higher with 500 μg r-hCG (67.4 ± 23.9 vs. 77.5 ± 23.3, P = 0.04). In the subgroup of poor responder women, there was a significant increase in the number of mature oocytes retrieved with double dose of r-hCG (2.2 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 1.9, P = 0.06), leading to improvement in fertilization and clinical pregnancy rates.

Conclusions

Double dose of r-hCG for final follicular maturation in IVF cycles resulted in improvement in mean number of oocytes per follicle but did not result in improved pregnancy rates in the women. In the subset of poor responders, 500 μg r-hCG seems to be more advantageous than the lower dose, although larger randomized trials are needed to generalize this strategy.

Recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles

BACKGROUND

For the last few decades urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (uhCG) has been used to trigger final oocyte maturation in cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Recombinant technology has allowed the production of two drugs, recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (rhCG) and recombinant luteinising hormone (rLH), that can be used for the same purpose, to mimic the endogenous luteinising hormone (LH) surge. This allows commercial manufacturers to adjust production according to market requirements and to remove all urinary contaminants, facilitating the safe subcutaneous administration of a compound with less batch-to-batch variation. However, prior to a change in practice, it is necessary to compare the effectiveness of the recombinant drugs to the currently used urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (uhCG).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of subcutaneous rhCG and high dose rLH versus uhCG for inducing final oocyte maturation in subfertile women undergoing IVF and ICSI cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (April 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2015, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1946 to April 2015), EMBASE (1980 to April 2015) and PsycINFO (1806 to April 2015) as well as trial registers at ClinicalTrials.gov on 13 May 2015 and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) search portal on 14 May 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two review authors independently scanned titles and abstracts and selected those that appeared relevant for collection of the full paper. We included randomised controlled trials comparing rhCG and rLH with urinary hCG for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles for treatment of infertility in normogonadotropic women.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently performed assessment for inclusion or exclusion, quality assessment and data extraction. We discussed any discrepancies in the presence of a third author to reach a consensus. The primary review outcomes were ongoing pregnancy/live birth and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate, number of oocytes retrieved and adverse events were secondary outcomes. We combined data to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic. We evaluated the overall quality of the evidence for the main comparisons using GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 18 RCTs involving 2952 participants; 15 compared rhCG with uhCG, and 3 compared rhLH with uhCG. The evidence for different comparisons ranged from very low to high quality: limitations were poor reporting of study methods and imprecision. Pharmaceutical companies funded 9 of the 18 studies, and 5 studies did not clearly report funding source. Ongoing pregnancy/live birthThere was no conclusive evidence of a difference between rhCG and uhCG (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.49; 7 RCTs, N = 1136, I(2) = 0%, moderate quality evidence) or between rhLH and uhCG (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.78, 2 RCTs, N = 289, I(2) = 0%, very low quality evidence) for ongoing pregnancy/live birth rates. OHSS There was no evidence of a difference between rhCG and uhCG in the incidence of OHSS: moderate to severe OHSS (OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.37 to 8.45; 3 RCTs, N = 417, I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence), moderate OHSS (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.27; 1 RCT, N = 243, I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence), mild to moderate OHSS (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.38; 2 RCTs, N = 320, I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence) or undefined OHSS (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.78; 3 RCTs, N = 495, I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence). Likewise, there was no evidence of a difference between rhLH and uhCG in OHSS rates for moderate OHSS (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.69, 2 RCTs, N = 280, I(2) = 5%, very low quality evidence). Other adverse events There was no evidence of a difference in miscarriage rates between rhCG and uhCG (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.25; 8 RCTs, N = 1196, I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence) or between rhLH and uhCG (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.40; 2 RCTs, N = 289, I(2) = 0%, very low quality evidence). For other adverse effects (most commonly injection-site reactions) rhCG was associated with a lower number of adverse events than uhCG (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.76; 5 RCTS, N = 561; I(2) = 67%, moderate quality evidence). However, when we used a random-effects model due to substantial statistical heterogeneity, there was no evidence of a difference between the groups (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.13). Only one study comparing rLH and uhCG reported other adverse events, and it was impossible to draw conclusions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there is no evidence of a difference between rhCG or rhLH and uhCG for live birth or ongoing pregnancy rates or rates of OHSS.

Comparing the efficacy of urinary and recombinant hCG on oocyte/follicle ratio to trigger ovulation in women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare the number of oocytes per follicles in ovulation induction with 10,000 IU urinary hCG (uhCG) and two different doses of recombinant hCG (rhCG) in women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial which was performed on 180 primary infertile women undergoing ICSI cycles. All eligible patients underwent a standard GnRH-a long protocol. When at least two follicles reached a diameter of 18 mm, all patients were randomized to receive 10,000 IU urinary hCG or 250 μg recombinant hCG or 500 μg recombinant hCG for ovulation induction. Primary outcome measure included the number of oocytes retrieved per aspirated follicles. Secondary outcome measures were the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of mature oocytes, the number and quality of generated embryos, fertilization rate, implantation rate, chemical and clinical pregnancy rates and OHSS occurrence rate.

RESULTS

The mean number of retrieved oocytes per follicles were 71.82 ± 15.09, 69.84 ± 17.44 and 77.16 ± 17.61 in 10,000 IU uhCG, 250 μg rhCG and 500 μg rhCG, respectively which was significantly higher with 500 μg rhCG than the lower dose(P = .04). Other cycles and clinical outcomes were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

Recombinant hCG shows equivalent efficacy to urinary hCG in terms of the number of oocytes per aspirated follicles in selected patients undergoing ICSI; however, 500 μg rhCG seems to be more advantageous than the lower dose in this indication. Larger randomized trials are needed to generalize this strategy.

Recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles

BACKGROUND

For the last few decades urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) has been used to induce final oocyte maturation triggering in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. Recombinant technology has allowed the production of two drugs that can be used for the same purpose, to mimic the endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. This allows commercial production to be adjusted according to market requirements; the removal of all urinary contaminants; and the safe subcutaneous administration of a compound with less batch-to-batch variation. However, prior to a change in practice the effectiveness of the recombinant drugs should be known compared to the currently used urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (uhCG).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous recombinant hCG (rhCG) and high dose recombinant LH (rLH) compared with intramuscular uhCG for inducing final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (January 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2010) and EMBASE (1980 to January 2010).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two review authors independently scanned titles and abstracts and selected those that appeared relevant for collection of the full paper. Only truly randomised controlled trials comparing rhCG and rLH with urinary hCG for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles for treatment of infertility in normo-gonadotropic women were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessment for inclusion or exclusion, quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two authors. Discrepancies were discussed in the presence of a third author and consensus reached. Quality assessment included method of randomisation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and assessors, reporting of a power calculation and intention-to-treat analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs (n = 2306) were identified; 11 compared rhCG with uhCG and three compared rhLH with uhCG. There was no evidence of a statistically significant difference between rhCG and uhCG regarding the ongoing pregnancy or live birth rate (6 RCTs: OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.37; P = 0.83, I(2) = 0%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) between rhCG and uhCG (3 RCTs: OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.37 to 4.1; P = 0.37, I(2) = 0%). There was no evidence of statistically significant difference between rhLH and uhCG regarding the ongoing pregnancy or live birth rate (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.76) and incidence of OHSS (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.69). These results leave open the possibility of strong differences in favour of either treatment for both ongoing pregnancy and OHSS.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there is no evidence of difference between rhCG or rhLH and uhCG in achieving final follicular maturation in IVF, with equivalent pregnancy rates and OHSS incidence. According to these findings uHCG is still the best choice for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI treatment cycles.

Recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for ovulation induction in assisted conception

BACKGROUND

For the last few decades urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin has been used to induce final follicular maturation and for triggering ovulation in assisted conception. Recombinant technology has allowed the production of two drugs that can be used for the same purpose: to mimic the endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. This would allow commercial production to be adjusted according to market requirements. In addition all urinary contaminants would also be removed. Hence, this would allow the safe subcutaneous administration of a compound with less batch-to-batch variation. However, prior to a change in practice, the effectiveness of the recombinant drugs should be known, compared to the currently used urinary human chorionic gonadotrophins.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous rhCG and high dose rLH compared with intramuscular uhCG for inducing final oocyte maturation and triggering ovulation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (27 August 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL on The Cochrane Library, issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to Feb 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to Feb 2004). Searches were not limited by language. The bibliographies of included, excluded trials and abstracts of major meetings were searched for additional trials. Authors and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for missing and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two reviewers independently scanned titles and abstracts, and selected those that appeared relevant for collection of the full paper. Only truly randomised controlled trials comparing rhCG or high dose r-LH with urinary hCG for triggering ovulation in assisted conception for treatment of infertility in normogonadotrophic women were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessment of inclusion/exclusion, quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by at least two reviewers. Discrepancies were discussed in the presence of a third reviewer and a consensus reached. Quality assessment included method of randomisation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and assessors, reporting of a power calculation, intention to treat analysis, and handling of dropouts. Data extraction included characteristics of participants, the intervention and control procedures, and outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven RCTs were identified, four comparing rhCG and uhCG and three comparing rhLH and uhCG. There was no statistically significant difference between rhCG vs uhCG regarding the ongoing pregnancy/ live birth rate (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.39), pregnancy rate, miscarriage or incidence of OHSS. There was no statistically significant difference between rhLH vs uhCG regarding the ongoing pregnancy/ live birth rate (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.76), pregnancy rate, miscarriage or incidence of OHSS. The manufacturer of rhLH has decided not to further develop this product. rhCG was associated with a reduction in the incidence of local site reactions and other minor adverse effects (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.70).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence of difference in clinical outcomes between urinary and recombinant gonadotrophins for induction of final follicular maturation. Additional factors should be considered when choosing gonadotrophin type, including safety, cost and drug availability.